Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) protein expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in aggressive and TP53-mutated salivary gland carcinomas.

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are rare and can be subdivided into distinct entities, some of which confer a poor prognosis. As targets for effective systemic therapy are warranted, some studies investigated the role of immune-checkpoint proteins PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in SGC. Our study depicts the expression of lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) in a test cohort and a larger validation cohort, totaling 139 SGCs. LAG3 is expressed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), mediates T cell exhaustion and is subject to numerous currently recruiting clinical studies. Overall, one-third of SGCs were infiltrated by LAG3-expressing TILs with a strikingly high concordance between the test cohort and the validation cohort (30% and 28.2%, respectively). In the validation cohort, entity-wise LAG3 expression frequencies were highly variable. The highest rates were observed in salivary duct carcinoma (SDC; 66.7%) and adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (ANOS; 50.0%). We observed LAG3 expression on effector T cells and in smaller frequencies also on FOXP3- T helper cells and FOXP3+ Tregs. LAG3 expression significantly correlated with advanced nodal metastases, cytotoxic T cell infiltrate and TP53 mutations. In the group of adenoid cystic carcinomas, LAG3 expression was also associated with a shorter event-free survival (EFS). Tumors with TP53 nonsense mutations (TP53 null type) exhibited higher LAG3 frequencies and a shorter EFS compared to TP53 wild type. This is the first report of LAG3 expression in SGC, a promising target for immunotherapy. LAG3 blockage could be distinctly applicable for SDC and ANOS, two SGC types with a particularly poor outcome.

Activating ERBB2/HER2 mutations indicate susceptibility to pan-HER inhibitors in Lynch and Lynch-like colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is detected in approximately 15% of all colorectal cancers (CRC) and virtually in all cases with Lynch syndrome. The MSI phenotype is caused by dysfunctional mismatch repair (MMR) and leads to accumulation of DNA replication errors. Sporadic MSI CRC often harbours BRAF(V600E); however, no consistent data exist regarding targeted treatment approaches in BRAF(wt) MSI CRC. DESIGN: Mutations and quantitative MSI were analysed by deep sequencing in 196 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens comprising Lynch and Lynch-like CRCs from the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer registry. Functional relevance of recurrent ERBB2/HER2 mutations was investigated in CRC cell lines using reversible and irreversible HER-targeting inhibitors, EGFR-directed antibody cetuximab, HER2-directed antibody trastuzumab and siRNA-mediated ERBB2/HER2 knockdown. RESULTS: Quantification of nucleotide loss in non-coding mononucleotide repeats distinguished microsatellite status with very high accuracy (area under curve=0.9998) and demonstrated progressive losses with deeper invasion of MMR-deficient colorectal neoplasms (p=0.008). Characterisation of BRAF(wt) MSI CRC revealed hot-spot mutations in well-known oncogenic drivers, including KRAS (38.7%), PIK3CA (36.5%), and ERBB2 (15.0%). L755S and V842I substitutions in ERBB2 were highly recurrent. Functional analyses in ERBB2-mutated MSI CRC cell lines revealed a differential response to HER-targeting compounds and superiority of irreversible pan-HER inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a high-throughput deep sequencing approach for concomitant MSI and mutational analyses in FFPE specimens. We provided novel insights into clinically relevant alterations in MSI CRC and a rationale for targeting ERBB2/HER2 mutations in Lynch and Lynch-like CRC.

Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment Options for Cutaneous T Cell Pseudolymphoma: A Case Study with Rituximab Treatment.

BACKGROUND Pseudolymphoma is a rare disorder that can mimic lymphoma both clinically and histologically. It usually affects middle-aged females. Since pseudolymphoma is a rare disorder not only is diagnosing the condition difficult, but there is also a lack of standardized treatment guidelines. In the literature, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is described as an effective treatment option. CASE REPORT 46-year-old female fell ill suddenly with swelling and enlargement of her chin. Multiple skin biopsies were done, which were re-evaluated multiple times as well. Each ended with a new diagnosis for the patient. Finally, in the last revision of biopsy material, pseudolymphoma was confirmed. The patient received multiple courses of corticosteroid treatments - locally and systemically - without long lasting effect. After diagnosis of pseudolymphoma, the patient was started on intravenous rituximab and this treatment was effective. CONCLUSIONS Cutaneous pseudolymphoma is a diagnostic challenge. Rituximab is a treatment option for refractory pseudolymphoma. Since there are no treatment guidelines for pseudolymphoma, more clinical studies are needed to establish best treatment options for these patients. Therefore, each reported clinical case is important.

Comparison of in Situ and Extraction-Based Methods for the Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in Solid Tumors.

Clinical data confirmed that patients with ROS1 rearrangement are sensitive to specific inhibitors. Therefore, reliable detection of ROS1 rearrangements is essential. Several diagnostic techniques are currently available. However, previous studies were hampered by the low number of ROS1-positive samples. Thirty-five samples, including 32 ROS1 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive and three ROS1 FISH-negative samples were evaluated by ROS1 chromogenic in situ hybridization, ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) immunohistochemistry (IHC), an Agilent SureSelectXT HS custom panel, the Archer FusionPlex Comprehensive Thyroid and Lung panel, and a custom NanoString fusion panel. Some samples were additionally analyzed with the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170 assay. Eleven samples were ROS1 FISH positive by a break-apart signal pattern. In all 11 samples, a ROS1 fusion was confirmed by at least one other method. The other 21 samples tested ROS1 FISH positive by an isolated 3' green signal pattern. Ten of 21 samples could be confirmed by at least two other methods. The other 11 samples tested negative by ROS1 IHC and at least one other method, indicating a false-positive ROS1 FISH result. Our study found that all ROS1 FISH-positive samples with isolated 3' green signals should be confirmed by another method. When sufficient material is available, extraction-based parallel sequencing approaches for the verification of these cases might be preferable.