Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 312(14): 1429-1437, 2014 10 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25271544

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are prophylactic antibiotic regimens used in intensive care units (ICUs) and associated with improved patient outcome. Controversy exists regarding the relative effects of both measures on patient outcome and antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of SDD and SOD, applied as unit-wide interventions, on antibiotic resistance and patient outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pragmatic, cluster randomized crossover trial comparing 12 months of SOD with 12 months of SDD in 16 Dutch ICUs between August 1, 2009, and February 1, 2013. Patients with an expected length of ICU stay longer than 48 hours were eligible to receive the regimens, and 5881 and 6116 patients were included in the clinical outcome analysis for SOD and SDD, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive care units were randomized to administer either SDD or SOD. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Unit-wide prevalence of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Secondary outcomes were day-28 mortality, ICU-acquired bacteremia, and length of ICU stay. RESULTS: In point-prevalence surveys, prevalences of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria in perianal swabs were significantly lower during SDD compared with SOD; for aminoglycoside resistance, average prevalence was 5.6% (95% CI, 4.6%-6.7%) during SDD and 11.8% (95% CI, 10.3%-13.2%) during SOD (P < .001). During both interventions the prevalence of rectal carriage of aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria increased 7% per month (95% CI, 1%-13%) during SDD (P = .02) and 4% per month (95% CI, 0%-8%) during SOD (P = .046; P = .40 for difference). Day 28-mortality was 25.4% and 24.1% during SOD and SDD, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88-1.06]; P = .42), and there were no statistically significant differences in other outcome parameters or between surgical and nonsurgical patients. Intensive care unit-acquired bacteremia occurred in 5.9% and 4.6% of the patients during SOD and SDD, respectively (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]; P = .002; number needed to treat, 77). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Unit-wide application of SDD and SOD was associated with low levels of antibiotic resistance and no differences in day-28 mortality. Compared with SOD, SDD was associated with lower rectal carriage of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria and ICU-acquired bacteremia but a more pronounced gradual increase in aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nlIdentifier: NTR1780.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Orofaringe/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Estudios Cruzados , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recto/microbiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 50(11): e69-72, 2010 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20420504

RESUMEN

In a prospective study involving 642 patients with febrile urinary tract infection (UTI), we found antimicrobial pretreatment (odds ratio [OR], 3.3), an indwelling urinary catheter (OR, 2.8), and malignancy (OR, 2.7) to be independent risk factors for bacteremia with a uropathogen that was not cultured or recognized in the urine. Although the diagnostic value of blood cultures has been questioned in UTI, we advocate performing blood cultures for patients with these risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Orina/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Adulto Joven
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20122012 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23220829

RESUMEN

A young man presented with recent-onset non-specific symptoms like headache, sleepiness and weight loss, interfering with normal daily life. Physical and biochemical irregularities were absent. Because extensive examination by neurologist and psychiatrist including brain imaging did not reveal any clues, the complaints were initially considered psychosomatic. As the symptoms deteriorated with ongoing weight loss, the patient was re-admitted to the hospital. Again, extensive additional investigation did not reveal any abnormalities. Because of previous exposition to the woods Lyme serology was determined. Surprisingly, it appeared to be a remarkable presentation of acute Lyme neuroborreliosis which was successfully treated with ceftriaxon. Clinicians must be aware of the fact that this severe illness can present without any typical symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Borrelia burgdorferi/inmunología , Neuroborreliosis de Lyme/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Mareo/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Neuroborreliosis de Lyme/complicaciones , Neuroborreliosis de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Anamnesis , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad/etiología , Pérdida de Peso
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA