Kidney Transplantation Anastomotic Time Is Jointly Associated With Resident and Attending Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies evaluate the interplay of attending and resident learning curves in surgical education. Anastomotic time is known to be correlated with transplant outcomes in kidney transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between the combination of resident and attending experience and anastomotic time in kidney transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of deceased donor kidney transplants from 2006 to 2019. To analyze the effect of attending and resident experience, dyads were classified as six combinations of early versus later practice attending and resident postgraduate year (PGY-2, PGY-3, and PGY-4/5). Attendings with less than 3 y of postfellowship practice were considered early practice. Linear mixed effects models tested the effects of attending experience, resident PGY, recipient body mass index, and technical operative characteristics (number of donor arteries, operative side) on anastomosis time. RESULTS: The final linear mixed effects model included 1306 transplants. Compared to later practice attendings with PGY-4/5 residents as reference, early practice attendings paired with PGY-2 or PGY-3 residents had longer anastomotic times (P ≤ 0.005) when adjusted for recipient body mass index, number of donor arteries, and transplant side. When PGY-4/5 residents were paired with early practice attendings, no difference in anastomotic time was demonstrated. When paired with later practice attendings, PGY-2 residents had longer anastomotic times (P < 0.001) while PGY-3 anastomotic times did not differ from PGY-4/5. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the correlation between trainee and attending experience jointly and anastomotic time, suggesting that pairing residents and attendings by experience may improve surgical training and potentially patient-related outcomes.

The Kidney Transplant: Maintaining Excellent Outcomes While Increasing Skills Acquisition.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a complex operation that incorporates multiple fundamental surgical techniques and is an excellent opportunity for surgical skill development during residency training. We hypothesized that increasing resident competency, measured as anastomosis time, could be demonstrated while maintaining high-quality surgical outcomes during the learning process. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of surgical resident involvement in kidney transplantation and recorded the anastomosis time. The study population comprised adult, single organ kidney transplants (n = 2052) at a large academic transplant center between 2006 and 2019. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, medians, and means. A mixed model of anastomosis time on number of procedures was fitted. Poisson models were fitted with outcomes of the number of patients with delayed graft function and number of patients that underwent reoperation postoperatively, with the exposure being number of kidney transplants performed by resident. RESULTS: Results from the mixed model suggest that as the number of times a resident performs the surgery increases, the time to conduct the operation decreases with statistical significance. The Poisson regression demonstrated no significant relationship between the operative volume of a resident and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated statistical evidence that with an increase in the number of renal transplantations performed by a surgical resident, anastomosis time decreased. It also demonstrated no significant relationship between number of kidney transplants performed by a resident and postoperative complications, suggesting that patient outcomes for this operation are not adversely affected by resident involvement.

Review of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes.

The Necrotizing Enterocolitis Surgery Trial (NEST) highlights the importance of distinguishing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) from spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) when developing surgical treatment plans. Further research is needed to increase the accuracy of this distinction, but even with our current abilities to do this initial laparotomy appears to be optimal for infants with presumed NEC. The preferred initial operation for those with SIP is more equivocal. Rates of NEC are likely decreasing slowly, whereas those with SIP are not. New imaging modalities, especially ultrasound, are becoming more useful but require more detailed investigation. Understanding the mechanisms causing these two conditions remains of paramount importance.

Comparison between antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion or profound hypothermia as brain protection strategies during repair of type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes and actuarial-free survival between patients who underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection by the method of cerebral perfusion used. METHODS: A total of 324 patients from five academic medical centers underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection between January 2000 and December 2010. Of those, antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) was used for 84 patients, retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) was used for 55 patients, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) was used for 184 patients during repair. Major morbidity, operative mortality, and 5-year actuarial survival were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of operative mortality and Cox Regression hazard ratios were calculated to determine the predictors of long term mortality. RESULTS: Operative mortality was not influenced by the type of cerebral protection (19% for ACP, 14.5% for RCP and 19.1% for DHCA, P=0.729). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, hemodynamic instability [odds ratio (OR) =19.6, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.102-0.414, P<0.001] and CPB time >200 min(OR =4.7, 95% CI, 1.962-1.072, P=0.029) emerged as independent predictors of operative mortality. Actuarial 5-year survival was unchanged by cerebral protection modality (48.8% for ACP, 61.8% for RCP and 66.8% for no cerebral protection, log-rank P=0.844). CONCLUSIONS: During surgical repair of type A aortic dissection, ACP, RCP or DHCA are safe strategies for cerebral protection in selected patients with type A aortic dissection.