Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Respiration ; : 1, 2024 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810608

RESUMEN

Based on the assessment of new evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in December 2022. The new recommendations and the latest study data made it necessary to update the existing guideline on the treatment of at least rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) for the German-speaking countries, replacing the respective chapters of the treatment guidelines published in 2022. A shortened treatment of proven RR-TB and multidrug-resistant TB for at least 6 months using the fixed and non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) is now also recommended for Austria, Germany, and Switzerland under certain conditions considering the existing barriers for the implementation of the new treatment regimen. For the treatment of pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR-) TB, an individualized treatment for 18 months continues to be the primary recommendation. The non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) may be used alternatively in selected pre-XDR-TB cases, provided that all prerequisites are met. The necessary requirements for using BPaLM and BPaL are presented in detail in this amendment to the consensus-based TB treatment guideline for adult patients.

2.
Pneumologie ; 78(1): 35-46, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931778

RESUMEN

In December 2022, based on the assessment of new evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). The evaluation of both, these recommendations, and the latest study data, makes it necessary to update the existing guidelines on the treatment of at least rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis for the German-speaking region, hereby replacing the respective chapters. A shortened MDR-TB treatment of at least 6 month using the fixed and non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) is now also recommended for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland under certain conditions. This recommendation applies to TB cases with proven rifampicin resistance, including rifampicin monoresistance. For treatment of pre-extensively drug resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB), an individualized treatment for 18 months adjusted to resistance data continues to be the primary recommendation. The non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) may be used alternatively in pre-XDR TB if all prerequisites are met. The necessary prerequisites for the use of BPaLM and BPaL are presented in this amendment to the S2k guideline for 'Tuberculosis in adulthood'.


Asunto(s)
Nitroimidazoles , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Rifampin , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Austria , Suiza , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Alemania , Combinación de Medicamentos
3.
Pneumologie ; 76(11): 727-819, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384164

RESUMEN

In Germany tuberculosis is a rare disease and usually well treatable. Worldwide it is one of the most common infectious diseases with approximately 10 million new cases every year. Even with low incidences in Germany, tuberculosis is an important differential diagnosis especially due to international developments and migration movements. With a decreasing experience there's a continuous demand on accurate and up-to-date information. This guideline covers all aspects of microbiological diagnostics, basic principles of standard therapy, treatment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, management of side effects, special features of diagnosis and treatment of resistant tuberculosis, and treatment in TB-HIV coinfection. Also, it explains when treatment in specialized centers is required, aspects of care and legal regulations and the diagnosis and preventive therapy of latent tuberculosis infection. The update of the S2k guideline "Tuberculosis in Adults" is intended to serve as a guideline for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of tuberculosis for all those involved in tuberculosis care and to help meet the current challenges in dealing with tuberculosis in Germany.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Tuberculosis Latente , Tuberculosis , Adulto , Humanos , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Alemania
4.
Respiration ; 100(3): 238-271, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486500

RESUMEN

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe and often fatal disease. Diagnosis of IPF requires considerable expertise and experience. Since the publication of the international IPF guideline in the year 2011 and the update 2018 several studies and technical advances have occurred, which made a new assessment of the diagnostic process mandatory. The goal of this guideline is to foster early, confident, and effective diagnosis of IPF. The guideline focusses on the typical clinical context of an IPF patient and provides tools to exclude known causes of interstitial lung disease including standardized questionnaires, serologic testing, and cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage. High-resolution computed tomography remains crucial in the diagnostic workup. If it is necessary to obtain specimens for histology, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is the primary approach, while surgical lung biopsy is reserved for patients who are fit for it and in whom a bronchoscopic diagnosis did not provide the information needed. After all, IPF is a diagnosis of exclusion and multidisciplinary discussion remains the golden standard of diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Pulmón , Biopsia/métodos , Lavado Broncoalveolar/métodos , Broncoscopía/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
5.
Zentralbl Chir ; 145(1): 82-88, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31269514

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications after lung resections pose a high burden of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Among other factors, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and management of a postoperative pneumonia have an impact on patient outcome. We developed a local clinical pathway for adequate perioperative use of antibiotics. METHODS: We analysed respiratory samples of 200 patients taken before and after lung resection performed in our lung clinic from October 2013 till October 2014. The clinical pathway was based on our local pathogen and resistance pattern as well as on current guidelines and on the principals of antibiotic stewardship. RESULTS: Gram negative bacteria were the predominant pathogens that grew from the samples in the preoperative phase (62%), as well as in the postoperative phase (78%). A significant number of these bacteria showed intrinsic resistance against the commonly used antibiotics for perioperative prophylaxis. This was the case for both the preoperative phase (21%) and the postoperative phase (39%). These findings were integrated into the local clinical pathway. CONCLUSION: The commonly used antibiotics for perioperative prophylaxis in thoracic surgery cover only some of the pathogens responsible for preoperative airway colonisation and postoperative pneumonia. Therefore, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis should be given as a single shot just before surgery and postoperative pneumonia should be treated as a hospital acquired pneumonia with respect to the local pathogen and resistance pattern.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Cirugía Torácica
7.
Pneumologie ; 72(2): 155-168, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29341047

RESUMEN

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe and often fatal disease with a median survival of 2 - 4 years after diagnosis. Since the publication of the German IPF guideline in 2013 new treatment trials have been published, necessitating an update of the pharmacological therapy of IPF. Different from the previous guideline, the GRADE system was discarded and replaced by the Oxford evidence classification system which allows a more differentiated judgement. The following pharmacological therapies were rated not suitable for the treatment of IPF patients (recommendation A; evidence 1-b): triple therapy with prednisolone, azathioprine and acetyl-cysteine; imatinib; ambrisentan; bosentan; macitentan. A less clear but still negative recommendation (B, 1-b) was attributed to the treatment of IPF with the phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor sildenafil and acetyl-cysteine monotherapy. In contrast to the international guideline antacid therapy as a general treatment for IPF was rated negative, based on conflicting results of recent analyses (recommendation C; evidence 4). An unanimous positive recommendation was granted for the antifibrotic drugs nintedanib and pirfenidone for the treatment of IPF (A, 1-a). For some open questions in the management of IPF patients for which firm evidence is lacking the guideline also offers recommendations based on expert consensus.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetilcisteína/efectos adversos , Acetilcisteína/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiácidos/efectos adversos , Antiácidos/uso terapéutico , Bosentán/efectos adversos , Bosentán/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Mesilato de Imatinib/efectos adversos , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenilpropionatos/uso terapéutico , Piridazinas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Citrato de Sildenafil/efectos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafil/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico
8.
Zentralbl Chir ; 142(S 01): S53-S65, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28977811

RESUMEN

Today surgical procedures for pulmonary tuberculosis are highly selective but owing to the increasing incidence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis has been becoming more and more relevant. Besides the treatment of tuberculosis foci in multidrug resistance tuberculosis to eliminate the source of relapse, complications as sequelae of tuberculosis are among the most frequent indications for surgery. In patients with cavernous lesions, destroyed lobe or lung, bronchiectasis, pleural empyema or hemoptysis thoracic surgical procedures may be warranted. However, in solitary pulmonary nodules operations with diagnostic purpose are necessary, not only to rule out a potential malignancy, but also to identify a so far unidentified tuberculoma. Considering the heterogenous group of patients with tuberculosis, surgical morbidity and mortality are in the known range for surgical resections in lung cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Colaboración Intersectorial , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/cirugía , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/cirugía , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/cirugía , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Bronquiectasia/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Empiema Tuberculoso/cirugía , Hemoptisis/cirugía , Humanos , Neumonectomía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video
9.
Pneumologie ; 71(7): 460-474, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28558396

RESUMEN

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe and often fatal disease with a median survival of 2 - 4 years after diagnosis. Since the publication of the German IPF guideline in 2013 new treatment trials have been published, necessitating an update of the pharmacological therapy of IPF. Different from the previous guideline, the GRADE system was discarded and replaced by the Oxford evidence classification system which allows a more differentiated judgement. The following pharmacological therapies were rated not suitable for the treatment of IPF patients (recommendation A; evidence 1-b): triple therapy with prednisolone, azathioprine and acetyl-cysteine; imatinib; ambrisentan; bosentan; macitentan. A less clear but still negative recommendation (B, 1-b) was attributed to the treatment of IPF with the phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor sildenafil and acetyl-cysteine monotherapy. In contrast to the international guideline antacid therapy as a general treatment for IPF was rated negative, based on conflicting results of recent analyses (recommendation C; evidence 4). An unanimous positive recommendation was granted for the antifibrotic drugs nintedanib and pirfenidone for the treatment of IPF (A, 1-a). For some open questions in the management of IPF patients for which firm evidence is lacking the guideline also offers recommendations based on expert consensus.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Consenso , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Alemania , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente
10.
Pneumologie ; 71(6): 325-397, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28651293

RESUMEN

Since 2015 a significant increase in tuberculosis cases is notified in Germany, mostly due to rising numbers of migrants connected to the recent refugee crisis. Because of the low incidence in previous years, knowledge on tuberculosis is more and more limited to specialized centers. However, lung specialist and healthcare workers of other fields have contact to an increasing number of tuberculosis patients. In this situation, guidance for the management of standard therapy and especially for uncommon situations will be essential. This new guideline on tuberculosis in adults gives recommendations on diagnosis, treatment, prevention and prophylaxis. It provides a comprehensive overview over the current knowledge, adapted to the specific situation in Germany. The German Central Committee against Tuberculosis (DZK e. V.) realized this guideline on behalf of the German Respiratory Society (DGP). A specific guideline for tuberculosis in the pediatrics field will be published separately. Compared to the former recommendations of the year 2012, microbiological diagnostics and therapeutic drug management were given own sections. Chapters about the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, tuberculosis in people living with HIV and pharmacological management were extended. This revised guideline aims to be a useful tool for practitioners and other health care providers to deal with the recent challenges of tuberculosis treatment in Germany.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/diagnóstico , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/prevención & control , Adulto , Antituberculosos/efectos adversos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Estudios Transversales , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania , Humanos , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/prevención & control , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/prevención & control
11.
Eur Respir J ; 45(1): 211-26, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25359341

RESUMEN

Considerable evidence is now available on the value of palliative care for lung cancer patients in all stages and at all times during the course of the disease. However, pneumologists and their institutions seem to be widely in arrears with the implementation of palliative care concepts and the development of integrated structures. This review focuses on the available evidence and experience of various frequently unmet needs of lung cancer patients, especially psychological, social, spiritual and cultural ones. A PubMed search for evidence on these aspects of palliative care as well as on barriers to the implementation, on outcome parameters and effectiveness, and on structure and process quality was performed with a special focus on lung cancer patients. As a consequence, this review particularly draws pneumologists' attention to improving their skills in communication with the patients, their relatives and among themselves, and to establish team structures with more far-reaching competences and continuity than existing multilateral cooperations and conferences can provide. Ideally, any process of structural and procedural improvement should be accompanied by scientific evaluation and measures for quality optimisation.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neumología/métodos , Cuidadores , Comunicación , Características Culturales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Apoyo Social , Espiritualidad
13.
Eur Respir J ; 43(5): 1254-77, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24659546

RESUMEN

Lung cancer is the commonest cause of cancer-related death worldwide and poses a significant respiratory disease burden. Little is known about the provision of lung cancer care across Europe. The overall aim of the Task Force was to investigate current practice in lung cancer care across Europe. The Task Force undertook four projects: 1) a narrative literature search on quality management of lung cancer; 2) a survey of national and local infrastructure for lung cancer care in Europe; 3) a benchmarking project on the quality of (inter)national lung cancer guidelines in Europe; and 4) a feasibility study of prospective data collection in a pan-European setting. There is little peer-reviewed literature on quality management in lung cancer care. The survey revealed important differences in the infrastructure of lung cancer care in Europe. The European guidelines that were assessed displayed wide variation in content and scope, as well as methodological quality but at the same time there was relevant duplication. The feasibility study demonstrated that it is, in principle, feasible to collect prospective demographic and clinical data on patients with lung cancer. Legal obligations vary among countries. The European Initiative for Quality Management in Lung Cancer Care has provided the first comprehensive snapshot of lung cancer care in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Benchmarking , Recolección de Datos , Europa (Continente) , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Derivación y Consulta , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
14.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 188(4): 503-7, 2013 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23947517

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a common problem seen by pulmonologists. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) are professional organizations whose memberships are composed of large numbers of pulmonologists. PURPOSE: This document describes the key role of pulmonologists in the prevention, early diagnosis, and management of lung cancer. METHODS: A committee of ATS and ERS leaders and their oncology groups discussed the activities of pulmonologists in relation to lung cancer in various settings and reviewed available literature on the topic. The content of this statement was approved by the board of directors of both the ATS and ERS. RESULTS: Optimal lung cancer care requires a multidisciplinary team of specialists who care for a significant number of patients on a regular basis. Pulmonologists are responsible for and involved with patients from their initial diagnosis and staging through treatment and restaging. They are often involved with complications, palliative care, and end-of-life care, and thus have an important role in team leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer is a disease with high mortality, profound effects on the quality of the lives of patients and their families, and an enormous cost and impact on society. To treat lung cancer optimally, care must be prompt, multidisciplinary, and patient-centered. In the entire process, pulmonologists have a key role. Pulmonologists and their professional societies should also enhance lung cancer research and education to provide better treatment options and patient care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Rol del Médico , Neumología , Europa (Continente) , Becas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevención & control , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Neumología/educación , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
15.
BMC Pulm Med ; 14: 171, 2014 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25366106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the small amount of alveolar tissue in transbronchial biopsy (TBB) by forceps, the diagnosis of diffuse, parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD) is inherently problematic, with an overall low yield. The use of cryotechnique in bronchoscopy, including TBB by cryoprobe, has revealed new opportunities in the endoscopical diagnosis of malignant and non-malignant lung diseases. METHODS: To evaluate TBB by cryotechnique for non-neoplastic lung diseases, we analyzed 52 patients (mean age 63 ± 13 years) with unclear DPLD. These individuals underwent bronchoscopy with TBB by cryoprobe. Thereafter histopathological results were compared with the clinically evaluated diagnosis. RESULTS: No major complications were seen. Mean specimen diameter in the histological biopsies was 6.9 ± 4.4 mm (Range 2 - 22 mm). A correlation between clinical and histopathological diagnoses was found in 79% of cases (41/52). In the case of UIP (usual interstitial pneumonia) pattern, the concordance was 10/15 (66%). CONCLUSION: Based on these results TBB by cryotechnique would appear to be a safe and useful method that reveals new perspectives for the endoscopical diagnosis of DPLD.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia/métodos , Frío , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/patología , Pulmón/patología , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/instrumentación , Broncoscopía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Eur Respir J ; 41(1): 177-82, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22496316

RESUMEN

The diagnostic value of flexible bronchoscopy in the pre-operative work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) is still under debate among pneumologists, radiologists and thoracic surgeons. In a prospective observational manner, flexible bronchoscopy was routinely performed in 225 patients with SPN of unknown origin. Of the 225 patients, 80.5% had lung cancer, 7.6% had metastasis of an extrapulmonary primary tumour and 12% had benign aetiology. Unsuspected endobronchial involvement was found in 4.4% of all 225 patients (or in 5.5% of patients with lung cancer). In addition, flexible bronchoscopy clarified the underlying aetiology in 41% of the cases. The bronchoscopic biopsy results from the SPN were positive in 84 (46.5%) patients with lung cancer. Surgery was cancelled due to the results of flexible bronchoscopy in four cases (involvement of the right main bronchus (impaired pulmonary function did not allow pneumonectomy) n=1, small cell lung cancer n=1, bacterial pneumonia n=2), and the surgical strategy had to be modified to bilobectomy in one patient. Flexible bronchoscopy changed the planned surgical approach in five cases substantially. These results suggest that routine flexible bronchoscopy should be included in the regular pre-operative work-up of patients with SPN.


Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/patología , Anciano , Broncoscopios , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA