Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 25(4): 489-493, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32477014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is commonly employed in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC); however, the optimal radiotherapy regimen is still unknown. This 3-institution analysis compares long-term disease control and survival outcomes for once- (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) radiotherapy at contemporary doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were collected for LS-SCLC patients treated with platinum-based CCRT and planned RT doses of >5940 cGy at >180 cGy QD or >4500 cGy at 150 cGy BID. Comparative outcome analyses were performed for treatment groups. RESULTS: From 2005 through 2014, 132 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis (80 QD, 52 BID). Treatment groups were well-balanced, excepting higher rate of advanced mediastinal staging, longer interval from biopsy to treatment initiation, and lower rate of prophylactic cranial irradiation for the QD group, as well as institutional practice variation. At median survivor follow-up of 33.5 months (range, 4.6-105.8), 80 patients experienced disease failure (44 QD, 36 BID), and 106 died (62 QD, 44 BID). No differences in disease control or survival were demonstrated between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The present analysis did not detect a difference in disease control or survival outcomes for contemporary dose QD versus BID CCRT in LS-SCLC.

2.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 6(6): 100778, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34934861

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The cohort of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PC) and positive surgical margin(s) at radical prostatectomy (RP) who would benefit from salvage or adjuvant treatment is unclear. This study examines the risk of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse in a large population of men with PC after margin-positive RP. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using a multi-institutional database, patients with clinically localized PC who underwent RP between 2002 and 2010 with recorded follow-up PSA were retrospectively selected. Patients were excluded for pathologic seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement, metastatic disease, pre-RP PSA ≥ 30, or adjuvant (nonsalvage) radiation therapy or hormone therapy. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS), where PSA failure was defined as PSA > 0.10 ng/mL and rising, or at salvage intervention. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed for bRFS estimates; recursive partitioning analysis using cumulative or single maximal margin extent (ME) and Gleason grade (GG) at RP was applied to identify variables associated with bRFS. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 105 months, 210 patients with positive margins at RP were eligible for analysis, and 89 had experienced PSA relapse. Median age was 61 years (range, 43-76), and median pre-RP PSA 5.8 ng/mL (1.6-26.0). Recursive partitioning analysis yielded 5 discrete risk groups, with the lowest risk group (GG1, ≤ 2 mm ME) demonstrating a bRFS of 92% at 8 years compared with the highest risk group (GG3-5, ≥ 3 mm ME) of 11%. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that it may be possible to risk-stratify patients undergoing margin-positive RP using commonly acquired clinical and pathologic variables. Patients with low-grade tumors and minimally involved margins have a very low recurrence risk and may be able to forego postprostatectomy radiation. Meanwhile, those with higher grade and greater involvement could benefit from adjuvant or early salvage radiation therapy.

3.
Pathol Oncol Res ; 25(1): 209-215, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29079967

RESUMEN

The clinical impact of lymph node dissection extent remains undetermined in the contemporary setting, as reflected in care pattern variations. Despite some series demonstrating a direct relationship between number of lymph nodes identified and detection of nodal involvement, the correlation between lymph node yield and disease control or survival outcomes remains unclear. Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, pre-RP PSA <30, and pT2-3a/N0 disease at RP were retrospectively identified from two databases for inclusion. Those who received pre- or post-RP radiotherapy or hormone therapy were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method was employed for survival probability estimation. Cox regression models were used to assess bRFS differences between subsets. From 2002 to 2010, 667 eligible patients were identified. The median age was 61 yrs. (range, 43-76), with median PSA 5.6 ng/dL (0.9-28.0). At RP, most patients had pT2c (64%) disease with Gleason Score (GS) ≤6 (43%) or 7 (48%); 218 (33%) patients had positive margins (M+). At median clinical and PSA follow-up of 96 and 87 months, respectively, 146 patients (22%) experienced PSA failure with an estimated bRFS of 81%/76% at 5/8 years. For patients who underwent LND, univariable analysis identified PSA (at diagnosis), higher GS (≥7, at biopsy or RP), intermediate/high risk stratification, M+ as adversely associated with bRFS (all p < 0.01). A higher number of LNs excised was not associated with improved bRFS for the entire cohort (HR = 0.97, p = 0.27), nor for any clinical risk stratum, biopsy GS, or RP GS subgroup. This study did not demonstrate an association between LN yield and bRFS in patients with clinically localized pT2-3a/pN0 prostate cancer managed with RP alone, either in the entire population or with substratification by clinical risk stratum or GS.


Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/mortalidad , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Prostatectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
4.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 15(2): 242-247, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a "high-risk" subpopulation of low-grade (Gleason score ≤6) prostate cancer defined by lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival (bRFS) might be identified within a large population of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) alone, with mature follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified for inclusion by cT1-2 prostate cancer managed with RP alone. Exclusion criteria were: Gleason score ≥7 at RP, any pre- or post-RP radiotherapy or hormone therapy, or PSA follow-up <12 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival estimates; recursive partitioning by conditional inference analysis was applied to identify variables associated with bRFS. RESULTS: From 2002 through 2010, 284 eligible patients were identified. Median age was 60 years (range, 44-76 years), 233 (82%) were cT1c, and median PSA was 5.3 ng/dL (92% ≤10). The median biopsy to RP interval was 50 days (range, 11-410, with 97% <180 days). Eighty patients (28%) had positive margin (M+). At a median follow-up of 92.6 months (range, 16.9-160.9, with 45% followed ≥ 8 years), 32 patients (11%) had PSA failure, with an estimated 8-year bRFS rate of 89%. In univariate analysis, M+, extraprostatic extension, detectable initial post-RP PSA, and longer biopsy to RP interval were significantly associated with lower bRFS. M+ and longer biopsy to RP interval remained significant in multivariable analysis. Recursive partitioning analysis identified M+ as the only stratification factor, with 8-year bRFS estimates of 74% versus 95% for M+ versus margin-negative. CONCLUSION: Gleason score ≤6 prostate cancer managed using RP alone is associated with high rates of bRFS; however, margin positivity predicts early PSA failure rates in >20% of patients.


Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Humanos , Calicreínas/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Head Neck ; 35(8): E240-5, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22740368

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Temporal bone inverted papilloma (IP) is an extremely rare tumor. Its etiology is unknown and represents a source of debate. Only 2 previous cases of bilateral temporal bone IP have been reported. A case report and review of the literature via PubMed database search are presented. MATHODS AND RESULTS: A 52-year-old African-American man who initially underwent medial maxillectomy for right-sided nasal IP returned with bilateral temporal bone IP 7 months later without evidence of extension through the Eustachian tubes. Despite multiple resections and adjuvant radiation, the tumor transformed into squamous cell carcinoma and progressed to involve the intracranial dura, temporal lobe, and cervical dura. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple origins may exist for temporal IP: direct extension, iatrogenic seeding, or development from ectopic Schneiderian epithelium. Temporal bone IP appears to represent a much more aggressive tumor than its nasal counterpart, necessitating aggressive early surgical intervention to decrease recurrence and transformation risk.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/patología , Papiloma Invertido/patología , Neoplasias Craneales/patología , Hueso Temporal , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/terapia , Papiloma Invertido/terapia , Neoplasias Craneales/terapia
6.
Surg Clin North Am ; 92(5): 1213-48, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23026279

RESUMEN

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Radiation therapy may be combined with chemotherapy, used as a component of induction therapy, used in the adjuvant setting, or used for palliation of advanced disease. Chemotherapy is also occasionally used as a solitary treatment modality for patients with esophageal cancer. Current treatment protocols include multiple agents, and agents directed against specific molecular targets have been investigated in clinical trials. This article discusses future directions related to the selection of radiation treatment protocols, novel targeted chemotherapeutic agents, and the selection of patients for surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Esofagectomía , Esofagoscopía , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA