Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Does Previous Bone Marrow Stimulation Negatively Affect Clinical Outcome?

PURPOSE: To determine if functional outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes were significantly different between patients receiving primary autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) and patients receiving secondary AOT surgery after failed microfracture. METHODS: A group of 76 patients enrolled into the Foot and Ankle Service between 2006 and 2012 was retrospectively analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in 76 patients using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Superficial and deep tissues at the repaired defect site, as well as the adjacent normal cartilage, were analyzed using quantitative T2 mapping MRI. Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) allowed for morphological evaluation of the repair tissue. The mean clinical follow-up time was 51 ± 23 months (range, 12 to 97 months), and the mean MRI follow-up time was 26 months (range, 24 to 36 months). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received primary AOT and 54 received secondary AOT after failed microfracture. Patient characteristics between groups were similar with regard to age, gender, lesion size, and follow-up time. The mean postoperative FAOS was 10 points higher in the primary AOT group (83.2 ± 17.0) compared with the secondary AOT group (72.4 ± 19.4) (P = .01). Regression analysis showed that secondary AOT patients preoperative to postoperative change in FAOS was 9 points lower than in primary AOT patients after adjustment for age, preoperative FAOS, and lesion size (P = .045). The mean MOCART score, superficial T2 and deep T2 values, and the difference between normal and repair cartilage T2 values were not significantly different between groups. Lesion size was negatively correlated with MOCART scores (ρ = -0.2, P = .04), but positively correlated with difference in T2 values between repair and adjacent normal cartilage in the superficial layer (ρ = 0.3, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Primary AOT shows better functional outcomes compared with secondary AOT after failed microfracture in patients with similar characteristics and lesion size. No significant differences in T2 mapping relaxation times and MOCART scores were identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case control study.

A synthetic haemoglobin-based oxygen carrier and the reversal of cardiac hypoxia secondary to severe anaemia following trauma.

We report a case of compassionate use of a haemoglobin-based oxygen carrier in a severely injured Jehovah's Witness patient, for whom survival was considered unlikely. Severe anaemia and cardiac hypoxia were reversed after slow infusion of this agent. No vasoactive side effects were associated with the treatment, possibly due to the slow infusion, and the patient survived.

Extracellular Matrix Cartilage Allograft and Particulate Cartilage Allograft for Osteochondral Lesions of the Knee and Ankle Joints: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Extracellular matrix cartilage allografts (EMCAs) and particulate cartilage allografts (PCAs) are relatively new biologics that may improve the quality of cartilage regeneration after bone marrow stimulation. The increasing popularity of these novel biologics in the treatment of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the knee and ankle joints prompts a systematic evaluation of their efficacies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to clarify the effectiveness of EMCAs and PCAs on cartilage regeneration. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, IV. METHODS: Two reviewers searched MEDLINE and Embase in February 2016 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Predetermined variables from each study were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: For EMCAs, 1 in vitro study and 2 clinical studies for OCLs of the ankle joint were found. For PCAs, 3 in vitro studies, 5 clinical studies for OCLs of the knee joint, and 5 clinical studies for OCLs of the ankle joint were found. For all studies, in vitro chondrogenesis and clinical outcomes favored EMCAs and PCAs. However, the highest level of evidence was IV, and the methodological quality of evidence was indicated to be poor. CONCLUSION: Both EMCAs and PCAs have yielded favorable outcomes in both in vitro and clinical studies. However, the available studies were of limited data with significant confounding factors. Therefore, it is unclear whether the effectiveness of these novel biologics is any greater than that of bone marrow stimulation alone in the repair of knee and ankle cartilage.

Osteochondral lesions of the talus in the athlete: up to date review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common injuries in athletes. The purpose of this study is to comprehensively review the clinical results and return to sport capacity in athletes following treatment for OLT. RECENT FINDINGS: Reparative procedures, such as bone marrow stimulation, and replacement procedures, such as autologous osteochondral transplantation, provide good clinical outcomes in short- and mid-term follow-up in the athlete. Recently, biological augmentation and scaffold-based therapies have been shown to improve clinical and radiological outcomes in OLT in both the general population and athletes. Most studies are of a low level of evidence. Studies analyzing the return to sport capability in athletes are further lacking. High-level evidence and well-designed clinical trials are required to establish the most effective treatment protocol.

Scaffolds based therapy for osteochondral lesions of the talus: A systematic review.

AIM: To clarify the effectiveness of scaffold-based therapy for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed during August 2016 and updated in January 2017. Included studies were evaluated with regard to the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Variable reporting outcome data, clinical outcomes, and the percentage of patients who returned to sport at previous level were also evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies for a total of 897 ankles were included; 96% were either LOE III or IV. Studies were designated as either of poor or fair quality. There were 30 treatment groups reporting six different scaffold repair techniques: 13 matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT), nine bone marrow derived cell transplantation (BMDCT), four autologous matrix-induced chondrogeneis (AMIC), and four studies of other techniques. The categories of general demographics (93%) and patient-reported outcome data (85%) were well reported. Study design (73%), imaging data (73%), clinical variables (49%), and patient history (30%) were also included. The weighted mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at final follow-up was: 86.7 in MACT, 88.2 in BMDCT, and 82.3 in AMIC. Eight studies reported that a weighted mean of 68.3% of patients returned to a previous level of sport activity. CONCLUSION: Scaffold-based therapy for OLT may produce favorable clinical outcomes, but low LOE, poor QOE, and variability of the data have confounded the effectiveness of this treatment.

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate in Surgical Treatment for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and concentrated bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) have the potential to improve the quality of cartilage repair in osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). In this review, we describe the basic science and clinical evidence that has been published on the topic of PRP and CBMA on 2 commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of OLT: bone marrow stimulation and osteochondral autograft transfer.