Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oncology ; 101(3): 153-158, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36412619

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is relatively common in elderly patients as the incidence increases with age. However, the optimal treatment approach is not well established in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to review our experience for localized gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients aged ≥80 years and to assess association between patient characteristics, clinical factors, and overall survival (OS) in order to optimize the therapeutic approaches for this population. METHODS: Patients ≥80 years old treated for localized gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to assess the association between patient characteristics and OS. Factors that were significant in the multivariate model were included in the final reduced model. RESULTS: 127 patients ≥80 years old, were included in this study with median age of 83 years. The median follow-up time was 3.2 years, and median OS was 2.5 years (95% CI: 2.0-3.1 years). Independent prognostic factors for OS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (p = 0.003), baseline clinical stage (p = 0.01), and surgery (p = 0.001). ECOG PS, tumor location, baseline stage, tumor grade, and surgery were included in the final reduced model. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment can improve survival in elderly patients. Therapeutic decisions should be based on the patients' general condition rather that age alone.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Anciano , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
2.
Oncology ; 99(10): 659-664, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) remains uncertain once gastroesophageal cancer is metastatic. We hypothesized that assessment of detailed PET-CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and/or total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), and the extent of metastatic burden could aid prediction of probability of response or prognosticate. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed treatment-naive patients with stage 4 gastroesophageal cancer (December 2002-August 2017) who had initial PET-CT for cancer staging at MD Anderson Cancer Center. SUVmax and TLG were compared with treatment outcomes for the full cohort and subgroups based on metastatic burden (≤2 or >2 metastatic sites). RESULTS: We identified 129 patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent PET-CT before first-line therapy. The median follow-up time was 61 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months; the first progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months. SUVmax or TLG of the primary tumor or of all metastases combined had no influence on OS or PFS, whether the number of metastases was ≤2 or >2. Overall response rates (ORRs) to first-line therapy were 48% and 45% for patients with ≤2 and >2 metastases, respectively (nonsignificant). ORR did not differ based on low or high values of SUVmax or TLG. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first assessment of a unique set of PET-CT data and its association with outcomes in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. In our large cohort of patients, detailed analyses of PET-CT (by SUVmax and/or TLG) did not discriminate any parameters examined. Thus, baseline PET-CT in untreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients has limited or no utility.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Unión Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Texas/epidemiología
3.
Radiographics ; 41(7): 1954-1972, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34678102

RESUMEN

Mucosal melanomas (MMs) are rare and aggressive tumors that arise from melanocytes in the mucosal tissues that line the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. Most MMs occur during the 6th and 7th decades of life. MMs may be asymptomatic but may also cause bleeding, pain, and itching, depending on the site of origin. Because of their asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic nature and the difficulty of visualizing them in some cases, they are often advanced tumors at patient presentation. MM staging varies depending on the site of the primary tumor. A simplified staging system allows classification of clinically localized disease as stage I, regional nodal involvement as stage II, and distant metastasis as stage III. MM differs genetically from its cutaneous counterparts. Common drivers in cutaneous melanoma such as B-raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) have a lower mutation rate in MM, whereas mutations of other genes including the KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and splicing factor 3b subunit 1 gene (SF3B1) are more common in MM. Complete resection is the best curative option. However, surgical intervention with wide local excision and negative margins may be difficult to attain because of the local anatomy and the extent of disease. In addition, despite aggressive surgical resection, most patients develop local recurrence and metastatic disease. Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma include immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Unfortunately, MMs have a relatively poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 25%. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/terapia , Membrana Mucosa , Mutación , Proto-Oncogenes Mas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia
4.
Br J Cancer ; 118(3): 331-337, 2018 02 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29235564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A randomised phase 2 trial of trimodality with or without induction chemotherapy (IC) in oesophageal cancer (EC) patients showed no advantage in overall survival (OS) or pathologic complete response rate. To identify subsets that might benefit from IC, a secondary analysis was done. METHODS: The trial had accrued 126 patients (NCT 00525915). Recursive partitioning and proportional hazards regression with interactions were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.7 years and the median OS duration was 3.8 years (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-5.8 years). OS was associated with tumour length (P=0.03), cT (P=0.02), cN (P=0.04), clinical stage (P=0.01), and tumour grade (P<0.001). The effect of IC differed according to tumour grade. Among patients with well or moderately differentiated (WMD) ECs (n=59), the 5-year survival rate was 74% with IC and 50% without IC, P=0.001. IC had no effect on OS of patients with poorly differentiated (PD) ECs (31% and 28%, respectively; interaction, P=0.04; IC, P=0.03). In the multivariate reduced model, WMD with IC was an independent prognosticator for better OS (HR=0.41, 95% CI, 0.25-0.67; P=<0.001). The following four EC phenotypes emerged for OS: (1) very high risk (PD, cN2/N3), (2) high risk (PD, cN0/N1, stage cIII), (3) moderate risk (PD, cN0/N1, stage cI/II or WMD without IC), and (4) low risk (WMD with IC). The 5-year survival rates were 11%, 27%, 48%, and 74%, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that IC significantly prolonged OS of WMD EC patients who undergo trimodality; prospective evaluation is needed.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Diferenciación Celular , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Esofagectomía , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia de Protones , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(12): 3667-3672, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28831698

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms can contain radiopaque calcifications. Whether appendiceal radiographic calcifications indicate the presence of an appendiceal epithelial neoplasm is unknown. This study aimed to determine whether appendiceal calcifications detected by computed tomography (CT) correlate with the presence of appendiceal epithelial neoplasms. METHODS: From prospective appendiceal and pathology databases, 332 cases of appendiceal neoplasm and 136 cases of control appendectomy were identified, respectively. Only cases with preoperative CT scans available for review were included in the study. Images were reviewed by two abdominal radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated, and the kappa statistic was used to determine agreement between the radiologists' interpretations. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement between the radiologists was substantial, with a kappa of 0.74. Appendiceal mural calcifications were identified on CT scans in 106 appendiceal neoplasm cases (32%) and in 1 control case (1%) (P = 0.0001). In the appendiceal neoplasm subgroup, the presence of radiographic calcifications was associated with mucinous histology (35% vs 17%; P = 0.006; odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.78) and with well-differentiated histologic grade (40% vs 24%; P = 0.002; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.76). The findings showed a sensitivity of 31.9% (95% CI, 26.9-37.2%), a specificity of 99.3% (95% CI, 96-100%), a PPV of 99.1% (95% CI, 94.9-100%), and an NPV of 37.4% (95% CI, 32.4-42.6%). CONCLUSION: This case-control study showed that appendiceal mural calcifications detected on CT are associated with underlying appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and that the identification of incidental mural appendiceal calcifications may have an impact on decisions regarding surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Calcinosis/patología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Apéndice/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto Joven
6.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(8): 2291-2301, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27770339

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (LGAC) have substantial postoperative morbidity and mortality; however, postoperative outcomes of the patients who receive preoperative chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation have not been reported. We examined the impact of age at baseline on potential predictors of postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients with LGAC who were treated with chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation followed by surgery (n = 203) formed two groups: (1) ≥65 years old (n = 70) and (2) <65 years old (n = 133). We assessed postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Potential predictors of 90-day postoperative outcomes were identified i) by age groups and ii) other clinical covariates. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were utilized. RESULTS: 90-day postoperative morbidity was similar in older and younger patients (61 % vs 58 %; P = 0.655). 90-day mortality was similar (3 % vs 0 %; P = 0.118). Major Clavien grade III/IV complications were similar (17 % vs 12 %; P = 0.392). OS and PFS were also similar for both groups (P = 0.863 and P = 0.558, respectively). Other factors, such as Charlson comorbidity index (P < 0.001) and median operative time (P = 0.002) were strongly associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Our data show that older patients with LGAC generally have similar outcomes as do younger patients after preoperative therapy but comorbidity indices have significant impact on complications and the long-term outcomes rather than age.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
Oncology ; 93(4): 243-248, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28683449

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Through a multidisciplinary decision-making process, we developed a strategy of systemic therapy followed by local consolidative therapy (chemoradiation with/without surgery) in selected patients with metastatic gastroesophageal carcinoma (mGEAC). Only after a consensus during multidisciplinary discussions, local therapy was initiated. METHODS: We identified 101 patients with mGEAC who had local consolidation. We evaluated the association between various clinical variables (location of the primary, location of metastases, duration of initial chemotherapy, histologic grade, and radiation dose) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 71 had a proximal primary (esophageal, Siewert type I or II), and 30 patients had a distal primary (Siewert type III or distal). The median OS was 25.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.3-32.8). The OS rates at 2 and 5 years were 53.8% (95% CI 44.7-64.8) and 20.7% (95% CI 13.4-31.9), respectively. OS was highly associated with the location of the primary (median of 22.8 months for Siewert I/II vs. 41.5 months for Siewert III or distal, p = 0.03). The duration of initial chemotherapy was highly associated with OS (median of 21.8 months for <3 months vs. 32.5 months for ≥3 months, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Some mGEAC patients with a favorable clinical course can achieve a ∼20% 5-year survival rate with an approach that uses initial chemotherapy followed by multidisciplinary discussion to proceed with consolidation with local therapy. Patients with distal GEAC and those who receive initial chemotherapy for ≥3 months are the maximum beneficiaries.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Terapia Combinada , Toma de Decisiones , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Oncology ; 90(5): 239-47, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27046280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (LGAC), who get pre-operative therapy, have heterogeneous/unpredictable outcomes. Predictive clinical variables/biomarkers are not established. METHODS: We analyzed 107 LGAC patients who had chemoradiation and surgery. LGACs were grouped for (1) presence/absence of signet ring cell histology (SRC) and (2) histologic grade: G2 or G3. %SRC was assessed (0, 1-10, 11-49, and 50-100%) and correlated with pathologic complete response (pathCR) or

Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Periodo Preoperatorio , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Oncology ; 91(1): 55-60, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27120436

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (MGEAC) have a poor but heterogeneous clinical course. Some patients have an unusually favorable outcome. We sought to identify clinical variables associated with more favorable outcomes. METHODS: Of 246 patients with MGEAC, we identified 64 who received systemic therapy and eventually received local consolidation therapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used, and a nomogram was developed. RESULTS: Of these 64 patients, 61% had received consolidation chemoradiation (CRT) with doses of 50-55 Gy and 78% did not undergo surgery. The median follow-up time of survivors was 3.9 years, and the median overall survival (OS) from CRT start was 1.5 years (95% CI, 1.2-2.2). Surgery (as local consolidation) was an independent prognosticator for longer OS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.02). The 5-year OS rate was 25% (SE = 6%). The contributors to the nomogram were longer duration of systemic therapy before CRT and the type of local therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a subset of patients with MGEAC have an excellent prognosis (OS >5 years). However, these patients need to be identified during their clinical course so that local consolidation (CRT, surgery, or both) may be offered.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Nomogramas , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Sobrevivientes , Taxoides/administración & dosificación
11.
J Surg Oncol ; 113(1): 29-35, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26603684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastases (PM) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) may be identified by diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) or imaging (I). Although prognosis is poor, some patients have excellent outcome. We compared the overall survival (OS) of patients in 3 groups: those with positive cytology (CY+) by DL (DL-CY+), those with gross PM (GPM) by DL (DL-GPM+) and with GPM obvious on I (I-GPM+). METHODS: 146 GAC patients were identified. The Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed. RESULTS: Patients were primarily men (67%), with good ECOG scores (0-1; 89%), had DL (84%), had poorly differentiated GAC (92%), and had received chemotherapy (89%). The median OS for all patients was 15 months (5% CI, 12.9-18.2 months). The DL-CY+ group had median OS of 22.5 months (95% CI, 15-29.3 months). Patients with I-GPM+ had four times the risk of death than those with DL-CY+ (P < 0.001) and patients with DL-GPM+ had two times the risk of death than those with DL-CY+ (P = 0.001). At 36 months, all DL-GPM+ and I-GPM+ had died but 8 patients with DL-CY+ remained alive. CONCLUSIONS: Some GAC patients with DL-CY+ have long OS; therefore, novel strategies to further prolong their OS are needed.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Carga Tumoral , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía
12.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 40(6): 872-879, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27454788

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of computed tomography (CT) to differentiate an atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from a WDLPS with a dedifferentiated component (DDLPS) within it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine untreated patients with abdominal atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas who had undergone contrast-enhanced CT were identified using an institutional database. Three radiologists who were blinded to the pathology findings evaluated all the images independently to determine whether a dedifferentiated component was present within the WDLPS. The CT images were evaluated for fat content (≤25% or >25%); presence of ground-glass density, enhancing and/or necrotic nodules; presence of a capsule surrounding the mass; septations; and presence and pattern of calcifications. A multivariate logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to correlate imaging features with pathology findings. Kappa statistics were calculated to assess agreement between the three radiologists. RESULTS: On the basis of pathological findings, 12 patients had been diagnosed with DDLPS within a WDLPS and 37 had been diagnosed with WDLPS. The presence of an enhancing or a centrally necrotic nodule within the atypical lipomatous tumor was associated with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (P = 0.02 and P = 0.0003, respectively). The three readers showed almost perfect agreement in overall diagnosis (κ r = 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: An enhancing or centrally necrotic nodule may be indicative of a dedifferentiated component in well-differentiated liposarcoma. Ground-glass density nodules may not be indicative of dedifferentiation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Liposarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Liposarcoma/patología , Radiografía Abdominal/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
13.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(11): 3640-6, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25698402

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complete cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been shown to improve survival in patients with low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma (LGMA). However, incomplete cytoreduction exposes patients to significant morbidity without a similar survival benefit. Preoperative assessment of the ability to achieve CRS is therefore a critical step in selecting patients for CRS/HIPEC. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative scoring system to accurately predict the ability to achieve complete cytoreduction in patients with LGMA of the appendix. METHODS: A simplified preoperative assessment for appendix tumor (SPAAT) score was developed based on computed tomography scan findings thought to predict incomplete cytoreduction. We applied the SPAAT score to patients with LGMA to determine the ability of the score to predict complete cytoreduction. This scoring system was then applied to a separate cohort of patients from a different institution. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the SPAAT score. Survival was calculated and correlated with the SPAAT score and the completeness of cytoreduction score. RESULTS: A SPAAT score of <3 is a significant predictor of complete cytoreduction in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, 40 of 42 patients with a SPAAT score <3 achieved a complete cytoreduction, for a positive predictive value of 95.2 % and a negative predictive value of 100 %. Additionally, the SPAAT score was a significant predictor of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SPAAT score is a useful tool in the preoperative assessment of patients with LGMA who are under consideration for cytoreductive surgery. Prospective analysis of this scoring system is warranted to appropriately select patients who will benefit from CRS/HIPEC.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Apéndice/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertermia Inducida , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/secundario , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirugía , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasia Residual , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Periodo Preoperatorio , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/etiología , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Oncology ; 89(4): 215-20, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26159599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nearly 50% of gastric cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Therapy is palliative but results in ill effects. The median overall survival (OS) of AGC patients is often <12 months. It is unclear if the early initiation of therapy in all AGC patients is beneficial. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of AGC patients in our database was carried out. The patients were divided into two groups: asymptomatic or symptomatic. We sought to assess whether the delay of systemic therapy was harmful in asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were analyzed. Most patients were symptomatic (68%), males (67%), and had low ECOG scores (0-1; 85%). In univariate analyses, ECOG performance status 0 (p = 0.005), delayed initiation of therapy (p = 0.03), and lack of symptoms (p = 0.03) were associated with a longer OS. The multivariate model for OS identified only ECOG performance status as an independent prognosticator of longer OS (p = 0.02). Asymptomatic patients who had delayed (≥ 4 weeks) systemic therapy had an OS rate of 77% at 1 year compared to 58% for patients treated within 4 weeks (p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic AGC patients had a poor outcome compared to asymptomatic AGC patients. Treatment delay in asymptomatic patients had no detrimental effect on OS, suggesting that the timing of therapy can be based on patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Oncology ; 89(6): 305-10, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26393501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (LGAC) who receive preoperative therapy, tools to predict response or prognosticate outcome before therapy are lacking. We used initial standardized uptake value (iSUV) of positron emission tomography (PET) to evaluate its association with overall survival (OS). METHODS: We identified 60 patients with confirmed LGAC who were treated with preoperative chemoradiation and had a baseline PET in addition to other routine staging. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank sum test were used to determine the association between iSUV and other variables, and the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: The median iSUV was 6 (range, 0-28). The presence of signet ring cells in pretreatment biopsies correlated highly with low iSUV (≤ 6; p = 0.0017). Patients with a high iSUV (> 6) had a longer OS compared to those with a low iSUV (≤ 6; p = 0.0344). iSUV was not an independent predictor (p = 0.12); however, the risk of death was reduced for patients with an iSUV > 6 (hazard ratio = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Our novel findings show that among LGAC patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation and surgery, those with a high iSUV have longer OS than patients with a low iSUV. iSUV appears to have a predictive role in patients with LGAC when treated with preoperative chemoradiation.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/farmacocinética , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiofármacos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Distribución Tisular
16.
Radiographics ; 35(4): 1286-94, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26172363

RESUMEN

Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery that is used in an attempt to cure patients with locally advanced central pelvic malignancies. Exenteration is a salvage operation that is considered only after other therapies, such as chemoradiation, have been exhausted. The high morbidity from exenteration's multiorgan resection warrants careful patient selection. Preoperative imaging plays a major role in the selection process, allowing the exclusion of patients with unresectable pelvic disease or distant metastases. Imaging is also crucial to surgical planning, providing the surgeon with a map of the distribution and extent of the pelvic disease.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Exenteración Pélvica/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos
17.
Abdom Imaging ; 40(2): 436-56, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25139643

RESUMEN

Peritoneal disease can be caused by a wide spectrum of pathologies. While peritoneal disease is usually caused by primary or secondary malignancies, benign diseases can occur and mimic malignancies. This article begins with an overview of peritoneal embryology and anatomy followed by a detailed description of the multimodality imaging appearance of peritoneal diseases. Common diseases include peritoneal carcinomatosis, pseudomyxoma peritonei, lymphomatosis, sarcomatosis, and tuberculous peritonitis. The uncommon diseases which cause peritoneal disease include desmoid fibromatosis, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, malignant mesothelioma, well-differentiated mesothelioma, multicystic mesothelioma, papillary serous carcinoma, leiomyomatosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, inflammatory pseudotumor and amyloidosis. This manuscript will help the radiologist become familiar with the different peritoneal spaces, pathways of spread, multimodality imaging appearance and differential diagnoses of peritoneal diseases in order to report the essential information for surgeons and oncologists to plan treatment.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen , Peritoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Peritoneo/patología
18.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 202(3): 593-601, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24555596

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This article will describe and illustrate the relevant anatomy and surgical techniques used in pelvic reconstruction using regional pedicled thigh flaps, which is often necessary in oncologic surgeries. Examples of normal postoperative imaging and common complications that can accompany pelvic reconstruction with anterolateral, gracilis myocutaneous, and posterior thigh fasciocutaneous flaps will be provided. CONCLUSION: Pelvic reconstruction using regional pedicled thigh flaps is often needed with extirpative oncologic surgeries to eliminate dead space, provide pelvic organ support, restore form and function, and introduce vascularized tissue to promote wound healing. Radiologists need to be aware of the normal postoperative appearance of these flaps so that the flaps are not mistaken for residual or recurrent disease and so that residual or recurrent disease can be identified and treated.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Pelvis/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Muslo/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/patología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Muslo/diagnóstico por imagen , Muslo/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Radiographics ; 34(4): 941-61, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25019433

RESUMEN

Oncologic patients are treated with a combination of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Advances in therapeutic options have greatly improved the survival of patients with cancer. Examples of these advances are newer chemotherapeutic agents that target the cell receptors and advanced radiation therapy delivery systems. It is imperative that radiologists be aware of the variety of imaging findings seen after therapy in patients with cancer. Complications may occur with classic cytotoxic therapies (eg, 5-fluorouracil), usually at higher or prolonged doses or when administered to radiosensitive areas. Newer targeted systemic agents, such as bevacizumab and imatinib, have associated characteristic toxicities because their effects on cells do not depend on dose. Radiation may induce early and late effects in local normal tissues that may be seen at imaging. Imaging findings after chemotherapy include fatty liver, pseudocirrhosis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, and splenic rupture. Complications of radiation therapy include large and small bowel strictures and radiation-induced hepatitis and tumors. Awareness of the various therapeutic options and knowledge of the spectrum of posttherapeutic complications allows radiologists to provide a comprehensive report that may impact patient management.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Abdomen , Adulto , Anciano , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Intestinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Intestinales/etiología , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatopatías/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Bazo/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología
20.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 2024 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918241

RESUMEN

Over the past several years, there has been a trend of decreasing screening or diagnostic fluoroscopic examinations ordered by clinical teams, particularly double contrast gastrointestinal studies. The underlying reason is due to increasing number of endoscopic procedures performed by Gastroenterology and Urology and usage of other imaging modalities, which are either more sensitive and/or offer the ability to obtain tissue for confirmation. Many fluoroscopic studies are now tailored toward patients who have undergone gastrointestinal or genitourinary oncologic surgeries, providing both functional and anatomic information, which are important tools for patient management. Some of these surgeries are very complex and an understanding of the postoperative anatomy and potential pitfalls is important to accurately evaluate for complications. The purpose of this article is to describe techniques and indications for common post-operative fluoroscopic procedures in gastrointestinal and genitourinary oncology while reviewing normal appearances. Complications, with emphasis on postoperative leaks, will be highlighted. Familiarity with the various types of gastrointestinal surgeries and urinary diversion techniques and knowledge of the expected postsurgical appearance is essential for achieving an accurate and prompt diagnosis of complications to allow for adequate treatment and management.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA