Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Oncological Surgeries: CORONAL Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative recovery from oncology surgeries should be understood for the clinical decision-making. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the postoperative cumulative 28-day mortality and the morbidity of surgical oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients consecutively admitted to intensive care units (ICU) of three centres for postoperative care of oncologic surgeries between March to June 2019 (first phase) and March to June 2020 (second phase). The primary outcome was cumulative 28-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative organic dysfunction and the incidence of clinical complications. Because of the possibility of imbalance between groups, adjusted analyses were performed: Cox proportional hazards model (primary outcome) and multiple logistic regression model (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: After screening 328 patients, 291 were included. The proportional hazard of cumulative 28-day mortality was higher in the second phase than that in the first phase in the Cox model, with the adjusted hazard ratio of 4.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-8.82). The adjusted incidences of respiratory complications (odds ratio [OR] 5.35; 95% CI 1.42-20.11) and pulmonary infections (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.17) were higher in the second phase. However, the adjusted incidence of other infections was lower in the second phase (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical oncology patients who underwent postoperative care in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher hazard of 28-day mortality. Furthermore, these patients had higher odds of respiratory complications and pulmonary infections. Trials registration The study is registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under the code RBR-8ygjpqm, UTN code U1111-1293-5414.

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A Western propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) has been shown to be safe and feasible in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). However, it is unclear whether RG is equivalent to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), especially in the Western world. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of RG and LG in GC patients. METHODS: We reviewed all gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative gastrectomy by minimally invasive approach in our institution from 2009 to 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to reduce selection bias. DaVinci Si platform was used for RG. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were eligible for inclusion (48 RG and 108 LG). Total gastrectomy was performed in 21.3% and 25% of cases in LG and RG, respectively. The frequency of stage pTNM II/III was 48.1%, and 54.2% in the LG and RG groups (p = 0.488). After PSM, 48 patients were matched in each group. LG and RG had a similar number of dissected lymph nodes (p = 0.759), operative time (p = 0.421), and hospital stay (p = 0.353). Blood loss was lower in the RG group (p = 0.042). The major postoperative complications rate was 16.7% for LG and 6.2% for RG (p = 0.109). The 30-day mortality rate was 2.1% and 0% for LG and RG, respectively (p = 1.0). There was no significant difference between the LG and RG groups for disease-free survival (79.6% vs. 61.2%, respectively; p = 0.155) and overall survival (75.9% vs. 65.7%, respectively; p = 0.422). CONCLUSION: RG had similar surgical and long-term outcomes compared to LG, with less blood loss observed in RG.

Surgical and medical outcomes in robotic compared to laparoscopic colectomy global prospective cohort from the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the outcomes benefits of robotic approach, when compared to a laparoscopic approach, in colectomy remain limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the value of robotic approach compared to laparoscopic approach in minimally invasive colectomy. DESIGN: Cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). SETTING: This study included data from the NSQIP from 1/2016 to 12/2021. PATIENT: Adult patients undergoing minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) colorectal surgery. INTERVENTION: Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk ratios for the incidence of medical and surgical morbidity and overall mortality. RESULTS: Compared to laparoscopic, robotic colectomy was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity [RR 0.84 (95%CI 0.72-0.96), P < 0.001], a significant reduction in postoperative mortality [RR 0.83 (95%CI 0.79-0.90), P 0.010)], and in post operative ileus [RR: 0.80 (95%CI 0.75-0.84), P < 0.001]. Yet, robotic approach was associated with a significant increase in total operative time despite a significant decrease in total length of stay. No benefit was observed regarding anastomotic leak. LIMITATIONS: Observational nature of the study cannot exclude residual bias. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort from the NSQIP, robotic colectomy was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative ileus, unplanned conversion to open surgery, morbidity, and overall mortality when compared to laparoscopic colectomy.

Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) is the standard modality for removing nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has emerged as an alternative method. There are few comparative studies between these techniques, especially evaluating recurrence. Therefore, the purpose of this trial was to compare CEMR and UEMR for the resection of colorectal lesions with respect to efficacy, safety, and recurrence rate. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial of UEMR versus CEMR for naïve and nonpedunculated lesions measuring between 10 and 40 mm. The primary outcome was adenoma recurrence at 6 months after the resection. Secondary outcomes were rates of technical success, en bloc resection, and adverse events. Block randomization was used to assign patients. Tattooing was performed to facilitate localization of the scars and eventual recurrences. Endoscopic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months after the procedure. The sites of resections were examined with white-light imaging, narrow-band imaging (NBI), and conventional chromoscopy with indigo carmine followed by biopsies. RESULTS: One hundred five patients with 120 lesions were included, with a mean size of 17.5 ± 7.1 (SD) mm. Sixty-one lesions were resected by UEMR and 59 by CEMR. The groups were similar at baseline regarding age, sex, average size, and histologic type. Lesions in the proximal colon in the CEMR group corresponded to 83% and in the UEMR group to 67.8% (P = .073). There was no difference between groups regarding success rate (1 failure in each group) and en bloc resection rate (60.6% UEMR vs 54.2% CEMR, P = .48). Intraprocedural bleeding was observed in 5 CEMRs (8.5%) and 2 UEMRs (3.3%) (P = .27). There was no perforation or delayed hemorrhage in either groups. Recurrence rate was higher in the CEMR arm (15%) than in the UEMR arm (2%) (P = .031). Therefore, the relative risk of 6-month recurrence rate in the CEMR group was 7.5-fold higher (95% CI, 0.98-58.20), with a number needed to treat of 7.7 (95% CI, 40.33-4.22). The higher recurrence rate in the CEMR group persisted only for lesions measuring 21 to 40 mm (35.7% vs 0%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that UEMR was associated with a lower adenoma recurrence rate than was CEMR. Both endoscopic techniques were effective and had similar rates of adverse events for the treatment of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions.

Impact of radiotherapy on adverse events of self-expanding metallic stents in patients with esophageal cancer.

Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are considered the treatment of choice for the palliation of dysphagia and fistulas in inoperable esophageal neoplasms. However, the safety of SEMSs in patients who received or who will be submitted to radiotherapy (RT) is uncertain. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of RT on adverse events (AEs) in patients with esophageal cancer with SEMSs. This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer hospital from 2009 to 2018. We collected information regarding RT, the histological type of the tumor, the model of SEMSs and AEs after stent placement. Three hundred twenty-three patients with malignant stenosis or fistula were treated with SEMSs. The predominant histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (79.6%). A total of 282 partially covered and 41 fully covered SEMSs were inserted. Of the 323 patients, 182 did not received RT, 118 received RT before SEMS placement and 23 after. Comparing the group that received RT before stent insertion with the group that did not, the first one presented a higher frequency of severe pain (9/118 7.6% vs. 3/182 1.6%; P = 0.02). The group treated with RT after stent placement had a higher risk of global AEs (13/23 56.5% vs. 63/182 34.6%; P = 0.019), ingrowth/overgrowth (6/23 26.1% vs. 21/182 11.5%; P = 0.045) and gastroesophageal reflux (2/23 8.7% vs. 2/182 1.1%; P = 0.034). Treatment with RT before stent placement in patients with inoperable esophageal neoplasm prolongs survival and is associated with an increased risk of severe chest pain. Treatment with RT of patients with an esophageal stent increases the frequency of minor, not life-threatening AEs.

Tube-in-tube endoscopic vacuum therapy for the closure of upper gastrointestinal fistulas, leaks, and perforations.

BACKGROUND : Although endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has been successfully used to treat postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) wall defects, its use demands special materials and several endoscopic treatment sessions. Herein, we propose a technical modification of EVT using a double tube (tube-in-tube drain) without polyurethane sponges for the drainage element. The tube-in-tube drainage device enables irrigation and application of suction. A flowchart for standardizing the management of postoperative UGI wall defects with this device is presented. METHODS : An EVT modification was made to achieve frequent fistula cleansing, with 3 % hydrogen peroxide rinsing, and the application of negative pressure. A tube-in-tube drain without polyurethane sponges can be inserted like a nasogastric tube or passed through a previously positioned surgical drain. This was a retrospective two-center observational study, with data collected from 30 consecutive patients. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, time under therapy, interval time from procedure to fistula diagnosis and treatment start, size of transmural defect, volume of cavity, number of endoscopic treatment sessions, and mortality were reviewed. RESULTS : 30 patients with UGI wall defects were treated. The technical and clinical success rates were 100 % and 86.7 %, respectively. Three patients (10 %) had adverse events and three patients (10 %) died. The median time under therapy was of 19 days (range 1-70) and the median number of endoscopic sessions was 3 (range 1-9). CONCLUSIONS : This standardized approach and EVT modification using a tube-in-tube drain, with frequent fistula cleansing, were successful and safe in a wide variety of UGI wall defects.

Prognostic Impact of Pathology, Cytoreduction, and Tumor Markers in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.

INTRODUCTION: The pathologic classification of pseudomyxoma peritonei is controversial. This study aimed to standardize the histopathological evaluation of pseudomyxoma peritonei and identify the clinicopathological factors associated with survival. METHODS: A pathologic review was performed to systematize the pathology report and verify the relationship between clinical features and survival. Terminology was based on the World Health Organization and Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International definitions. Preoperative serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, and CA-125 were evaluated to determine their association with overall survival (OS) and ability to predict CC0-1 cytoreduction. RESULTS: Among 109 patients with carcinomas resulting from primary appendiceal neoplasms, 72 had pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin and underwent debulking surgery. CC0-1 cytoreduction and CC2-3 cytoreduction were achieved in 61% and 39% of patients, respectively. Patients in the CC0-1 and CC2-3 groups had an OS of 122.80 and 32.92 mo, respectively. The histologic grade was associated with CC0-1 cytoreduction; however, it did not influence OS. Patients with CC0-1 cytoreduction, acellular mucin, and low-grade lesions had better disease-free survival. Higher preoperative CA19-9 levels were associated with poor OS. Normal carcinoembryonic antigen values were associated with 100% sensitivity for predicting CC0-1. CA19-9 levels of 625 U/mL were associated with a low possibility of predicting CC0-1. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic grades are associated with disease-free survival when CC0-1 cytoreduction is achieved. Normal preoperative CA19-9 levels were associated with a better OS. CC0-1 cytoreduction is the main determinant of longer survival.

Multivisceral resection compared to standard gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multivisceral resection (MVR) in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) is a morbid procedure. However, the precise impact of removing additional organs remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of MVR versus standard gastrectomy (SG) in an unbiased cohort. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma were considered. Those submitted to SG were compared to the ones who received MVR using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 685 GC patients were included (621 SG and 64 MVR). Groups were distinct concerning the extent of the gastrectomy, tumor size, pTNM, R0, postoperative complications, and 90-day mortality. After PSM, 57 patients were matched in each group. All variables assigned in the score were well matched. Postoperative complication, 90-day mortality, and overall survival (OS) became similar among groups. Age >65 years old and resection of two or more organs, besides the stomach, were factors associated with 90-day mortality. R1 and not received multimodal therapy were independent prognostic factors for worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: After PSM, the difference in morbidity, mortality, and survival of MVR compared to SG was no longer statistically significant, suggesting that MVR is an acceptable therapeutic strategy to patients with advanced GC.

Preoperative chemotherapy is a better strategy than upfront surgery in cT4 gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy (CMT) followed by surgery is recommended by Western countries for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, cT4 GC usually undergoes upfront surgery, due to symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate if preoperative CMT is a better strategy than upfront surgery in cT4 GC. METHODS: All cT4 GCs who underwent curative gastrectomy were included. Patients were divided according to their initial treatment: upfront surgery (SURG) or CMT + SURG. RESULTS: Among the 226 GC initially staged as cT4, 150 underwent SURG and 76 CMT + SURG. Groups were similar concerning age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists, gastrectomy performed, and postoperative complications. The CMT + SURG group had less advanced pTNM. Median overall survival (OS) was 32 and 58.5 months for SURG and CMT + SURG, respectively (p = 0.04). Patients who received perioperative or adjuvant CMT had better OS compared to surgery alone (49.4 vs. 15.9 months, p < 0.001). OS was similar for those receiving preoperative and adjuvant CMT. Non-CMT, pN+, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for worse OS. CONCLUSION: Multimodal treatment associating CMT with surgery, regardless of whether the approach is pre- or postoperative, is essential to improve the survival of cT4 GC. As tolerance to adjuvant treatment is reduced, preoperative CMT is a better strategy than upfront surgery in these patients.

Gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: A propensity score-matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although D2-gastrectomy is the most effective treatment for resectable gastric cancer (GC), it is unclear whether elderly patients have increased risk of morbidity and worse survival. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of older age (OA) patients with those of less advanced age (LAA). METHODS: GC patients undergoing curative gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups: OA (>75 years) and LAA (<75 years). Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis using seven variables was conducted to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Among 586 patients, 494 (84.3%) were classified as LAA and 92 (15.7%) as OA. OA patients had worse clinical status, higher rates of D1-lymphadenectomy, subtotal gastrectomy, and Lauren type; higher mortality and worse survival. No difference in pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) stage was observed between groups. Preoperative chemotherapy was performed more frequently in the LAA group. After PSM (92 OA: 92 LAA), all variables included in PSM were matched, and mortality rates and survival became similar between groups. In multivariate analysis, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score III/IV was an independent factor associated with a 90-day mortality after PSM. CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy in elderly GC patients has similar outcomes compared with younger ones. Clinical status and disease stage are more important than the patient's age.

Gastric cancer with microsatellite instability displays increased thymidylate synthase expression.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) with microsatellite instability (MSI) is a less aggressive disease and associated with resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy (CMT). Thymidylate synthase (TS) is inhibited by 5-FU, and another potential mediator of therapeutic resistance to 5-FU. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the association between MSI and TS expression in GC, and its impact on disease outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated GC who underwent D2-gastrectomy. MSI and TS were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. We also investigated p53 expression, PD-L1 status, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD4 and CD8). RESULTS: Out of 284 GC, 60 (21.1%) were MSI. Median TS-score for all cases was 16.5. TS expression was significantly higher in MSI compared to microsatellite-stable (MSS; p < 0.001). Considering both status, GC were classified in four groups: 167 (58.8%) MSS + TS-low; 57 (20.1%) MSS + TS-High; 24 (8.5%) MSI + TS-low; and 36 (12.7%) MSI + TS-high. MSI + TS-high group had less advanced pTNM stage, higher CD8+T cells levels (p < 0.001) and PD-L1 positivity (p < 0.001). Normal p53 expression was related to MSI GC (p < 0.001). Improved survival was observed in MSI + TS-high, but no survival benefit was seen with CMT. CONCLUSION: MSI GC was associated with high TS levels, which may explain therapeutic resistance to 5-FU. Additionally, MSI + TS-high showed better survival, but without improvement with CMT.

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with high-risk post-operative complications.

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is challenging, due to considerable morbidity, especially in high surgical risk patients. While transhiatal esophagectomy leads to good oncological outcomes and reduced postoperative complications, less invasive techniques might further improve outcomes. Our goal was to compare results of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) with open transhiatal esophagectomy (OTE) in esophageal cancer patients at high surgical risk. From 2014 to 2020, 128 patients were identified. Seventy received OTE while 51 received LTE. After propensity score matching (1:1), postoperative complications, analysis of overall and disease-free survival, and survival-related prognostic factors were assessed in two groups of 48 patients. Ninety-one (77%) patients were men with a mean age of 65 ± 10.3 years. Those who underwent OTE experienced more clinical and surgical complications. In LTE patients, the number of mean resected lymph nodes was 25.9, and in patients who had OTE, it was 17.4 (P < 0.001). Overall survival was 56.0% in the LTE group and 33.6% (P = 0.023) in the OTE group. In multivariable analysis of overall survival, open surgery and incomplete pathological response were seen as worse negative factors. In multivariable analysis, metastatic lymph nodes, incomplete pathologic response, surgical complications, and a Charlson's index > 2 (P = 0.014) were associated with poor prognosis. Both surgical methods are safe with similar morbidity and mortality; however, LTE was associated with fewer complications, a higher number of resected lymph nodes, better overall survival, and more prognostic factors related to global and disease-free overall survival in high-risk patients.

Treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: insights of an international case vignette survey and expert discussions.

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a severe complication after esophagectomy. Clinical presentation of AL is diverse and there is large practice variation regarding treatment of AL. This study aimed to explore different AL treatment strategies and their underlying rationale. This mixed-methods study consisted of an international survey among upper gastro-intestinal (GI) surgeons and focus groups with expert upper GI surgeons. The survey included 10 case vignettes and data sources were integrated after separate analysis. The survey was completed by 188 respondents (completion rate 69%) and 6 focus groups were conducted with 20 international experts. Prevention of mortality was the most important goal of primary treatment. Goals of secondary treatment were to promote tissue healing, return to oral feeding and safe hospital discharge. There was substantial variation in the preferred treatment principles (e.g. drainage or defect closure) and modalities (e.g. stent or endoVAC) within different presentations of AL. Patients with local symptoms were treated by supportive means only or by non-surgical drainage and/or defect closure. Drainage was routinely performed in patients with intrathoracic collections and often combined with defect closure. Patients with conduit necrosis were predominantly treated by resection and reconstruction of the anastomosis or by esophageal diversion. This mixed-methods study shows that overall treatment strategies for AL are determined by vitality of the conduit and presence of intrathoracic collections. There is large variation in preferred treatment principles and modalities. Future research may investigate optimal treatment for specific AL presentations and aim to develop consensus-based treatment guidelines for AL after esophagectomy.

D2 Lymphadenectomy According to the Arterial Variations in Gastric and Hepatic Irrigation.

BACKGROUND: D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer is technically demanding and requires clearance of the lymph node stations along the main arteries that irrigate the stomach and the liver. As gastric and hepatic irrigation have a different pattern from the classic branching of the celiac trunk in approximately 25% of patients, acquaintance with these variations and knowledge on how to adequately perform the lymphadenectomy in different anatomic settings is of utmost importance for surgeons who manage gastric cancer.1 METHODS: This video demonstrates, step-by-step, how to perform D2 lymphadenectomy in accordance with gastric and hepatic irrigation. Illustrations of the arterial variation correlate with the corresponding computed tomography image and operative management of the lymph node stations. DISCUSSION: D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard of care in advanced gastric cancer.2 It implies clearing the lymph node stations along the celiac trunk, left gastric artery, and common and proper hepatic arteries. However, the celiac trunk and hepatic irrigation are highly variable and surgeons must be aware of how to properly and safely address the lymph node stations in all scenarios. Vessel anatomical variations increase the risk of vascular injuries and its complications, such as bleeding, necrosis, liver function impairment, liver necrosis, and conversion to open surgery.3-5 Additionally, the lymphadenectomy cannot be compromised if a variation is found.6 Preoperative knowledge of the gastric blood supply also shortens the surgical duration.7 CONCLUSIONS: The present video demonstrates how to recognize the most common variations found during D2 gastrectomy, and provides strategies to adequately approach them.

Epstein-Barr Virus Positive Gastric Cancer: A Distinct Subtype Candidate for Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive gastric cancer (GC) has been described as a distinct molecular subtype of the disease, especially associated with gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (GCLS). The possibility that EBV associated GC (EBVaGC) had better prognosis and may be susceptible to immunotherapy has increased the interest in this subtype. However, immune checkpoint and survival of EBVaGC are still controversial, especially with regard to GCLS and conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, immunohistochemical profiles and prognosis of EBVaGC according to the histological type GCLS and CGA. METHODS: we retrospectively evaluated a series of EBVaGC who underwent gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy. Biomarkers and tumor-infiltrating cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 was evaluated using a combined positive score (CPS). RESULTS: From a total of 30 EBVaGC, 14 (46.7%) were identified as GCLS and 16 (53.3%) as CGA (9 Intestinal, 6 diffuse, 1 undetermined). There were no significant differences in age, sex, and pTNM between GCLS and CGA. CPS-positivity and high-CD8+ was significantly higher in GCLS compared with CGA (P = 0.007 and P = 0.005, respectively). Diffuse EBVaGC had worse survival than intestinal type (P = 0.020). There was no difference in survival between GCLS and intestinal CGA (P = 0.260). In multivariate analysis, CPS and pN status were related with survival in EBVaGC. CONCLUSIONS: CGLS was associated with a predominance of CD8+ cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression. CPS and lymph node metastasis were independent factors associated with prognosis in EBVaGC. These results suggest that specifically EBV-positive GCLS may be prime candidates for PD-1 directed therapy.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 in gastric cancer: Prognosis and association with PD-L1 expression.

BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) is one of the most studied immune checkpoint in gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic role of CTLA-4 expression in GC is poorly described. This study aimed to evaluate CTLA-4 expression in GC and its impact on survival, including patients treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy (CMT), and association with PD-L1 expression. METHODS: All GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy were investigated retrospectively. Tumor samples were examined for CTLA-4 and PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry. Tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells, including CD4 + and CD8 + , were also examined. RESULTS: Among the 284 GC patients included, 159 (56%) were CTLA-4 positive and the remaining 125 (44%) were classified as negative. CTLA-4 positive GC was associated with increased inflammatory cell infiltration (p < 0.001), high CD8 + T cells (p = 0.016) and PD-L1 expression (p = 0.026). Considering GC referred for treatment, CTLA-4 negative patients who received CMT had a significant improvement in disease-free survival compared to untreated CLTA-4 negative (p = 0.028). In multivariate analysis, GC positive for both CTLA-4 and PD-L1 had a prognostic impact on survival. CONCLUSION: CTLA-4 positive was associated with PD-L1 expression and a high tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells. Accordingly, positivity for both CTLA-4 and PD-L1 was an independent factor associated to better survival in GC patients.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical and pathological results of gastric cancer patients: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery represents a treatment option for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This case-control study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of GC patients who received NACT, and its impact on survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GC who underwent gastrectomy. A total of 45 cases with NACT were matched with consecutive 45 patients who underwent upfront gastrectomy for the following characteristics: gender, age, gastrectomy type, lymphadenectomy extent, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, histological type, cT and cN. RESULTS: NACT group had smaller tumors (4.9 vs 6.8 cm P = .006), lower lymphatic invasion rate (40% vs 73.3%, P = .001), lower venous invasion rate (18% vs 46.7%, P = .003) and lower perineural invasion rate (35% vs 77.8%, P < .0001). The ypTNM stage was lower in patients treated with NACT (P < .001). The major postoperative complication (POC) rate was lower in NACT patients (6.7% vs 24.4%, P = .02), as was hospital length of stay (10.8 vs 17 days, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: NACT allowed nodal and tumor downstaging. In addition, patients who underwent NACT had fewer POC and shorter length of hospital stay.

Multivisceral resection vs standard gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Multivisceral resection (MVR) is potentially curative for selected gastric cancer patients, supposedly at the cost of increased complications. However, current data comparing MVR to standard gastrectomy (SG) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: Compare complications and survival after MVR and SG. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 1015 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, 58 underwent MVR and 466 SG. Groups were compared concerning their characteristics, complications, and survival. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients had postoperative complications. Major complications were more frequent after MVR (P = .002). Surgical mortality was 8.6% and 4.9% for MVR and SG (P = .221). Older age, higher morbidities, and MVR were independent risk factors for major complications. The odds ratio for major complications was 5.89 for MVR with one or two organs and 38.01 for MVR with three or more organs. The pancreas was the most commonly removed organ and pT4b disease were confirmed in 34 (58.6%) of the MVR cases. Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in MVR patients (51% vs 77.8%; P < .001), being worse according to the number of organs resected. In pN+ patients, DFS was worse after MVR. DFS was equivalent to pT4b and non-pT4b in the MVR group. CONCLUSIONS: Increased morbidity and lower survival are expected for gastric cancer patients undergoing MVR.

Gastric cancer molecular classification and adjuvant therapy: Is there a different benefit according to the subtype?

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) has been defined in distinct molecular subtypes with different therapeutic implications. However, its clinical significance and prognosis regarding standard chemotherapy (CMT) remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the impact of perioperative or adjuvant treatment among subtypes of GC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all stage II/III patients with GC who underwent a curative gastrectomy. Based on immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization techniques, GC was classified into five subtypes: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive, microsatellite instability (MSI), e-cadherin aberrant, p53-aberrant, and p53-normal. RESULTS: Among the 178 CG included, 111 patients received CMT and 67 were treated with surgery alone. Survival analysis showed that p53-aberrant GC treated with CMT had better disease-free survival (DFS) compared with surgery alone (P = .001).There was no significant difference in DFS between patients who received CMT and those with surgery alone for EBV, MSI, E-cadherin, and p53-normal GC. An improvement in overall survival was observed only for E-cadherin (P = .001) and p53-aberrant (P < .001) patients who received CMT. CONCLUSIONS: CMT showed different impact on the survival of CG according to the molecular subtype. No survival benefit was observed for EBV and MSI groups who received CMT. GC with p53-aberrant had a significant benefit in survival with standard therapy.

Lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A predictor of survival in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCMT) has been increasingly used in advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic impact of tumor response remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate if tumor response at the primary site and lymph nodes (LN) correlate with survival in GC patients after nCMT. METHODS: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated with nCMT followed by gastrectomy were evaluated. Residual tumor was graded from 0% to 100%, defining two groups: poor (PR) and major response (MR). LN regression rate (LNRR) was determined based on tumor/fibrosis examination at each LN and a cutoff value established by receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among 62 cases, 20 (32.2%) had MR and 42 (67.7%) PR. Smaller size, diffuse histology, lower ypT status and less advanced stage were associated with the MR group. Based on cutoff value of 57, 45.6% and 54.4% patients were classified as low-LNRR and high-LNRR. High-LNRR correlated with absence of venous, lymphatic and perineural invasion, and less advanced stage. Survival was equivalent between MR and PR (P = .956). High-LNRR had better disease-free survival (DFS) than low-LNRR (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, only LNRR associated with DFS. CONCLUSION: High-LNRR associates with DFS in GC treated with nCMT. Response at the primary site does not correlate with survival.