Potentially curative surgery of colon cancer: patterns of failure and survival.

In an effort to determine the patterns of failure and survival of colon cancer, a retrospective review of 294 patients who underwent potentially curative surgery at the New England Deaconess Hospital (NEDH) was performed. For the entire group, the 5-year crude survival rate was 68% and the actuarial rate was 80%. Survival decreased with increasing bowel wall penetration by tumor and the presence of lymph node metastasis. Although survival varied with the tumor site, none of the differences was statistically significant. Other variables, including the grade of adenocarcinoma, size, and the type of surgery had a significant impact on survival. Patterns of failure, expressed as the actuarial incidence of first diagnosed failure at 5 years, were examined by stage and site. There was a trend toward increased failure with increasing bowel wall penetration by tumor and the presence of lymph node metastasis. Abdominal failure, either as the only site or as a component of failure, was the most common type of failure. When compared by site, patients with cecal carcinoma had a significantly lower incidence of local and distant failure than patients with disease in other selected sites. No differences in patterns of failure were seen in patients with carcinomas in the mobile sections of the colon compared with those who had disease arising in the nonmobile sections of the colon. These data may be useful in identifying those patients who might benefit most from adjuvant therapy.

Potentially curative surgery of colon cancer: the influence of blood vessel invasion.

A number of series have examined the influence of blood vessel invasion (BVI) by tumor on survival of patients with colorectal cancer; however, there are little data available regarding its influence on patterns of failure. In an effort to determine the influence of BVI on the patterns of failure and survival in colon cancer, a retrospective review of 294 patients who underwent potentially curative surgery at the New England Deaconess Hospital (NEDH) was performed. Patients whose tumors had BVI experienced a significant decrease in the 5-year actuarial survival rate. BVI had little impact on the patterns of failure in stage B2 disease, but a significant increase in total failure and local failure (as a component of failure) occurred in stage C2. However, when examined by proportional hazards analysis, BVI was found not to be an independent prognostic variable. For patients with stage C2 tumors, which are also BVI+, radiation therapy to the tumor bed might play a contributory role in overall management.

Emergency prebiopsy radiation for mediastinal masses: impact on subsequent pathologic diagnosis and outcome.

From 1968 to 1983, 19 patients were treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy for symptomatic mediastinal masses before a biopsy was obtained. This study evaluates the impact of radiation on the ability to establish a pathologic diagnosis and the results of subsequent empirical therapy if no diagnosis was established. Eight of the 19 (42%) patients were not able to have a histologic diagnosis established at the time of biopsy. Seven of these eight patients went on to receive empiric therapy for what was thought to be the most likely diagnosis on clinical grounds. Four of the seven have not relapsed; three who have relapsed were found to have the diagnosis for which they were empirically treated. The untreated patient relapsed with seminoma. Thus, the use of emergency irradiation for mediastinal masses is sometimes associated with the loss of pathologic diagnosis. These patients likely have a radioresponsive disease (ie, lymphoma or seminoma) that may be treated successfully on the presumed clinical diagnosis even when the histologic diagnosis is lost secondary to prebiopsy irradiation.

The 5-year results of a randomized trial of adjuvant radiation therapy after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy.

The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy has been controversial. In order to assess the necessity and effectiveness of adjuvant radiation therapy in this setting, we reviewed the results in 510 patients with T1-T3 tumors and pathologically positive nodes or tumors larger than 5 cm and negative nodes who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with four or more positive nodes or at least one positive apical node were randomized to receive either five or ten cycles of cyclophosphamide/Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) (CA) and patients with one to three positive nodes or operable tumors larger than 5 cm and pathologically negative nodes were randomized to receive eight cycles of either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF) or methotrexate and 5-FU (MF) chemotherapy. Two hundred six of these patients were subsequently rerandomized to receive either no further treatment or adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-five patients withdrew after randomization, including 34 who declined to receive radiotherapy. Radiation therapy consisted of 4,500 cGy in 5 weeks to the chest wall and appropriate draining lymph nodes. Median follow-up from chemotherapy randomization is 45 months for patients in the CA arm and 53 months for those in the CMF/MF arm. The crude rate of local failure (chest wall or draining lymph node areas) as first site of failure for patients randomized to receive chemotherapy only was 14%; for those randomized to receive both chemotherapy and radiotherapy it was 5% (P = .03). For patients in the CMF/MF arm, the rate of local failure as the first site of failure was nearly the same for patients randomized to chemotherapy only as for those randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy as well (5% v 2%). For patients in the CA arm, the crude rate of local failure was 20% for patients randomized to receive chemotherapy only, and 6% for those randomized to both types of adjuvant treatment (P = .03). Among the 43 patients treated with CA who actually received radiotherapy, there was only one local failure, compared with 12 local failures among the 59 patients (20%) who actually did not receive radiotherapy (P = .007). No significant difference was seen in disease-free survival or overall survival in either the CA or the CMF/MF arm between patients randomized to receive radiation therapy and those randomized to no further treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Integration of conservative surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for the treatment of early-stage, node-positive breast cancer: sequencing, timing, and outcome.

The optimal means of combining breast-conserving surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with early-stage, node-positive breast cancer is not known. We reviewed the results in 295 patients treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy and affiliated institutions from 1976 to 1985. All patients had positive axillary nodes on dissection, had no gross residual disease in the breast or axilla after surgery, and received breast irradiation (with or without nodal irradiation) and three or more cycles of a cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-based or doxorubicin-containing regimen. Median follow-up in patients without any failure was 78 months. Breast failure rates were assessed in relation to the sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The different sequences were not randomly assigned, and the characteristics of the sequence groups differed. The actuarial 5-year breast failure rate was 4% in 99 patients receiving radiotherapy before chemotherapy; 8% in 54 patients sequentially receiving some chemotherapy, then radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy, then further chemotherapy; and 6% in 116 patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the failure rate was 41% in 26 patients who received all chemotherapy before radiotherapy. The crude incidences of local failure within 4 years of treatment in these groups were 3%, 2%, 4%, and 15%, respectively (P = .065 for all four groups not being the same). The actuarial 5-year local failure rate was 5% for 252 patients irradiated within 16 weeks after surgery compared with 35% for 34 patients irradiated more than 16 weeks after surgery. The 4-year crude incidences were 4% and 12% for the two groups, respectively (P = .06). These results suggest that delaying the initiation of radiotherapy may result in an increased likelihood of local failure. Formal randomized controlled trials will be needed to confirm these results and to improve the integration of these treatment modalities.

Regional nodal failure after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma.

We retrospectively analyzed the likelihood of regional nodal failure (RNF) for 1,624 patients with stage I or II invasive breast carcinoma treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy (RT) at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy (JCRT) between 1968 and 1985. The median follow-up time was 77 months. RNF was the first site of failure for 38 of the 1,624 patients (2.3%). The incidence of axillary failure for patients undergoing axillary dissection (AXD) who were irradiated to the breast only was 2.1% (nine of 420) for patients with negative nodes and 2.1% (one of 47) for patients with one to three positive nodes. The incidence of supraclavicular failure in these two groups was 1.9% (eight of 420) and 0% (zero of 47), respectively. The incidences of axillary and supraclavicular failure in patients without clinically suspicious axillary involvement who did not have AXD but were treated with RT were 0.8% (three of 355) and 0.3% (one of 364), respectively. Despite various combinations of salvage surgery, RT, and systemic therapy, only 47% of patients (18 of 38) achieved complete regional control after nodal relapse. We conclude that RNF is uncommon in patients treated to the breast alone following an adequate AXD when the axillary nodes are negative or when one to three nodes are positive. RNF is also uncommon in patients with a clinically uninvolved axilla treated with nodal RT without AXD. Symptoms of RNF can be controlled in most but not all patients. Further study is needed to determine if the benefits of RT in preventing a small number of symptomatic RNF outweigh the potential toxicity for any subgroup of patients.

Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This analysis was performed to clarify the relationship of young age at diagnosis to the pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis in patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,398 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging stage I or II breast cancer treated by breast-conserving therapy between 1968 and 1985. One hundred seven patients were younger than 35 years at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up duration for the 1,032 survivors was 99 months. RESULTS: Patients younger than 35 years had a significantly higher overall recurrence rate (P = .002), as well as a greater risk for developing distant metastases (P = .03), when compared with older patients. The cancers in younger patients more commonly showed factors associated with a worse prognosis (including grade 3 histology, lymphatic vessel invasion [LVI], necrosis, and estrogen receptor [ER] negativity) as compared with older patients. In a proportional hazards model that included clinical and treatment-related variables, as well as these pathologic features, age younger than 35 years remained a significant predictor for time to recurrence (relative risk [RR], 1.70), time to distant failure (RR, 1.60), and overall mortality (RR, 1.50). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients younger than 35 years have a worse prognosis than older patients. This difference is only partially explained by a higher frequency of adverse pathologic factors seen in younger patients.

Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between pathologic margin status and outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 533 patients with International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II breast cancer who had assessable margins, who received at least 60 Gy to the primary tumor bed, and who had more than 8 years of potential follow-up. Each margin was scored (according to the presence of invasive or in situ disease that touched the inked surgical margin) as one of the following: negative, close, focally positive, or extensively positive. Outcome at 8 years was calculated using crude rates of first site of failure. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed. Median follow-up time was 127 months. RESULTS: At 8 years, patients with close margins and those with negative margins both had a rate of local recurrence (LR) of 7%. Patients with extensively positive margins had an LR rate of 27%, whereas patients with focally positive margins had an intermediate rate of LR of 14%. In the polychotomous logistic regression model, margin status and the use of systemic therapy were the only two variables that had significant effects on the risk ratio of LR to remaining alive and free of disease. Among the 45 patients with focally positive margins who received systemic therapy, the crude LR rate was 7% at 8 years (95% confidence interval, 1% to 20%). CONCLUSION: Pathologic margin status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy are the most important factors associated with LR among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.

Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: results of treatment with excisional biopsy and irradiation.

Between 1976 and 1983, 40 women with intraductal carcinoma of the breast without invasion underwent excisional biopsy and irradiation as an alternative to mastectomy. The median age was 53 years (range, 28 to 77 years) and the median follow-up time since initiation of radiation was 44 months (range, 14 to 97 months). Twenty-seven patients presented with a palpable mass; in 13 patients the tumor was detected only by mammography. A limited axillary dissection was performed in 13 patients, and all lymph nodes removed were negative. Treatment was administered to the breast and adjacent chest wall to a dose of 4,600 to 5,000 rad, with 26 patients also receiving a boost dose of 1,000 to 2,000 rad to the site of the primary. Four patients have developed a recurrence in the treated breast, at 17, 19, 35, and 63 months after the beginning of radiation therapy. The 5-year actuarial rate of local recurrence is 10%. Three of the recurrences were in those four patients who presented with a nipple discharge and a central primary. In two cases, the recurrence consisted of only intraductal carcinoma; in the other two, both intraductal and invasive cancer were found. All four patients with recurrence underwent mastectomy and are well without evidence of distant metastases at 1, 12, 15, and 15 months since mastectomy. Cosmetic results were excellent. No patient has developed distant metastases. Since the number of patients treated is small and the period of follow-up is short, one must be cautious in the interpretation of these results. Nonetheless, the treatment of intraductal carcinoma of the breast by excision and irradiation appears to give acceptable local control and excellent survival when suitable precautions of patient selection and evaluation are taken.

Time course and prognosis of local recurrence following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer.

The frequency, time course, and prognosis of local recurrence following primary radiation therapy in 152 patients with early breast cancer treated before 1967 were examined. Local recurrence occurred at a constant rate over the first 14 years after treatment. The crude 15-year local recurrence rate was 22%. Of the 30 patients who developed an isolated local recurrence and underwent definitive secondary surgery, the 10-year freedom from distant relapse rate was 50%. These results indicate that breast cancer patients treated by primary radiation therapy require long-term follow-up to detect curable local recurrences.

Prognosis following salvage mastectomy for recurrence in the breast after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The prognosis and factors that influence prognosis following salvage mastectomy in patients with recurrence in the treated breast after conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT) were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,593 patients with stage I or II invasive breast cancer were treated following gross total excision of the tumor at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy (JCRT) between 1968 and 1985. One hundred sixty-six of the 1,593 (10%) had subsequent recurrence in the breast. Of these, 123 had salvage mastectomy and constitute the study population. The recurrent tumor was predominantly invasive in 99 patients, noninvasive in 14, and focally invasive in 10. Following mastectomy, chemotherapy or hormonal therapy was administered to 29 patients. The median follow-up time was 39 months after salvage mastectomy. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial rate of further local or distant relapse for the entire group was 41%. None of the 24 patients with focally invasive or noninvasive tumors had a subsequent relapse. In comparison, the 5-year actuarial rate of further relapse in the 99 patients with a predominantly invasive recurrence was 52% (P = .001). The method of detection of the recurrence, the age of the patient at initial diagnosis, the disease-free interval, and the location of the recurrence in the breast were not found to have a statistically significant association with the risk of further relapse. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the histology of the recurrent tumor is an important prognostic factor for the risk of further relapse. Patients with purely noninvasive or focally invasive tumors have an excellent prognosis following salvage mastectomy. In contrast, patients with predominantly invasive tumors are at substantial risk for further relapse.

Locoregional failure 10 years after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation: experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To assess patterns of failure and how selected prognostic and treatment factors affect the risks of locoregional failure (LRF) after mastectomy in breast cancer patients with histologically involved axillary nodes treated with chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 2,016 patients entered onto four randomized trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. The median follow-up time for patients without recurrence was 12.1 years (range, 0.07 to 19.1 years). RESULTS: A total of 1,099 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. The first sites of failure were as follows: isolated LRF, 254 (13%); LRF with simultaneous distant failure (DF), 166 (8%); and distant only, 679 (34%). The risk of LRF with or without simultaneous DF at 10 years was 12.9% in patients with one to three positive nodes and 28.7% for patients with four or more positive nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing tumor size, increasing numbers of involved nodes, negative estrogen receptor protein status, and decreasing number of nodes examined were significant for increasing the rate of LRF with or without simultaneous DF. CONCLUSION: LRF after mastectomy is a substantial clinical problem, despite the use of chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen. Prospective randomized trials will be necessary to estimate accurately the potential disease-free and overall survival benefits of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients in particular prognostic subgroups treated with presently used and future systemic therapy regimens.

Family history and treatment outcome in young women after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of breast-conserving therapy for young women with a family history (FH) suggestive of inherited breast cancer susceptibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 201 patients aged 36 or younger at diagnosis treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy (> or = 60 Gy) for early-stage breast cancer were categorized by FH. FH was considered positive in 29 patients who, at the time of diagnosis, had a mother or sister previously diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 or ovarian cancer at any age. Clinical, pathologic, and demographic variables; sites of first failure; disease-free survival; and overall survival (OS) were compared between FH-positive and -negative groups. Median follow-up time was 11 years. RESULTS: Patient and tumor features were similar between those with and without an FH. Regression analysis of sites of first failure at 5 years demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) of 5.7 for opposite breast cancer for FH-positive patients. Rates of local, regional, and distant failure and disease-free survival or OS did not differ between FH-positive and -negative patients. Age at diagnosis and Ashkenazi heritage were not significantly predictors of patterns of failure. CONCLUSION: Breast-conserving surgery combined with radiation therapy is not associated with a higher rate of local recurrence, distant failure, or second (non-breast) cancers in young women with an FH suggestive of inherited breast cancer susceptibility compared with young women without an FH. However, their increased risk of opposite breast cancer should be taken into account when considering breast conservation as a treatment option.

No long-term increase in cardiac-related mortality after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy using modern techniques.

PURPOSE: To determine whether left-breast irradiation using modern techniques after breast-conserving surgery leads to an increased risk of cardiac-related mortality. METHODS: Between 1968 and 1986, 1,624 patients were treated for unilateral stage I or II breast cancer at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, with conservative surgery and breast irradiation. Seven hundred forty-five patients with a potential follow-up of at least 12 years were analyzed. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment characteristics were compared between the 365 patients (49%) who received left-sided irradiation and the 380 patients (51%) who received right-sided irradiation. The relationship between left-sided breast irradiation and the risk of nonbreast cancer- and cardiac-related mortality was examined. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the distribution of clinical, pathologic, or treatment characteristics between the two groups, with the exception of a small difference in pathologic tumor size (medians, left, 2.0 cm, right, 1.5 cm; P = .007). At 12 years, a majority of patients still were alive. Slightly more patients with left-sided tumors had died of breast cancer (31% v 27%; P = NS). Equivalent proportions from each group died of nonbreast cancer causes (11%), including nine patients (2%) from each group who died from cardiac causes. The risk of cardiac mortality did not increase as time after treatment increased for patients who received left-sided irradiation compared with right-sided irradiation. A model that controlled for clinical, pathologic, and treatment differences showed no significant increase in any category of cause of death (breast, cardiac, or other) for patients who received left-sided irradiation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that modern breast radiotherapy is not associated with an increased risk of cardiac-related mortality within at least the first 12 years after treatment.

Skin recurrences after breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency and prognosis of skin recurrences after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) compared with other breast recurrences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1968 to 1986, 1,624 patients with unilateral stage I or II breast cancer treated with BCT at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy (Boston, MA) underwent gross tumor excision and received a dose of > or = 60 Gy to the tumor bed. Skin recurrences (SR) were defined as breast recurrences without associated parenchymal disease. An invasive breast recurrence with any parenchymal disease noted clinically or radiographically was scored as an other breast recurrence (OBR). Median follow-up for survivors was 137 months. RESULTS: SR represented 8% (18 of 229) of all breast recurrences and occurred in 1.1% of all patients. The outcome after local recurrence was different for patients with SR and invasive OBR. Patients with SR more frequently had uncontrolled local failure (50%; 9 of 18) than did patients with OBR (14%; 26 of 188) (P = .0007). Forty-four percent (8 of 18) of patients with SR had distant metastasis simultaneously or within 2 months of the recurrence compared with 5% (9 of 188) of invasive OBR patients (P < .0001). For patients without distant metastasis at the time of recurrence, the 5-year actuarial rate of development of distant metastasis was 60% for SR patients compared with 39% for invasive OBR patients (P = .07), and the corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates beyond the time of local failure were 51% and 79%, respectively (P = .06). CONCLUSION: In contrast to other types of invasive breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy, skin recurrences are rare and are associated with a significantly higher rate of distant metastasis and uncontrolled local disease as well as a lower rate of survival.

Cardiac effects of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the cardiac effects of two different cumulative doses of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine breast cancer patients were prospectively randomized to receive either five cycles (CA5) or 10 cycles (CA10) of adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide (500 mg/ m2) and doxorubicin (45 mg/m2) administered by intravenous bolus every 21 days. One hundred twenty-two of these patients also received RT. Estimates of the cardiac RT dose-volume were retrospectively categorized as low, moderate, or high. The risk of major cardiac events (congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction) was assessable in 276 patients (92%), with a median follow-up time of 6.0 years (range, 0.5 to 19.4). RESULTS: The estimated risk (95% confidence interval) of cardiac events per 100 patient-years was significantly higher for CA10 than for CA5 [1.7 (1.0 to 2.8) v 0.5 (0.1 to 1.2); P=.02]. The risk of cardiac events in CA5 patients, irrespective of the cardiac RT dose-volume, did not differ significantly from rates of cardiac events predicted for the general female population by the Framingham Heart Study. In CA10 patients, the incidence of cardiac events was significantly increased (relative risk ratio, 3.6; P < .00003) compared with the Framingham population, particularly in groups that also received moderate and high dose-volume cardiac RT. CONCLUSION: Conventional-dose adjuvant doxorubicin as delivered in the CA5 regimen by itself, or in combination with locoregional RT, was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of cardiac events. Higher doses of adjuvant doxorubicin (CA10) were associated with a threefold to fourfold increased risk of cardiac events. This appears to be especially true in patients treated with higher dose-volumes of cardiac RT. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these results.

Fifteen-year results of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

PURPOSE: To determine the 15-year outcome for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, intraductal carcinoma) of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An analysis was performed of 270 intraductal breast carcinomas in 268 women from 10 institutions in Europe and the United States. In all patients, breast-conserving surgery included complete gross excision of the primary tumor followed by definitive breast irradiation. When performed, pathologic axillary lymph node staging was node-negative (n=86). The median follow-up time was 10.3 years (range, 0.9 to 26.8). RESULTS: The 15-year actuarial overall survival rate was 87%, and the 15-year actuarial cause-specific survival rate was 96%. The 15-year actuarial rate of freedom from distant metastases was 96%. There were 45 local recurrences in the treated breast, and the 15-year actuarial rate of local failure was 19%. The median time to local failure was 5.2 years (range, 1.4 to 16.8). A number of clinical and pathologic parameters were evaluated for correlation with local failure, and none were predictive for local failure (all P > or = .15). CONCLUSION: The results from the present study demonstrate high rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, and freedom from distant metastases following the treatment of DCIS of the breast using breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. These results support the use of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of DCIS of the breast.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine indications for the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with invasive breast cancer with involved axillary lymph nodes or locally advanced disease who receive systemic therapy. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: The benefits and risks of PMRT in such patients, as well as subgroups of these patients, were considered. The details of the PMRT technique were also evaluated. OUTCOMES: The outcomes considered included freedom from local-regional recurrence, survival (disease-free and overall), and long-term toxicity. EVIDENCE: An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through July 2000; certain investigators were contacted for more recent and, in some cases, unpublished information. A computerized search was performed of MEDLINE data; directed searches based on the bibliographies of primary articles were also performed. VALUES: Levels of evidence and guideline grades were assigned by the Panel using standard criteria. A "recommendation" was made when level I or II evidence was available and there was consensus as to its meaning. A "suggestion" was made based on level III, IV, or V evidence and there was consensus as to its meaning. Areas of clinical importance were pointed out where guidelines could not be formulated due to insufficient evidence or lack of consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations, suggestions, and expert opinions of the Panel are described in this article. VALIDATION: Seven outside reviewers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee members, and the ASCO Board of Directors reviewed this document.

Recurrence in the breast following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

This report summarizes the experience of the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy (JCRT) in treating patients with clinical stage I and II breast cancer with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. The study population consisted of 1396 patients treated between 1968 and 1985. All patients underwent a gross excision of the tumor and received breast irradiation (with or without nodal irradiation) including a "boost" to bring the primary tumor site to a total dose of at least 60 Gy. The method of treatment evolved over the study-time period. During the interval from 1968 to 1982, patients typically underwent a limited gross excision of the tumor without regard to the microscopic margins of resection. During the period 1983 to 1985, film-screen mammography, inking of specimen margins, and reexcisions for inevaluable or involved margins were more commonly performed. With a median follow-up of 80 months, the 5-year crude rate of failure in the breast (as the first site of failure) was 8% (106/1396) and the crude rate of regional nodal/distant failure (as the first site of failure) was 16% (228/1396). The time-course of failures in the breast was protracted, occurring at a fairly constant rate over the first 7 years after treatment, but still seen beyond that point. Most recurrences in the breast (75%) developed at or near the original tumor site. The most important risk factor for developing a breast recurrence was the presence of an extensive intraductal component in the tumor. The cosmetic results following treatment were excellent or good in the majority of patients (87%) and were most adversely affected by extensive surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)