Drug-induced liver injury at a tertiary care centre in Germany: Model for end-stage liver disease is the best predictor of outcome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Agents most frequently inducing idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) differ between countries worldwide. Besides, there is no consistent data on the best model predicting mortality or the need for liver transplantation in DILI. We here analysed the DILI cohort of our centre with regard to causative drugs and clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 157 consecutive severe DILI patients presenting to our tertiary care centre in Hamburg, Germany, from 2008 to 2018, was performed. RESULTS: The most frequent putatively causative drugs were phenprocoumon (n = 21), metamizole (n = 17) and flupirtine (n = 6). The mean values of ALT, bilirubin and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the time of hospitalisation were 1201 U/L (SD: 1169 U/L), 6.8 mg/dL (SD: 7 mg/dL) and 17 (SD: 8). About 71% of all cases were treated with steroids or steroids combined with n-acetylcysteine. About 12.1% of all DILI cases had a poor outcome (liver transplantation and/or death). At the time of admission, MELD score performed better than Hy's law, the ratio (R) or the new ratio (nR) on their own or combined with bilirubin, regarding sensitivity or specificity for poor outcome. MELD score had a c-statistic of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.731-0.964). Furthermore, the cut-off of 18 MELD points had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 72% for poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Phenprocoumon and metamizole are frequent causative drugs for DILI in Germany. In comparison to other prognostic scores, MELD score ≥18 at the time of admission performed best in our cohort for the prediction of poor outcome in DILI.

Metamizole: An underrated agent causing severe idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.

AIMS: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a heterogenous entity leading to liver damage. We have analysed the frequency, biochemical and histological patterns and clinical courses of DILI cases due to metamizole at our tertiary care centre in Hamburg, Germany. METHODS: Consecutive patients with DILI who presented to our clinic were analysed retrospectively. Causes of acute hepatitis other than DILI were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 154 DILI cases were admitted to our centre from 2008 to 2017. After phenprocoumon, metamizole was the second most frequent putative agent causing DILI (23 of all 154 DILI cases, 14,9%). The biochemical pattern on admission of metamizole-induced DILI cases was hepatocellular with median levels of alanine transaminase (779 U/L, 64-3532 U/L) by far exceeding median alkaline phosphatase levels (131 U/L, 42-578 U/L). In 17 of the 23 cases (74%) liver biopsy was performed. Moderate to severe inflammatory histological activity and severe centrilobular necrosis (>30%) was present in 76.5 and 35.3%, respectively. Metamizole was involved in 2 DILI cases progressing to acute liver failure, then receiving liver transplantation and still alive at time of assessment. Our data were supported by re-exposure in 4 patients. Furthermore, a database search for metamizole-induced liver injury in the European Medicines Agency's database identified about 300 reports on suspected metamizole-induced DILI in Europe. CONCLUSION: Elevation of liver enzymes or acute liver failure are not mentioned in the German drug label of metamizole as potential side effects. Our study reveals that in Germany and Europe, metamizole is a frequent and underrated agent causing DILI.