RESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Almost all beta cells contact one capillary and insulin granule fusion is targeted to this region. However, there are reports of beta cells contacting more than one capillary. We therefore set out to determine the proportion of beta cells with multiple contacts and the impact of this on cell structure and function. METHODS: We used pancreatic slices in mice and humans to better maintain cell and islet structure than in isolated islets. Cell structure was assayed using immunofluorescence and 3D confocal microscopy. Live-cell two-photon microscopy was used to map granule fusion events in response to glucose stimulation. RESULTS: We found that 36% and 22% of beta cells in islets from mice and humans, respectively, have separate contact with two capillaries. These contacts establish a distinct form of cell polarity with multiple basal regions. Both capillary contact points are enriched in presynaptic scaffold proteins, and both are a target for insulin granule fusion. Cells with two capillary contact points have a greater capillary contact area and secrete more, with analysis showing that, independent of the number of contact points, increased contact area is correlated with increased granule fusion. Using db/db mice as a model for type 2 diabetes, we observed changes in islet capillary organisation that significantly reduced total islet capillary surface area, and reduced area of capillary contact in single beta cells. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Beta cells that contact two capillaries are a significant subpopulation of beta cells within the islet. They have a distinct form of cell polarity and both contact points are specialised for secretion. The larger capillary contact area of cells with two contact points is correlated with increased secretion. In the db/db mouse, changes in capillary structure impact beta cell capillary contact, implying that this is a new factor contributing to disease progression.
RESUMEN
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers. Late presentation of disease at the time of diagnosis is one of the major reasons for dismal prognostic outcomes for PDAC patients. Currently, there is a lack of clinical biomarkers, which can be used to diagnose PDAC patients at an early resectable stage. This study performed proteomic mass spectrometry to identify novel blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis of PDAC. Serum specimens from 88 PDAC patients and 88 healthy controls (60 discovery cohort and 28 validation cohort) were analyzed using data independent acquisition high resolution mass spectrometry to identify candidate biomarker proteins. A total of 249 proteins were identified and quantified by the mass spectrometric analysis. Six proteins were markedly (>1.5 fold) and significantly (p < .05; q < 0.1) increased in PDAC patients compared to healthy controls in discovery cohort. Notably, four of these six proteins were significantly upregulated in an independent validation cohort. The top three upregulated proteins (i.e., Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor [PIGR], von Willebrand Factor [vWF], and Fibrinogen) were validated using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, which led to selection of PIGR and vWF as a diagnostic biomarker panel for PDAC. The panel showed high ability to diagnose early stage (stage I and II) PDAC patients (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.8926), which was further improved after the addition of clinically used prognostic biomarker (Ca 19-9) to the panel (AUC: 0.9798). In conclusion, a novel serum protein biomarker panel for early diagnosis of PDAC was identified.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Proteómica , Humanos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Proteómica/métodos , Receptores de Inmunoglobulina Polimérica/sangre , Factor de von Willebrand/análisis , Factor de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Fibrinógeno/análisis , Fibrinógeno/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adulto , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisisRESUMEN
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have late presentation at the time of diagnosis and a poor prognosis. Metal dyshomeostasis is known to play a role in cancer progression. However, the blood and tissue metallome of PDAC patients has not been assessed. This study aimed to determine the levels of essential and toxic metals in the serum and pancreatic tissue from PDAC patients. Serum samples were obtained from PDAC patients before surgical resection. Tissue (tumor and adjacent normal pancreas) were obtained from the surgically resected specimen. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis was performed to quantify the levels of 10 essential and 3 toxic metals in these samples. Statistical analysis was performed to identify dysregulated metals in PDAC and their role as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Significantly decreased serum levels of magnesium, potassium, calcium, iron, zinc, selenium, arsenic, and mercury and increased levels of molybdenum were shown to be associated with PDAC. There were significantly decreased levels of zinc, manganese and molybdenum, and increased levels of calcium and selenium in the pancreatic tumor tissue compared with the adjacent normal pancreas. Notably, lower serum levels of calcium, iron, and selenium, and higher levels of manganese, were significantly associated with a poor prognosis (i.e., overall survival) in PDAC patients. In conclusion, this is the first study to comprehensively assess the serum and tissue metallome of PDAC patients. It identified the association of metals with PDAC diagnosis and prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Metales/sangre , Metales/metabolismo , Metales/análisis , Páncreas/metabolismo , Páncreas/patología , Magnesio/sangre , Magnesio/metabolismo , Magnesio/análisis , Adulto , Calcio/sangre , Calcio/metabolismo , Calcio/análisis , Selenio/sangre , Selenio/análisis , Selenio/metabolismo , Hierro/metabolismo , Hierro/sangre , Zinc/sangre , Zinc/metabolismo , Zinc/análisis , Molibdeno/sangreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Through a systematic review and spline curve analysis, to better define the minimum volume threshold for hospitals to perform (pancreaticoduodenectomy) and the high-volume center. BACKGROUND: The pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a resource-intensive procedure, with high morbidity and long hospital stays resulting in centralization towards high-volume hospitals; the published definition of high volume remains variable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a systematic review of studies comparing PD outcomes across volume groups, semiparametric regression modeling of morbidity (%), mortality (%), length of stay (days), lymph node harvest (number of nodes), and cost ($USD) as continuous variables were performed and fitted as a smoothed function of splines. If this showed a nonlinear association, then a "zero-crossing" technique was used, which produced "first and second derivatives" to identify volume thresholds. RESULTS: Our analysis of 33 cohort studies (198,377 patients) showed 55 PDs/year and 43 PDs/year were the threshold value required to achieve the lowest morbidity and highest lymph node harvest, with model estimated df 5.154 ( P <0.001) and 8.254 ( P <0.001), respectively. The threshold value for mortality was ~45 PDs/year (model 9.219 ( P <0.001)), with the lowest mortality value (the optimum value) at ~70 PDs/year (ie, a high-volume center). No significant association was observed for cost ( edf =2, P =0.989) and length of stay ( edf =2.04, P =0.099). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant benefit from the centralization of PD, with 55 PDs/year and 43 PDs/year as the threshold value required to achieve the lowest morbidity and highest lymph node harvest, respectively. To achieve mortality benefit, the minimum procedure threshold is 45 PDs/year, with the lowest and optimum mortality value (ie, a high-volume center) at approximately 70 PDs/year.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Tiempo de Internación , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Análisis de RegresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes following surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains poor, with only 20% of patients surviving 5 years after pancreatectomy. Patient selection for surgery remains suboptimal largely due to the absence of consideration of aggressive tumor biology. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate traditional staging criteria for PDAC in the setting of molecular subtypes. METHODS: Clinicopathological data were obtained for 5 independent cohorts of consecutive unselected patients, totaling n = 1298, including n = 442 that underwent molecular subtyping. The main outcome measure was disease-specific survival following surgical resection for PDAC stratified according to the American Joint Commission for Cancer (TNM) staging criteria, margin status, and molecular subtype. RESULTS: TNM staging criteria and margin status confers prognostic value only in tumors with classical pancreatic subtype. Patients with tumors that are of squamous subtype, have a poor outcome irrespective of favorable traditional pathological staging [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.28, P = 0.032]. Margin status has no impact on survival in the squamous subtype (16.0 vs 12.1 months, P = 0.374). There were no differences in molecular subtype or gene expression of tumors with positive resection margin status. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive tumor biology as measured by molecular subtype predicts poor outcome following pancreatectomy for PDAC and should be utilized to inform patient selection for surgery.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Pancreatectomía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is perhaps one of most dreaded pancreatoduodenectomy-related complications. Various approaches to mitigate this risk have been explored, with conflicting results and no clear consensus on the comparative superiority of any one technique. We postulate that regardless of technique, the key to reducing POPF is a robust pancreatic anastomosis with careful apposition of tissues, in particular the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. METHOD: We describe the fashioning of a pancreatojejunostomy with an external pancreatic stent in the setting of a high-risk anastomosis with help of a 10 × magnification surgical microscope. A technical description with a short, edited video is presented.
Asunto(s)
Páncreas , Pancreatoyeyunostomía , Humanos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Consenso , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Granular cell tumours (GCTs) of the pancreas are mostly benign and exceptionally rare, with no unique identifying radiological features. Following a case discussion of a patient with GCT, a comprehensive review of available literature was conducted to identify the common diagnostic features associated with GCT. METHODS: Following a case report identified in our institution, a systematic review was conducted by two authors in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis protocols (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, World of Science, and grey literature were searched on August 2021. Inclusion criteria were histopathology diagnosed granular cell tumour of the pancreas. RESULTS: A 37-year-old male presented with 1 month of abdominal pain and an MRI demonstrating a dilated main pancreatic duct, distal parenchymal atrophy, but no focal lesion. Repeat MRI at 6 months re-demonstrated similar findings and subsequent endoscopic ultrasound was suspicious for main duct IPMN. Following multidisciplinary team discussion, a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed. Histopathology demonstrated granular cell tumour with cells diffusely positive for S100 and no malignant transformation. 11 case reports were identified in the literature with diagnosis confirmed on tissue histopathology based on positive immunohistochemical staining for S-100 protein. Eight patients presented with gastrointestinal symptoms with abdominal pain the main presenting complaint (50%). 10 patients underwent CT with portal venous contrast and all underwent endoscopic examination. Imaging findings were similar in five studies for EUS which demonstrated a hypoechoic lesion with homogenous appearance. On non-contrast CT GCT was iso-enhancing, and with portal venous contrast demonstrated hypo-enhancement that gradually enhanced on late phases. Pre-operative diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma was described in six cases based on imaging and biopsy, resulting in progression to surgical resection. Nine patients were managed surgically and no complications identified on follow-up (6-52 months). CONCLUSION: The currently proposed management pathway includes EUS with biopsy and CT, and surgical resection recommended due to malignancy risk. Improved sample collection with EUS-FNA and microscopic assessment utilising S-100 immunohistochemistry may improve pre-operative diagnosis. Limitations include rare numbers in reported literature and short follow-up not allowing an assessment of GCT's natural history and malignancy risk. Additional cases would expand the current dataset of GCTs of the pancreas, so that surgical resection may be avoided in the future.
Asunto(s)
Tumor de Células Granulares , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Tumor de Células Granulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor de Células Granulares/cirugía , Páncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Endosonografía/métodos , Dolor AbdominalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) represents one of the most severe complications following pancreatic surgery. Despite being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, its pathophysiology is poorly understood. In recent years, there has been growing evidence to support the role of postoperative or post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) in the development of POPF. This article reviews the contemporary literature on POPF pathophysiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, to retrieve relevant literature published between 2005 and 2023. A narrative review was planned from the outset. RESULTS: A total of 104 studies fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Forty-three studies reported on technical factors predisposing to POPF, including resection and reconstruction technique and adjuncts for anastomotic reinforcement. Thirty-four studies reported on POPF pathophysiology. There is compelling evidence to suggest that PPAP plays a critical role in the development of POPF. The acinar component of the remnant pancreas should be regarded as an intrinsic risk factor; meanwhile, operative stress, remnant hypoperfusion, and inflammation represent common mechanisms for acinar cell injury. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for PPAP and POPF is evolving. Future POPF prevention strategies should look beyond anastomotic reinforcement and target underlying mechanisms of PPAP development.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Pancreática , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Fístula Pancreática/prevención & control , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of postoperative or post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) is controversial. In 2021, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) published the first unifying definition and grading system for PPAP. This study sought to validate recent consensus criteria, using a cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a high-volume pancreaticobiliary specialty unit. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing PD at a tertiary referral centre between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with serum amylase recorded within 48h from surgery were included for analysis. Postoperative data were extracted and evaluated against the ISGPS criteria, including the presence of postoperative hyperamylasaemia, radiologic features consistent with acute pancreatitis, and clinical deterioration. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were evaluated. The overall incidence of PPAP was 32% (26/82) in this cohort, of which 3/26 demonstrated postoperative hyperamylasaemia and 23/26 had clinically relevant PPAP (Grade B or C) when correlated radiologic and clinical criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This study is among the first to apply the recently published consensus criteria for PPAP diagnosis and grading to clinical data. While the results support their utility in establishing PPAP as a distinct post-pancreatectomy complication, there remains a need for future large-scale validation studies.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Aguda , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Accurate preoperative assessment using computed tomography (CT) to determine resectability is crucial in ensuring patients are offered the most appropriate therapeutic strategy. Despite the use of classification guidelines, any interobserver variability between reviewing surgeons and radiologists may confound decisions influencing patient treatment pathways. METHODS: In this multicentre observational study, an international group of 96 clinicians (42 hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons and 54 radiologists) were surveyed and asked to report 30 pancreatic CT scans of pancreatic cancer deemed borderline at respective multidisciplinary meetings (MDM). The degree of interobserver agreement in resectability among radiologists and surgeons was assessed and subgroup regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Interobserver variability between reviewers was high with no unanimous agreement. Overall interobserver agreement was fair with a kappa value of 0.32 with a higher rate of agreement among radiologists over surgeons. CONCLUSION: Interobserver variability among radiologists and surgeons globally is high, calling into question the consistency of clinical decision making for patients with PDAC and suggesting that central review may be required for studies of neoadjuvant or adjuvant approaches in future as well as ongoing quality control initiatives, even amongst experts in the field.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the low recurrence rate of resected nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs), nearly all patients undergo long-term surveillance. A prediction model for recurrence may help select patients for less intensive surveillance or identify patients for adjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the external validity of a recently published model predicting recurrence within 5 years after surgery for NF-pNET in an international cohort. This prediction model includes tumor grade, lymph node status and perineural invasion as predictors. METHODS: Retrospectively, data were collected from 7 international referral centers on patients who underwent resection for a grade 1-2 NF-pNET between 1992 and 2018. Model performance was evaluated by calibration statistics, Harrel's C-statistic, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve for 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). A sub-analysis was performed in pNETs >2 cm. The model was improved to stratify patients into 3 risk groups (low, medium, high) for recurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 342 patients were included in the validation cohort with a 5-year RFS of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78-88%). Fifty-eight patients (17%) developed a recurrence. Calibration showed an intercept of 0 and a slope of 0.74. The C-statistic was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83), and the AUC for the prediction of 5-year RFS was 0.74. The prediction model had a better performance in tumors >2 cm (C-statistic 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: External validity of this prediction model for recurrence after curative surgery for grade 1-2 NF-pNET showed accurate overall performance using 3 easily accessible parameters. This model is available via www.pancreascalculator.com.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Most surgeons perform right-sided semicircular clearance of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) nerve plexus for pancreatic head carcinoma, presuming a linear course of the SMA nerve fibers. The hypothesis was that the SMA nerve plexus fibers follow a non-linear course, and the goal of the present study was to assess the neural fibers distribution along the SMA. METHODS: The course of neural fibers along the retropancreatic and suprapancreatic SMA was assessed in 7 cadavers. RESULTS: In the retropancreatic course of the vessel, the main nerve cords branch and form a large number of finer nerve branches performing an anti-clockwise rotation of slightly less than 90° around the SMA. Finer nerve branches are located rather close to the vessel, while the main nerve cords are localized in the loose connective tissue of the peripheral parts of the vascular sheath. Nerve fibers around the suprapancreatic SMA run as two main nerve cords framing the artery on the right lateral-ventral and the left lateral to lateral-dorsal side. CONCLUSION: The rotation of the nerve fiber around the SMA indicates that a more radical resection of at least 180° of neural tissue around the SMA might be required to achieve tumor clearance in pancreatic cancer with perineural invasion at the uncinate margin.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Cadáver , Humanos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Fibras Nerviosas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prompt and accurate staging of pancreatic cancer is essential to distinguish patients to benefit from resection with curative intent and those with unresectable disease. A staging laparoscopy is used preoperatively to identify macroscopic or occult metastases not identified on imaging. This single-institution study aims to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its effect on overall survival. METHOD: Clinicopathologic data were evaluated for all patients undergoing staging laparoscopy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from July 2014 to December 2019. The study identified 155 patients eligible for analysis. All patients were followed for at least 2 years. Clinical backgrounds, survival curves and prognostic factors were investigated. RESULTS: Resectability status among the cohort was 62 (40%) upfront resectable, 53 (34%) borderline resectable and 40 (26%) locally advanced disease. The median age was 69, with 44% male patients. Median CA19-9 value was 125 kU/L, and median CA125 value was 22 kU/L. Staging laparoscopy resulted in upstaging nine (15%) upfront resectable patients, five (9%) borderline resectable patients and ten (25%) locally advanced patients. There was positive cytology in 19 (12%), peritoneal deposits in six (4%) and peritoneal liver deposits in seven (5%) patients. Overall, the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid an unnecessary laparotomy was eight patients. CONCLUSION: Staging laparoscopy continues to be a valuable investigation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this institution, one in every eight patients undergoing a staging laparoscopy was upstaged to metastatic disease, thus avoiding an unnecessary laparotomy or a non-curative resection.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Antígeno CA-19-9 , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
Appreciation of the potential anatomical variation of the hepatic arterial supply and branches of the abdominal aorta is of paramount importance in pancreatic and hepatobiliary surgery. Here we describe a hitherto un-reported coelio-mesenteric anastomotic connection between a replaced right hepatic artery, originating from the superior mesenteric artery, and the left hepatic branch of the proper hepatic artery. The embryological origins of the variant anatomy as well as its potential surgical implications are discussed with a view to encourage thorough pre-operative interrogation of available imaging by radiologists and surgeons to successfully identify such variants and take advantage of their potentially useful functionality.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Hepática , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Variación Anatómica , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this survey was to assess practices regarding pain management, fluid therapy and thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy on a global basis. METHODS: This survey study among surgeons from eight (inter)national scientific societies was performed according to the CHERRIES guideline. RESULTS: Overall, 236 surgeons completed the survey. ERAS protocols are used by 61% of surgeons and respectively 82%, 93%, 57% believed there is a relationship between pain management, fluid therapy, and thromboprophylaxis and clinical outcomes. Epidural analgesia (50%) was most popular followed by intravenous morphine (24%). A restrictive fluid therapy was used by 58% of surgeons. Chemical thromboprophylaxis was used by 88% of surgeons. Variations were observed between continents, most interesting being the choice for analgesic technique (transversus abdominis plane block was popular in North America), restrictive fluid therapy (little use in Asia and Oceania) and duration of chemical thromboprophylaxis (large variation). CONCLUSION: The results of this international survey showed that only 61% of surgeons practice ERAS protocols. Although the majority of surgeons presume a relationship between pain management, fluid therapy and thromboprophylaxis and clinical outcomes, variations in practices were observed. Additional studies are needed to further optimize, standardize and implement ERAS protocols after pancreatic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Tromboembolia Venosa , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & controlRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that human beta cells are structurally and functional polarised with respect to the islet capillaries. We set out to test this using confocal microscopy to map the 3D spatial arrangement of key proteins and live-cell imaging to determine the distribution of insulin granule fusion around the cells. METHODS: Human pancreas samples were rapidly fixed and processed using the pancreatic slice technique, which maintains islet structure and architecture. Slices were stained using immunofluorescence for polarity markers (scribble, discs large [Dlg] and partitioning defective 3 homologue [Par3]) and presynaptic markers (liprin, Rab3-interacting protein [RIM2] and piccolo) and imaged using 3D confocal microscopy. Isolated human islets were dispersed and cultured on laminin-511-coated coverslips. Live 3D two-photon microscopy was used on cultured cells to image exocytic granule fusion events upon glucose stimulation. RESULTS: Assessment of the distribution of endocrine cells across human islets found that, despite distinct islet-to-islet complexity and variability, including multi-lobular islets, and intermixing of alpha and beta cells, there is still a striking enrichment of alpha cells at the islet mantle. Measures of cell position demonstrate that most beta cells contact islet capillaries. Subcellularly, beta cells consistently position polar determinants, such as Par3, Dlg and scribble, with a basal domain towards the capillaries and apical domain at the opposite face. The capillary interface/vascular face is enriched in presynaptic scaffold proteins, such as liprin, RIM2 and piccolo. Interestingly, enrichment of presynaptic scaffold proteins also occurs where the beta cells contact peri-islet capillaries, suggesting functional interactions. We also observed the same polarisation of synaptic scaffold proteins in islets from type 2 diabetic patients. Consistent with polarised function, isolated beta cells cultured onto laminin-coated coverslips target insulin granule fusion to the coverslip. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Structural and functional polarisation is a defining feature of human pancreatic beta cells and plays an important role in the control of insulin secretion.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Células Secretoras de Insulina/patología , Islotes Pancreáticos/irrigación sanguínea , Islotes Pancreáticos/patología , Donantes de Tejidos , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/metabolismo , Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Humanos , Insulina/metabolismo , Secreción de Insulina , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Islotes Pancreáticos/metabolismo , Microscopía Confocal , Microscopía de Fluorescencia por Excitación Multifotónica , Fenotipo , Vesículas Secretoras/metabolismo , Vesículas Secretoras/patología , Técnicas de Cultivo de TejidosRESUMEN
Our study aimed to identify a urinary metabolite panel for the detection/diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDAC continues to have poor survival outcomes. One of the major reasons for poor prognosis is the advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis. Hence, identification of a novel and cost-effective biomarker signature for early detection/diagnosis of PDAC could lead to better survival outcomes. Untargeted metabolomics was employed to identify a novel metabolite-based biomarker signature for PDAC diagnosis. Urinary metabolites from 92 PDAC patients (56 discovery cohort and 36 validation cohort) were compared with 56 healthy volunteers using 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multivariate (partial-least squares discriminate analysis) and univariate (Mann-Whitney's U-test) analyses were performed to identify a metabolite panel which can be used to detect PDAC. The selected metabolites were further validated for their diagnostic potential using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Statistical analysis identified a six-metabolite panel (trigonelline, glycolate, hippurate, creatine, myoinositol and hydroxyacetone), which demonstrated high potential to diagnose PDAC, with AUROC of 0.933 and 0.864 in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Notably, the identified panel also demonstrated very high potential to diagnose early-stage (I and II) PDAC patients with AUROC of 0.897. These results demonstrate that the selected metabolite signature could be used to detect PDAC and will pave the way for the development of a urinary test for detection/diagnosis of PDAC.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/orina , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Anciano , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/orina , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metabolómica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/orina , Urinálisis/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a nomogram estimating the probability of recurrence free at 5âyears after resection for localized grade 1 (G1)/ grade 2 (G2) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). BACKGROUND: Among patients undergoing resection of PanNETs, approximately 17% experience recurrence. It is not established which patients are at risk, with no consensus on optimal follow-up. METHOD: A multi-institutional database of patients with G1/G2 PanNETs treated at 2 institutions was used to develop a nomogram estimating the rate of freedom from recurrence at 5âyears after curative resection. A second cohort of patients from 3 additional institutions was used to validate the nomogram. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate analysis using Cox regression model. The nomogram was internally validated using bootstrap resampling method and on the external cohort. Performance was assessed by concordance index (c-index) and a calibration curve. RESULTS: The nomogram was constructed using a cohort of 632 patients. Overall, 68% of PanNETs were G1, the median follow-up was 51âmonths, and we observed 74 recurrences. Variables included in the nomogram were the number of positive nodes, tumor diameter, Ki-67, and vascular/perineural invasion. The model bias-corrected c-index from the internal validation was 0.85, which was higher than European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society/ American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging scheme (c-index 0.76, P = <0.001). On the external cohort of 328 patients, the nomogram c-index was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.88). CONCLUSION: Our externally validated nomogram predicts the probability of recurrence-free survival at 5âyears after PanNETs curative resection, with improved accuracy over current staging systems. Estimating individual recurrence risk will guide the development of personalized surveillance programs after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer, 80% have high-risk, borderline resectable or locally advanced cancer, with a 5-year overall survival of 12%. MASTERPLAN evaluates the safety and activity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in addition to chemotherapy in these patients. METHODS AND DESIGN: MASTERPLAN is a multi-centre randomised phase II trial of 120 patients with histologically confirmed potentially operable pancreatic cancer (POPC) or inoperable pancreatic cancer (IPC). POPC includes patients with borderline resectable or high-risk tumours; IPC is defined as locally advanced or medically inoperable pancreatic cancer. Randomisation is 2:1 to chemotherapy + SBRT (investigational arm) or chemotherapy alone (control arm) by minimisation and stratified by patient cohort (POPC v IPC), planned induction chemotherapy and institution. Chemotherapy can have been commenced ≤28 days prior to randomisation. Both arms receive 6 × 2 weekly cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 IV), irinotecan (150 mg/m2), 5-fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2 CIV), leucovorin (50 mg IV bolus)) plus SBRT in the investigational arm. Gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel is permitted for patients unsuitable for mFOLFIRINOX. SBRT is 40Gy in five fractions with planning quality assurance to occur in real time. Following initial chemotherapy ± SBRT, resectability will be evaluated. For resected patients, adjuvant chemotherapy is six cycles of mFOLFIRINOX. Where gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel was used initially, the adjuvant treatment is 12 weeks of gemcitabine and capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX. Unresectable or medically inoperable patients with stable/responding disease will continue with a further six cycles of mFOLFIRINOX or three cycles of gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel, whatever was used initially. The primary endpoint is 12-month locoregional control. Secondary endpoints are safety, surgical morbidity and mortality, radiological response rates, progression-free survival, pathological response rates, surgical resection rates, R0 resection rate, quality of life, deterioration-free survival and overall survival. Tertiary/correlative objectives are radiological measures of nutrition and sarcopenia, and serial tissue, blood and microbiome samples to be assessed for associations between clinical endpoints and potential predictive/prognostic biomarkers. Interim analysis will review rates of locoregional recurrence, distant failure and death after 40 patients complete 12 months follow-up. Fifteen Australian and New Zealand sites will recruit over a 4-year period, with minimum follow-up period of 12 months. DISCUSSION: MASTERPLAN evaluates SBRT in both resectable and unresectable patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000409178 , 13/03/2019. Protocol version: 2.0, 19 May 2019.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas account for some of the most aggressive malignancies, and the leading causes of cancer-related mortalities. Partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with negative resection margins is the only potentially curative therapy. The high prevalence of lymph node metastases has led to the hypothesis that wider excision with the removal of more lymphatic tissue could result in an improvement of survival, and higher rates of negative resection margins. OBJECTIVES: To compare overall survival following standard (SLA) versus extended lymph lymphadenectomy (ELA) for pancreatic head and periampullary adenocarcinoma. We also compared secondary outcomes, such as morbidity, mortality, and tumour involvement of the resection margins between the two procedures. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from 1973 to September 2020; we applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing PD with SLA versus PD with ELA, including participants with pancreatic head and periampullary adenocarcinoma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened references and extracted data from study reports. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) for most binary outcomes except for postoperative mortality, for which we estimated a Peto odds ratio (Peto OR), and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We used a fixed-effect model in the absence of substantial heterogeneity (I² < 25%), and a random-effects model in cases of substantial heterogeneity (I² > 25%). Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias, and we used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for important outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven studies with 843 participants (421 ELA and 422 SLA). All seven studies included Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival. There was little or no difference in survival between groups (log hazard ratio (log HR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.06 to 3.31; P = 0.94; seven studies, 843 participants; very low-quality evidence). There was little or no difference in postoperative mortality between the groups (Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.20, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.80; seven studies, 843 participants; low-quality evidence). Operating time was probably longer for ELA (mean difference (MD) 50.13 minutes, 95% CI 19.19 to 81.06 minutes; five studies, 670 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 88%; P < 0.00001). There may have been more blood loss during ELA (MD 137.43 mL, 95% CI 11.55 to 263.30 mL; two studies, 463 participants; very low-quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 81%, P = 0.02). There may have been more lymph nodes retrieved during ELA (MD 11.09 nodes, 95% CI 7.16 to 15.02; five studies, 670 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 81%, P < 0.00001). There was little or no difference in the incidence of positive resection margins between groups (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.13; six studies, 783 participants; very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of an impact on survival with extended versus standard lymph node resection. However, the operating time may have been longer and blood loss greater in the extended resection group. In conclusion, current evidence neither supports nor refutes the effect of extended lymph lymphadenectomy in people with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.