RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of osteoradionecrosis/medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ORN/MRONJ) after dental extraction with use of postextraction antibiotic coverage without prophylactic hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) in patients who received radiotherapy to head and neck (RT-HN) or antiresorptive medications and to determine possible associated factors. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who had a history of RT-HN or exposure to antiresorptives and who underwent dental extractions from 2003 to 2019. According to the clinical protocol, patients received amoxicillin 500 mg, 3 times daily (TID) for at least 14 days, and chlorhexidine 0.12% rinses, 2 times daily (BID), after extraction (or an alternative antibiotic if allergic to amoxicillin). HBO was not used for patients with RT-HN. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent a total of 243 extractions. Fifty patients (55.5%) received a median of 54.1 Gray to the extraction site and 40 (44.4%) were on antiresorptives. None of the patients received both RT and antiresorptives. Of 40 patients, 3 (7.5%) developed MRONJ, and of 50 patients, 1 (2%) developed ORN. Among those at risk for MRONJ, male gender and concomitant immunosuppressant medications were associated with MRONJ development (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, the rate of postextraction ORN/MRONJ was lower and comparable with the rates reported in the literature. Larger prospective studies are required to validate the efficacy of postextraction antibiotics in reducing ONJ.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteonecrosis , Osteorradionecrosis , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention at improving Oral Health Professionals (OHP's) knowledge of HPV and comfortability to discuss vaccination with their American Indian and Alaskan Native patients. OHP's attended an educational lecture covering HPV vaccination. Participants completed four validated questionnaires that encompassed a sociodemographic survey, a pre-lecture questionnaire (pre-Q), a post-lecture questionnaire (post-Q), and a follow-up questionnaire (follow-Q). The McNemar test was used to assess the significance of marginal probabilities in the responses between the pre-Q and post-Q and the Chi-square test to assess responses between the post-Q and follow-Q. A total of 122 OHP's completed the sociodemographic survey, pre-Q, and post-Q. Among these, 29 OHP's completed the eight-week follow-Q. The majority of all the participants were White/Caucasian (41%), 31 to 60 years of age (72%), females (64%), and held a graduate/professional degree (52%). Analysis of the pre-Q responses showed that only 6.8% of OHP's discuss the connection between HPV and oropharyngeal cancer with patients and a lack of information on the topic was the major barrier reported. After the educational intervention (post-Q), 86.5% of OHP's reported they were more likely to recommend the HPV vaccine and 69.8% felt more comfortable administering it. Comparison between the pre-Q and the post-Q showed a significant improvement in overall HPV knowledge. Similarly, a comparison between the post-Q and the follow-Q showed retained knowledge overtime. Our study suggests that the educational intervention was effective at improving OHP's knowledge of HPV and enhancing their comfortability and preparedness to discuss the vaccination with their patients.