Renal transplantation: better fat than thin.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been a relative contraindication for renal transplantation. This study evaluates the impact of pretransplant body mass index (BMI) on renal transplant outcomes in a single institution in the era of modern immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-y retrospective analysis was undertaken of 454 consecutive patients who received a renal transplant at Westmead Hospital from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2010. The role of pretransplant BMI on patient survival, graft survival, surgical complications, and postoperative complications was studied. RESULTS: The mean age of transplant of this study population was 45.4 ± 13.0 y. Live donation rate was 53.5%, and 60.6% were male. The median preoperative BMI was 25.6 (range, 14.3-51.4). One-year and 5-y patient survival were 97.4% and 86.6%, respectively, whereas 1-y and 5-y death-censored graft survival were 97.1% and 91.9%, respectively. Patients with BMI >30 did not exhibit any significant difference in survival or graft failure but had higher surgical wound infection rates (hazard ratio 3.95, P < 0.01). Patients with preoperative BMI <18.5 were associated with a six-fold increase in both death and death-censored graft failure (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant obesity increases wound infection but is not a contraindication to renal transplantation. Future prospective studies are required to further define the impact of low preoperative BMI <18.5.

Excellent outcomes of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation in patients from rural and urban Australia: a national service experience.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is performed to restore normoglycemia and renal function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure. The National Pancreas Transplant Unit (NPTU) in Sydney provides a service to a population spread across 7.4 million km. We aimed to see if SPK transplantation outcomes differed between recipients from metropolitan (M) centers and those from nonmetropolitan (NM) regions. METHODS: Using a prospectively collected database, patient and graft survival were analyzed. Patients were categorized according to region of residence and by distance from the NPTU. RESULTS: Between January 2001 and May 2010, 165 patients underwent first-time SPK transplantation at the NPTU. There were 126 M and 39 NM recipients. Median distance from the NPTU was 732 km for donors (range, 0-3930 km) and 887 km for recipients (range, 1-4114 km). Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 1.1-10.3 years). Actuarial 5-year patient survival was 94% in M and 95% in NM groups. At 5 years, non-death-censored pancreas graft survival was 75% and 82% among M and NM patients, respectively, while kidney allograft survival was 88% in M and 92% in NM groups. There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival between groups. Distance of donor and recipient from the NPTU did not influence graft or patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: SPK transplantation can be performed with excellent outcomes at a national center with a vast catchment area, irrespective of donor or recipient location.

En bloc paediatric kidney transplant: is this the best use of a scarce resource?

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplants using organs from paediatric cadaver donors are uncommon and technically difficult. It has become accepted practice to transplant both kidneys en bloc from donors of 5 years into a single recipient. We aim to compare outcomes of en bloc kidney (EBK) transplants versus single kidney (SK) transplants from cadaver donors of age 5 years and lesser. METHODS: Data reported to Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry from 1989 to 2004 were analysed. RESULTS: From donors 5 years of age and younger, there were 33 EBK and 38 SK transplants carried out. Overall graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 78 and 61%, respectively, in the EBK group and 63 and 55%, respectively, in the SK group (P = 0.94). Vascular thrombosis was the most common cause of early graft loss with an incidence of 11 and 18%, respectively, in the EBK and SK groups (P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: There is a trend towards a lower vascular thrombosis rate and a better long-term graft survival in EBK transplants. These transplants will remain a technical challenge for the surgeon and EBK transplants should remain the technique of choice for donors of 5 years and lesser.