Variant PNLDC1, Defective piRNA Processing, and Azoospermia.

BACKGROUND: P-element-induced wimpy testis (PIWI)-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are short (21 to 35 nucleotides in length) and noncoding and are found almost exclusively in germ cells, where they regulate aberrant expression of transposable elements and postmeiotic gene expression. Critical to the processing of piRNAs is the protein poly(A)-specific RNase-like domain containing 1 (PNLDC1), which trims their 3' ends and, when disrupted in mice, causes azoospermia and male infertility. METHODS: We performed exome sequencing on DNA samples from 924 men who had received a diagnosis of nonobstructive azoospermia. Testicular-biopsy samples were analyzed by means of histologic and immunohistochemical tests, in situ hybridization, reverse-transcriptase-quantitative-polymerase-chain-reaction assay, and small-RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Four unrelated men of Middle Eastern descent who had nonobstructive azoospermia were found to carry mutations in PNLDC1: the first patient had a biallelic stop-gain mutation, p.R452Ter (rs200629089; minor allele frequency, 0.00004); the second, a novel biallelic missense variant, p.P84S; the third, two compound heterozygous mutations consisting of p.M259T (rs141903829; minor allele frequency, 0.0007) and p.L35PfsTer3 (rs754159168; minor allele frequency, 0.00004); and the fourth, a novel biallelic canonical splice acceptor site variant, c.607-2A→T. Testicular histologic findings consistently showed error-prone meiosis and spermatogenic arrest with round spermatids of type Sa as the most advanced population of germ cells. Gene and protein expression of PNLDC1, as well as the piRNA-processing proteins PIWIL1, PIWIL4, MYBL1, and TDRKH, were greatly diminished in cells of the testes. Furthermore, the length distribution of piRNAs and the number of pachytene piRNAs was significantly altered in men carrying PNLDC1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a direct mechanistic effect of faulty piRNA processing on meiosis and spermatogenesis in men, ultimately leading to male infertility. (Funded by Innovation Fund Denmark and others.).

Age, Sperm Retrieval, and Testicular Histology in Klinefelter Syndrome.

PURPOSE: We sought to examine sperm retrieval and testicular histology in males of different ages with Klinefelter syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all males with Klinefelter syndrome who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction at our institution from 1995 to 2020. Patients were divided into adolescent (<20 years) and adult (≥20 years) cohorts. Histology and sperm retrieval were compared using chi-square statistics. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with successful sperm retrieval. RESULTS: We identified 217 males with Klinefelter syndrome, of whom 59 were adolescents and 158 were adults. Adults were stratified into 10-year groupings (20-29 years, n = 62; 30-39 years, n = 88; ≥40 years, n = 8). Approximately 17% of adolescents had testis histology containing germ cells compared with 15% of the 20 to 29-year cohort, 14% of the 30 to 39-year cohort, and 0% over 40 years. In comparison to adolescents (53%), the sperm retrieval rate was significantly higher in the 20 to 29-year cohort (71%, P = .04) and lower in the ≥40-year cohort (13%, P = .03). In multivariable analysis, the presence of hypospermatogenesis on testis biopsy (OR 5.8, P = .03) was associated with higher odds of successful sperm retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Younger males more frequently had germ cell-containing testis histology, however this finding was not associated with a higher odds of sperm retrieval. Reproductive urologists should counsel azoospermic males with Klinefelter syndrome that sperm retrieval during adolescence for fertility preservation is not required and can be performed in young adulthood.

Gabapentin for Postoperative Pain Control and Opioid Reduction in Scrotal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of gabapentin in reducing postoperative pain among patients undergoing scrotal surgery for male infertility by conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy men undergoing scrotal surgery with a single surgeon were randomized to receive either (1) gabapentin 600 mg given 2 hours preoperatively and 300 mg taken 3 times a day postoperatively for 3 days, or (2) inactive placebo. The primary outcome measure was difference in postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included differences in opioid usage, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 97 patients screened, 74 enrolled and underwent randomization. Of these, 4 men were lost to follow-up, and 70 were included in the final analysis (35 gabapentin, 35 placebo). Both differences in initial postoperative mean pain score (-1.14, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.08, P = .035) and final mean pain score differences (-1.27, 95% CI -2.23 to -0.32, P = .0097) indicated lower gabapentin pain compared to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid usage, patient satisfaction, or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that perioperative gabapentin results in a statistically and clinically significant decrease in pain following scrotal surgery. While there was no evidence of an impact on opioid usage or patient satisfaction, given the low risk of adverse events, it may be considered as part of a multimodal pain management strategy.

Timing of Testicular Biopsy in Relation to Oocyte Retrieval and the Outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

PURPOSE: We evaluate microscopic (micro) testicular sperm extraction (TESE) timing relative to oocyte retrieval on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Couples with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved spermatozoa were analyzed based on whether micro-TESE was performed at least 1 day prior to oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-before group) or on the day of oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-of group). Embryology and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who underwent a successful testicular sperm retrieval was significantly lower in the TESE-day-before cohort (62%) than in the TESE-day-of cohort (69%; odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI [1.1, 1.7], P < .001). The fertilization rate was also found to be significantly lower in the TESE-day-before group (45%) than in the TESE-day-of group (53%; OR 1.4, 95% CI [1.2, 1.7], P = .01). Although the association between the cleavage rate and TESE timing was not statistically significant, the implantation rate was found to be significantly higher in the day-before cohort (28%) than in the day-of cohort (22%; OR 0.7, 95% CI [0.6, 0.9], P = .01). Nevertheless, it was found that the clinical pregnancy and delivery rates were not statistically significantly associated with the TESE timing. CONCLUSIONS: Although sperm retrieval and fertilization rates were lower in the TESE-day-before cohort, the 2 cohorts showed comparable embryologic and clinical outcomes. Micro-TESE can be performed before oocyte harvesting to provide physicians ample time to decide between cancelling oocyte retrieval or retrieving oocytes for cryopreservation.

Abstinence for sperm sample collection and ART outcome: an unsubstantiated myth.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Semen analysis is a basic component of male evaluation. Reproductive centers typically instruct men to provide a semen specimen based on recommendations from WHO Standard for semen examination. Evidence that these recommendations optimize sperm reproductive capacity is lacking. Existing data to optimize sperm quality with shorter abstinence were reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent studies have reviewed the effects of shorter ejaculatory abstinence of semen quality and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. Shorter abstinence was defined as 1 h-1 day in one review, and <4 h in the other systematic meta-analysis and review. SUMMARY: Prior instructions for male patients have not been designed to optimize fertility potential for semen analyses. Optimal sperm quality is obtained by instructing men to have a short abstinence (certainly <1 day, and preferably <4 h) for semen specimens used for in vitro fertilization (assisted reproduction).

Genetic profiling of azoospermic men to identify the etiology and predict reproductive potential.

PURPOSE: To identify germline mutations related to azoospermia etiology and reproductive potential of surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and to investigate the feasibility of predicting seminiferous tubule function of nonobstructive azoospermic men by transcriptomic profiling of ejaculates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sperm specimens were obtained from 30 men (38.4 ± 6 years) undergoing epididymal sperm aspiration for obstructive azoospermia (OA, n = 19) acquired by vasectomy, or testicular biopsy for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA, n = 11). To evaluate for a correlation with azoospermia etiology, DNAseq was performed on surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and cell-free RNAseq on seminal fluid (n = 23) was performed to predict spermatogenesis in the seminiferous tubule. RESULTS: Overall, surgically retrieved sperm aneuploidy rates were 1.7% and 1.8% among OA and NOA cohorts, respectively. OA men carried housekeeping-related gene mutations, while NOA men displayed mutations on genes involved in crucial spermiogenic functions (AP1S2, AP1G2, APOE). We categorized couples within each cohort according to ICSI clinical outcomes to investigate genetic causes that may affect reproductive potential. All OA-fertile men (n = 9) carried mutations in ZNF749 (sperm production), whereas OA-infertile men (n = 10) harbored mutations in PRB1, which is essential for DNA replication. NOA-fertile men (n = 8) carried mutations in MPIG6B (stem cell lineage differentiation), whereas NOA-infertile individuals (n = 3) harbored mutations in genes involved in spermato/spermio-genesis (ADAM29, SPATA31E1, MAK, POLG, IFT43, ATG9B) and early embryonic development (MBD5, CCAR1, PMEPA1, POLK, REC8, REPIN1, MAPRE3, ARL4C). Transcriptomic assessment of cell-free RNAs in seminal fluid from NOA men allowed the prediction of residual spermatogenic foci. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm genome profiling provides invaluable information on azoospermia etiology and identifies gene-related mechanistic links to reproductive performance. Moreover, RNAseq assessment of seminal fluid from NOA men can help predict sperm retrieval during testicular biopsies.

Zinc finger RNA binding protein 2 (ZFR2) is not required for male fertility in the mouse.

BACKGROUND: Thousands of genes are expressed during spermatogenesis and male infertility has a strong genetic component. Within this study, we focus on the role of Zfr2 in male fertility, a gene previously implicated in human male fertility. To date, very little is known about the role of ZFR2 in either humans or mice. To this end, the requirement for ZFR2 in male fertility was assessed using a knockout mouse model. RESULTS: Zfr2 was found to be expressed in the testes of both humans and mice. Deletion of Zfr2 was achieved via removal of exon 2 using CRISPR-Cas9 methods. The absence of Zfr2 did not result in a reduction in any fertility parameters assessed. Knockout males were capable of fostering litter sizes equal to wild type males, and there were no effects of Zfr2 knockout on sperm number or motility. We note Zfr2 knockout females were also fertile. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of Zfr2 alone is not sufficient to cause a reduction in male fertility in mice.

Modern surgical treatment of azoospermia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review noteworthy research from the last 2 years on surgical management of azoospermia. RECENT FINDINGS: The recommended treatments for nonobstructive and obstructive azoospermia have not appreciably changed. However, recent level-1 evidence has reinforced superiority of micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction over sperm aspiration in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and several studies have identified genetic and other clinical factors that may aid in selecting candidates for testicular sperm extraction. Machine learning technology has shown promise as a decision support system for patient selection prior to sperm retrieval as well a tool to aid in sperm identification from testis tissue. SUMMARY: Most men with obstructive azoospermia who desire fertility can be offered either surgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval. For men with nonobstructive azoospermia, sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction remains the gold standard treatment. Uncovering more genetic causes of nonobstructive azoospermia may aid in properly counseling and selecting patients for microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Neural networks and deep learning may have a future role in patient selection for surgical sperm retrieval and postprocedural sperm identification.

Sperm DNA Damage and Its Relevance in Fertility Treatment: A Review of Recent Literature and Current Practice Guidelines.

Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage has recently emerged as one of the most controversial topics in male reproductive medicine. While level I evidence indicates that abnormal sperm DNA damage has substantial adverse effects on reproductive outcomes (including chance of pregnancy and risk of miscarriage), there is limited consensus on how sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing should be performed and/or interpreted in clinical practice. In this article, we review: (1) how SDF is assessed, (2) cumulative evidence regarding its impact on reproductive outcomes, (3) methods for mitigating high SDF, and (4) the most recent practice guidelines available for clinicians regarding the use and interpretation of SDF testing.

Preservation of male fertility in patients undergoing pelvic irradiation.

As the number of cancer survivors increases, so does the demand for preserving male fertility after radiation. It is important for healthcare providers to understand the pathophysiology of radiation-induced testicular injury, the techniques of fertility preservation both before and during radiation, and their role in counseling patients on the risks to their fertility and the means of mitigating these risks. Impaired spermatogenesis is a known testicular toxicity of radiation in both the acute and the late settings, as rapidly dividing spermatogonial germ cells are exquisitely sensitive to irradiation. The threshold for spermatogonial injury and subsequent impairment in spermatogenesis is ~ 0.1 Gy and the severity of gonadal injury is highly dose-dependent. Total doses < 4 Gy may allow for recovery of spermatogenesis and fertility potential, but with larger doses, recovery may be protracted or impossible. All patients undergoing gonadotoxic radiation therapy should be counseled on the possibility of future infertility, offered the opportunity for semen cryopreservation, and offered referral to a fertility specialist. In addition to this, every effort should be made to shield the testes (if not expected to contain tumor) during therapy.

Data-Driven Commentary on SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Vaccination, and Fertility.

A recent study by Wesselink et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191(8):1383-1395) adds to the growing body of research finding that vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is safe for individuals either seeking pregnancy or who are pregnant. The study's authors found no effect of COVID-19 vaccination on fecundity in a population of individuals with no known infertility who were attempting conception. The finding reinforces the messaging of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 Task Force, the aim of which is to provide data-driven recommendations to individuals contemplating pregnancy in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. As safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines became available, and with an increasing number of studies showing a heightened risk of severe disease during pregnancy, an important role of the Task Force is to encourage vaccination during the preconceptual window and in early pregnancy. The Task Force supports ongoing research to address gaps in knowledge about safe and effective therapies and preventive measures for individuals contemplating pregnancy and during pregnancy. Such research will help optimize care for reproductive-age individuals in the face of current and future health crises.

Effects of Chemo- and Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction for Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia.

PURPOSE: Men who survive cancer as children or young adults may have severe spermatogenic impairment with azoospermia requiring surgical sperm retrieval and assisted reproductive technologies. We assessed treatment outcomes from a large series of cancer patients with prior radiation and/or chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent initial microsurgical testicular sperm extraction from 1995-2020 from a high-volume surgeon at a single institution were identified. Those with a history of malignancy treated by radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy were included. The primary outcome was successful sperm retrieval. RESULTS: A total of 106 men were evaluated, of whom 57 received chemotherapy and radiation, 44 received only chemotherapy and 5 received only radiation. Sperm retrieval was successful in 39 of 106 (37%) men, with higher likelihood of retrieval in men who received only chemotherapy compared to men who received chemotherapy and radiation (61% vs 18%, p <0.001). None of the 18 patients who received chemotherapy with radiation to the pelvis had successful sperm retrieval, compared to 26% of patients who received chemotherapy with extra-pelvic radiation (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy and radiation for cancer may result in nonobstructive azoospermia that can be treated to allow fertility. However, pelvic radiation therapy is associated with the worst prognosis for successful treatment with microsurgical sperm retrieval and in vitro fertilization; we observed no cases of successful retrieval in men who received pelvic radiation therapy. These data are useful for pretreatment counseling, suggesting that men with prior radiation therapy may not be candidates for surgical sperm retrieval.

A multicenter phase 1/2 study investigating the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of a small molecule antimetabolite, RX-3117, plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Background RX-3117 is an oral small molecule antimetabolite, cyclopentyl pyrimidyl nucleoside that is activated by cancer cells over-expressing uridine cytidine kinase 2 (UCK2). Single agent RX-3117 demonstrated efficacy in a phase I trial in patients with metastatic (met) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC). RX-3117 plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-Pac) was evaluated as a first line treatment in met-PC cancer. Methods This was a multicenter open label phase I/II 2-stage study investigating the combination of RX3117 plus nab-Pac in the frontline treatment of patients with met-PC. The phase I portion comprised a dose de-escalation design with primary objectives of determining the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of RX-3117 (orally 700, 600, or 500 mg/day for 5 consecutive days with 2 days off/week) plus nab-Pac (intravenous (IV) 125 mg/m2 once weekly) for 3 weeks with 1 week off per a 4-week cycle. The primary objective was to determine the antitumor efficacy. Results 46 patients were enrolled (22 male/24 female; median age 67; 91% Caucasian). The RP2D of RX-3117 plus nab-Pac was 700 mg/day. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed (DLTs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 23.1% and disease control rate (DCR) 74.4%. RX-3117 pharmacokinetics (PK) results were similar to previously reported monotherapy phase 1 trial. All patients experienced a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) with the most common diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue.10.9% of patients experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) related to the combination. Conclusion RX-3117 plus nab-Pac in newly diagnosed met-PC patients demonstrated tolerability, safety, and early treatment efficacy.

Actionable secondary findings following exome sequencing of 836 non-obstructive azoospermia cases and their value in patient management.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the load, distribution and added clinical value of secondary findings (SFs) identified in exome sequencing (ES) of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA)? SUMMARY ANSWER: One in 28 NOA cases carried an identifiable, medically actionable SF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In addition to molecular diagnostics, ES allows assessment of clinically actionable disease-related gene variants that are not connected to the patient's primary diagnosis, but the knowledge of which may allow the prevention, delay or amelioration of late-onset monogenic conditions. Data on SFs in specific clinical patient groups, including reproductive failure, are currently limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study group was a retrospective cohort of patients with NOA recruited in 10 clinics across six countries and formed in the framework of the international GEMINI (The GEnetics of Male INfertility Initiative) study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: ES data of 836 patients with NOA were exploited to analyze SFs in 85 genes recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), Geisinger's MyCode, and Clinical Genome Resource. The identified 6374 exonic variants were annotated with ANNOVAR and filtered for allele frequency, retaining 1381 rare or novel missense and loss-of-function variants. After automatic assessment of pathogenicity with ClinVar and InterVar, 87 variants were manually curated. The final list of confident disease-causing SFs was communicated to the corresponding GEMINI centers. When patient consent had been given, available family health history and non-andrological medical data were retrospectively assessed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We found a 3.6% total frequency of SFs, 3.3% from the 59 ACMG SF v2.0 genes. One in 70 patients carried SFs in genes linked to familial cancer syndromes, whereas 1 in 60 cases was predisposed to congenital heart disease or other cardiovascular conditions. Retrospective assessment confirmed clinico-molecular diagnoses in several cases. Notably, 37% (11/30) of patients with SFs carried variants in genes linked to male infertility in mice, suggesting that some SFs may have a co-contributing role in spermatogenic impairment. Further studies are needed to determine whether these observations represent chance findings or the profile of SFs in NOA patients is indeed different from the general population. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: One limitation of our cohort was the low proportion of non-Caucasian ethnicities (9%). Additionally, as comprehensive clinical data were not available retrospectively for all men with SFs, we were not able to confirm a clinico-molecular diagnosis and assess the penetrance of the specific variants. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: For the first time, this study analyzed medically actionable SFs in men with spermatogenic failure. With the evolving process to incorporate ES into routine andrology practice for molecular diagnostic purposes, additional assessment of SFs can inform about future significant health concerns for infertility patients. Timely detection of SFs and respective genetic counseling will broaden options for disease prevention and early treatment, as well as inform choices and opportunities regarding family planning. A notable fraction of SFs was detected in genes implicated in maintaining genome integrity, essential in both mitosis and meiosis. Thus, potential genetic pleiotropy may exist between certain adult-onset monogenic diseases and NOA. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the Estonian Research Council grants IUT34-12 and PRG1021 (M.L. and M.P.); National Institutes of Health of the United States of America grant R01HD078641 (D.F.C., K.I.A. and P.N.S.); National Institutes of Health of the United States of America grant P50HD096723 (D.F.C. and P.N.S.); National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia grant APP1120356 (M.K.O'B., D.F.C. and K.I.A.); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)/Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação grant POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007274 (A.M.L., F.C. and J.G.) and FCT: IF/01262/2014 (A.M.L.). J.G. was partially funded by FCT/Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES), through the Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health-ToxOmics (grants UID/BIM/00009/2016 and UIDB/00009/2020). M.L.E. is a consultant for, and holds stock in, Roman, Sandstone, Dadi, Hannah, Underdog and has received funding from NIH/NICHD. Co-authors L.K., K.L., L.N., K.I.A., P.N.S., J.G., F.C., D.M.-M., K.A., K.A.J., M.K.O'B., A.M.L., D.F.C., M.P. and M.L. declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Variants in GCNA, X-linked germ-cell genome integrity gene, identified in men with primary spermatogenic failure.

Male infertility impacts millions of couples yet, the etiology of primary infertility remains largely unknown. A critical element of successful spermatogenesis is maintenance of genome integrity. Here, we present a genomic study of spermatogenic failure (SPGF). Our initial analysis (n = 176) did not reveal known gene-candidates but identified a potentially significant single-nucleotide variant (SNV) in X-linked germ-cell nuclear antigen (GCNA). Together with a larger follow-up study (n = 2049), 7 likely clinically relevant GCNA variants were identified. GCNA is critical for genome integrity in male meiosis and knockout models exhibit impaired spermatogenesis and infertility. Single-cell RNA-seq and immunohistochemistry confirm human GCNA expression from spermatogonia to elongated spermatids. Five identified SNVs were located in key functional regions, including N-terminal SUMO-interacting motif and C-terminal Spartan-like protease domain. Notably, variant p.Ala115ProfsTer7 results in an early frameshift, while Spartan-like domain missense variants p.Ser659Trp and p.Arg664Cys change conserved residues, likely affecting 3D structure. For variants within GCNA's intrinsically disordered region, we performed computational modeling for consensus motifs. Two SNVs were predicted to impact the structure of these consensus motifs. All identified variants have an extremely low minor allele frequency in the general population and 6 of 7 were not detected in > 5000 biological fathers. Considering evidence from animal models, germ-cell-specific expression, 3D modeling, and computational predictions for SNVs, we propose that identified GCNA variants disrupt structure and function of the respective protein domains, ultimately arresting germ-cell division. To our knowledge, this is the first study implicating GCNA, a key genome integrity factor, in human male infertility.

Quantifying Heterogeneity of Testicular Histopathology in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine if testicular histopathological heterogeneity is associated with sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) who are undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing mTESE by a single, high-volume surgeon at a tertiary infertility referral center between 2010 and 2020 were evaluated. Pathology reports from testis biopsy at the time of mTESE reported by fellowship-trained genitourinary pathologists were reviewed. Testicular heterogeneity was correlated to absolute SRRs. Logistic regression was used to determine if heterogeneity was associated with sperm retrieval. RESULTS: A total of 918 men with mTESE were included. Of these, 391 men (43%) had 1 pathology, 388 men (42%) had 2, 108 (12%) had 3, and 31 (3.4%) had 4. Overall, the most common histopathology was Sertoli-cell only, followed by maturation arrest. The overall SRR was 42% with a clinical intrauterine gestation rate of 30%. Increasing histopathological variety was associated with higher SRRs (p <0.01); a SRR of 33% was observed when one histopathological subtype was present vs 94% with 4 subtypes. Furthermore, men with any foci of spermatogenesis had higher SRRs. CONCLUSIONS: In men with NOA, increasing testicular histopathological heterogeneity is correlated with higher SRRs driven by the identification of focal areas of spermatogenesis. This is an important, although predictable, observation. While diagnostic biopsy is not routinely required, these findings emphasize the value of having histology to perhaps predict the chance of sperm retrieval for future mTESE procedures.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline Part I.

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline. Part I outlines the appropriate evaluation of the male in an infertile couple. Recommendations proceed from obtaining an appropriate history and physical exam (Appendix I), as well as diagnostic testing, where indicated. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed®, Embase®, and Medline from January, 2000 through May, 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology. RESULTS: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding evaluation of male infertility as well as the association of male infertility with other important health conditions. The detection of male infertility increases the risk of subsequent development of health problems for men. In addition, specific medical conditions are associated with some causes for male infertility. Evaluation and treatment recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure[Figure: see text]). CONCLUSION: The presence of male infertility is crucial to the health of patients and its effects must be considered for the welfare of society. This document will undergo updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline PART II.

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline. Part II outlines the appropriate management of the male in an infertile couple. Medical therapies, surgical techniques, as well as use of intrauterine insemination (IUI)/in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are covered to allow for optimal patient management. Please refer to Part I for discussion on evaluation of the infertile male and discussion of relevant health conditions that are associated with male infertility. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed®, Embase®, and Medline from January 2000 through May 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology. RESULTS: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding management of male infertility. Such recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure[Figure: see text]). CONCLUSION: Male contributions to infertility are prevalent, and specific treatment as well as assisted reproductive techniques are effective at managing male infertility. This document will undergo additional literature reviews and updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.

Anti-Müllerian hormone level as a predictor of sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia.

Limited factors effectively predict sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. We therefore sought to evaluate the role of serum anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictive biomarker for successful sperm retrieval. We included patients with pre-operative anti-Müllerian hormone levels and stratified them based on prior history of prior sperm retrieval procedure. We compared hormone levels between those who did and did not have a successful sperm retrieval and used receiver operating curves to determine an optimal cut-off value. A total of 46 men were included, of whom 18 (39.1%) had no prior sperm retrieval and 11 (61.1%) had sperm successfully retrieved. Pre-operative serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels were predictive of sperm retrieval in patients with no prior attempts at retrieval (p = .03). Receiver operating curve for those without prior retrieval was 0.6753. The optimal anti-Müllerian hormone cut-off for those without prior sperm retrieval was 0.133 ng/ml with a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.29. Therefore, serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels have modest predictive value for sperm retrieval in this cohort. The combination of clinical history, examination and laboratory investigations should continue to be used to guide surgeons in counselling patients regarding the chance of sperm retrieval.

Impact of duloxetine on male fertility: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

This study assessed the impact of duloxetine (serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) on semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation and serum hormones. We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial of duloxetine 60mg or placebo daily for 6 weeks (5 weeks full dose and 1 week taper). The primary outcome was the proportion of men with abnormal DNA fragmentation during and after duloxetine administration. Secondary outcomes were changes in semen parameters and hormones on treatment (2 and 6 weeks) and after discontinuation (8 and 10 weeks). Sixty-eight healthy males aged 18-65 were included. Duloxetine was not associated with an increase in the proportion of participants with abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labelling scores (>25%) on treatment (p = 0.09) or after treatment (p = 0.56), nor did median sperm DNA fragmentation increase on treatment. Compared with placebo, there were no changes in bulk semen parameters during treatment. Limited changes in hormonal values were detected. This first published human study of a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor on male fertility revealed no clinically meaningful effects on sperm DNA fragmentation, semen parameters or serum hormones. Duloxetine, and possibly other serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, may be considered for men desiring fertility who require antidepressant treatment.