Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 112, 2022 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105335

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of antibiotics not only increases antibiotic resistance as collateral damage but also increases clinical failure rates and medical costs. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription and outcomes of community-acquired acute pyelonephritis (CA-APN). METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at eight hospitals in Korea between September 2017 and August 2018. All hospitalized patients aged ≥ 19 years who were diagnosed with CA-APN on admission were recruited. The appropriateness of empirical and definitive antibiotics, as well as the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration and route of administration, was evaluated in accordance with the guideline and expert opinions. Clinical outcomes and medical costs were compared between patients who were administered antibiotics 'appropriately' and 'inappropriately.' RESULTS: A total of 397 and 318 patients were eligible for the analysis of the appropriateness of empirical and definitive antibiotics, respectively. Of them, 10 (2.5%) and 18 (5.7%) were administered 'inappropriately' empirical and definitive antibiotics, respectively. Of the 119 patients whose use of both empirical and definitive antibiotics was classified as 'optimal,' 57 (47.9%) received antibiotics over a longer duration than that recommended; 67 (56.3%) did not change to oral antibiotics on day 7 of hospitalization, even after stabilization of the clinical symptoms. Patients who were administered empirical antibiotics 'appropriately' had shorter hospitalization days (8 vs. 10 days, P = 0.001) and lower medical costs (2381.9 vs. 3235.9 USD, P = 0.002) than those who were administered them 'inappropriately.' Similar findings were observed for patients administered both empirical and definitive antibiotics 'appropriately' and those administered either empirical or definitive antibiotics 'inappropriately'. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate use of antibiotics leads to better outcomes, including reduced hospitalization duration and medical costs.


Asunto(s)
Pielonefritis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pielonefritis/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(7): 1013-1019, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33642250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired acute pyelonephritis (CA-APN) is relatively rare in men. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of CA-APN between male and female patients. METHODS: We prospectively collected the clinical and microbiological data of hospitalized CA-APN patients aged ≥19 years in South Korea from March 2010 to February 2011 in 11 hospitals and from September 2017 to August 2018 in 8 hospitals. Only the first episodes of APN of each patient during the study period were included. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2011, 573 patients from 11 hospitals were recruited, and from 2017 to 2018, 340 patients were recruited from 8 hospitals. Among them, 5.9% (54/913) were male. Male patients were older (66.0 ± 15.2 vs. 55.3 ± 19.0 years, P < 0.001), had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (1.3 ± 1.5 vs. 0.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.027), and had a higher proportion of structural problems in the urinary tract (40.7% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001) than female patients. Moreover, the total duration of antibiotic treatment was longer (21.8 ± 17.8 d vs. 17.3 ± 9.4 d, P = 0.001) and the proportion of carbapenem usage was higher (24.1% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.001) in men than in women. Male patients were hospitalized for longer durations than female patients (median, 10 d vs. 7 d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Male CA-APN patients were older and had more comorbidities than female CA-APN patients. In addition, male patients received antibiotic treatment for a longer duration than female patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Pielonefritis , Enfermedad Aguda , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pielonefritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pielonefritis/epidemiología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 174, 2019 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is emerging in Asian 3 countries, China, Japan and Korea, which are scrub typhus endemic areas, and its incidence is increasing. As the two infections overlap epidemiologically and clinically and the accessibility or sensitivity of diagnostic tests is limited, early clinical prediction may be useful for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. METHODS: Patients aged ≥16 years who were clinically suspected and laboratory-confirmed to be infected with Orientia tsutsugamushi or the SFTS virus in South Korea were enrolled. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared. Scrub typhus was further subclassified according to the status of eschar and skin rash. An SFTS prediction scoring tool was generated based on a logistic regression analysis of SFTS compared with scrub typhus. RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 255 patients with scrub typhus and 107 patients with SFTS. At initial presentation, subjective symptoms except for gastrointestinal symptoms, were more prominent in scrub typhus patients. In addition to the characteristic eschar and skin rash, headache was significantly more prominent in scrub typhus, while laboratory abnormalities were more prominent in SFTS. Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 4000/mm3; odds ratio [OR] 30.13), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 80,000 /mm3; OR 19.73) and low C-reactive protein (< 1 mg/dL; OR 67.46) were consistent risk factors for SFTS (all P < 0.001). A prediction score was generated using these 3 variables, and a score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 96.1% (95% CI, 93.8-97.6%) for SFTS. CONCLUSION: This prediction scoring tool may be useful for differentiating SFTS from eschar- or skin rash-negative scrub typhus. It is a simple and readily applicable tool with potential for use in primary care settings.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Bunyaviridae/diagnóstico , Tifus por Ácaros/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Anciano , Infecciones por Bunyaviridae/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Leucopenia/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Orientia tsutsugamushi/genética , Orientia tsutsugamushi/patogenicidad , Phlebovirus/genética , Phlebovirus/patogenicidad , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Tifus por Ácaros/epidemiología , Tifus por Ácaros/virología , Trombocitopenia/virología
4.
J Infect Chemother ; 25(5): 388-391, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30482698

RESUMEN

An epidemiologic surveillance of non-albicans candidemia for a 6-year period was conducted in Korea. Compared to the published epidemiologic data for the previous 6 years, an increase of C. glabrata (from 21.3% to 28.5%) and a decrease of C. parapsilosis (from 36.5% to 24.7%) were noticed. During the study period, C. tropicalis (36.4%) was most frequently isolated non-albicans Candida, followed by C. glabrata (28.5%), C. parapsilosis (24.7%), and C. krusei (2.6%). Replacement of primary amphotericin B treatment with echinocandins (P < 0.001) eliminated amphotericin B resistance (from 7.8% in 2011 to 0% in 2014).


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidemia/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica/efectos de los fármacos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida/fisiología , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidemia/microbiología , Equinocandinas/farmacología , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología
5.
J Korean Med Sci ; 33(32): e212, 2018 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30079005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and clinical effectiveness data of peramivir in the real clinical field are limited. A prospective observational study was conducted based on the post-marketing surveillance data to evaluate the post-marketing safety and effectiveness of peramivir in Korean adults with seasonal influenza. METHODS: Among adults aged 20 years or older who were diagnosed with influenza A or B, patients who started peramivir within 48 hours from the initial symptoms of influenza were enrolled. All adverse events (AEs) that occurred within 7 days after administration of peramivir were checked. For the evaluation of effectiveness, changes in the severity of influenza symptoms and daily living performance were examined before and 7 days after the administration of peramivir. The date on which influenza related symptoms disappeared was checked. RESULTS: A total of 3,024 patients were enrolled for safety evaluation and 2,939 patients were for effectiveness evaluation. In the safety evaluation, 42 AEs were observed in 35 (1.16%) patients. The most common AE was fever. AEs were mostly rated as mild in severity. Serious AEs were observed in 10 patients and two of them died. However, both deaths were considered to be less relevant to peramivir. In the effectiveness evaluation, the severity of influenza symptoms decreased by 10.68 ± 4.01 points and daily living performance was improved 5.59 ± 2.16 points. Influenza related symptoms disappeared on average 3.02 ± 2.39 days after peramivir administration. CONCLUSION: Peramivir showed a tolerable safety profile and acceptable effectiveness in Korean adult patients with seasonal influenza.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Ciclopentanos/uso terapéutico , Guanidinas/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácidos Carbocíclicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Ciclopentanos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Guanidinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Mercadotecnía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , República de Corea , Adulto Joven
6.
Infection ; 45(1): 67-74, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27541039

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Various immunocompromised conditions increase the risk of meningitis caused by Listeria monocytogenes. However, the relative importance of these risk factors has not been well established. We determined the risk factors that predict meningitis due to L. monocytogenes compared to that caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. METHODS: A nationwide multicenter case-control study was conducted in Korea. Cases of meningitis caused by L. monocytogenes between 1998 and 2013 were included. Patients with pneumococcal meningitis were included as controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk factors of Listeria meningitis. RESULTS: A total of 36 cases and 113 controls were enrolled. The most significant predictive risk factor of Listeria meningitis was a prior history of receiving immunosuppressive therapy (odds ratio 8.12, 95 % CI 2.47-26.69). Chronic liver disease was the second most important predictive risk factor (OR 5.03, 95 % CI 1.56-16.22). Delaying appropriate antibiotic therapy by more than 6 h (hazard ratio 2.78) and fatal underlying disease (hazard ratio 2.88) were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a prior history of receiving immunosuppressive therapy within 1 month and chronic liver disease have 8.1-fold and 5-fold increased risk of meningitis by L. monocytogenes compared to S. pneumoniae, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Listeria monocytogenes , Meningitis por Listeria/epidemiología , Meningitis Neumocócica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 331, 2016 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418274

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purported value of empirical therapy to cover methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been debated for decades. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with healthcare-associated MRSA bacteremia (HA-MRSAB). METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in 15 teaching hospitals in the Republic of Korea from February 2010 to July 2011. The study subjects included adult patients with HA-MRSAB. Covariate adjustment using the propensity score was performed to control for bias in treatment assignment. The predictors of in-hospital mortality were determined by multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 345 patients with HA-MRSAB were analyzed. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 33.0 %. Appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was given to 154 (44.6 %) patients. The vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations of the MRSA isolates ranged from 0.5 to 2 mg/L by E-test. There was no significant difference in mortality between propensity-matched patient pairs receiving inappropriate or appropriate empirical antibiotics (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-2.03). Among patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, there was no significant difference in mortality between the treatment groups. In multivariate analyses, severe sepsis or septic shock (OR = 5.45; 95 % CI = 2.14-13.87), Charlson's comorbidity index (per 1-point increment; OR = 1.52; 95 % CI = 1.27-1.83), and prior receipt of glycopeptides (OR = 3.24; 95 % CI = 1.08-9.67) were independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was not associated with clinical outcome in patients with HA-MRSAB. Prudent use of empirical glycopeptide therapy should be justified even in hospitals with high MRSA prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
8.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(1): 317-24, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165181

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin to those of teicoplanin for the treatment of adult patients with health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) bacteremia. A multicenter observational study was prospectively conducted in 15 teaching hospitals in Korea between February 2010 and July 2011. Adult patients (≥18 years old) with HA-MRSA bacteremia who were initially treated with vancomycin (VAN) (n = 134) or teicoplanin (TEC) (n = 56) were enrolled. Clinical and microbiological responses and drug-related adverse events were compared between the two treatment groups using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs were determined by Etest. The MRSA-related mortality, duration of fever, and duration of MRSA bacteremia in the treatment groups were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of drug-related adverse events. Among the 190 MRSA isolates, the VAN MICs ranged from 0.5 to 2 µg/ml (MIC50 and MIC90, 1.5 µg/ml), and the TEC MIC ranged from 0.5 to 8 µg/ml (MIC50, 3 µg/ml; MIC90, 6 µg/ml). In multivariate analyses, the antibiotic type (vancomycin or teicoplanin) was not associated with treatment outcomes. This study indicates that teicoplanin is an effective and safe alternative to vancomycin for the treatment of HA-MRSA bacteremia.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Korean Med Sci ; 29(8): 1178-81, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25120333

RESUMEN

With increase of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli in community-acquired urinary tract infections (CA-UTI), other treatment option with a therapeutic efficacy and a low antibiotic selective pressure is necessary. In this study, we evaluated in vitro susceptibility of E. coli isolates from CA-UTI to fosfomycin (FM), nitrofurantoin (NI), temocillin (TMO) as well as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SMX), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and cefepime (FEP). The minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined by E-test or agar dilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, using 346 E. coli collected in 12 Korean hospitals from March 2010 to February 2011. FM, NI and TMO showed an excellent susceptibility profile; FM 100% (346/346), TMO 96.8% (335/346), and NI 99.4% (344/346). Conversely, resistance rates of CIP and SMX were 22% (76/346) and 29.2% (101/349), respectively. FEP still retained an activity of 98.5%. In Korea, NI and TMO in addition to FM are a good therapeutic option for uncomplicated CA-UTI, especially for lower UTI.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosfomicina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Nitrofurantoína/administración & dosificación , Penicilinas/administración & dosificación , República de Corea , Sulfadoxina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trimetoprim/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico
10.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 45(12): 900-6, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24047226

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical implications of a positive central venous catheter (CVC) tip culture with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) in patients without concurrent bacteremia. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted in 9 teaching hospitals in the Republic of Korea from May 2008 to April 2012. Study subjects included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) who yielded an MRAB-positive CVC tip culture without concurrent MRAB bacteremia. All patients were observed for the development of subsequent MRAB bacteremia for 6 months after CVC removal. Multivariable Firth logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors independently associated with subsequent MRAB bacteremia. RESULTS: During the study period, subsequent MRAB bacteremia was observed in 18.8% of patients (21/112). Of the 112 patients, 23 (20.5%) did not show systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). None of the 23 patients without SIRS presented with subsequent MRAB bacteremia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that prior administration of carbapenems (odds ratio (OR) 7.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-34.77) or corticosteroids (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.19-37.44), and C-reactive protein ≥ 40 mg/l (OR 18.11, 95% CI 2.22-148.07) were positive predictive factors. Prior acquisition of MRAB at a site other than the catheter (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.39) was a negative predictive factor for developing MRAB bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with a CVC tip colonized with MRAB should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of subsequent MRAB bacteremia.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Anciano , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA