Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 43(7): 350-4, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16035378

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of amoxicillin 875 mg tablets (EMS Sigma Pharma used as test formulation) and Amoxil BD 875 mg tablets (GlaxoSmithKline used as reference formulation) in 26 healthy volunteers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 26 healthy volunteers (13 males and 13 females) received each formulation in an open, 2 x 2 crossover, randomized study with seven days of washout period between doses. Plasma samples were obtained over a 12-hour interval after administration. Plasmatic amoxicillin concentrations were obtained by combined reversed-phase liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry with positive ion electrospray ionization using the select ion monitoring method. AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal rule extrapolation method. Cmax and tmax were compiled from the plasmatic concentration-time data. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed AUC0-inf, AUC0-12 h, Cmax and untransformed tmax. RESULTS: The mean values (+/- SD) for AUC0-12 h (microg x h x ml(-1)), AUC0-inf (microg x h x ml(-1)), Cmax (microg x ml(-1)), t1/2 (h) and tmax (h), were, respectively: 55.42 (+/- 16.85), 55.42 (+/- 16.85), 18.59 (+/- 6.3), 1.49 (+/- 1.57) and 2.04 (+/- 0.75) concerning the test formulation, and 51.11 (+/- 18.9), 51.29 (+/- 19.12), 17.83 (+/- 5.86), 1.52 (+/- 1.31) and 2.02 (+/- 0.87) concerning the reference formulation. Confidence intervals (90%) of amoxicillin means of AUC0-12 h and Cmax ratios (test/reference) were: 0.961-1.149 and 0.914-1.142, respectively, agreeing with the bioequivalence criteria established by the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency. CONCLUSION: Both formulations were bioequivalent based on both the rate and extent of absorption.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Adulto , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/sangre , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Cromatografía Liquida , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Semivida , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Espectrometría de Masa por Ionización de Electrospray , Comprimidos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 43(8): 399-404, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16119515

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of clarithromycin 500 mg tablets (Merck S.A Industrias Quimicas, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, used as test formulation) and Klaricid (Abbott Laboratórios do Brasil Ltda, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, used as reference formulation) in 24 healthy volunteers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with one-week interval between doses. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose, 0.33, 0.66, 1, 1.33, 1.66, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after the administration. AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal rule extrapolation method. Cmax and tmax were compiled from the plasmatic concentration-time data. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed AUC(0-inf), AUC(0-24 h), Cmax and untransformed tmax. RESULTS: Intraindividual coefficient of variation (CV%) values were 14.25% and 12.62%, respectively for Cmax and AUC(0-24 h). The geometric mean values (+/- SD) for AUC(0-24 h) (microg x h/ml), AUC(0-inf) (microg x h/ml), and Cmax (microg/ml) for test medication were 18.56 (+/- 6.87), 18.8 (+/- 5.70) and 2.45 (+/- 0.88); the obtained values for reference medication were 18.29 (+/- 5.39), 19.10 (+/- 7.21) and 2.5 (+/- 0.69). 90% Cl for clarithromycin geometric mean of AUC(0-24 h), AUC(0-inf) and Cmax ratios (test/reference) were: 93.6-105.9%, 93.8-106.2% and 89- 103.2%. CCONCLUSION The test medication was considered bioequivalent to the reference medication based on the rate and extent of absorption.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Claritromicina/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/sangre , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Brasil , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Claritromicina/sangre , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Comprimidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA