Opioid-free Anesthesia Protocol on the Early Quality of Recovery after Major Surgery (SOFA Trial): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-free anesthesia is increasingly being adopted to reduce opioid consumption, but its impact on early postoperative recovery after major surgery has not been evaluated in comparative trials. The hypothesis was that an opioid-free anesthesia protocol would enhance the early quality of recovery for patients undergoing scheduled major surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: The SOFA study was a monocentric, randomized, controlled, assessor- and patient-blinded clinical trial conducted from July 10, 2021, to February 12, 2022. The eligible population included male and female patients undergoing scheduled major surgery, excluding bone procedures, that typically require opioids for postoperative pain management. Patients in the intervention group received a combination of at least two drugs among ketamine, lidocaine, clonidine, and magnesium sulfate, without opioids for anesthesia. The standard group received opioids. The primary outcome was early postoperative quality of recovery, assessed by Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were Quality of Recovery-15 at 48 and 72 h after surgery, incidence of chronic pain, and quality of life at 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 136 randomized patients, 135 were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 45.9 ± 15.7 yr; 116 females [87.2%]; 85 underwent major plastic surgery [63.9%]), with 67 patients in the opioid-free anesthesia group and 68 in the standard group. The mean Quality of Recovery-15 at 24 h was 114.9 ± 15.2 in the opioid-free anesthesia group versus 108.7 ± 18.1 in the standard group (difference, 6.2; 95% CI, 0.4 to 12.0; P = 0.026). Quality of Recovery-15 scores also differed significantly at 48 h (difference, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.9 to 14.5; P = 0.004) and at 72 h (difference, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 13.0; P = 0.013). There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. No major adverse events were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: The opioid-free anesthesia protocol improved quality of recovery after major elective surgery in a statistically but not clinically significant manner when compared to standard anesthesia.

Arterial hypotension "magnitude" and neurological outcome during mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO), but unfavorable outcomes remain common. Procedural arterial hypotension is associated with poor patient outcome. This study aimed to assess the impact of arterial hypotension "magnitude" (a combination of the depth, defined as the percentage relative to baseline arterial blood pressure, and the duration of hypotensive episodes)" during MT on neurological outcome. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective study. Charts were reviewed between January 2018 and June 2021. "Patients were eligible if they were 18 years or older, anterior LVO was diagnosed on cerebral imaging" and MT performed under general anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded every 5 minutes throughout the procedure, and the arterial hypotension "magnitude" was estimated by the area under the curve (AUC) for different thresholds of MAP drops. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. MAIN RESULTS: Among the 117 patients analyzed, 46% had poor neurological outcome. Our study showed correlations between poor outcome and a greater procedural AUC of arterial hypotension for the different thresholds: 5% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.30; P = 0.007), 10% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.30; P = 0.008), 15% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.30; P = 0.011), 20% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.30; P = 0.010) and 30% (k 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.31; P = 0.010). This association persisted after controlling for age, baseline NIHSS score, and ASPECT score. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of hypotension during MT under general anesthesia for AIS is an independent factor of poor outcome at 90 days. These associations have been observed in patients with mild and severe hypotensive episodes.

Postoperative prophylactic intermittent noninvasive ventilation versus usual postoperative care for patients at high risk of pulmonary complications: a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in preventing postoperative acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This is an open, multicentre randomised trial that included patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after elective or semi-urgent surgery with an Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score ≥45. Patients were randomly assigned to intermittent prophylactic face-mask NIV for 6-8 h day-1 or usual postoperative care. The primary outcome was in-hospital acute respiratory failure within 7 days after surgery. Patients who underwent surgery and postoperative extubation were included in the modified intended-to-treat analysis. Results are presented as n (%) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Between November 2017 and October 2019, 266 patients were randomised and 253 included in the main analysis. Of these, 203 (80.2%) were male with a mean age of 68 (11) yr and an ARISCAT score of 53 (6); 237 subjects (93.7%) underwent cardiac or thoracic surgery. There were 125 patients allocated to prophylactic NIV and 128 to usual care. Unplanned treatment termination occurred in 58 subjects in the NIV group, which was linked to NIV discomfort for 36 subjects. There was no difference in the incidence of the primary outcome of postoperative acute respiratory failure between treatment groups (NIV: 30 of 125 subjects [24.0%] vs usual care: 35 of 128 subjects [27.3%]; OR 0.97 [0.90-1.04]; P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic NIV was difficult to implement after high-risk surgery because of low patient compliance. Prophylactic NIV did not prevent acute respiratory failure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03629431 and EudraCT 2017-001011-36.

Objective structured clinical examination versus traditional written examinations: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) became an official evaluation modality for 6-year medical students in France. Before, standard examination modalities were: written progressive clinical cases (PCC), written critical reading of scientific articles (CRA), and internship evaluation (IE). The aim of this study was to assess the performances of 6-year medical students in their final faculty tests by comparing OSCE-exams with standard examination modalities. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. We included all 6-year medical students in our university from 2020 to 2021. The endpoints were the scores obtained at the following final faculty tests during the 6th year of medical studies: OSCE-training, OSCE-exams, written PCC, written CRA, and IE. All scores were compared in a paired-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 400 students were included in the study. No student was excluded in the final analysis. The mean scores obtained at the OSCE-exams were significantly different from those obtained at OSCE-training, PCC, CRA, and IE (12.6 ± 1.7, 11.7 ± 1.7, 13.4 ± 1.4, 13.2 ± 1.5, 14.7 ± 0.9, respectively; p < 0.001). OSCE-exams scores were moderately and significantly correlated with OSCE-training and PCC (Spearman rho coefficient = 0.4, p < 0.001); OSCE examination scores were lowly but significantly correlated with CRA and IE (Spearman rho coefficient = 0.3, p < 0.001). OSCE-scores significantly increased after an OSCE training session. CONCLUSION: In our faculty, 6-year medical students obtained lower scores at OSCE exams compared to other standard evaluation modalities. The correlation was weak to moderate but significant. These results suggest that OSCE are not redundant with the other evaluation modalities. Interestingly, a single OSCE training session led to an improvement in OSCE scores underlining the importance of a specific training.

Risk Factors and Consequences of Late-Onset Hyperlactatemia After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanisms and consequences of late-onset hyperlactatemia after cardiac surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and outcomes of late hyperlactatemia, defined as a lactate value ≥3 mmol/L developing in the intensive care unit (ICU) after not being elevated on admission after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: A single-center University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in 2019 and who had normal lactatemia at ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were divided in 2 groups according to their lactatemia on postoperative day 1 (14.0 ± 3.0 hours after ICU admission): normal lactatemia (control group) and late hyperlactatemia (HL group). Risk factors for late hyperlactatemia were identified using a multivariate analysis, and postoperative outcomes were compared using a composite criterion of severe outcomes. Of the 432 included patients, 37 (8.5%) presented with late hyperlactatemia. Risk factors independently associated with hyperlactatemia were afternoon surgery (odds ratio [OR] 4.24, 95% CI 2.00-9.35), a bleeding >300 mL within the 6 hours after surgery (H6) (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.71-8.30), and H6 fluid loading >250 mL (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.22-5.55). Patients with hyperlactatemia presented more frequently with major postoperative complications, including acute kidney injury, and received more frequent red-cell transfusion. CONCLUSION: The strongest risk factors associated with late-onset hyperlactatemia in the authors' population were afternoon surgery and H6 bleeding >300 mL. Poor postoperative outcomes were more frequent in patients with late hyperlactatemia, even in the absence of early hyperlactatemia or severe obvious condition.

High-Fidelity Simulation Nurse Training Reduces Unplanned Interruption of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Sessions in Critically Ill Patients: The SimHeR Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is common, unplanned interruptions (UI) often limit its usefulness. In many units, nurses are responsible for CRRT management. We hypothesized that a nurse training program based on high-fidelity simulation would reduce the rate of interrupted sessions. METHODS: We performed a 2-phase (training and evaluation), randomized, single-center, open study: During the training phase, intensive care unit nurses underwent a 6-hour training program and were randomized to receive (intervention) or not (control) an additional high-fidelity simulation training (6 hours). During the evaluation phase, management of CRRT sessions was randomized to either intervention or control nurses. Sessions were defined as UI if they were interrupted and the interruption was not prescribed in writing more than 3 hours before. RESULTS: Study nurses had experience with hemodialysis, but no experience with CRRT before training. Intervention nurses had higher scores than control nurses on the knowledge tests (grade, median [Q1-Q3], 14 [10.5-15] vs 11 [10-12]/20; P = .044). During a 13-month period, 106 sessions were randomized (n = 53/group) among 50 patients (mean age 70 ± 13 years, mean simplified acute physiology II score 69 [54-96]). Twenty-one sessions were not analyzed (4 were not performed and 17 patients died during sessions). Among the 42 intervention and 43 control sessions analyzed, 25 (59%) and 38 (88%) were labeled as UI (relative risk [95% CI], 0.67 [0.51-0.88]; P = .002). Intervention nurses required help significantly less frequently (0 [0-1] vs 3 [1-4] times/session; P < .0001). The 2 factors associated with UI in multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.81 [0.65-99]; P = .047) and the intervention group (odds ratio, 0.19 [0.05-0.73]; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity simulation nurse training reduced the rate of UI of CRRT sessions and the need for nurses to request assistance. This intervention may be particularly useful in the context of frequent nursing staff turnover.

Patient Blood Management in Major Orthopedic Surgery: Less Erythropoietin and More Iron?

Erythropoietin (EPO) is proposed preoperatively to reduce blood transfusion in anemic patients (hemoglobin < 13 g/dL) scheduled for a major orthopedic surgery. New intravenous iron formulations allow infusion of higher doses, increasing EPO response. In that context, we evaluated in a before-after study (n = 62 and 65 patients for each period) a new EPO administration protocol (2 injections 4 and 3 weeks before surgery, and a third if hemoglobin <13 g/dL instead of <15 g/dL 2 weeks before surgery). After this protocol implementation, the mean (standard deviation) number of EPO injections decreased from 2.8 (0.5) to 2.2 (0.4)/patient (P < .0001) without changing transfusion rates (3% in the 2 periods).

Does IV Iron Induce Plasma Oxidative Stress in Critically Ill Patients? A Comparison With Healthy Volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oxidative stress induced by IV iron infusion in critically ill patients and in healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Multicenter, interventional study. SETTING: Two ICUs and one clinical research center. SUBJECTS: Anemic critically ill patients treated with IV iron and healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: IV infusion of 100 mg of iron sucrose. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-eight anemic patients (hemoglobin, median [interquartile range] = 8.4 g/dL [7.7-9.2]) (men, 25 [66%]; aged 68 yr [48-77]; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, 48.5 [39-59]) and 39 healthy volunteers (men, 18 [46%]; aged 42.1 yr [29-50]) were included. Blood samples were drawn before (H0) and 2, 6, and 24 hours (H2, H6, and H24) after a 60-minute iron infusion for the determination of nontransferrin bound iron, markers of lipid peroxidation-8α-isoprostanes, protein oxidation-advanced oxidized protein product, and glutathione reduced/oxidized. Iron infusion had no effect on hemodynamic parameter in patients and volunteers. At baseline, patients had much higher interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and hepcidin levels. 8α-isoprostanes was also higher in patients at baseline (8.5 pmol/L [6.5-12.9] vs 4.6 pmol/L [3.5-5.5]), but the area under the curve above baseline from H0 to H6 was not different (p = 0.38). Neither was it for advanced oxidized protein product and nontransferrin bound iron. The area under the curve above baseline from H0 to H6 (glutathione reduced/oxidized) was lower in volunteers (p = 0.009). Eight patients had a second set of dosages (after the fourth iron infusion), showing higher increase in 8α-isoprostanes. CONCLUSIONS: In our observation, IV iron infusion does not induce more nontransferrin bound iron, lipid, or protein oxidation in patients compared with volunteers, despite higher inflammation, oxidative stress, and hepcidin levels and lower antioxidant at baseline. In contrary, iron induces a greater decrease in antioxidant, compatible with higher oxidative stress in volunteers than in critically ill patients.

Implementing a blood management protocol during the entire perioperative period allows a reduction in transfusion rate in major orthopedic surgery: a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: Patient blood management (PBM) must be promoted in orthopedic surgery and relies on different strategies implemented during the entire perioperative period. Our aim was to assess whether the introduction of a pre-, intra-, and postoperative PBM protocol combining erythropoietin (EPO), ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), and tranexamic acid was effective in reducing perioperative transfusion and postoperative anemia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a two-phase prospective observational study, all patients admitted for total hip or knee arthroplasty were included the day before surgery. In Phase 1, use of EPO, iron, and tranexamic acid was left to the discretion of the anesthesiologists. In Phase 2, a protocol combining these treatments was implemented in the perioperative period. Perioperative hemoglobin levels and transfusion rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients were included (184 and 183 in Phase 1 and 2, respectively). During Phase 2, implementing a PBM protocol allowed an increase in preoperative EPO prescription in targeted patients (i.e., with Hb < 13 g/dL; 18 [38%] vs. 34 [62%], p = 0.03) and in postoperative use of intravenous iron (12 [6%] vs. 32 [18%], p = 0.001) and tranexamic acid (157 [86%] vs. 171 [94%] patients, p = 0.02). In Phase 2, the number of patients who received transfusions (24 [13%] vs. 5 [3%], p = 0.0003) and of patients with a Hb level of less than 10 g/dL at discharge (46 [25%] vs. 26 [14%], p = 0.01) were reduced. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a PBM protocol, using EPO, FCM, and tranexamic acid, reduces the number of perioperative transfusions and of patients with a Hb level of less than 10 g/dL at discharge.

Iron is essential for living!

Iron as an element is a double-edged sword, essential for living but also potentially toxic through the generation of oxidative stress. The recent study by Chen and colleagues in Critical Care reminds us of this elegantly. In a mouse model of acute lung injury, they showed that silencing hepcidin (the master regulator of iron metabolism) locally in airway epithelial cells aggravates lung injury by increasing the release of iron from alveolar macrophages, which in turn enhances pulmonary bacterial growth and reduces the macrophages' killing properties. This work underscores that hepcidin acts not only systematically (as a hormone) but also locally for iron metabolism regulation. This opens areas of research for sepsis treatment but also for iron deficiency or anaemia treatment, since the local and systemic iron regulation appear to be independent.

A Case Report of Pulmonary Embolectomy Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Patient with Intracranial Hemorrhage and History of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Pulmonary embolism is a common complication after intracranial hemorrhage. As thrombolysis is contraindicated in this situation, surgical pulmonary embolectomy may be indicated in case of high-risk pulmonary embolism but requires transient anticoagulation with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass. We report the case of a patient with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented with a high-risk pulmonary embolism 10 days after the spontaneous onset of a voluminous intracerebral hematoma. Despite high doses of heparin required to run the cardiopulmonary bypass and subsequent anticoagulation by danaparoid sodium, the brain hematoma remained stable and the patient was discharged without complications 30 days after surgery.

Preoperative endothelial dysfunction for the prediction of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot study based on a second analysis of the MONS study.

BACKGROUND: Up to 42% of patients develop acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between preoperative microcirculatory function and postoperative AKI after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: The prospective observational cohort MONS enrolled 60 patients scheduled for valvular (n = 30, 50%) or coronary (n = 30, 50%) surgery using CPB. Preoperative microcirculation was assessed during preoperative consultation from January 2019 to April 2019 at the University Hospital of Angers, France, using endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent reactivity tests on the forearm (iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), respectively). Skin blood flow was measured by laser speckle contrast imaging. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of AKI according to the KDIGO classification during the hospital stay. RESULTS: Forty-three (71.7%) patients developed AKI during the in-hospital follow-up, and 15 (25%) were classified as KDIGO stage 1, 20 (33%) KDIGO stage 2, and 8 (13%) KDIGO stage 3. Regarding preoperative microcirculation, a higher peak amplitude of vasodilation in response to iontophoresis of ACh was found in patients with postoperative occurrence of AKI (35 [20-49] vs 23 [9-44] LSPU, p = 0.04). Iontophoresis of SNP was not significantly different according to AKI occurrence (34 [22-49] vs 36 [20-50] LSPU, p = 0.95). In a multivariable model, the preoperative peak amplitude at iontophoresis of ACh was independently associated with postoperative AKI (OR 1.045 [1.001-1.092], p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative peak amplitude of endothelium-dependent vasodilation is independently associated with the postoperative occurrence of AKI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical-Trials.gov, NCT03631797. Registered 15 August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03631797.

Quality of life of patients with hip fracture was better during the COVID-19 period than before, an ancillary study from the HiFIT multicenter study.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a global impact on people life, notably because of lockdown periods. This could particularly affected patients suffering from hip fracture, who could have been more isolated during these periods. We aim at evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 period (including lockdown periods) on quality of life (QOL) in older adult patients 90 days after a surgery for a hip fracture. Subject and methods: Ancillary study of the prospective randomized controlled HiFIT study. We compared the QOL measured at 90 days after a hip fracture surgery using the EuroQOL-5 dimensions 3 levels (EQ-5D), the Perceived Quality of life (PQOL) and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in patients included in the Hifit study before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The characteristics of the 161 patients included before and of the 213 included during the COVID period (including 122 (57%) during COVID with containment periods and 91 (43%) during COVID without containment periods) were similar (mean age 84 ± 10 years; 282 (75%) women). The majority (81%) of the patients alive at 90 days had returned to their previous place of residence in both periods. During the COVID period, EQ-5D showed better patient pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression levels. The PQOL happiness was not different, with around 81% of the patient being "happy" or "very happy" during the two periods and the IADL was also similar during the two periods. In the multivariate analysis odd ratios of having poorer outcomes were increased before COVID for pain/discomfort (OR 2.38, 95%CI [1.41-4.15], p = 0.001), anxiety (OR 1.89 [1.12-3.21], p = 0.017) and mobility (1.69 [1.02-2.86], p = 0.044). Conclusion: Patient's quality of life measured using different scales was not altered during the COVID period compared to before COVID, 90 days after a hip fracture. Surprisingly, the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety dimensions of the EQ-5D questionnaires were even better during the COVID period.Clinical trial registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT02972294).

Perioperative Patient Blood Management (excluding obstetrics): Guidelines from the French National Authority for Health.

The French National Authority for Health (HAS) recently issued guidelines for patient blood management (PBM) in surgical procedures. These recommendations are based on three usual pillars of PBM: optimizing red cell mass, minimizing blood loss and optimizing anemia tolerance. In the preoperative period, these guidelines recommend detecting anemia and iron deficiency and taking corrective measures well in advance of surgery, when possible, in case of surgery with moderate to high bleeding risk or known preoperative anemia. In the intraoperative period, the use of tranexamic acid and some surgical techniques are recommended to limit bleeding in case of high bleeding risk or in case of hemorrhage, and the use of cell salvage is recommended in some surgeries with a major risk of transfusion. In the postoperative period, the limitation of blood samples is recommended but the monitoring of postoperative anemia must be carried out and may lead to corrective measures (intravenous iron in particular) or more precise diagnostic assessment of this anemia. A "restrictive" transfusion threshold considering comorbidities and, most importantly, the tolerance of the patient is recommended postoperatively. The implementation of a strategy and a program for patient blood management is recommended throughout the perioperative period in healthcare establishments in order to reduce blood transfusion and length of stay. This article presents an English translation of the HAS recommendations and a summary of the rationale underlying these recommendations.

Preoperative ketamine administration for prevention of postoperative neurocognitive disorders after major orthopedic surgery in elderly patients: A multicenter randomized blinded placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preventive anesthetic impact on the high rates of postoperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients is debated. The Prevention of postOperative Cognitive dysfunction by Ketamine (POCK) study aimed to assess the effect of ketamine on this condition. METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, interventional study. Patients ≥60 years undergoing major orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive preoperative ketamine 0.5 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus (n = 152) or placebo (n = 149) in random blocks stratified according to the study site, preoperative cognitive status and age. The primary outcome was the proportion of objective delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNR) defined as a decline of one or more neuropsychological assessment standard deviations on postoperative day 7. Secondary outcomes included a three-month incidence of objective postoperative neurocognitive disorder (POND), as well as delirium, anxiety, and symptoms of depression seven days and three months after surgery. RESULTS: Among 301 patients included, 292 (97%) completed the trial. Objective dNR occurred in 50 (38.8%) patients in the ketamine group and 54 (40.9%) patients in the placebo group (OR [95% CI] 0.92 [0.56; 1.51], p = 0.73) on postoperative day 7. Incidence of objective POND three months after surgery did not differ significantly between the two groups nor did incidence of delirium, anxiety, apathy, and fatigue. Symptoms of depression were less frequent in the ketamine group three months after surgery (OR [95% CI] 0.34 [0.13-0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: A single preoperative bolus of intravenous ketamine does not prevent the occurrence of dNR or POND in elderly patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02892916).

Impact of the presence of a humanoid robot in the anesthesia visit waiting room on patient's satisfaction: the PEPPER before-after study.

BACKGROUND: The quality of information during a medical visit, such as a preoperative anesthesia visit, impacts patient's satisfaction. New digital supports, including humanoid robots, have been recently proposed to provide medical information to patients. We aimed to assess whether the presence of a PEPPER humanoid robot, programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery and placed in the waiting room for a preoperative anesthesia visit, can improve patient overall satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, before-after study. French-speaking adult patient global satisfaction (rated from 0 to 10) was measured after a scheduled preoperative anesthesia visit (for orthopedic, abdominal, urologic surgeries or for endoscopy), by direct interview with a research person, before modification of usual practices (information leaflets and brochure were given to the patients prior to the visit), and after the implementation in the waiting room of a PEPPER humanoid robot programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery through short videos, designed by a group of healthcare workers and patients. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients (237 [80%] ASA I-II) were included, 179 before and 117 after periods. Patient global satisfaction was not different (8.9±1.6 vs. 9.0±1.4/10, for before and after periods, P=0.53). However, the satisfaction on the information about risks was significantly improved in the after period (8.5±2.3 vs. 9.1±1.4/10, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a humanoid PEPPER robot in the waiting room did not improve patient's global satisfaction about anesthesia visit.