[Treatments around surgery of prostate cancer and surgery of recurrence]. / Traitements complémentaires de la chirurgie du cancer de la prostate et chirurgie de la récidive.

OBJECTIVE: To describe neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments to surgery and the place of surgery in the recurrence after primary treatments. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Bibliography search was performed from the database Medline (National Library of Medicine, Pubmed), selected according to the scientific relevance. The research was focused on treatments before and after surgery, biological recurrence and surgery as the procedure in case of failure of other treatments of non-metastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS: Main oncological objectif of surgery is to decrease positive surgical margins by good adequation between technics and tumor and patient status. Neoadjuvant treatments are today disappointing; however, adjuvant radiotherapy and hormonotherapy demonstrated their interest in case of extracapsular extension, positive margins or invasion of lymph nodes. Nevertheless, superiority of adjuvant treatment to salvage treatment is still debated. Radical prostatectomy is still the only curative treatment in case of failure of another localized treatment. CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy has to be one of the main references of localized prostate cancer treatments especially in case of multimodal approach. Pathological exam of specimen and postoperative PSA value should precise the optimal management of prostate cancer.

[Management of low-risk prostate cancer]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs de la prostate à faible risque évolutif.

INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of prostate cancer screening has led to a stage migration resulting in an increase in the diagnosis of low-risk disease, which currently accounts for 40-50% of diagnosed forms. New therapeutic strategies have been developed in order to minimize the risk of overtreatment. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature over the past 20 years was performed using the Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations. RESULTS: Low-risk tumors are conventionally defined by the d'Amico classification. The use of multiparametric MRI helps to better characterize these tumors. The contribution of molecular biology remains to be determined in clinical practice. Novel therapeutic options for low-risk disease are currently being evaluated. CONCLUSION: The new therapeutic strategies are evolving. They seek to reduce overtreatment without compromising oncological success.

[Imagery of treated prostate cancer]. / Imagerie post-thérapeutique du cancer de la prostate.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis, localization of recurrence in the management of prostate cancer patients with increasing concentrations of tumor serum markers is crucial for treatment planning of the patients. The present review describes the role of prostate MRI and (18) Fcholine PET/computed tomography (CT) in tumor detection and extent, when there is a suspicion of residual or recurrent disease after treatment of prostate cancer. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching in the PUB MED/MEDLINE database searching for articles in French or English published between the last 12years. RESULTS: In patient with a clinical suspicion of recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer, imaging can be used to distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease. (11)C-choline PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MR imaging (mp MRI) are complementary in this indication. In this paper, the current status of imaging techniques used for the staging of patients with suspected locally recurrent or metastatic disease in patients treated for prostate cancer were reviewed. CONCLUSION: Mp MRI of the prostate may be valuable imaging modality for the detection and localization of local recurrence. C-choline PET/CT offers an advantage in detecting metastatic disease to lymph node and bone.

[Prostate cancer surgical margin: review by the CCAFU (Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology)]. / Les marges chirurgicales dans le cancer de la prostate. CCAFU revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVE: Literature showed the impact of surgical margin status on prognosis after radical prostatectomy (mostly on biochemical survival). Margin status is an easy self-evaluation of surgical practice to assess. The aim of this paper was to define what a positive surgical margin (PSM) is and how to prevent the occurrence, to precise the impact on survival and how to treat. METHOD: A literature analysis with Pubmed has been performed to 2012, furthermore conclusions of the main congresses with selection committee and review publication have also been studied. RESULTS: PSM is defined as "tumor cells touching the ink on the specimen edge". The most frequent reported incidence is between 15 to 20%. Margin status remains one of the major criteria to determine the need of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Quality of life is not or only lightly modified by radiotherapy with the current techniques. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves biological survival but is synonymous with overtreatment in many times. Salvage radiotherapy has to be quickly performed after Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse (PSA<1 ng/mL even<0.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: This literature review did not allow to suggest superiority of one surgical technique over another. In the same way, the kind of dissection i.e. bladder neck or neurovascular bundle preservation does no clearly modify PSM rate. However, it seems logical to "customize" dissection according to prostate cancer characteristics (D'Amico criteria for instance) guided with multiparametric MRI. Intrafascial dissection has to be applied only to low risk. Lastly, the debate between adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy is always ongoing.

[CCAFU Recommendations 2013: Diagnosis, treatment, follow up of urological cancers]. / Recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques 2013 du CCAFU: Diagnostic, traitement et suivi des cancers urologiques chez l'homme et la femme.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the 2013 recommendations performed by the different committees of CCAFU is to improve the management of urological cancers regarding diagnosis, clinical assessment and treatments in men and women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 2010 clinical guidelines were updated based on international AUA and EAU guidelines and on systematic literature search performed by each sub-Committee in Medline and PubMed databases to evaluate references, levels of evidence and grade of recommendation. RESULTS: CCAFU clinical guidelines reply to the main clinical questions on management of urological cancers. CONCLUSION: French clinical guidelines are updated every three years by CCAFU in accordance with the main international guidelines in onco-urology.

[Prostate brachytherapy: indications and outcomes]. / Curiethérapie exclusive du cancer de la prostate par implants permanents : indications et résultats. Revue du CC-AFU.

INTRODUCTION: To summarize the indications and outcomes of low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants. METHODS: Bibliographic database PubMed was searched with prostate cancer and brachytherapy as keywords from 1995 to 2012. RESULTS: The main indication of prostate brachytherapy is the favorable group, but it could be proposed to patients with an intermediate prognostic group if the PSA is ≤ 15 ng/mL or if the Gleason score is 7 (3+4), under cover of a prostate MRI without any extra-capsular extension. Oncologic results are similar to those of surgery or external beam irradiation (EBRT), with a 10-yr biochemical control rate approaching 90%. Urinary toxicity is common during the year following the implant, mainly irritative symptoms; 5 to 15% of patients experienced acute urinary retention. A prostate volume higher than 50 cc or an initial high international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) are predictive of toxicity and are recognized as relative contraindications of the technique. Sexual activity is maintained in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy must be proposed as a validated option beside active surveillance, surgery and EBRT.

[Incidence and mortality of urological cancers in 2012 in France]. / Projection de l'incidence et de la mortalité par cancer urologique en France en 2012.

OBJECTIVES: Present national estimations of the incidence and mortality trends in urological cancers in France between 1980 and 2012. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Francim database and French Register of Cancers. RESULTS: Analysis of the current data shows a regular increase of the incidence of renal cancer in men and women (7,781 cases in men and 3,792 in women in 2012). For bladder cancer, trends are divergent. There is a small reduction in incidence for men and an increase for women (9,549 cases in men and 2,416 in women in 2012). Testicular cancer is still increasing slightly (2,317 incidental cases in 2012). The incidence of prostate cancer experienced a huge increase up until 2005, and thereafter it decreased sharply, though it is difficult to discern whether this drop (which was observed up until 2008) continued at the same rate after that point (56,841 incidences in 2012 based on the rates calculated for 2009). CONCLUSION: The analyses by organ database show that there are significant variations in the incidence of urological cancers, particularly for prostate cancer, which shows that both the natural history of urological tumours and the methods of detection have an impact on incidence.

[CCAFU Recommendations 2013: Prostate cancer]. / Recommandations en onco-urologie 2013 du CCAFU : Cancer de la prostate.

INTRODUCTION: The sub Comittee prostate of the CCAFU established guidelines for diagnostic, treatment, evaluation and standart of care of prostate cancer. METHODS: Guidelines 2010 were updated based on systematic literature search performed by the sub-Comittee in Medline and PubMed databases to evaluate references, levels of evidence and grade of recommandation. RESULTS: Pathological examination of the tissue specimens was defined specifically for Gleason score according to ISP 2005 recommandations. Prostate and pelvis RMN became the reference in terms of radiological exam. Individual and early diagnosis of prostate cancer was defined and role of PSA was precised. Active surveillance became one of the standart of care of low-risk tumors, radical prostatectomy remained one of the options for all risk group tumors, length of hormonotherapy in association with radiotherapy was precised according to the risk group. Side effects of hormonotherapy treament needed specific supervision ; hormonotherapy had no indication in case of non metastatic tumors and intermittent hormonotherapy in metastatic tumors. New hormonal drugs in pre and post chemotherapy and bone target drugs opened new therapeutics pathways. CONCLUSION: From 2010 to 2013, standarts of care of prostate cancer were modified because of results of prospective studies and new therapeutics. They allowed precise treatments for each specific clinical situation. In the future, multidisciplinary treatments for high risk tumors, time of adjuvant treatment and sequencies of new hormonal treatment had to be defined.

[5 alpha-reductase inhibitors and prostate cancer: a statement of the Committee of Cancerology of the French Association of Urology]. / Inhibiteurs des 5 alpha-réductases et cancer de la prostate : une mise au point du Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie.

INTRODUCTION: Two randomised trials and negative conclusion of the FDA about inhibitors of 5 alpha-reductase in prevention of prostate cancer need a revision of the indications of these drugs. METHODS: After description of fundamentals data, review of the literature in PubMed library was performed to analyse the indications of these drugs according to the different stages of prostate cancer. RESULTS: Even if PCPT and REDUCE studies showed a decrease of cancers with the use of 5 alpha-reductase (5ARI) but with side effects, there is no indication for prostate cancer prevention by these drugs. In the same way, despite the results of REEDEM study, there is no indication of these drugs in active surveillance. CONCLUSION: Despite the large interest of these drugs, no recommendation can be given for indications of 5ARI in prevention or treatment of prostate cancer.

[High-risk prostate cancer. Review by the Oncology Committee of the French Urology Association]. / Cancer de la prostate à haut risque de progression. Article de revue du comité de cancérologie de l'association française d'urologie.

INTRODUCTION: Localized prostate tumors have various clinical, biological and histopathological characteristics that lead to different progression profiles. High-risk prostate cancer has been classically defined by clinical examination, PSA levels and histopathological data. High-risk prostate cancer has usually a worse outcome, but classic stratification predictive of outcome for prostate cancer is a matter of debate concerning its accuracy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on high-risk prostate cancer over the 15 last years was carried out on Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations. RESULTS: A great deal of scientific work have been deployed to prove that high-risk prostate cancer should be approached by teamwork including radio-hormone therapy, systemic treatment with long term use of LH-RH and a radical prostatectomy with adequate lymph node dissection. Selection of patients is essential to define individualized therapeutic strategy and timing for every modality should come as a consensus of medical supported evidence. CONCLUSION: Accurate patient selection and multimodal treatment offer the best therapeutic option in high-risk prostate cancer.

[How to manage bone metastasis in prostate cancer. A case report]. / Prise en charge des métastases osseuses du cancer de la prostate. A propos d'un cas.

Androgen deprivation therapy with LHRH agonists is the gold standard in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. This treatment leads to decrease the bone mass, thus bone mineral density evaluation is recommended after one year of hormonal treatment to measure bone loss. Bisphosphonate is recommended when metastasis occurred during hormonal resistance phase to reduce bone events. The necessity of preventive treatment and the appropriate schedule is not well established. Long term fracture risk should be ideally evaluated with a CT scan and an MRI. Fragmented and focal radiotherapy is considered as the treatment of choice to decrease localized pain. Metastasis surgery has functional results and should be performed before major neurologic symptoms occur. Metabolic radiotherapy is an option for multifocal bone metastases.

[The screening of prostate cancer in 2009: overview of the oncology committee of the French Urological Association]. / Le dépistage du cancer de la prostate en 2009: mise au point du comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of screening on prostate cancer (PCa) mortality, and to discuss the main points of controversy regarding this screening. METHODS: A bibliographic analysis was made using Medline services (keywords: prostate cancer, screening). Only the randomized studies regarding the impact of PCa screening on specific mortality were taken into account. RESULTS: Two randomized studies, comparing one group of screened men with another group of nonscreened men, were published this year with conflicting results. The American study PLCO included 76,693 men. After a follow-up of 7 years, it did not report a significant difference in terms of specific mortality between both arms: 2/10,000 deaths in the control group versus 1.7/10,000 in the screened arm (RR=1.13; IC 95%: 0.75-1.7). The European study ERSPC included 182,160 men. After 9 years of follow-up, it showed a significant 20% reduction of specific mortality rate in the screened group (RR=0.80; IC 90%: 0.65-0.98; p=0.04). Methodologically, the European study seems to be superior to the American study, in which the control group was biased by a high percentage of preinclusion screening. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that a large randomized study shows a benefit of PCa screening regarding specific mortality. However, this issue remains to be clarified, due to the lack of data regarding the risk of "overdiagnosis" and the economic impact of screening.

[New perspectives in prostate cancer management]. / Les nouvelles perspectives de prise en charge du cancer de la prostate.

The treatment of prostate cancer is experiencing important innovations. Hormone therapy includes a new class of drugs: LHRH antagonists, which induce a rapid, fast and sustained reduction of testosterone levels. Active surveillance enables to avoid an aggressive treatment without decreasing survival, provided that strict eligibility and follow-up criteria are applied. New imaging techniques and laboratory assays lead to early diagnosis of small size tumors. Lastly, focal therapy has the potential to target localized cancers without deterioration of surrounding structures. These concomitant improvements offer the clinician and the patient attractive options for prostate cancer management. However, they are not devoid of limitations and constraints. Thus, it is crucial to define the most appropriate patient's profile for each therapeutic option, taking into account the objective characteristics of the tumor and the psychological features of the patient.

[First line indications for hormonal therapy in prostate cancer]. / Cancer de la prostate et hormonothérapie: indications thérapeutiques de première ligne.

The utilization of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer has evolved over time. Unquestionably considered first line treatment in metastatic cancers or in case of lymph node involvement, it is increasingly used in locally advanced and high-risk cancers, combined with radiation therapy. However, the practical modalities of treatment are still controversial (neoadjuvant, concomitant/adjuvant) and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account tumor stage and risk level, which depends mainly on Gleason score and PSA levels and kinetics. Hormone therapy is also indicated in case of systemic relapse, especially if PSA doubling time is less than 12 months. LHRH agonists have become the standard care; antiandrogens can be added at the beginning of the LHRH agonist therapy to obtain a complete androgen blockade. Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy has recently proved efficacious and might be more widely used in the future, provided that strict prescription and follow-up recommendations are clearly established.

[Critic analysis of a comparative meta-analysis on the morbidity, functional and carcinologic results after radical prostatectomy according to surgical approach. Work of cancerology committee of the French urological association]. / Analyse critique d'une méta-analyse comparative sur la morbidité, les résultats fonctionnels et carcinologiques de la prostatectomie totale en fonction de la voie d'abord utilisée. Travail du comité de cancérologie de l'AFU.

Surgical approach for radical prostatectomy is even today a subject of debate in the urologic community. Many comparative studies between retropubic and laparoscopic approach (robotic assisted or not) were reported since 10 years without being able to decide between the supporters of retropubic or laparoscopic approach. The committee of cancer research of the French urological association took hold this question after a recent meta-analysis publication on this subject. Although imperfect, this meta-analysis exists and permits to conclude partially on the advantages and the inconveniences supposed for each surgical approach. Regarding morbidity after radical prostatectomy, the only significant difference reported concerns the hemorrhagic risk in favour of the laparoscopic approach. Regarding oncologic results, the only exploitable data concern positive surgical margins rate, which is identical whatever surgical approach. Concerning the functional results, no difference was reported in the literature between different surgical approaches.

[What's new in 2009 in prostate cancer: highlights from ASTRO, EAU, ASCO and AUA meetings]. / Les nouveautés 2009 sur le cancer de la prostate: les points forts de l'ASTRO, l'EAU, l'ASCO et l'AUA.

In 2009, prostate cancer was the subject of a large number of communications in international urologic, oncologic and radiation therapy conferences. The most interesting studies that are likely to modify physician's daily practice were selected. This year the results from the European (ERSPC) and the American (PLCO) mass screening studies. Many abstract on prevention, natural history and tumor markers such as PCa3 and fusion gene TMPRSS2 : ERG were presented. Adjuvant hormonal treatment was evaluated in high-risk patients. Hormonal and radiation therapy association reduces recurrence, specific and overall mortality in locally advanced prostate cancer. Intermittent hormonal treatment is an option in hormone sensitive metastatic patients. toremifene and denosumab were evaluated in the prevention of fracture risk in patients under androgen deprivation therapy. The mechanism of tumor proliferation in castrate resistant prostate cancer further explained and 2 new molecules abiraterone and MDV 3100 were presented.

[Characteristics of prostate cancer in men less than 50-year-old]. / Spécificités du cancer de la prostate avant l'âge de 50 ans.

OBJECTIVE: To report the characteristics of prostate cancer (PCa) in men less than 50-year-old and the results of different treatments of PCa in this population. METHOD: A bibliographic research was performed using Pubmed database. The keywords that we used were: prostate cancer, age, young, radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, radiotherapy, active surveillance. The studies which included a significant number of patients were selected. A total of 38 articles were used as bibliographic references. RESULTS: PCa in young men does not seem to have different characteristics than in older men. Nevertheless, young men seem to have a lower risk of severe urinary and sexual sequelae, particularly following radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There is no recommendation regarding management of PCa in men less than 50-year-old. In case of localized cancer, two options may be considered. First option consists in decreasing the urinary and sexual complications of radical prostatectomy. A minimally-invasive treatment, such as brachytherapy or even active surveillance, may reach this objective. Second option consists in being more aggressive. To propose a radical prostatectomy offers to the patient the possibility of salvage radiation therapy in case of locally-advanced tumor or local recurrence.

[Recommendations for the treatment of prostate cancer in the elderly man: A study by the oncology committee of the French association of urology]. / Recommandations pour la prise en charge du cancer de la prostate chez l'homme âgé : un travail du comité de cancérologie de l'association française d'urologie.

The increase in life expectancy combined with the increase in the global incidence of cancers will probably results in an increase in the number of cancers observed in the elderly. The increase in the incidence of prostate cancers in geriatric patients (45% of prostate cancers are diagnosed after 75 years old) is in sharp contrast with the lack of strong scientific data on the topic. By the meantime, oncogeriatrics has been developing for some years now under the guidance of the International Society of Oncogeriatrics. Such an approach aims at palliating the low quality of care of cancers in geriatric patients. The reasons for the low quality of care come from the characteristics of these patients and from the training of the care providers. The authors recall the principles of oncogeriatric evaluation and the classification of patients as it is actually proposed. They describe the main treatments and their results in the geriatric population and they describe the decision process concerning the choice of the treatment. They also suggest some guidelines on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, evaluation of the patients and the treatments of the disease in the elderly. Prostate cancer is almost the perfect model for oncogeriatrics. Urologists should remain the corner stone of its management, whatever the age of their patient.