A Novel Macroglossia Severity Index for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE/ SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: We propose the first classification scheme for macroglossia in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS), the BWS Index of macroGlossia (BIG). METHODS: Patients with molecularly confirmed BWS seen from 2004-2023 were included to develop this system. Relationships among BIG scores, tongue reduction surgery, BWS clinical score, percent mosaicism, and polysomnography findings were examined. RESULTS: Patients were classified from BIG0 to BIG3. BIG0 includes those without macroglossia; BIG1 includes those with macroglossia not protruding beyond the teeth/alveolus; BIG2 includes those with tongue protrusion past the teeth/alveolus to the lips but that can be contained within the mouth; and BIG3 includes those with tongues that protrude beyond the teeth/alveolus and lips but that cannot be closed within the mouth. Of the 459 patients with molecularly confirmed BWS, 266 (58.0%) patients were scored. One hundred and eleven (41.7%) were BIG0, 44 (16.5%) were BIG1, 90 (33.8%) were BIG2, and 21 (7.9%) were BIG3. As scores increased, patients had an increased incidence of tongue reduction surgery (BIG0: 0% versus BIG1: 20.5% versus BIG2: 51.1% versus BIG3: 100%; r=0.66, P <0.01). Higher BIG scores were associated with elevated BWS clinical scores (r=0.68, P <0.01) and increased tissue mosaicism (r=0.50, P <0.01) as well as trends towards worse obstructive apnea-hypopnea indices (r=0.29, P =0.02) and lower SpO 2 nadirs (r=-0.29, P =0.02). CONCLUSION: In this large series of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome, increased BIG score correlates with undergoing tongue reduction surgery and increased phenotypic severity. Adoption of the BIG scoring system may facilitate communication and risk stratification across institutions.

Early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis changes the syndromic craniosynostosis treatment paradigm: long-term outcomes of a 23-year cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Early surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis varies widely between centers, with patients typically undergoing multiple intracranial procedures through childhood. This study evaluates the long-term impact of early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) versus conventional treatment paradigms on the number and timing of subsequent craniofacial procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinal operative patterns of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated from 2000 to 2023 with greater than five years of follow-up. Outcomes of patients who underwent early PVDO and conventional vault reconstruction were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria (30 PVDO and 25 conventional). Age at initial vault surgery was similar between the PVDO and conventional cohorts (7.6 vs. 8.8 months), as were baseline craniometrics (p > 0.05). Multiple fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) procedures were performed in only 1/30 (3%) PVDO-treated patient versus 12/25 (48%) conventionally-treated patients (p < 0.001). Twelve (40%) PVDO-treated patients did not undergo FOA at all. Among patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes, fewer PVDO-treated patients required FOA prior to midface surgery (33% vs. 92%, p = 0.004) or repeat FOA (6% vs. 50%, p = 0.005) compared to conventionally-treated patients. Among patients with Muenke and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes, a similar proportion of patients required FOA in the PVDO and conventional cohorts (91% vs. 100%, p = 0.353), though no PVDO-treated patients required repeat FOA (0% vs. 44%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Early PVDO is associated with a reduction in the high burden of both FOA and, critically, revisionary frontal procedures which are commonly seen in conventionally-treated patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Long-term sequelae of normocephalic pansynostosis: a rare but insidious entity.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with normocephalic pansynostosis, who have a grossly normal head shape, are often overlooked early in life and present late with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) requiring timely cranial vault expansion. This study evaluates the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with normocephalic pansynostosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of primary pansynostosis who underwent vault reconstruction between 2000 and 2023. Clinical and treatment course after craniofacial interventions was followed in patients with normocephaly to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with primary pansynostosis were identified, of which eight (23.5%) had normocephaly and underwent initial vault expansion at a mean age of 5.0 ± 2.4 years. All eight patients (50.0% male) presented with symptoms of elevated ICP including headaches (50.0%), nausea and vomiting (50.0%), and developmental delay (62.5%) and/or signs of elevated ICP including papilledema (75.0%) and radiologic thumbprinting on head computed tomography scan (87.5%). Three of the four normocephalic patients who had over 7 years of postoperative follow-up developed subjective headaches, vision changes, or learning and behavioral issues in the long-term despite successful vault reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our longitudinal experience with this rare but insidious entity demonstrates the importance of timely intervention and frequent postoperative monitoring, which are critical to limiting long-term neurological sequelae. Multidisciplinary care by craniofacial surgery, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, and neuropsychology with follow-up into adolescence are recommended to assess for possible recurrence of elevated ICP secondary to cranio-cerebral disproportion.

Vaulting further: cranial vault expansion for craniocerebral disproportion without primary craniosynostosis.

PURPOSE: Treatment of subjects with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) or shunted hydrocephalus with chronic shunt complications is challenging. What is the role for cranial vault expansion, particularly utilizing posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO), in these cases? This study assesses medium-term efficacy of cranial vault expansion in this unique patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent cranial vault expansion from 2008 to 2023 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Subjects who did not have a diagnosis of primary craniosynostosis were included in the study. Demographic information, medical history, and perioperative details were collected from medical records. Primary outcomes were the rate of CSF diversion procedures and resolution of presenting signs and symptoms. Secondary outcomes were perioperative and 90-day complications and reoperation requirement. RESULTS: Among 13 included subjects, nine (69.2%) patients had a primary diagnosis of shunted hydrocephalus and 4 (30.8%) patients had IIH. Twelve (92.3%) subjects underwent posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) and one (7.7%) underwent posterior vault remodeling (PVR). All 4 patients with IIH demonstrated symptomatic improvement following PVDO, including resolution of headaches, vomiting, and/or papilledema. Among 9 patients with shunted hydrocephalus, CSF diversion requirement decreased from 2.7 ± 1.6 procedures per year preoperatively to 1.2 ± 1.8 per year following cranial vault expansion (p = 0.030). The mean postoperative follow-up was 4.1 ± 2.1 years and four (30.8%) patients experienced complications within 90 days of surgery, including infection (n = 2), CSF leak (n = 1), and elevated ICP requiring lumbar puncture (n = 1). Four (30.8%) patients underwent repeat cranial vault expansion for recurrence of ICP-related symptoms. At most recent follow-up, 7 of 9 patients with shunted hydrocephalus demonstrated symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Cranial vault expansion reduced intracranial hypertension-related symptomology as well as the rate of CSF diversion-related procedures in patients with refractory IIH and shunted hydrocephalus without craniosynostosis, and should be considered in those who have significant shunt morbidity.

Management of Human Bites in a Rural Kenyan Setting: A Plastic Surgeon's 8-Year Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of human bites is a common issue facing healthcare practitioners in the developing countries of Sub-Saharan Africa where it has been noted as a growing public health concern. Generally, the desired outcomes from surgical management are healing, function, and aesthetics. We share our 8-year experience at Kapsowar Hospital in Kenya with the presentation, management, and outcome of human bites. We are uniquely situated to do so given the prevalence of human biting in our community and the full-time presence of a plastic surgeon at our institution. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to present human bite surgical management by a plastic surgeon certified by the American Board of Surgery working full-time on the African continent. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who presented to the operating theater at Kapsowar Hospital with a human bite between 2013-2021. After identification of eligible patients, charts were reviewed assessing parameters including age, gender, timing from injury to presentation at hospital, localization of bite, severity of facial wounds using Lackmann's classification, surgical procedure(s), postoperative complications, surgical revisions, antibiotics administered, and circumstance of incident. Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0.0.0. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were identified. Seventeen (38.6%) were female and 27 (61.4%) were male. Thirty-one patients had facial bites and 13 patients had bites to other parts of the body. Of facial bites, 70.3% resulted in amputation of the affected part while 29.7% were lacerations. Using Lackmann's classification for facial bite severity, IIIA bites (complete avulsion) were most common for both males (9) and females (7). Females comprised 68.4% of total lip bite victims. Bites to the extremity were associated with late presentation and infection. We report a salvage rate of 85.7% for infected digits. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with most other studies on human bites, our patient population presents with a higher rate of avulsive lip injuries, most commonly among women. Our postoperative infection rate is lower than many others reported in the literature. Satisfactory cosmetic outcome with low risk of infection can be achieved by following well-established principles of wound healing and tension-free closure.

Clinical practice guidelines in the management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion: a systematic evaluation using the AGREE II instrument.

PURPOSE: Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been produced to optimize the diagnosis and management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion. However, to date there have been no critical evaluations of their methodological rigor or quality. Herein, we address this need via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. METHODS: A literature search of Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Scopus was performed up until February 25, 2021. Identified CPGs were then assessed by four independent reviewers trained in AGREE II. A scaled domain score of >60% was indicated as satisfactory quality. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-reviewer agreement. RESULTS: 11 guidelines were assessed with only one being classified as high quality and others being either average (two) or low quality (eight). Domain 4 (clarity of presentation) achieved the highest mean score (66.41 ± 13.33%), while domain 5 (applicability) achieved the lowest score (10.80 ± 10.37%). ICC analysis revealed generally strong agreement between reviewers with a range of 0.60-0.98. CONCLUSION: Quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument suggests that the methodologic rigor and quality of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion need significant improvement.

The Pattern and Profile of Orofacial Clefts in Somaliland: A Review of 40 Consecutive Cleft Lip and Palate Surgical Camps.

INTRODUCTION: Somaliland is an autonomously run country that is not internationally recognized. As such, it has been largely excluded by global health development programs despite being the world's fourth poorest country. The purpose of this study was to provide the first known description of the pattern and clinical profile of patients with cleft lip and palate from this nation. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review on all patients who received cleft lip and palate repair by a single surgeon in 40 separate surgical camps at Edna Adan University Hospital in Hargeisa, Somaliland, between 2011 and 2024. Information regarding patient age, sex, cleft etiology, surgical management, and home location was retrieved. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 767 patients (495 male, 64.5%) received 787 surgical procedures. The average age of primary surgery was 73.7 months. The most common chief complaint was left cleft lip with cleft palate (316, 41.2%). Males received primary surgery 19.2 months later than did females (73.7 and 54.6 mo, respectively, P<0.001). Patients residing in Hargeisa received their initial procedure an average of 17.8 months younger than those who lived elsewhere in Somaliland (62.9 and 80.7 mo, respectively, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this severely economically depressed region, patients received treatment at ages that lagged far beyond recommended guidelines. Our finding of earlier treatment for females than males is rare in the literature and likely relates to cultural sex expectations. Patients from rural locations were especially vulnerable to receiving delayed treatment. Further efforts to decrease the burden of craniofacial deformities in Somaliland should be pursued in earnest.

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Reveals High Rates of Suicidality in 602 Patients With Cleft and Craniofacial Conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about rates of suicidal ideation and behavior among youth with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) and other craniofacial conditions. METHODS: Records of patients ages 6 and older who were administered the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Lifetime Version during routine multidisciplinary cleft or craniofacial team visits between 2019 and 2023 were examined. Demographics information, C-SSRS data, and diagnoses were assessed with statistics including t tests, the Fisher exact test, and odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 1140 C-SSRS questionnaires across 602 (433 CLP and 169 craniofacial) patients with an average age of 11.2±3.7 years were included. Eighty-four (13.6%) patients endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, 9 (1.5%) had at least one instance of suicidal behavior, 30 (5.0%) endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury, and 2 (0.3%) engaged in self-injurious behavior. Compared with CLP, those with other craniofacial conditions had similar odds of endorsing suicidal ideation and behavior (P≥0.05). Compared with those with isolated cleft palates, CLP had greater odds of endorsing suicidal ideation and behavior, though those differences were not significant (P≥0.05). Incidence of suicidality was unchanged before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic (P≥0.05). Dividing patients by sex or insurance type revealed no difference in suicidality (P≥0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with CLP and craniofacial conditions have a high incidence of suicidal ideation and behavior, though levels are similar between these groups. Suicidality in these patients was not negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Early identification of safety risks and psychosocial challenges through regular screening can facilitate connection with appropriate clinical interventions.

Validating the Supraorbital Notch-Nasion-Supraorbital Notch Angle as a Marker for Metopic Craniosynostosis Severity.

OBJECTIVE: Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) can be difficult to differentiate from metopic ridge (MR) or normal frontal morphology. This study assess whether the supraorbital notch-nasion-supraorbital notch (SNS) angle can help identify MCS. METHODS: Records of 212 patients with preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were examined. The SNS angles, surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings, and CranioRate metopic severity scores (MSSs) were compared with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with Youden J-statistic and cross-validation of regression models assessed the ability of these measures to predict surgery. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included, consisting of 78 MCS, 37 MR, and 97 controls. Both the mean SNS angle (MCS: 111.7 ± 10.7 degrees, MR: 126.0 ± 8.2 degrees, controls: 130.7 ± 8.8 degrees P < 0.001) and MSS (MCS: 5.9 ± 2.0, MR: 1.4 ± 1.9, controls: 0.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) were different among the cohorts. The mean SNS angle (111.5 ± 10.7 versus 129.1 ± 8.8, P < 0.001) was lower in those who had surgery and CranioRate score (5.9 ± 2.1 versus 0.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) was higher in those who underwent surgery. SNS angles were positively correlated with surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings ( r = 0.41, P < 0.05) and CranioRate MSS ( r = 0.54, P < 0.05). The ROC curve requiring high sensitivity revealed an SNS angle of 124.8 degrees predicted surgery with a sensitivity of 88.7% and a specificity of 71.3%. A ROC curve using the CranioRate MCC values ≥3.19 predicted surgery with 88.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: Orbital dysmorphology in patients with MCS is well captured by the supraorbital-nasion angle. Both the SNS angle and CranioRate MSS scores accurately predict surgical intervention.

Nasal Airway Volumes are More Asymmetric in Skeletally Mature Patients With Cleft lip and Palate Than Controls on 3-Dimensional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses nasal airway volumes in skeletally mature patients with CLP and healthy controls and examines the relationship among nasal volumes, cleft laterality, and facial asymmetry. METHODS: Computed tomography images from patients with CLP and controls were analyzed using Mimics Version 23.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Relationships among nasal airway volume, cleft laterality, and facial asymmetry were compared. RESULTS: The 89 patients in this study included 66 (74%) CLP and 23 (17%) controls. Nasal airway volumes in CLP were more asymmetric than controls (26.8±17.5% vs. 17.2±14.4%; P=0.015). In UCLP, the smaller nasal airway was on the cleft side 81% of the time (P<0.001). Maximum airway stenosis was on the cleft side 79% of the time (P<0.001), and maximum stenosis was on the same side as the smaller airway 89% of the time (P<0.001). There was a mild linear relationship between nasal airway asymmetry and maximum stenosis (r=0.247, P=0.023). On 3-dimensional image reconstruction, the septum often bowed convexly into the cleft-sided nasal airway with a caudal deviation towards the noncleft side. Nasal airway asymmetry was not associated with facial midline asymmetry (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The nasal airway is more asymmetric in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with the general population, with the area of maximum stenosis usually occurring on the cleft-sided airway. In patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, the septum often bows into the cleft side, reducing the size of that nasal airway. Nasal airway asymmetry did not correlate with facial asymmetry.

Clinical Research Fellowship Fosters Mentorship, Teamwork, and Productivity: Our 11-Year Experience With a Craniofacial Research Fellowship.

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the development and explores the academic impact of a cleft and craniofacial research fellowship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research and career outcomes from 3 cleft and craniofacial surgeons, 14 clinical fellows, and 25 research fellows between 2010 and 2023 were examined. Academic productivity was measured by the number of peer-reviewed publications indexed in PubMed and podium presentations at national/international meetings. Residency match statistics were recorded for eligible research fellows. RESULTS: Over this 14-year period (11 with research fellows), the team produced 500 publications in 96 peer-reviewed journals, with 153 (31%) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117 (23%) in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, and 32 (6%) in The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Yearly publications increased from 15.3±7.6 per year (before fellowship) to 23.0±5.3 (with 1 fellow) to 38.3±12.9 (2 fellows) to 81.0±5.7 (3 fellows; P<0.001). There was a strong annual linear growth in publications since the beginning the research fellowship position (r=0.88, P<0.001). All (100%) clinical research fellows developed strong relationships with senior surgeons, and all who applied to plastic surgery residency matched a significantly higher success rate than the national average (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing a structured cleft and craniofacial clinical research fellowship was associated with a broad impact across all cleft and craniofacial team members, as reflected by increased academic output and high match rates among fellows. The fellowship also strengthens the talent pipeline into plastic surgery by fostering meaningful mentor/mentee relationships and provides a model that can be adopted in both surgical and nonsurgical fields.

Sociodemographic Factors Predict Long-Term Attrition from Multidisciplinary Cleft Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Identify and describe factors associated with retention and attrition of patients during longitudinal follow-up at multidisciplinary cleft clinic. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single, tertiary care center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients born between 1995 and 2007 with a diagnosis of cleft palate with or without cleft lip attending multidisciplinary cleft clinic. INTERVENTIONS: None tested, observational study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age at last clinical appointment with a multidisciplinary cleft team provider. Attrition was defined as absence of an outpatient appointment following 15 years of age. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-eight patients were included. The average age at last appointment across the entire cohort was 13.1 years (IQR 6.6-17.2). Patients who were Black (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.10-2.32, p = 0.014) and other races (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.22-2.98, p = 0.004) were more likely to be lost to follow-up compared to white patients. Publicly insured patients were more likely to experience attrition than those who were privately insured (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, p = 0.030). Estimated income was not significantly associated with length of follow-up (p = 0.259). Those whose residence was in the fourth quartile of driving distance from our center experienced loss to follow-up significantly more than those who lived the closest (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.50-2.78, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of follow-up attrition among patients with cleft lip and palate. Race, insurance status, and driving distance to our center were associated with attrition in a large, retrospective cohort of patients who have reached the age of cleft clinic graduation.

Crowdsourcing the Impact of Illustration in Cleft Surgery Education.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) assess layperson preferences for how surgical information is presented; (2) evaluate how the format of visual information relates to layperson comfort with undergoing surgery, perceptions of surgeon character traits, and beliefs about artistic skill impacting plastic surgery practice; and (3) identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with these outcomes. DESIGN: A survey was developed in which one of five standardized sets of information depicting a unilateral cleft lip repair was presented as (1) text alone, (2) quick sketches, (3) simple drawings, (4) detailed illustrations, or (5) photographs. SETTING: Online crowdsourcing platform. PARTICIPANTS: Raters aged 18 years and older from the United States. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): After viewing the surgical information, participants answered three sets of Likert scale questions. Ratings were averaged to produce three composite scores assessing (1) comfort with undergoing surgery (2) perceptions of surgeon character traits, and (3) beliefs about plastic surgery and artistry. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-nine participants were included. Surgeon character traits score was highest among participants who viewed detailed illustrations at 4.46 ± 0.59, followed by photographs at 4.43 ± 0.54, text alone at 4.28 ± 0.59, simple drawings at 4.17 ± 0.67, and quick sketches at 4.17 ± 0.71 (p = 0.0014). Participants who viewed detailed illustrations rated surgical comfort score and plastic surgery and artistry score highest, although differences did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Viewing detailed cleft lip repair illustrations was significantly associated with positive perceptions of surgeon character traits. Our data help to contextualize methods of communication and education valued by the public when seeking cleft care.

Psychosocial Status and Self-Perception in Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the psychosocial status of patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) relates to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 8 to 29 years attending cleft team evaluations during a 1-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CLEFT-Q. RESULTS: Patients (N = 158) with isolated or syndromic CL/P and mean age 13.4 ± 3.0 years were included. Fifteen (9%) patients had siblings who also had CL/P. Of 104 patients who met with the team psychologist, psychosocial concerns were identified in 49 (47%) patients, including 25 (24%) with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder or behavior concerns, 28 (27%) with anxiety, and 14 (13%) with depression or mood concerns. Younger age and having siblings with cleft were associated with better PROs, while psychosocial concerns were associated with worse PROs on Speech, Psychosocial, and Face Appearance scales. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perception of cleft outcomes is linked to psychosocial factors.

A framework for advancing sustainable magnetic resonance imaging access in Africa.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology has profoundly transformed current healthcare systems globally, owing to advances in hardware and software research innovations. Despite these advances, MRI remains largely inaccessible to clinicians, patients, and researchers in low-resource areas, such as Africa. The rapidly growing burden of noncommunicable diseases in Africa underscores the importance of improving access to MRI equipment as well as training and research opportunities on the continent. The Consortium for Advancement of MRI Education and Research in Africa (CAMERA) is a network of African biomedical imaging experts and global partners, implementing novel strategies to advance MRI access and research in Africa. Upon its inception in 2019, CAMERA sets out to identify challenges to MRI usage and provide a framework for addressing MRI needs in the region. To this end, CAMERA conducted a needs assessment survey (NAS) and a series of symposia at international MRI society meetings over a 2-year period. The 68-question NAS was distributed to MRI users in Africa and was completed by 157 clinicians and scientists from across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). On average, the number of MRI scanners per million people remained at less than one, of which 39% were obsolete low-field systems but still in use to meet daily clinical needs. The feasibility of coupling stable energy supplies from various sources has contributed to the growing number of higher-field (1.5 T) MRI scanners in the region. However, these systems are underutilized, with only 8% of facilities reporting clinical scans of 15 or more patients per day, per scanner. The most frequently reported MRI scans were neurological and musculoskeletal. The CAMERA NAS combined with the World Health Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency data provides the most up-to-date data on MRI density in Africa and offers a unique insight into Africa's MRI needs. Reported gaps in training, maintenance, and research capacity indicate ongoing challenges in providing sustainable high-value MRI access in SSA. Findings from the NAS and focused discussions at international MRI society meetings provided the basis for the framework presented here for advancing MRI capacity in SSA. While these findings pertain to SSA, the framework provides a model for advancing imaging needs in other low-resource settings.

Spinal pseudomeningocele closure: capsulofascial interposition technique.

INTRODUCTION: The development of a spinal pseudomeningocele is a complication of dural repair or reconstruction that carries significant morbidity for pediatric patients. In addition to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypotension and positional headaches, CSF leaking into the extradural space increases the risk for incisional breakdown, meningitis, and cosmetic deformity. Spinal pseudomeningocele management is challenging, and reported techniques range from local wound revisions/exploration to shunt placement for permanent CSF diversion. METHODS: At our institution, we have recently implemented a multidisciplinary approach of capsulofascial interposition for the surgical repair of the symptomatic spinal pseudomeningocele with a combined neurosurgery-plastic surgery team. To our knowledge, this technique has not previously been characterized, and we describe the technical aspects of this surgery here. RESULTS: Among 10 patients treated with this technique, none required reoperation or developed infections following pseudomeningocele closure; 2 patients received postoperative transfusions; and 2 patients underwent CSF diversion procedures. CONCLUSION: We propose that this capsulofascial interposition technique should be employed in the surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal pseudomeningoceles.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of recurrent head and neck cancer: a systematic review and quality appraisal.

PURPOSE: Recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) has a significant global disease burden and its treatment is complex. Multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed to improve management of these patient populations; however, no study has systematically reviewed the quality and rigor in development of these guidelines. Here, we identify and systematically appraise existing recommendations for the management of recurrent HNC and assess their clinical applicability, methodologic rigor, and transparency of development. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was conducted for recurrent HNC CPGs. Each guideline was scored independently by four reviewers trained in the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition (AGREE II) methodology. Salient recommendations from the selected guidelines were summarized. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 1799 articles; after iterative title/abstract and full text screening, five remaining guidelines met inclusion criteria. CPGs received the lowest scores in 'Applicability' and 'Rigor of development,' with scores of 12.9% and 22.3%, respectively. Overall quality of available guidelines for management of recurrent HNC is poor, with an average overall scaled domain score of 40.9% (± 11.0), and with four guidelines (80.0%) receiving an overall quality rating of 'low'. CONCLUSION: We found significant variability in quality and overall lack of methodologic rigor among available guidelines for the management of recurrent HNC. Future groups developing recommendations for this purpose should implement the AGREE II framework to improve quality and standardization of their guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines for management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: an AGREE II appraisal.

IMPORTANCE: Squamous cell carcinoma without a known primary is an uncommon form of head and neck cancer that requires multidisciplinary collaboration for effective management. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed to identify CPGs pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP). Data were abstracted from guidelines meeting inclusion criteria and appraised by four independent reviewers in the six domains of quality defined by the AGREE II. SETTING: Online database. PARTICIPANTS: None. EXPOSURE: None. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Quality domain scores and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated across domains to qualify inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Seven guidelines met inclusion criteria. Two guidelines achieved a score of > 60% in five or more AGREE II quality domains to gain designation as 'high'-quality content. One "average-quality" guideline authored by the ENT UK Head and Neck Society Council achieved a score of > 60% in three quality domains. The remaining four CPGs demonstrated low-quality content, with deficits most pronounced in domains 3 and 5, suggesting a lack of rigorously developed and clinically applicable information. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: As the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer continues to evolve, identification of high-quality guidelines will become increasingly important. The authors recommend consulting HNSCCUP guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) or the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). TRIAL REGISTRATION: None.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Topical Intranasal Fluorescein for Localizing CSF Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess existing literature on topical intranasal fluorescein (TINF) for the diagnosis and localization of nasal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A 6-database literature search was conducted to identify articles providing insight into TINF for the diagnosis and treatment of sinonasal CSF leak. Demographic characteristics, technical details, efficacy, and safety data were extracted and analyzed. Methodological quality was assessed using Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: All studies reported a diagnostic accuracy rate ≥96%. There were no major complications reported for any patient (n=99) with either 5% or 10% fluorescein use. The MINORS instrument of methodological quality indicated that the assessed studies were of moderate quality (7.29 out of a maximum score of 24). CONCLUSION: This systematic review indicates that TINF is an easy, safe, inexpensive, and sensitive approach for the diagnosis and treatment of sinonasal CSF leakage. For these reasons, it may be especially well suited for resource-limited clinical scenarios.

Clinical Practice Guidelines on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal Using the AGREE II Instrument.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that is standard of care for the evaluation of clinically negative regional lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma. As the presence of metastases dictates patient prognosis and determines the need for further regional disease control or adjuvant therapy, SLNB is invaluable to clinical decision-making in patients presenting with melanoma. However, the indications for SLNB, specifically among patients with thin (<1 mm) or thick (>4 mm) melanomas, remain unclear. A number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed outlining recommendations for the role of lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma. However, to date, their quality has not been critically appraised. Our objective was to systematically evaluate all available CPGs on this topic using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Four total guidelines met the inclusion criteria and underwent appraisal. Only one CPG achieved a "high" quality rating, indicating scores of >60% in at least five of the six AGREE II domains. Across all CPGs, the lowest scoring domains were "Applicability" and "Stakeholder involvement," which had average scores of 41.2% and 48.3%, respectively. Based on the AGREE II instrument, the quality of existing CPGs for the indications of SLNB for melanoma is low. Future guidelines should be pilot tested to evaluate barriers to application and should utilize multidisciplinary guideline development teams that include patients and key stakeholders in addition to clinical experts from all relevant disciplines.