Online behavioural activation during the COVID-19 pandemic decreases depression and negative affective bias.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for mental health interventions that can be easily disseminated during a crisis. Behavioural activation (BA) is a cost-effective treatment that can be administered by non-specialists; however, it is unclear whether it is still effective during a time of lockdown and social distancing, when opportunities for positive activity are significantly constrained. METHODS: Between May and October 2020, we randomised 68 UK participants with mild to moderate low mood to either a 4-week online programme of non-specialist administered BA or to a passive control group. Before and after the intervention, we collected self-report data on mood and COVID-related disruption, as well as measuring emotional cognition as an objective marker of risk for depression. RESULTS: In comparison to the control group, the BA group showed a significant decrease in depression, anxiety and anhedonia after the intervention, as well as an increase in self-reported activation and social support. Benefits persisted at 1-month follow-up. BA also decreased negative affective bias on several measures of the Facial Emotion Recognition Task and early change in bias was associated with later therapeutic gain. Participants rated the intervention as highly acceptable. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the benefits of online BA that can be administered by non-specialists after brief training. These findings can help inform the policy response towards the rising incidence of mental health problems during a crisis situation such as a pandemic. They also highlight the use of objective cognitive markers of risk across different treatment modalities.

Role of blood biomarkers in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage - a prospectively studied cohort of patients.

The study of blood biomarkers can offer new possibilities in diagnostics, prognostication, determination of etiology, and management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between a panel of selected blood biomarkers and clinical and radiodiagnostic parameters in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Primarily, the aim was to find a prognostic biomarker which could help in deciding on the optimal categorization of treatment. A total of 70 patients were prospectively included in this study. As shown by our findings, higher levels of S100B protein are associated with larger hematoma volume. They predict hematoma progression and an unfavorable outcome. One other positive correlation was found between hematoma volume and interleukin 6, interleukin 10 and blood glucose. Lower levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9 are an independent prognostic factor for hematoma progression in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Warfarin loading dose guided by pharmacogenetics is effective and safe in cardioembolic stroke patients - a randomized, prospective study.

Warfarin treatment is commonly started with a fixed loading dose that might be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. An individual maintenance dose can then be estimated based on a pharmacogenetic algorithm. Starting treatment with the estimated dose implies a longer time to reach the therapeutic range. Our goal was to compare the safety and efficacy of initiating warfarin treatment with a loading dose guided by pharmacogenetics versus a maintenance dose. The primary endpoint was time in the therapeutic range (TTR) in the first 10 days of treatment. Secondary endpoints were time to the first international normalized ratio (INR) in therapeutic range (2.0-3.0) and occurrence of serious adverse events. Consenting cardioembolic stroke patients were genotyped for CYP2C9 (cytochrome P450 2C9 gene) and VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex, subunit 1 gene) polymorphisms and a maintenance warfarin dose was estimated. Patients were randomized into two groups. The loading dose group (LDG) patients received twice the estimated dose in the first 2 days of treatment. The maintenance dose group (MDG) patients received the estimated dose directly from day one. The TTR in the first 10 days was significantly higher in the LDG than in the MDG (50.5% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.003). The time to the first INR in this range was significantly shorter in the LDG (5.24 vs. 7.3 days). There were no significant differences in the INR above this range or serious adverse events. Warfarin loading dose guided by pharmacogenetics after recent cardioembolic stroke improved the efficacy of warfarin initiation without increasing the risk of adverse events.

Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes and Antiplatelet Potency of Clopidogrel in Caucasian Poststroke Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Variable response after clopidogrel is well documented and may affect major adverse clinical events after stroke. Impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms is an established marker linked to variable response after clopidogrel. However, the association of certain genetic polymorphisms with prediction of major adverse clinical events following stroke still remains controversial, especially in Caucasians. STUDY QUESTION: The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of CYP2C19 allele *2 in heterozygote form on major adverse clinical events in Caucasian poststroke survivors treated with clopidogrel. The secondary aim was to analyze the potential link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism and variable response after clopidogrel. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty patients of Caucasian origin following documented ischemic stroke were included. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and matched with various CYP2C19 loss-of-function genetic polymorphisms and major adverse clinical events (composite of vascular deaths, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction). RESULTS: Over the mean follow-up of 14.9 months, 19 patients experienced major adverse clinical events. The risk of major adverse clinical events was nearly 3-fold in loss-of-function allele carriers (hazard ratio = 2.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.083-7.786; P = 0.013), whereas the risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack alone was also higher (hazard ratio = 3.170; 95% confidence interval, 1.281-7.849; P = 0.034). Platelet activity was strongly associated with allele *2 status (rs = 0.21, P = 0.016) but not with other genetic polymorphisms. Carriers of allele*2 exhibited lower platelet response to adenosine diphosphate-mean LTA (30.1% vs. 42.0%; P = 0.017). There were no significant differences in LTA results with other agonists. Strong association of increase in adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation with diabetes mellitus (rs = 0.20, P = 0.023), increasing age (rs = 0.23, P = 0.008), and conversely diminishing over increased weight (rs = 0.23, P = 0.009) was also detected. The carriers of other gene allele variants lack uniformed impact on variable response after clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: Even heterozygous CYP2C19*2 allele carriers among Caucasian patients after ischemic stroke had a higher risk of major adverse clinical events. The LTA, however, did not predict major adverse clinical events. The exact clinical utility of these findings is still uncertain and requires large outcome-driven randomized trial in Caucasians for proof of concept.

No antidepressant-like acute effects of bright light on emotional information processing in healthy volunteers.

RATIONALE: Bright light treatment (BLT) is an efficacious antidepressant intervention, but its mechanism of action is not well understood. Antidepressant drugs acutely affect how emotional information is processed, pushing the brain to prioritise positive relative to negative input. Whether BLT could have a similar effect is not known to date. OBJECTIVE: To test whether BLT acutely influences emotional information processing similar to antidepressant drugs, using an established healthy volunteer assay. METHODS: Following a double-blind, parallel-group design, 49 healthy volunteers (18-65 years, 26 females) were randomly allocated to 60-min BLT (≥ 10,000 lux) or sham-placebo treatment early in the morning in autumn/winter. Immediately after treatment, emotional information processing was assessed using the Oxford Emotional Test Battery, a validated set of behavioural tasks tapping into emotional information processing in different cognitive domains. Participants also completed questionnaires before and after treatment to assess changes in subjective state. RESULTS: The BLT group did not show significantly more positively biased emotional information processing compared to the placebo group (p > 0.05 for all measures). After adjustment for pre-treatment scores, there were also no significant post-treatment differences between groups in subjective state (p > 0.05 for all measures). CONCLUSIONS: BLT did not show immediate effects on emotional information processing in an established healthy volunteer assay. Thus, BLT might exert its clinical effects through a different (cognitive) mechanism than other antidepressant interventions. Future studies should corroborate this finding including clinical populations and more intensive treatment regimes, and control for potential chronobiological effects.

Pharmacogenetic algorithm for predicting daily dose of warfarin in Caucasian patients of Czech origin.

OBJECTIVES: Warfarin use is limited by a low therapeutic index and significant interindividual variability of the daily dose. The most important factor predicting daily warfarin dose is individual genotype, polymorphisms of genes CYP2C9 (warfarin metabolism) and VKORC1 (sensitivity for warfarin). Algorithms using clinical and genetic variables could predict the daily dose before the initiation of therapy. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm for the prediction of warfarin daily dose in Czech patients. METHODS: Detailed clinical data of patients with known and stable warfarin daily dose were collected. All patients were genotyped for polymorphisms in genes CYP2C9 and VKORC1. RESULTS: Included patients were divided into derivation (n=175) and validation (n=223) cohorts. The final algorithm includes the following variables: Age, height, weight, treatment with amiodarone and presence of variant alleles of genes CYP2C9 and VKORC1. The adjusted coefficient of determination is 72.4% in the derivation and 62.3% in the validation cohort (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our validated algorithm for warfarin daily dose prediction in our Czech cohort had higher precision than other currently published algorithms. Pharmacogenetics of warfarin has the potential in the clinical practice in specialized centers.