Sedation for less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sedation to preterm neonates receiving less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for respiratory distress syndrome is controversial. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OS) to evaluate the effect of sedative drugs for LISA on respiratory outcomes and adverse effects. RESULTS: One RCT (78 neonates) and two OS (519 neonates) were analyzed in pairwise meta-analysis and 30 studies (2164 neonates) in proportion-based meta-analysis. Sedative drugs might not affect the duration of the procedure [RCT: mean difference (MD) (95% CI); -11 (-90; 67) s; OS: MD 95% CI: -60 (-178; 58) s; low certainty of evidence (CoE)]. Evidence for success at the first attempt and rescue intubation was uncertain (very low CoE). The risk of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation [RCT: 1.97 (1.38-2.81); OS: RR, 95% CI: 2.96 (1.46; 6.00), low CoE], desaturation [RCT: RR, 95% CI: 1.30 (1.03; 1.65), low CoE], and apnea [OS: RR, 95% CI: 3.13 (1.35; 7.24), very low CoE] might be increased with sedation. Bradycardia, hypotension, and mechanical ventilation were comparable between groups (low CoE). CONCLUSIONS: Use of sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affects the newborn's breathing. Further trials are warranted to explore the use of sedation for LISA. IMPACT: The effect of sedative drugs (analgesics, sedatives, anesthetics) compared to the effect of no-sedation for LISA in preterm infants with RDS is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the impact of sedative drugs compared to no-sedation for LISA on short-term pulmonary outcomes and potential adverse events. Sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affect the newborn's breathing (desaturation, apnea) and increase the need for nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. For most outcomes, certainty of evidence is low/very low.

No evidence of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 after induction of labour in an immune-suppressed SARS-CoV-2-positive patient.

We present a case of a 38+1 weeks pregnant patient (G1P0) with a proven COVID-19 infection, who was planned for induction of labour because of pre-existent hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, respiratory problem of coughing and mild dyspnoea without fever during the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. To estimate the risk of vertical transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during labour and delivery, we collected oropharyngeal, vaginal, urinary, placental and neonatal PCRs for SARS-CoV-2 during the period of admission. All PCRs, except for the oropharyngeal, were negative and vertical transmission was not observed. Labour and delivery were uncomplicated and the patient and neonate were discharged the next day. We give a short overview of the known literature about SARS-CoV-2-related infection during pregnancy, delivery and outcome of the neonate.

The case for a chronobiological approach to neonatal care.

Time of day is a critical factor for most biological functions, but concepts from the field of chronobiology have yet to be fully translated to clinical practice. Circadian rhythms, generated internally and synchronised to the external environment, promote function and support survival in almost every living species. Fetal circadian rhythms can be observed in utero from 30weeks gestation, coupled to the maternal rhythm, but synchronise to the external environment only after birth. Important cues for synchronisation include the light/dark cycle, the timing of feeding, and exposure to melatonin in breast milk. Disruption to these cues may occur during admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. This can impair the development of circadian rhythms, and influence survival and function in the neonatal period, with a potential to impact health and well-being throughout adult life. Here we outline the rationale and evidence to support a chronobiological approach to neonatal care.