Higher Apparent Gas Transfer Velocities for CO2 Compared to CH4 in Small Lakes.

Large greenhouse gas emissions occur via the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) from the surface layer of lakes. Such emissions are modeled from the air-water gas concentration gradient and the gas transfer velocity (k). The links between k and the physical properties of the gas and water have led to the development of methods to convert k between gases through Schmidt number normalization. However, recent observations have found that such normalization of apparent k estimates from field measurements can yield different results for CH4 and CO2. We estimated k for CO2 and CH4 from measurements of concentration gradients and fluxes in four contrasting lakes and found consistently higher (on an average 1.7 times) normalized apparent k values for CO2 than CH4. From these results, we infer that several gas-specific factors, including chemical and biological processes within the water surface microlayer, can influence apparent k estimates. We highlight the importance of accurately measuring relevant air-water gas concentration gradients and considering gas-specific processes when estimating k.

Diel variability of methane emissions from lakes.

Lakes are considered the second largest natural source of atmospheric methane (CH4). However, current estimates are still uncertain and do not account for diel variability of CH4 emissions. In this study, we performed high-resolution measurements of CH4 flux from several lakes, using an automated and sensor-based flux measurement approach (in total 4,580 measurements), and demonstrated a clear and consistent diel lake CH4 flux pattern during stratification and mixing periods. The maximum of CH4 flux were always noted between 10:00 and 16:00, whereas lower CH4 fluxes typically occurred during the nighttime (00:00-04:00). Regardless of the lake, CH4 emissions were on an average 2.4 higher during the day compared to the nighttime. Fluxes were higher during daytime on nearly 80% of the days. Accordingly, estimates and extrapolations based on daytime measurements only most likely result in overestimated fluxes, and consideration of diel variability is critical to properly assess the total lake CH4 flux, representing a key component of the global CH4 budget. Hence, based on a combination of our data and additional literature information considering diel variability across latitudes, we discuss ways to derive a diel variability correction factor for previous measurements made during daytime only.

Minor impacts of rain on methane flux from hemiboreal, boreal, and subarctic lakes.

Methane (CH4) emissions (FCH4) from northern freshwater lakes are not only significant but also highly variable in time and one driver variable suggested to be important is precipitation. Rain can have various, potentially large effects on FCH4 across multiple time frames, and verifying the impact of rain on lake FCH4 is key to understand both contemporary flux regulation, and to predict future FCH4 related to possible changes in frequency and intensity of rainfall from climate change. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term impact of typically occurring rain events with different intensity on FCH4 from various lake types located in hemiboreal, boreal, and subarctic Sweden. In spite of high time resolution automated flux measurements across different depth zones and covering numerous commonly types of rain events in northern areas, in general, no strong impact on FCH4 during and within 24 h after the rainfall could be observed. Only in deeper lake areas and during longer rain events FCH4 was weakly related to rain (R2 = 0.29, p < 0.05), where a minor FCH4 decrease during the rain was identified, suggesting that direct rainwater input, during greater rainfall, may decrease FCH4 by dilution of surface water CH4. Overall, this study indicates that typical rain events in the studied regions have minor direct short-term effects on FCH4 from northern lakes and do not enhance FCH4 from shallow and deeper parts of lakes during and up to 24-h after the rainfall. Instead, other factors such as wind speed, water temperature and pressure changes were more strongly correlated with lake FCH4.