Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 332, 2023 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37161480

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: mRNA vaccination is an effective, safe, and widespread strategy for protecting pregnant women against infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, information on factors such as perinatal outcomes, safety, and coverage of mRNA vaccinations among pregnant women is limited in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the perinatal outcomes, coverage, adverse effects, and short-term safety of mRNA vaccination as well as vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter online survey of postpartum women who delivered their offspring at 15 institutions around Tokyo from October 2021 to March 2022. Postpartum women were divided into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Perinatal outcomes, COVID-19 prevalence, and disease severity were compared between the two groups. Adverse reactions in the vaccinated group and the reasons for being unvaccinated were also investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 1,051 eligible postpartum women were included. Of these, 834 (79.4%) had received an mRNA vaccine, while 217 (20.6%) had not, mainly due to concerns about the effect of vaccination on the fetus. Vaccination did not increase the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, including fetal morphological abnormalities. The vaccinated group demonstrated low COVID-19 morbidity and severity. In the vaccinated group, the preterm birth rate, cesarean section rate, and COVID-19 incidence were 7.2%, 33.2%, and 3.3%, respectively, compared with the 13.7%, 42.2%, and 7.8% in the unvaccinated group, respectively. Almost no serious adverse reactions were associated with vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: mRNA vaccines did not demonstrate any adverse effects pertaining to short-term perinatal outcomes and might have prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection or reduced COVID-19 severity. Concerns regarding the safety of the vaccine in relation to the fetus and the mother were the main reasons that prevented pregnant women from being vaccinated. To resolve concerns, it is necessary to conduct further research to confirm not only the short-term safety but also the long-term safety of mRNA vaccines.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Nacimiento Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Mujeres Embarazadas , Cesárea , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(9): 2252-2266, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37381694

RESUMEN

Here, we aimed to provide an overview of Japan Council for the Implementation of the Maternal Emergency Life-Saving System (J-CIMELS) and its simulation program, which has reduced maternal mortality due to direct causes in Japan. The Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG), Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Maternal Death Exploratory Committee (JMDEC) launched the Maternal Death Reporting Project in 2010. The project analyzed obstetricians' tendency to delay their initial response to sudden maternal deterioration. Obstetricians can predict small changes before deterioration by monitoring vital signs. In 2015, the J-CIMELS was established to provide practical education. J-CIMELS developed a simulation program (J-MELS; Japan Maternal Emergency Life Support) to ensure that the obstetricians acquire the latest knowledge of emergency physicians, anesthesiologists, and other general practitioners and apply it in clinical situations. In the last 7 years, the J-MELS basic course has been conducted 1000 times with a total attendance of 19 890 people. As a result, the incidence of obstetric hemorrhage progressively decreased from 29% in 2010 to 7% in 2020. We believe that the activities of J-CIMELS are improving obstetric care providers' medical practices in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Materna , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Muerte Materna/prevención & control , Japón/epidemiología , Sistemas de Manutención de la Vida , Mortalidad Materna
3.
J Hum Genet ; 67(5): 261-265, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974528

RESUMEN

The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies is not well-studied. In this retrospective study, we investigated the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies and compared the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in dichorionic diamniotic (DD) and monochorionic diamniotic (MD) twins. We used data from 57 clinical facilities across Japan. Twin pregnancies of more than 12 weeks of gestation managed between January 2016 and December 2018 were included in the study. A total of 2899 and 1908 cases of DD and MD twins, respectively, were reported, and the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in one or both fetuses was 0.9% (25/2899) and 0.2% (4/1908) in each group (p = 0.004). In this study, the most common chromosomal abnormality was trisomy 21 (51.7% [15/29]), followed by trisomy 18 (13.8% [4/29]) and trisomy 13 (6.9% [2/29]). The incidence of trisomy 21 in MD twins was lower than that in DD twins (0.05% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.007). Trisomy 21 was less common in MD twins, even when compared with the expected incidence in singletons (0.05% vs. 0.3%, RR 0.15 [95% CI 0.04-0.68]). The risk of chromosomal abnormality decreases in twin pregnancies, especially in MD twins.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de los Cromosomas , Síndrome de Down , Aneuploidia , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/epidemiología , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/genética , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Síndrome de Down/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Embarazo Gemelar , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trisomía/genética
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 527, 2022 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35764977

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is worthwhile to identify women at risk of developing postpartum depression during pregnancy. This study aimed to determine the optimal time and cutoff score for antenatal screening for prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and to identify risk factors for PDS. METHODS: The target population was healthy pregnant women receiving antenatal care at a university hospital in Tokyo, Japan. During the first, second, and third trimesters, 3-4 days postpartum, and one month postpartum, they were asked to take the Japanese version of the EPDS questionnaire. The primary outcome of the study was PDS, defined as an EPDS score ≥ 9 at one month postpartum. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EPDS scores at each antenatal screening time were calculated. RESULTS: From 139 pregnant women, 129 were successfully followed up throughout the study. The number of women with an EPDS score ≥ 9 during the first, second, and third trimesters, 3-4 days postpartum, and one month postpartum were 6/126 (4.8%), 9/124 (7.3%), 5/117 (4.3%), 17/123 (13.8%), and 15/123 (12.2%), respectively. Screening during the second trimester had the highest AUC to predict PDS (0.89) among antenatal screenings. The optimal EPDS cutoff score during the second trimester was 4/5 (sensitivity: 85.7%; specificity: 77.1%; PPV: 33.3%; NPV: 97.6%). An EPDS score ≥ 5 during the second trimester (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 15.9; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.2-78.1) and a family history of mental illness (aOR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.2-17.5) were significantly associated with PDS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the EPDS score at the second trimester with the cutoff value of 4/5 may be adequate for initial screening for prediction of PDS. Women with an EPDS score ≥ 5 at the second trimester require more elaborate follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Depresión , Periodo Posparto , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica
5.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(7): 2684-2692, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35678738

RESUMEN

In this retrospective study, we analysed clinical and demographic data from the medical records of 31 pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were treated at our hospital between April 2020 and April 2021. The most common symptom was a fever; ∼10% of patients were asymptomatic. One patient with rapidly worsening pneumonia needed a Caesarean Section at 30 weeks and was admitted for intensive care. Twelve patients received perinatal care in our hospital (10 live births, one stillbirth, and one artificial abortion). Six patients delivered vaginally; the others delivered via caesarean section. Two patients had complications, including severe hypertensive disorders and preeclampsia. All patients recovered from COVID-19. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was not detected in the placenta, umbilical cord, cord blood, amniotic fluid, vaginal fluid, or breast milk in any patient. There were no neonatal adverse outcomes. The possibility of transmitting the coronavirus to pregnancy-related samples was low.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on the subject? COVID-19 has been affecting different countries in diverse ways, and the incidence, mortality, and morbidity rates of patients with COVID-19 vary widely by country or region and race. These differences in results may reflect racial differences and differences in national health care systems. Moreover, the information about the perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 and their newborns from Japan is limited.What do the results of this study add to what is known? We described the perinatal outcomes of 31 Japanese pregnant women with COVID-19 who were managed safely in a perinatal medical centre in Tokyo Japan, during the first 1 year of the pandemic.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Severe pneumonia and perinatal complications may occur, although no maternal and neonatal deaths were observed for COVID-19-positive pregnant women in our facility. Therefore, it is important to prevent this infection during pregnancy with the provision of effective medical care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cesárea , Mujeres Embarazadas , Pandemias , Japón/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Mortinato/epidemiología , Hospitales , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 47(10): 3720-3726, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34342369

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 36-year-old woman with spontaneously conceived heterotopic pregnancy with abdominal pregnancy. She visited the hospital at 5 weeks and 4 days of gestation and transvaginal ultrasonography revealed a normal intrauterine pregnancy. Two days later, she was urgently transported to the hospital due to extreme abdominal pain. Emergent laparotomy was performed to investigate the cause of massive intraperitoneal bleeding, which was confirmed to have been due to an abdominal pregnancy that implanted on the vesicouterine pouch. The hematic mass, including chorionic villi, was successfully removed from the peritoneum. The subsequent course of the intrauterine pregnancy was uneventful and a healthy baby was born at term. To the best of our knowledge, this is an extremely rare case report of a spontaneously conceived heterotopic abdominal pregnancy, in which the intrauterine pregnancy showed a successful outcome despite the collapse of the abdominal pregnancy at a very early stage.


Asunto(s)
Embarazo Abdominal , Embarazo Heterotópico , Adulto , Vellosidades Coriónicas , Femenino , Humanos , Peritoneo , Embarazo , Embarazo Abdominal/diagnóstico , Embarazo Abdominal/etiología , Embarazo Abdominal/cirugía , Embarazo Heterotópico/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo Heterotópico/etiología , Embarazo Heterotópico/cirugía
7.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 47(9): 3144-3150, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34189855

RESUMEN

AIM: To confirm that variations in cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) are indicators of external placental damage, we quantitatively investigated cffDNA alterations in maternal peripheral blood during external cephalic version (ECV). METHODS: We recruited 48 singleton pregnant women who underwent ECV in our hospital. Before and immediately after ECV, we harvested 10 ml of maternal peripheral blood samples for cffDNA analysis. cffDNA alterations were assessed based on the fetal fraction (FF) rate. We performed ECV without epidural anesthesia but administered epidural anesthesia if ECV was disrupted due to severe pain. RESULTS: The FF increased from 22.9% ± 5.7% to 27.0% ± 5.7% (p < 0.05) after ECV. The FF increased in both successful (before, 24.4% ± 5.9%; after, 28.1% ± 5.9%; p < 0.05) and unsuccessful (before, 21.8% ± 3.8%; after, 27.3% ± 4.2%; p < 0.05) cases, as well as in patients who received epidural anesthesia (before, 23.9% ± 4.7%; after, 28.5% ± 4.4%; p < 0.05) or underwent ECV more than once (before, 23.5% ± 6.1%; after, 28.4% ± 5.3%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FF alterations increased due to external stresses during ECV; the alterations were markedly greater when the strength and duration of external stress increased. These FF alterations may serve as potential biomarkers for the direct assessment of placental damage.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células , Versión Fetal , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Humanos , Placenta , Embarazo
8.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 47(10): 3437-3446, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34355471

RESUMEN

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: Pregnant women who underwent GeneTech NIPT, the most commonly used NIPT in Japan, between January 2015 and March 2019, at Japan NIPT Consortium medical sites were recruited for this study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: pregnant women with missing survey items, multiple pregnancy/vanishing twins, chromosomal abnormalities in the fetus other than the NIPT target disease, and nonreportable NIPT results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated from the obtained data, and maternal age-specific PPV and NPV were estimated. RESULTS: Of the 45 504 cases, 44 263 cases fulfilling the study criteria were included. The mean maternal age and gestational weeks at the time of procedure were 38.5 years and 13.1 weeks, respectively. Sensitivities were 99.78% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 98.78-99.96), 99.12% (95% CI: 96.83-99.76), and 100% (95% CI: 88.30-100) for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Specificities were more than 99.9% for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Maternal age-specific PPVs were more than 93%, 77%, and 43% at the age of 35 years for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. CONCLUSION: The GeneTech NIPT data showed high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in high-risk pregnant women, and maternal age-specific PPVs were obtained. These results could provide more accurate and improved information regarding NIPT for genetic counseling in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Laboratorios , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Trisomía
9.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 41(3): 380-384, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632049

RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the side effects of silicone gel sheet (Lady Care®) and evaluate its prophylactic efficacy in preventing abnormal scarring. Sixty women who underwent caesarean section were recruited from September 2016 to September 2017 in this prospective study. Lady Care® was applied from the 2nd to the 6th postoperative months. Side effects of Lady Care® were evaluated through medical examinations and questionnaires. A plastic surgeon diagnosed abnormal scarring. Pruritus was diagnosed in 25 (47.2%) patients; folliculitis, four (7.5%); dry skin, four (7.5%); contact dermatitis, three (5.7%); wound infection, two (3.8%); and epidermolysis, one (1.9%), albeit with mild severity. Following Lady Care® application, no abnormal scarring and mild hypertrophic scarring was observed in 32 (64.0%) and 18 (36.0%) patients respectively. Of seven patients with pre-existing hypertrophic scars, only two showed hypertrophic scarring after Lady Care® application. Our findings support the safety and prophylactic efficacy of Lady Care®.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The incidence of abnormal scarring, i.e. keloid or hypertrophic scar formation after caesarean section (CS) is reported to be ∼41%. Abnormal or excessive scar formation can lead to functional limitations, pruritus, pain and cosmetic issues. Studies have also shown a prophylactic effect of the application of silicone materials against the development of hypertrophic and keloid scars, though prohibitive cost and lack of adhesiveness of such gel sheets are known factors limiting their usage.What the results of this study add? The new silicone gel sheet 'Lady Care®' has strong adhesive properties and is consequently not easily peeled off. Furthermore, it is easy to use and economically efficient.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This is the first clinical trial on the application of Lady Care® silicone gel sheet for the prevention of CS scarring. Our findings support the safety and prophylactic efficacy of Lady Care®.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/prevención & control , Queloide/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Geles de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/epidemiología , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Queloide/epidemiología , Queloide/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Am J Med Genet A ; 182(4): 735-739, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31880411

RESUMEN

We present two unrelated Japanese pedigrees with achondrogenesis type 1b (ACG1B), characterized by prenatally lethal fetal hydrops and severe micromelia. The affected members in these pedigrees carried a common homozygous missense point mutation in solute carrier family 26 member 2 (SLC26A2), a gene associated with ACG1B (NM_000112:c.1987G>A). This loss-of-function point mutation causes substitution of glycine 663 with arginine in a highly conserved loop domain of SLC26A2. Interestingly, only a few cases of this mutation have been registered in Japanese genomic databases, and there are no reports of this mutation in any major genomic databases outside Japan. Furthermore, we confirmed the presence of a homozygous stretch of approximately 75 kb surrounding the pathogenic variant. Our findings suggest that this missense point mutation in SLC26A2, which is likely the cause of the ACG1B phenotypes in these unrelated fetuses, is distributed exclusively in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia/patología , Mutación , Transportadores de Sulfato/genética , Acondroplasia/genética , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Linaje , Fenotipo
11.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 112, 2020 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32066398

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women who receive negative results from non-invasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) may find that they later have mixed or ambivalent feelings, for example, feelings of accepting NIPT and regretting undergoing the test. This study aimed to investigate the factors generating ambivalent feelings among women who gave birth after having received negative results from NIPT. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who received a negative NIPT result, and a contents analysis was conducted focusing on ambivalent expressions for those 1562 women who responded the questionnaire. The qualitative data gathered from the questionnaire were analyzed using the N-Vivo software package. RESULTS: Environmental factors, genetic counseling-related factors, and increased anticipatory anxiety, affected the feeling of ambivalence among pregnant women. Furthermore, pregnant women desired more information regarding the detailed prognosis for individuals with Down syndrome and living with them and/or termination, assuming the possibility that they were positive. CONCLUSIONS: Three major interrelated factors affected the feeling of ambivalence in women. Highlighting and discussing such factors during genetic counseling may resolve some of these ambivalences, thereby enhancing the quality of decisions made by pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Emociones , Resultados Negativos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas , Parto/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético/psicología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Medio Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 46(8): 1246-1254, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32558079

RESUMEN

Eight years have passed since noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was clinically evaluated and data on NIPT for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 were collected. The data revealed that NIPT is more accurate than conventional first-trimester screening. However, there is still insufficient data regarding the clinical use of NIPT results in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies or whole-genome regions. NIPT is already being used as a clinical screening method globally. However, it is an unconfirmed diagnostic test and the results must be interpreted with caution as they may yield false negatives, false positives or inconclusive results. Therefore, the aim of this review is to highlight the current status of information, including the different methodologies, shortcomings and implications, regarding NIPT after its adoption worldwide. It is important to include genetic counseling when implementing NIPT. Going forward, the knowledge obtained to date, including the associated shortcomings, must be considered in evaluating the effectiveness of NIPT in detecting genetic abnormalities.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Trisomía , Aneuploidia , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Down/genética , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Aberraciones Cromosómicas Sexuales , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18
13.
Lab Invest ; 99(6): 885-897, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30760866

RESUMEN

Down syndrome is the most frequent chromosomal abnormality among live-born infants. All Down syndrome patients have mental retardation and are prone to develop early onset Alzheimer's disease. However, it has not yet been elucidated whether there is a correlation between the phenotype of Down syndrome and the extra chromosome 21. In this study, we continuously cultivated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with chromosome 21 trisomy for more than 70 weeks, and serendipitously obtained revertant cells with normal chromosome 21 diploids from the trisomic cells during long-term cultivation. Repeated experiments revealed that this trisomy rescue was not due to mosaicism of chromosome 21 diploid cells and occurred at an extremely high frequency. We herewith report the spontaneous correction from chromosome 21 trisomy to disomy without genetic manipulation, chemical treatment or exposure to irradiation. The revertant diploid cells will possibly serve a reference for drug screening and a raw material of regenerative medicinal products for cell-based therapy.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/genética , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas , Células Cultivadas , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Trisomía
14.
Prenat Diagn ; 39(2): 100-106, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586157

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reasons for nonreportable cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), we retrospectively studied maternal characteristics and other details associated with the results. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in pregnant women undergoing NIPT by massively parallel sequencing (MPS) with failed cfDNA tests was performed between April 2013 and March 2017. The women's data and MPS results were analyzed in terms of maternal characteristics, test performance, fetal fraction (FF), z scores, anticoagulation therapy, and other details of the nonreportable cases. RESULTS: Overall, 110 (0.32%) of 34 626 pregnant women had nonreportable cfDNA test results after an initial blood sampling; 22 (20.0%) cases had a low FF (<4%), and 18 (16.4%) cases including those with a maternal malignancy, were found to have altered genomic profile. Approximately half of the cases with nonreportable results had borderline z score. Among the women with nonreportable results because of altered genomic profile, the success rate of retesting using a second blood sampling was relatively low (25.0%-33.3%). Thirteen (11.8%) of the women with nonreportable results had required hypodermic heparin injection. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of nonreportable results using cfDNA analysis is important to provide women with precise information and to reduce anxiety during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Adulto , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo/sangre , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo/genética , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo/sangre , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trisomía/genética
15.
J Hum Genet ; 63(10): 1097-1098, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30069028

RESUMEN

Since the advance online publication of this article, the authors of the above paper have noticed errors in the list of authors and affiliations. The article with correct author information now appears in this issue.

16.
J Hum Genet ; 63(10): 1035-1040, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29849041

RESUMEN

The data collected by nation-wide study of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21 from 21,610 pregnant women with advanced maternal age in Japan were reported. Among 188 NIPT-positive cases, 180 cases were true positive. The incidence of aneuploidy according to maternal age was estimated using a state-space model. Although, the frequency of trisomy increased exponentially with maternal age as previously reported, the maternal age-specific risk for trisomy 21 that was based on the clinical performance of NIPT was lower than the predicted risk in previous Western cohorts based on the data from invasive prenatal testing (Bayesian two-sided tail-area probability P = 0.0156). The empirical positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT is likely to turn out higher than that of the theoretical PPV calculated from the sensitivity/specificity of the test and the incidence of trisomy 21 from this study.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Síndrome de Down/genética , Edad Gestacional , Edad Materna , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
17.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 43(8): 1245-1255, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586143

RESUMEN

AIM: The purpose of this study was to report the 3-year experience of a nationwide demonstration project to introduce non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of maternal plasma for aneuploidy, and review the current status of NIPT in Japan. METHODS: Tests were conducted to detect aneuploidy in high-risk pregnant women, and adequate genetic counseling was provided. The clinical data, test results, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. We discuss the problems of NIPT on the basis of published reports and meta-analyses. RESULTS: From April 2013 to March 2016, 30 613 tests were conducted at 55 medical sites participating in a multicenter clinical study. Among the 30 613 women tested, 554 were positive (1.81%) and 30 021 were negative (98.1%) for aneuploidy. Of the 289, 128, and 44 women who tested positive for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively, and underwent definitive testing, 279 (96.5%), 106 (82.8%), and 28 (63.6%) were determined to have a true-positive result. For the 13 481 women with negative result and whose progress could be traced, two had a false-negative result (0.02%). The tests were performed on the condition that a standard level of genetic counseling be provided at hospitals. CONCLUSION: Here, we report on the 3-year nationwide experience with NIPT in Japan. It is important to establish a genetic counseling system to enable women to make informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. Moreover, a welfare system is warranted to support women who decide to give birth to and raise children with chromosomal diseases.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno/tendencias , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético , Humanos , Japón , Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno/ética , Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno/métodos , Embarazo
18.
J Hum Genet ; 61(7): 647-52, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26984559

RESUMEN

The purpose of this noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) study was to compare the fetal fraction of singleton gestations by gestational age, maternal characteristics and chromosome-specific aneuploidies as indicated by z-scores. This study was a multicenter prospective cohort study. Test data were collected from women who underwent NIPT by the massively parallel sequencing method. We used sequencing-based fetal fraction calculations in which we estimated fetal DNA fraction by simply counting the number of reads aligned within specific autosomal regions and applying a weighting scheme derived from a multivariate model. Relationships between fetal fractions and gestational age, maternal weight and height, and z-scores for chromosomes 21, 18 and 13 were assessed. A total of 7740 pregnant women enrolled in the study, of which 6993 met the study criteria. As expected, fetal fraction was inversely correlated with maternal weight (P<0.001). The median fetal fraction of samples with euploid result (n=6850) and trisomy 21 (n=70) were 13.7% and 13.6%, respectively. In contrast, the median fetal fraction values for samples with trisomies 18 (n=35) and 13 (n=9) were 11.0% and 8.0%, respectively. The fetal fraction of samples with trisomy 21 NIPT result is comparable to that of samples with euploid result. However, the fetal fractions of samples with trisomies 13 and 18 are significantly lower compared with that of euploid result. We conclude that it may make detecting these two trisomies more challenging.


Asunto(s)
ADN/genética , Marcadores Genéticos , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Trisomía/genética , Adulto , Peso Corporal , ADN/sangre , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
19.
J Hum Genet ; 61(12): 995-1001, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27604555

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study is to summarize the results from a survey on awareness of genetic counseling for pregnant women who wish to receive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan. As a component of a clinical study by the Japan NIPT Consortium, genetic counseling was conducted for women who wished to receive NIPT, and a questionnaire concerning both NIPT and genetic counseling was given twice: once after pre-test counseling and again when test results were reported. The responses of 7292 women were analyzed. They expressed high satisfaction with the genetic counseling system of the NIPT Consortium (94%). The number of respondents who indicated that genetic counseling is necessary for NIPT increased over time. Furthermore, they highly valued genetic counseling provided by skilled clinicians, such as clinical geneticists or genetic counselors. The vast majority (90%) responded that there was sufficient opportunity to consider the test ahead of time. Meanwhile, women who received positive test results had a poor opinion and expressed a low-degree satisfaction. We confirmed that the pre-test genetic counseling that we conducted creates an opportunity for pregnant women to sufficiently consider prenatal testing, promotes its understanding and has possibilities to effectively facilitate informed decision making after adequate consideration. A more careful and thorough approach is considered to be necessary for women who received positive test results.


Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Concienciación , Comprensión , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Adulto Joven
20.
Prenat Diagn ; 36(12): 1121-1126, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27760457

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rates of termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and factors related to such parental decision in Japan. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed before 22 weeks of gestation between April 2008 and March 2015. The pregnancy outcomes and parental decisions were investigated. RESULTS: Among 931 fetuses with chromosome abnormalities, the total TOP rate was 75.1% (699/931). TOP rates were 89.3% (585/655) in autosomal aneuploidies and 40.8% (51/125) in sex chromosome aneuploidies. Trisomy 21 showed the highest TOP rate (93.8% [390/416]) followed by trisomy 18 (84.5% [163/193]) and trisomy 13 (71.9% [23/32]). Indications for karyotyping were related to a parental decision for TOP (p < 0.01): in cases of autosomal aneuploidy, with fetal abnormal ultrasound findings as the reference value, diagnoses made following positive results at non-invasive prenatal testing (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 13.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.07-45.9) and those because of advanced maternal age (adj. OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.15-7.35) were significantly more frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, pregnancies with fetal trisomy 21 are more likely to result in TOP when diagnosed in utero than any other chromosome anomaly. The indications for prenatal karyotyping strongly affect the decision to TOP. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Toma de Decisiones , Padres , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Aneuploidia , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica , Trastornos de los Cromosomas , Cromosomas Humanos Par 13 , Cromosomas Humanos Par 18 , Estudios de Cohortes , Anomalías Congénitas/genética , Síndrome de Down , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Cariotipificación , Edad Materna , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aberraciones Cromosómicas Sexuales , Trisomía , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13 , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18 , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA