Spectrum of genetic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a German single center study.

BACKGROUND: Determination of mutation status of BRCA1 and BRCA2 has become part of the clinical routine. However, the spectrum of genetic variants differs between populations. The aim of this study was to deliver a comprehensive description of all detected variants. METHODS: In families fulfilling one of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) criteria for genetic testing, one affected was chosen for analysis. DNA of blood lymphocytes was amplified by PCR and prescreened by DHPLC. Aberrant fragments were sequenced. All coding exons and splice sites of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed. Screening for large rearrangements in both genes was performed by MLPA. RESULTS: Of 523 index patients, 121 (23.1%) were found to carry a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (class 4/5) mutation. A variant of unknown significance (VUS) was detected in 73/523 patients (13.9%). Two mutations p.Gln1756Profs*74 and p.Cys61Gly comprised 42.3% (n = 33/78) of all detected pathogenic mutations in BRCA1. Most of the other mutations were unique mutations. The most frequently detected mutation in BRCA2 was p.Val1283Lys (13.9%; n = 6/43). Altogether, 101 different neutral genetic variants were counted in BRCA1 (n = 35) and in BRCA2 (n = 66). CONCLUSION: The two most frequently detected mutations are founder mutations in Poland and Czech Republic. More similarities seem to be shared with our direct neighbor countries compared to other European countries. For comparison of the extended genotype, a shared database is needed.

Prevalence of Lynch syndrome in unselected patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lynch syndrome is known by healthcare providers mainly for patients with colorectal cancer. Awareness of other associated tumors, such as endometrial or ovarian cancer, is low. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of Lynch syndrome in unselected patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer. In addition, the willingness of patients and family members to undergo germline mutation testing was investigated. METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer at the Department of Gynecology and Obsterics, University Hospital Dresden, between 1998 and 2012, were screened for a family history of HNPCC-associated cancer. Telephone interviews were used to screen, inform, and enroll patients in this genetic analysis study. Molecular analysis was performed by prescreening of tumor tissue, followed by germline mutation analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-three patients were diagnosed with endometrial cancer, 291 with ovarian cancer, and 14 with both. A positive family history for tumors associated with Lynch syndrome was documented for 61 patients. Two pathogenic mutations in the genes MLH1 and MSH2 in nine genetic analyses had already been detected before. After genetic counseling, only 10 of 31 index patients (32.3 %) consented for mutation analysis. However, no additional pathogenic heterozygous mutations were found. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study in unselected patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, only a small number of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome could be identified. Of those, acceptance of germline analyses was moderate, only. As a result, the rate of identified pathogenic germline mutations was lower than expected. Therefore, we are convinced that more information on cancer risks, options for predictive molecular testing and preventive procedures, needs to be provided to patients and gynecologists.