RESUMEN
Strategies of cancer prevention are generally developed with the population at large in mind. However, special attention is warranted for those persons with rare genetic traits associated with a greatly elevated risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) and some other malignancies: Orphan diseases demand Orphan preventive measures! Recent advances in modern genetics have enhanced our understanding of several genes and the specific germ-line mutations responsible for colorectal carcinogenesis. A number of features provide evidence for a genetic predisposition to CRC. These include typical clinical and histological features of a particular syndrome, a familial aggregation of CRC and associated malignancies, young age at onset of CRC, occurrence of multiple neoplasias and/or unusual localisation of the tumour (e.g., right side of the colon). In hereditary colorectal cancer, genetic testing can easily be demonstrated as cost-effective.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioprevención , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Proteínas de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
The mismatch repair (MMR) gene hMLH1 is mutated in approximately 50% of hereditary non-polyposis colon cancers and transcriptionally silenced in approximately 25% of sporadic tumours of the right colon. Cells lacking hMLH1 display microsatellite instability and resistance to killing by methylating agents. In an attempt to study the phenotypic effects of hMLH1 downregulation in greater detail, we designed an isogenic system, in which hMLH1 expression is regulated by doxycycline. We now report that human embryonic kidney 293T cells expressing high amounts of hMLH1 were MMR-proficient and arrested at the G(2)/M cell cycle checkpoint following treatment with the DNA methylating agent N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), while cells not expressing hMLH1 displayed a MMR defect and failed to arrest upon MNNG treatment. Interestingly, MMR proficiency was restored even at low hMLH1 concentrations, while checkpoint activation required a full complement of hMLH1. In the MMR-proficient cells, activation of the MNNG-induced G(2)/M checkpoint was accompanied by phosphorylation of p53, but the cell death pathway was p53 independent, as the latter polypeptide is functionally inactivated in these cells by SV40 large T antigen.