RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is becoming more widespread. However, there is little evidence to show which device is best in an emergent clinical scenario. OBJECTIVE: We compared both fiberoptic-guided and blind tracheal intubation through the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposal (iLTS-D), the AuraGain™, and the i-gel® in an airway manikin. METHODS: Thirty residents were included in a randomized trial to perform both fiberoptic-guided and blind tracheal intubation using the iLTS-D, the AuraGain, and the i-gel. The main endpoint was the total time taken to achieve successful fiberoptic intubation through the SAD. Additional endpoints included total time for blind intubation, SAD insertion time, tracheal tube insertion time, intubation success rate, fiberoptic view, and maneuvers performed to achieve tracheal intubation. RESULTS: All participants performed fiberoptic intubation using all three SADs on the first attempt. The total time to fiberoptic tracheal intubation using the i-gel, AuraGain, and iLTS-D was 42 s, 56 s, and 56 s, respectively. The blind tracheal intubation success rate was 80% with the iLTS-D, 43% with the i-gel, and 0% with the AuraGain. The total time for blind tracheal intubation through the i-gel and the iLTS-D was 29 s and 40 s, respectively. Laryngeal view grades were significantly poorer with the iLTS-D compared to the other devices. The iLTS-D required significantly more maneuvers to achieve successful tracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: In an airway manikin, the iLTS-D, AuraGain, and i-gel appear to be reliable devices for airway rescue and fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. The iLTS-D is recommended for blind tracheal intubation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia compared to preventive regimen, managing postoperative pain is still controversial. AIM: Evaluating the efficacy of intravenous (IV) paracetamol as pre-emptive analgesia compared to preventive post-treatment administration in pediatric dental setting. DESIGN: In a prospective trial, 60 noncooperative children of ASA I, II aged 3-10 years who underwent dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Pre-emptive group (n = 30) received 15 mg/kg of IV paracetamol before the start of treatment. Preventive group (n = 30) received 15 mg/kg of paracetamol at the end of treatment. Analgesic efficacy was measured by visual analog scale of faces (VASOF), percentage of children received postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The VASOF results in the pre-emptive group were significantly lower compared to the preventive group at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h (0.0146, 0.0188, 0.0085, and 0.0001, respectively). Less children in the pre-emptive group received supplemental fentanyl postoperatively compared to the preventive group (27.6%, 58.6%, respectively, P = 0.0170). Time to first rescue dose of fentanyl postoperatively in the pre-emptive group was later than in the preventive group (P = 0.0432). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of IV paracetamol pre-emptively provides lower pain scores, and a decreased percentage of children required pain relief and less amount of postoperative opioids, compared to preventive administration.