Patient Handoff Practices at the Epilepsy Centers in the United States: A Survey of the Medical Directors.

PURPOSE: Communication failure is one of the most significant causes of medical errors. Providing care to patients with seizures at comprehensive epilepsy centers requires uninterrupted coverage and a multidisciplinary approach. However, handoff practices in these settings have not been comprehensively assessed, and recommendations for their standardization are currently lacking. The aim of this observational study was to define the scope of existing practices for patient handoffs across epilepsy centers in the United States and provide relevant recommendations. METHODS: A 79-question survey was developed to establish the patterns of transition of care for patients undergoing continuous EEG recording, including the periodicity of handoffs and specifics of the relevant workflow. With permission from the National Association of Epilepsy Centers (NAEC), the survey was distributed to the medical directors of all Level 3 and 4 NAEC-accredited epilepsy centers in the United States. RESULTS: The responses were obtained from 70 institutions yielding a survey response rate of 26%. Of these, more than 77% had established weekly handoff processes for both the epilepsy monitoring unit and continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring services. However, only 53% and 43% of centers had procedures for daily service transfers for the patients admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit or the patients undergoing cEEG, respectively. The patterns of handoffs were complex and utilized group handoffs in < 50% of institutions. In most centers (>70%), patient data transmitted through handoffs included history, clinical information, and EEG findings. However, templates were not applied to standardize this information. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that a culture of patient safety was maintained in their place of practice; however, 12% of participants felt that insufficient time was allowed to discuss these patients or carry out the handoffs without interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: Existing handoff practices are not uniform or fully established across epilepsy centers in the United States. This study recommends that guidelines for formal handoff procedures be developed and introduced as a quality metric for all NAEC-accredited epilepsy centers.

Revisiting EEG as part of the multidisciplinary approach to post-cardiac arrest care and prognostication: A review.

Since the 1960s, EEG has been used to assess the neurologic function of patients in the hours and days after cardiac arrest. Accurate and reliable prognostication after cardiac arrest is vital for tailoring aggressive patient care for those with a high likelihood of recovery and setting appropriate goals of care for those who have a high likelihood of a poor outcome. Attempts to define EEG's role in this process has evolved over the years. In this review, we provide important historical context about EEG's use, it's perceived unreliability in the post-cardiac arrest patient in the past and provide a detailed analysis of how this role has changed recently. A review of the 71 most recent and highest quality studies demonstrates that the introduction of a uniform classification and a timed approach to EEG analysis have positioned EEG as a complementary tool in the multimodal approach for prognostication. The review was created and intended for medical staff in the intensive care units and emphasizes EEG patterns and timing which portend both favorable and poor prognoses. Also, the review addresses the overall quality of the existing studies and discusses future directions to address the knowledge gaps in this field.

Safe Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring During Posterior Spinal Fusion in a Patient With Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants are generally considered a contraindication for any procedure requiring electrical stimulation near the implant. We present a case of a patient undergoing intraoperative transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring with a cochlear implant without adverse outcomes. PATIENT: A 12-year-old girl with a history of VACTERL presented with worsening congenital kyphosis and bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. Since age 7 the patient used a cochlear implant in the right ear and hearing aid in the left ear. Physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in 2016 revealed a left-sided 66-degree thoracolumbar kyphosis at T11 making the patient a candidate for surgical correction. INTERVENTIONS: She underwent a posterior spinal fusion surgery, performed with intraoperative transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring. Steps were taken to mitigate electrical stimulation of the patient's cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative impedance of individual channels, audiometry, and neural response testing were compared with preoperative measurements. RESULTS: Significant (>10%) impedance changes were observed postoperatively in channels 1, 2, 4, and 6; however, the net variation across all the channels was low (3%). The patient reported no hearing changes, and no significant changes in hearing threshold were seen in postoperative audiometric testing or neural response testing. CONCLUSION: We present a case of successful posterior spinal fusion with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring via transcranial electrical stimulation, in a patient with a cochlear implant. With proper precautions, motor-evoked potential monitoring can be safely performed in a patient with a cochlear implant.