Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 312(14): 1429-1437, 2014 10 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25271544

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are prophylactic antibiotic regimens used in intensive care units (ICUs) and associated with improved patient outcome. Controversy exists regarding the relative effects of both measures on patient outcome and antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of SDD and SOD, applied as unit-wide interventions, on antibiotic resistance and patient outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pragmatic, cluster randomized crossover trial comparing 12 months of SOD with 12 months of SDD in 16 Dutch ICUs between August 1, 2009, and February 1, 2013. Patients with an expected length of ICU stay longer than 48 hours were eligible to receive the regimens, and 5881 and 6116 patients were included in the clinical outcome analysis for SOD and SDD, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive care units were randomized to administer either SDD or SOD. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Unit-wide prevalence of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Secondary outcomes were day-28 mortality, ICU-acquired bacteremia, and length of ICU stay. RESULTS: In point-prevalence surveys, prevalences of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria in perianal swabs were significantly lower during SDD compared with SOD; for aminoglycoside resistance, average prevalence was 5.6% (95% CI, 4.6%-6.7%) during SDD and 11.8% (95% CI, 10.3%-13.2%) during SOD (P < .001). During both interventions the prevalence of rectal carriage of aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria increased 7% per month (95% CI, 1%-13%) during SDD (P = .02) and 4% per month (95% CI, 0%-8%) during SOD (P = .046; P = .40 for difference). Day 28-mortality was 25.4% and 24.1% during SOD and SDD, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88-1.06]; P = .42), and there were no statistically significant differences in other outcome parameters or between surgical and nonsurgical patients. Intensive care unit-acquired bacteremia occurred in 5.9% and 4.6% of the patients during SOD and SDD, respectively (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]; P = .002; number needed to treat, 77). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Unit-wide application of SDD and SOD was associated with low levels of antibiotic resistance and no differences in day-28 mortality. Compared with SOD, SDD was associated with lower rectal carriage of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria and ICU-acquired bacteremia but a more pronounced gradual increase in aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nlIdentifier: NTR1780.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Orofaringe/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Estudios Cruzados , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recto/microbiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 154: A1225, 2010.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21262033

RESUMEN

An interdisciplinary workgroup from the National Committee for Practical Tuberculosis Control in the Netherlands has written an evidence-based practice guideline on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV-infected patients with active tuberculosis or latent tuberculosis infection. The diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis are effectively the same in patients with or without an HIV infection. The diagnosis is more complex in a patient with an HIV infection due to the effect of the immunodeficiency on diagnostic parameters. Concomitant treatment of tuberculosis and HIV is complicated by drug interactions and overlapping adverse effects. In patients with tuberculosis and an HIV infection, the tuberculosis is preferably treated before antiretroviral therapy is started. The nurse or nurse practitioner in the organisation where the tuberculosis is diagnosed is responsible for supporting the HIV patient with tuberculosis.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Humanos
4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 153: A1225, 2009.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20482917

RESUMEN

An interdisciplinary workgroup from the National Committee for Practical Tuberculosis Control in the Netherlands has written an evidence-based practice guideline on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV-infected patients with active tuberculosis or latent tuberculosis infection. The diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis are effectively the same in patients with or without an HIV infection. The diagnosis is more complex in a patient with an HIV infection due to the effect of the immunodeficiency on diagnostic parameters. Concomitant treatment of tuberculosis and HIV is complicated by drug interactions and overlapping adverse effects. In patients with tuberculosis and an HIV infection, the tuberculosis is preferably treated before antiretroviral therapy is started. The nurse or nurse practitioner in the organisation where the tuberculosis is diagnosed is responsible for supporting the HIV patient with tuberculosis.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Países Bajos , Sociedades Médicas , Tuberculosis/complicaciones , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA