Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 15: 74, 2015 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25890081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that both coming from a rural background and spending a year-long clinical rotation in our Rural Clinical School (RCS) have independent and additive effects to increase the likelihood of medical students practicing rurally following graduation. The current study assesses the extent to which medical school selection criteria and/or the socio-demographic profile of medical students may further facilitate or hamper the selection of students ultimately destined for the rural medical workforce. METHODS: The study comprised 729 students, admitted from secondary school since 1999 and having graduated by 2011, whose actual workplace location in 2014 was classified as either urban or rural using the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency database. Selection factors on entry (score from a standardised interview, percentile scores for the 3 components of the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT) and prior academic performance as assessed by the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank) together with socio-demographic factors (age, gender, decile for the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD)), were examined in relation to ultimate rural destination of practice. RESULTS: In logistic regression, those practicing in a rural location in 2014 were more likely to have come from the lower 6 IRSAD deciles (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.44, 5.23, P = 0.002), to be older (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.09, 3.18, p = 0.023) and to have a lower UMAT-3 (Non-verbal communication) score (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97, 0.99, P = 0.005). After further controlling for either rural background or RCS participation, only age and UMAT-3 remained as independent predictors of current rural practice. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of the socio-demographic profiles of those selected for medical school entry from secondary school, only older age weakly augmented the selection of graduates likely to ultimately work in a rural destination. Among the selection factors, having achieved higher scores in UMAT-3 tended to mitigate this outcome. The major focus in attempts to grow the rural medical workforce should therefore remain on recruiting medical students from a rural background together with providing maximal opportunity for prolonged immersion in rural clinical environments during their training.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Servicios de Salud Rural , Población Rural , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Urbana , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Pruebas de Aptitud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios Urbanos de Salud , Australia Occidental , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Med Educ ; 15: 55, 2015 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25879715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extended rural clerkships clearly increase the likelihood of rural practice post-graduation. What has not been determined is whether such rural interventions increase the likelihood of graduates practicing in more remote, versus inner regional, locations. METHODS: The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency database was used to identify the current workplace of every graduate of the Medical School of Western Australia, 1980 to 2011. There were 324 graduates working in a primary practice location defined by the Australian Standard Geographical Classification as inner regional to very remote. They were divided into 3 groups - 200 graduates who entered medical school before commencement of the Rural Clinical School of Western Australia (RCSWA), 63 who entered after the RCSWA had started, but not participated in RCSWA, and 61 who participated in the RCSWA. The RCSWA offers a longitudinal rural clinical clerkship throughout level 5 of the MBBS course. RESULTS: The two groups not participating in the RCSWA had 45.5% and 52.4% of subjects in outer regional/very remote locations, respectively. In comparison, 78.7% of those who had participated in the RCSWA were currently practicing in outer regional/very remote locations. When the 3 groups were compared, the significant predictors of working in a more remote practice compared to working in an inner regional area were being female (OR 1.75 95% CI 1.13, 2.72, P = 0.013) and participating in the RCSWA (OR 4.42, 95% CI 2.26, 8.67, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression that corrected for gender and remoteness of rural address before entry to medical school, participation in the RCSWA still predicted a more than 4-fold increase in the odds of practicing in a more remote area (OR 4.11, 95% CI 2.04, 8.30, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Extended rural clinical clerkship during an undergraduate MBBS course is related to a much greater likelihood of practicing in more remote, under-serviced rural locations.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Prácticas Clínicas/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Curriculum , Bases de Datos Factuales , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia Occidental
3.
Med J Aust ; 200(2): 104-7, 2014 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24484114

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether completing a year of the Rural Clinical School of Western Australia (RCSWA) program is associated with entering the rural medical workforce. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study of graduates from the University of Western Australia who completed Year 5 of medical school between 2002 and 2009, comparing work location (identified from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency database in March-June 2013) between those who participated in the RCSWA (RCSWA graduates) and those who did not (controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rural or urban work location of graduates. RESULTS: Of 1116 eligible graduates, 1017 (91.1%) could be traced and were included in the study. Of 258 RCSWA graduates, 42 (16.3%) were working rurally compared with 36 of 759 controls (4.7%). Of 195 RCSWA graduates from urban backgrounds, 29 (14.9%) were working rurally compared with 26 of 691 urban-background controls (3.8%). Of 63 rural-background RCSWA graduates, 13 (20.6%) were working rurally, compared with 10 of 68 rural-background controls (14.7%). Using logistic regression, RCSWA participation had a strong relationship with working rurally (rural-background RCSWA graduates: odds ratio [OR], 7.5; 95% CI, 3.5-15.8; urban-background RCSWA graduates: OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.9-9.1). Rural background without RCSWA participation (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.8-9.2) and older age (age in 2012, 30-39 years: OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7 v ≥ 40 years: OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 2.8-15.0) were also significant factors for working rurally. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in the RCSWA is strongly associated with greater likelihood of working rurally. Graduates from urban backgrounds who participated in the RCSWA were much more likely to work in rural areas than those who did not. These data substantiate the RCSWA as an effective rural workforce strategy.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional , Servicios de Salud Rural , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Australia Occidental , Recursos Humanos
4.
BMC Med Educ ; 14: 218, 2014 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25315743

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recruiting medical students from a rural background, together with offering them opportunities for prolonged immersion in rural clinical training environments, both lead to increased participation in the rural workforce after graduation. We have now assessed the extent to which medical students' intentions to practice rurally may also be predicted by either medical school selection criteria and/or student socio-demographic profiles. METHODS: The study cohort included 538 secondary school-leaver entrants to The University of Western Australia Medical School from 2006 to 2011. On entry they completed a questionnaire indicating intention for either urban or rural practice following graduation. Selection factors (standardised interview score, percentile score from the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT) and prior academic performance (Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank), together with socio-demographic factors (age, gender, decile for the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) and an index of rurality) were examined in relation to intended rural or urban destination of practice. RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression, students from a rural background had a nearly 8-fold increase in the odds of intention to practice rurally after graduation compared to those from urban backgrounds (OR 7.84, 95% CI 4.10, 14.99, P < 0.001). Those intending to be generalists rather than specialists had a more than 4-fold increase in the odds of intention to practice rurally (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.69, 11.22, P < 0.001). After controlling for these 2 factors, those with rural intent had significantly lower academic entry scores (P = 0.002) and marginally lower interview scores (P = 0.045). UMAT percentile scores were no different. Those intending to work in a rural location were also more likely to be female (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.08, 3.48, P = 0.027), to come from the lower eight IRSAD deciles (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.47, 4.32, P = 0.001) and to come from Government vs independent schools (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.15, 3.55, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Very high academic scores generally required for medical school entry may have the unintended consequence of selecting fewer graduates interested in a rural practice destination. Increased efforts to recruit students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may be beneficial in terms of an ultimate intended rural practice destination.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Medicina General/educación , Salud Rural/educación , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Adolescente , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Estudios de Cohortes , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Australia Occidental , Adulto Joven
5.
Med J Aust ; 184(11): 566-70, 2006 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16768664

RESUMEN

General practitioners have a key role in managing patients with bipolar disorder, a condition which affects at least one in 200 Australians each year and is the sixth leading cause of disability in the population. Although diagnosis and treatment of the illness is complex, effective treatment can lead to good outcomes for many patients. GPs can contribute significantly to early recognition of bipolar disorder, avoiding the long delays in accurate diagnosis that have been reported. As in other complex recurrent or persistent illnesses, GPs are well placed to coordinate multidisciplinary "shared care" with specialists and other health care professionals. GPs also provide continuing general medical care for patients with bipolar disorder, and are in a unique position to understand patients' life circumstances and to monitor their progress over time. The last decade has seen many advances in medication for bipolar disorder, including the introduction of new therapies and the refinement of treatment protocols using older medications. There has also been increasing recognition of the contribution of psychological therapies to symptom relief, relapse prevention, optimal function, and quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Urgencias Médicas , Familia , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Humanos , Rol del Médico , Psicoterapia , Recurrencia
6.
Med J Aust ; 181(7): 350-3, 2004 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15462646

RESUMEN

Stress in doctors is a product of the interaction between the demanding nature of their work and their often obsessive, conscientious and committed personalities. In the face of extremely demanding work, a subjective lack of control and insufficient rewards are powerful sources of stress in doctors. If demands continue to rise and adjustments are not made, then inevitably a "correction" will occur, which may take the form of "burnout" or physical and/or mental impairment. Doctors need to reclaim control of their work environment and employers need to recognise the need for doctors to participate in decisions affecting their working lives. All doctors should be aware of predictors of risk and signals of impairment, as well as available avenues of assistance. Relevant medical organisations (eg, the Colleges, hospital administrations, and medical defence organisations) need to develop and rehearse effective response pathways for assisting impaired doctors.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Inhabilitación Médica/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Adulto , Australia , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Selección de Profesión , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Médicos Mujeres/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Carga de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA