RESUMEN
Assessing and improving test-retest reliability is critical to efforts to address concerns about replicability of task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging. The current study uses two statistical approaches to examine how scanner and task-related factors influence reliability of neural response to face-emotion viewing. Forty healthy adult participants completed two face-emotion paradigms at up to three scanning sessions across two scanners of the same build over approximately 2 months. We examined reliability across the main task contrasts using Bayesian linear mixed-effects models performed voxel-wise across the brain. We also used a novel Bayesian hierarchical model across a predefined whole-brain parcellation scheme and subcortical anatomical regions. Scanner differences accounted for minimal variance in temporal signal-to-noise ratio and task contrast maps. Regions activated during task at the group level showed higher reliability relative to regions not activated significantly at the group level. Greater reliability was found for contrasts involving conditions with clearly distinct visual stimuli and associated cognitive demands (e.g., face vs. nonface discrimination) compared to conditions with more similar demands (e.g., angry vs. happy face discrimination). Voxel-wise reliability estimates tended to be higher than those based on predefined anatomical regions. This work informs attempts to improve reliability in the context of task activation patterns and specific task contrasts. Our study provides a new method to estimate reliability across a large number of regions of interest and can inform researchers' selection of task conditions and analytic contrasts.
Asunto(s)
Emociones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Mapeo Encefálico/métodos , Emociones/fisiología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Cognitive dysfunction (CD), inclusive of specific cognitive content (e.g., hopelessness, unbearability) or impaired cognitive processes (e.g., attentional fixation on suicide, rumination), is a key risk factor for suicidal ideation (SI). This study aimed to evaluate multiple forms of CD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to determine the unique contributions of CD to concurrent and prospective SI. Fifty-five college students with a history of SI or non-suicidal self-injury completed EMA surveys measuring momentary CD and passive SI ("Wish to Die" [WTD], "Wish to Stay Alive" [WTL]) four times a day for 14 days (2149 total observations). Passive SI and CD variables showed notable within-person variability. Multiple CD variables were significant predictors of concurrent ideation when examined simultaneously in multilevel models with random intercepts and fixed slopes, and associations were stronger when participants were around others. Controlling for concurrent passive SI, between-person rumination was a significant predictor of prospective WTD, and both within-person unbearability and between-person hopelessness were each predictive of prospective WTL. These findings provide evidence for the roles of specific types of CD in conferring risk for passive SI and highlight potentially malleable factors that can be changed through targeted interventions.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Evaluación Ecológica Momentánea , Estudiantes , Ideación Suicida , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Estudiantes/psicología , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Adolescente , Universidades , Adulto , Rumiación Cognitiva , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Aberrant responses to frustration are central mechanisms of pediatric irritability, which is a common reason for psychiatric consultation and a risk factor for affective disorders and suicidality. This pilot study aimed to characterize brain network configuration during and after frustration and test whether characteristics of networks formed during or after frustration relate to irritability. METHOD: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, a transdiagnostic sample enriched for irritability (N = 66, mean age = 14.0 years, 50% female participants) completed a frustration-induction task flanked by pretask and posttask resting-state scans. We first tested whether and how the organization of brain regions (ie, nodes) into networks (ie, modules) changes during and after frustration. Then, using a train/test/held-out procedure, we aimed to predict past-week irritability from global efficiency (Eglob) (ie, capacity for parallel information processing) of these modules. RESULTS: Two modules present in the baseline pretask resting-state scan (one encompassing anterior default mode and temporolimbic regions and one consisting of frontoparietal regions) contributed most to brain circuit reorganization during and after frustration. Only Eglob of modules in the posttask resting-state scans (ie, after frustration) predicted irritability symptoms. Self-reported irritability was predicted by Eglob of a frontotemporal-limbic module. Parent-reported irritability was predicted by Eglob of ventral-prefrontal-subcortical and somatomotor-parietal modules. CONCLUSION: These pilot results suggest the importance of the postfrustration recovery period in the pathophysiology of irritability. Eglob in 3 specific posttask modules, involved in emotion processing, reward processing, or motor function, predicted irritability. These findings, if replicated, could represent specific intervention targets for irritability.
Asunto(s)
Frustación , Individualidad , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Encéfalo , Genio Irritable/fisiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Attentional Fixation on Suicide Experiences Questionnaire (AFSEQ) was developed to measure attentional fixation on suicide, a cognitive process characterized by a preoccupation with suicide as a solution. This study investigated a revised version (AFSEQ-R) and examined differences between those who made a recent suicide attempt and those with suicidal ideation (SI). METHOD: Participants were 57 inpatients who attempted suicide within 14 days of study participation and 57 inpatients who presented with SI but no suicidal behavior within the past year. Analyses examined the internal reliability, multidimensionality, and construct validity of the AFSEQ-R, and whether attentional fixation moderated the correlation between SI and attempt status. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure, and subscale and total scores demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Cognitive Stuckness (and total score) correlated with SI, anxiety, impulsivity, and specific problem-solving deficits, while Cognitive Dysfunction correlated with anxiety and acted as a moderator of the correlation between Stuckness and SI. AFSEQ-R scores did not moderate the relationship between SI and attempt status. CONCLUSION: AFSEQ-R is a psychometrically sound and valid measure of attentional fixation. Attentional fixation on suicide is correlated with SI, and prospective studies are needed to uncover its directional effect on suicidal crises.
Asunto(s)
Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Conducta Impulsiva , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Irritability is defined as a tendency towards anger in response to frustration. Clinically, impairing irritability is a significant public health problem. There is a need for mechanism-based psychotherapies targeting severe irritability as it manifests in the context of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD). This study protocol describes a randomised multiple baseline design testing the preliminary efficacy of a new treatment, exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for severe irritability in youth, which also integrates components of parent management training. We will investigate associations of this intervention with primary clinical measures, as well as ecological momentary assessment measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Forty youth will be enrolled. Participants, aged 8-17 years, must present at least one of two core symptoms of DMDD: abnormal mood or increased reactivity to negative emotional stimuli, with severe impairment in one domain (home, school, peers) and moderate in another, or moderate impairment in at least two domains. Each participant is randomised to a 2-week, 4-week or 6-week baseline observation period, followed by 12 active treatment sessions. Clinical ratings are conducted at baseline, biweekly (clinician), weekly (parent/child) throughout treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month and 6-month follow-up (clinician). Clinician ratings on the Affective Reactivity Index and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale for DMDD are our primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures include parent and child reports of irritability. Post hoc additional symptom measures include clinician, parent and self-ratings of depression, anxiety and overall functional impairment. Prospective, digitally based event sampling of symptoms is acquired for a week pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post-treatment. Based on our pathophysiological model of irritability implicating frustrative non-reward, aberrant threat processing and instrumental learning, we probe these three brain-based targets using functional MRI paradigms to assess target engagement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research project and all related materials were submitted and approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02531893 and NCT00025935.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Genio Irritable , Adolescente , Déficit de la Atención y Trastornos de Conducta Disruptiva , Niño , Humanos , Trastornos del Humor/terapia , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Irritability is a transdiagnostic symptom in developmental psychopathology, conceptualized as a low threshold for frustration and increased proneness to anger. While central to emotion regulation, there is a vital need for empirical studies to explore the relationship between irritability and underlying physiological mechanisms of cardiovascular arousal. METHODS: We examined the relationship between irritability and cardiovascular arousal (i.e., heart rate [HR] and heart rate variability [HRV]) in a transdiagnostic sample of 51 youth (M = 12.63 years, SD = 2.25; 62.7% male). Data was collected using the Empatica E4 during a laboratory stop-signal task. In addition, the impact of motion activity, age, medication, and sleep on cardiovascular responses was explored. RESULTS: Main findings showed that irritability was associated with increased HR and decreased HRV during task performance. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the role of peripheral physiological dysregulation in youth with emotion regulation problems and suggest the potential use of available wearable consumer electronics as an objective measure of irritability and physiological arousal in a transdiagnostic sample of youth.