Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 111(11): 1564-1571, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27753434

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Successful outpatient colonoscopy (CLS) depends on many factors including the quality of a patient's bowel preparation. Although education on consumption of the pre-CLS purgative can improve bowel preparation quality, no study has evaluated dietary education alone. We have created an educational video on pre-CLS dietary instructions to determine whether dietary education would improve outpatient bowel preparation quality. METHODS: A prospective randomized, blinded, controlled study of patients undergoing outpatient CLS was performed. All patients received a 4 l polyethylene glycol-based split-dose bowel preparation and standard institutional pre-procedure instructions. Patients were then randomly assigned to an intervention arm or to a no intervention arm. A 4-min educational video detailing clear liquid diet restriction was made available to patients in the intervention arm, whereas those randomized to no intervention did not have access to the video. Patients randomized to the video were provided with the YouTube video link 48-72 h before CLS. An attending endoscopist blinded to randomization performed the CLS. Bowel preparation quality was scored using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Adequate preparation was defined as a BBPS total score of ≥6 with all segment scores ≥2. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson's χ2-tests were performed to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomized (video: n=42; control: n=50) with 47 total video views being tallied. There were no demographic differences between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in adequate preparation between groups (video=74%; control=68%; P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a supplementary patient educational video on clear liquid diet alone was insufficient to improve bowel preparation quality when compared with standard pre-procedure instruction at our institution.


Asunto(s)
Catárticos/uso terapéutico , Colonoscopía , Dietoterapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Grabación en Video , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Recursos Audiovisuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Método Simple Ciego
2.
Endosc Int Open ; 8(12): E1804-E1810, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33269313

RESUMEN

Background and study aims Endoscopic mentoring requires active attention by the preceptor. Unfortunately, sources of distraction are abundant during endoscopic precepting. The impact of distraction minimization on endoscopic mentoring and performance is unknown. Methods Fellow and attending preceptors were paired and randomized in a prospective crossover design to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or colonoscopy in either a "distraction minimization" (DM) or a "standard" (S) room. Cell phones, pagers, music, and computers were not permitted in DM rooms. S rooms operated under typical conditions. Fellows and attendings then completed a survey. The primary outcome was fellow satisfaction with mentoring experience (visual analogue scale: 0 = min,100 = max). Additional fellow outcomes included satisfaction of attending attentiveness, identifying landmarks, communication, and distractedness; attending outcomes included satisfaction with mentoring, attentiveness, communication, and distractedness. Endoscopic performance measures included completion of EGD, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total procedure time, attending assistance, and polyp detection rate. A paired t -test was used to compare mean differences (MD) between rooms; significance set at P  < 0.05. Results Eight fellows and seven attendings completed 164 procedures. Despite a trend toward less distraction between rooms (DM = 12.5 v. S = 18.3, MD =  4.1, P  = 0.17), there was no difference in fellow satisfaction with training/mentoring (DM = 93, S = 93, MD = -0.04, P  = 0.97), attentiveness (DM = 95, S = 92, MD = 0.86, P  = 0.77), identifying pathology/landmarks (DM = 94, S = 94, MD = -1.72, P  = 0.56), or communication (DM = 95, S = 95,MD = 1.0, P  = 0.37). Similarly, there was no difference between rooms for any attending outcome measures or performance metrics. Conclusions DM did not improve perceived quality of endoscopic mentoring or performance for fellows or attendings; however, reduced distraction may improve attending engagement/availability.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA