RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Ketamine is a safe and widely used sedative and analgesic in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to sedoanalgesia for painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in children younger than 16 years who underwent painful procedures with intravenous/intranasal ketamine between January 2016 and December 2022. We collected demographic variables, effectiveness, route of administration, indication, dose, sedation strategy, duration of procedure, and associated adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 671 ketamine sedation procedures (411 males/260 females) were included, with a mean age of 7.2 years. Closed reduction was the most common painful procedure (53.8%), followed by burn healing (24.6%). Ketamine was administered intravenously in 93.4% of procedures and intranasally in 6.6%. The result of sedoanalgesia was satisfactory in 84.9% and unsatisfactory in 15.1%. The percentage of cases with unsatisfactory analgesia was higher with intranasal administration (36.4%; P < 0.001). In the intravenous group, the percentage of cases with unsatisfactory effectiveness (28.7%) was higher for patients younger than 2 years of age ( P < 0.001). Arthrocentesis procedures were associated with the highest percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia failures among patients receiving intravenous ketamine (39.3%; P < 0.001). Intranasal ketamine patients who received a dose between 3.6 and 4 mg/kg had a significantly higher percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia (66.7%; P = 0.048). Patients receiving intravenous ketamine had significantly higher rates of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia when the initial dose interval was 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (11.8%; P = 0.002) and when the final total dose was also 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (17.6%; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes that intravenous/intranasal ketamine can provide safe and successful analgesia in pediatric patients in the ED. At intravenous doses of 1-1.5 mg/kg, good effectiveness was achieved in almost 90% of cases. Arthrocentesis had the highest percentage of unsatisfactory results. Repeat dosing should be considered for procedures longer than 20 minutes.
Asunto(s)
Administración Intranasal , Analgésicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ketamina , Humanos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Preescolar , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Lactante , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Administración Intravenosa , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most commonly identified virus associated with lower respiratory tract infections. The monoclonal antibody nirsevimab immunization campaign began in our country in October 2023. METHODS: This study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) of a tertiary care center in Madrid, Spain. The aim was to compare PED visits of patients eligible for immunization with nirsevimab who attended between weeks 40 and 52 of 2022 and 2023 and who had a confirmed diagnosis of RSV infection. RESULTS: During the study period, 264 out of 765 patients with confirmed RSV infection who attended the PED were eligible for immunization with nirsevimab and were selected for our analysis. The PED attendance was 80.3% in 2022 and 19.7% in 2023. The number of RSV-positive cases increased from week 42 in both analyzed periods, with a peak of maximum incidence between weeks 46 and 48. In 2022, the morphology of the case curve in the group of children eligible for immunization was similar to the overall curve. However, in 2023, we did not observe a similar increase in cases among patients eligible for immunization. CONCLUSION: Immunization with nirsevimab during the 2023 RSV epidemic season had a beneficial effect, reducing the number of PED consultations for RSV infection.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , España/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , NiñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although respiratory symptoms are the most prominent manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and especially the omicron variant, may cause neurological manifestations such as seizures. It remains unclear if specific variants of the virus increase the risk of seizures more than others. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study of pediatric (zero to 16 years) patients with COVID-19 who attended five pediatric emergency departments in Madrid, Spain, between March 2020 and July 2022. An analysis of demographics, medical history, and seizure characteristics was conducted. The data obtained were correlated with the incidence of the different strains of SARS-CoV-2 in the Community of Madrid. RESULTS: A total of 2411 seizures (infectious and noninfectious) were recorded, and 35 of them (1.4%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of those 35 patients, 18 (51.4%) reported a history of previous seizures. The highest percentage of cases occurred when the omicron variant was the most prevalent (28 [80%] vs 7 [20%] before omicron variant). Typical febrile seizures accounted for 52.9% of the cases. No treatment was required in more than half (57.1%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: during the emergence of the omicron variant, there has been an increase in the number of COVID-19-associated seizures. These findings highlight the need for SARS-CoV-2 screening in patients with febrile and afebrile seizures, in addition to other microbiological, biochemical, or neuroimaging tests, depending on the patient's age and clinical presentation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Convulsiones , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/etiología , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Lactante , España/epidemiología , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The development of unicentric pediatric acute stroke protocols has improved stroke diagnosis and treatment. The impact of the implementation of a multicentric Pediatric Stroke Code (PSC) remains unknown. AIM: to describe the characteristics of the PSC activations and identify clinical features associated with stroke compared to stroke mimics in children in whom a multicentric PSC had been activated and compare them to reported monocentric PSC results. METHODS: Observational, retrospective, case and control multicentric study, performed in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) of the three Primary Pediatric Stroke Centers (PPSCs) in Madrid (Spain). Study population corresponded to children between 28 days and 16 years old in whom PSC was activated that consulted or were referred to any of the PPSC PED between March 2019 and June 2022. The main outcome was to compare the characteristics of patients with final diagnosis of stroke versus stroke mimics, among all patients for which PSC had been activated. Logistic regression modeling was used to investigate associations between independent variables and stroke diagnosis. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95%CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: PSC was activated in 196 patients. Stroke was confirmed in 39 patients (19.9 %): 20 (10.2 %) had an ischemic stroke and 19 (9.7 %) a hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke mimics represented 80.1 % of the PSC activations. Migraine was the most frequent stroke mimic (38.3 %). Time from symptom onset to brain imaging was 233.00 min (IQR 153.00-373.00) when patients self-presented at the PPSC compared to 231.00 min (IQR 129.00-400.00) when PSC was triggered at other settings (p0.580). Five patients (25.3 %) were eligible for hyperacute recanalization treatment. Low level of consciousness (OR4.373, 95%IC 0.247-0.652, p < 0.001), sensory disruption/motor disability of face/limbs (OR3.633, 95%IC 0.103-0.349, p < 0.001), aphasia (OR2.311, 95%IC 0.023-0.284, p0.022) and altered mental status (OR2.517, 95%IC 0.043-0.357, p0.013) were associated with an increased probability of stroke. CONCLUSION: multicentric PSC achieved similar results to previously reported unicentric PSCs, showing the feasibility of such an organization.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children who report sexual abuse are often first evaluated in a Pediatric Emergency Room (ER). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe clinical characteristics and management among these children. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of child sexual abuse (CSA) cases in the ER of a tertiary hospital in Madrid over a 9-year period (January 2011 to April 2020) was conducted. 213 children up to 16 years old were included. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: An 83% of victims were girls, of whom 97.7% reported physical contact. The mean age was 8.5 ± 4.4 years, with two peaks of incidence at ages of 3 and 13. Aggressors were known by the victim in 77.8% of cases. Anogenital lesions were present in 39.9% of children who described physical contact, of which 31.7% were suspicious or specific of CSA. We obtained positive microbiological samples in 41 patients, with 14.6% specific findings for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). 23,9% received prophylaxis for bacterial STIs and 13.6% against HIV. 59.6% were followed-up in outpatient clinics. Since our protocol renovation in 2019, we observe a statistically significant increase in microbiological detection (p < .005) and outpatient follow-up (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: STIs screening should always be done when physical contact is reported for eventual treatment and perpetrator prosecution, as physical lesions are frequently not found. The optimal treatment of CSA requires the use of renewed specific protocols and the involvement of multidisciplinary trained teams to ensure adequate medical and personal care.
Asunto(s)
Abuso Sexual Infantil , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Examen Físico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The ingestion of magnetic objects can cause complications in children, and there are no epidemiological or clinical data on the subject in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, epidemiological characteristics and management of magnet ingestion in paediatric emergency departments in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational multicentre study conducted over a 3-year period. The study universe consisted of patients aged less than 14 years. RESULTS: The incidence was 4.8 cases per 100 000 emergency care episodes. Of the 72 patients included (mean age, 7.2 years), 54% were male. Seven percent had neuropsychiatric disorders. Sixty-one percent of the magnets were spherical and 69% came from toys. The size was variable, most frequently between 5 and 10 mm (50%), and ranging from 3 to 30 mm. Eighty-six percent of patients were asymptomatic. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Eighty-three percent of the patients sought medical care within 6 h of ingestion and 92% within 24 h. Thirty-one percent of the cases were of multiple ingestion. Endoscopy was required for extraction in 15% of cases, a proportion that rose to 36% in the group of cases of multiple ingestion. None of the patients required surgery. We did not observe any gastrointestinal complications of magnet ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: The ingestion of multiple magnets is less frequent than single magnet ingestion, and we did not observe any complications despite the lower frequency of procedures compared to other studies.
Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Imanes , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Imanes/efectos adversos , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ingestión de AlimentosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Whooping cough in patients aged under 3 months has higher rates of morbimortality. Hospitalization and treatment with azithromycin is generally recommended. Many patients with cough without other signs of alarm, are admitted and started antibiotic therapy until a result of Bordetella-PCR is available. This technique, when performed urgently, can provide the diagnosis in a few hours. The objective of this study is to determine if its generalisation in the Emergency Department allows to improve patient management. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged under 3 months who underwent Bordetella-PCR testing from upper respiratory tract secretions since March 2011 to December 2017. From December 2015 the test was performed urgently. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight PCR were performed, 16 (10%) were positive for B. pertussis. Negative results (142; 90%) were divided in 2 cohorts: conventional-PCR, with 74 cases, and urgent-PCR, with 68 cases. The 2 groups were homogeneous in terms of clinical and analytical characteristics. In the urgent-PCR group there was 18% reduction in chest X-rays performed (P=.008). There were 33 (48.5%) patients admitted in the urgent-PCR group, compared to 49 (66.2%) in the conventional-PCR (P=.042). Antibiotic treatment was initiated in 32% of the patients in the urgent-PCR group compared to 67% in the conventional-PCR group (P=.000047), without observing any significant increase in the number of visits to the Emergency Department or worse clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of urgent PCR in the Emergency Department is a useful tool in the management of infants under 3 months of age with suspected pertussis, since it can avoid unnecessary admissions, diagnostic tests and antibiotic treatments.
Asunto(s)
Bordetella pertussis , Tos Ferina , Anciano , Bordetella pertussis/genética , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Lactante , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tos Ferina/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first detected in Spain on 31 January 2020. On 14 March 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Spain in a bid to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country. The aim of our study is to analyse the impact on emergency medicine attendance after the national lockdown, as well as the clinical presentation and the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the Paediatric Emergency Department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included children and adolescents under the age of 18, attended in our Paediatric Emergency Department during the period March 14 to April 17, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1,666 patients were attended during the study period, 65.4% less than in the same period of 2019. Just over half (51.2%) were males, and mean age was 5.4 years. In triage, 39.9% were high priority levels, 6.5% more than 2019. Most frequent reasons for consultation at the Paediatric Emergency Department were fever (26.5%), respiratory symptoms (16.1%), and trauma (15.2%). A total of 218 patients (13%) received a diagnosis of possible COVID-19, with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed in 18.4%, and 23.8% (52/218) were hospitalised. At discharge, 44% (96/218) were diagnosed with lower, and 33.9% (74/218) with upper respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the demand for urgent paediatric care decreased, with the proportion of cases with high priority triage levels increasing. Most of the patients with suspected or microbiological confirmation of COVID-19 had mild respiratory symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Hospitales Pediátricos/tendencias , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Adolescente , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Femenino , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología , TriajeRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first detected in Spain on 31 January 2020. On 14 March 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Spain in a bid to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country. The aim of our study is to analyze the impact on emergency medicine attendance after the national lockdown, as well as the clinical presentation and the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the Paediatric Emergency Department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included children and adolescents under the age of 18, attended in our Paediatric Emergency Department during the period March 14 to April 17, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1666 patients were attended during the study period, 65.4% less than in the same period of 2019. Just over half (51.2%) were males, and mean age was 5.4 years. In triage, 39.9% were high priority levels, 6.5% more than 2019. Most frequent reasons for consultation at the Paediatric Emergency Department were fever (26.5%), respiratory symptoms (16.1%), and trauma (15.2%). A total of 218 patients (13%) received a diagnosis of possible COVID-19, with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed in 18.4%, and 23.8% (52/218) were hospitalised. At discharge, 44% (96/218) were diagnosed with lower, and 33.9% (74/218) with upper respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the demand for urgent paediatric care decreased, with the proportion of cases with high priority triage levels increasing. Most of the patients with suspected or microbiological confirmation of COVID-19 had mild respiratory symptoms.
INTRODUCCIÓN: SARS-CoV-2, responsable de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), fue detectado por primera vez en España el 31 de enero de 2020. El 14 de marzo fue declarado el estado de alarma con el objetivo de controlar la pandemia. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar las consecuencias de esta crisis sanitaria sobre el patrón de demanda asistencial, así como el manejo y las características de los pacientes con sospecha de COVID-19 en el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo observacional en niños y adolescentes menores de 18 años, atendidos en nuestro Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas durante el periodo comprendido desde el 14 de marzo hasta el 17 de abril de 2020. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de estudio se atendieron 1.666 pacientes, un 65,4% menos que en el mismo periodo de 2019. La edad media fue de 5,4 años y el 51,2% eran varones. El 39,9% fueron clasificados con niveles de alta prioridad, un 6,5% más que en 2019. Los principales motivos de consulta fueron fiebre (26,5%), síntomas respiratorios (16,1%) y traumatismos (15,2%). Un total de 218 pacientes (13%) fueron diagnosticados de posible COVID-19, confirmándose la infección en el 18,4%. El 44% (96/218) fueron diagnosticados de infección respiratoria inferior y el 33,9% (74/218), superior. El 23,8% (52/218) fueron hospitalizados. CONCLUSIONES: Durante el brote epidémico SARS-CoV-2 disminuyó la demanda de asistencia pediátrica urgente, aumentando la proporción de casos con niveles de triaje de alta prioridad. La mayoría de los pacientes con sospecha o confirmación microbiológica de COVID-19 cursaron con clínica respiratoria leve.