Early prediction of decompensation (EPOD) score: Non-invasive determination of cirrhosis decompensation risk.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Decompensation is a hallmark of disease progression in cirrhotic patients. Early detection of a phase transition from compensated cirrhosis to decompensation would enable targeted therapeutic interventions potentially extending life expectancy. This study aims to (a) identify the predictors of decompensation in a large, multicentric cohort of patients with compensated cirrhosis, (b) to build a reliable prognostic score for decompensation and (c) to evaluate the score in independent cohorts. METHODS: Decompensation was identified in electronic health records data from 6049 cirrhosis patients in the IBM Explorys database training cohort by diagnostic codes for variceal bleeding, encephalopathy, ascites, hepato-renal syndrome and/or jaundice. We identified predictors of clinical decompensation and developed a prognostic score using Cox regression analysis. The score was evaluated using the IBM Explorys database validation cohort (N = 17662), the Penn Medicine BioBank (N = 1326) and the UK Biobank (N = 317). RESULTS: The new Early Prediction of Decompensation (EPOD) score uses platelet count, albumin, and bilirubin concentration. It predicts decompensation during a 3-year follow-up in three validation cohorts with AUROCs of 0.69, 0.69 and 0.77, respectively, and outperforms the well-known MELD and Child-Pugh score in predicting decompensation. Furthermore, the EPOD score predicted the 3-year probability of decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: The EPOD score provides a prediction tool for the risk of decompensation in patients with cirrhosis that outperforms well-known cirrhosis scores. Since EPOD is based on three blood parameters, only, it provides maximal clinical feasibility at minimal costs.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of elinzanetant based on integrated clinical phase I and II data.

Elinzanetant is a potent and selective dual neurokin-1 (NK-1) and -3 (NK-3) receptor antagonist that is currently developed for the treatment of women with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. Here, we report the development of a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for elinzanetant and its principal metabolites based on an integrated dataset from 366 subjects (including 197 women with VMS) collected in 10 phase I or II studies. The pharmacokinetics of elinzanetant and its metabolites could be well described by the popPK model. Within the investigated dose range of 40-160 mg, the oral bioavailability of elinzanetant was dose independent and estimated to be 36.7%. The clearance of elinzanetant was estimated to be 7.26 L/h and the central and peripheral distribution volume were 23.7 and 168 L. No intrinsic or extrinsic influencing factors have been identified in the investigated population other than the effect of a high-fat breakfast on the oral absorption of elinzanetant. The popPK model was then coupled to a pharmacodynamic model to predict occupancies of the NK-1 and NK-3 receptors. After repeated once-daily administration of the anticipated therapeutic dose of 120 mg elinzanetant, the model-predicted median receptor occupancies are >99% for NK-1 and >94.8% for NK-3 during day and night-time, indicating sustained and near-complete inhibition of both target receptors during the dosing interval.

Data-driven personalization of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for caffeine: A systematic assessment.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been proposed as a tool for more accurate individual pharmacokinetic (PK) predictions and model-informed precision dosing, but their application in clinical practice is still rare. This study systematically assesses the benefit of using individual patient information to improve PK predictions. A PBPK model of caffeine was stepwise personalized by using individual data on (1) demography, (2) physiology, and (3) cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 phenotype of 48 healthy volunteers participating in a single-dose clinical study. Model performance was benchmarked against a caffeine base model simulated with parameters of an average individual. In the first step, virtual twins were generated based on the study subjects' demography (height, weight, age, sex), which implicated the rescaling of average organ volumes and blood flows. The accuracy of PK simulations improved compared with the base model. The percentage of predictions within 0.8-fold to 1.25-fold of the observed values increased from 45.8% (base model) to 57.8% (Step 1). However, setting physiological parameters (liver blood flow determined by magnetic resonance imaging, glomerular filtration rate, hematocrit) to measured values in the second step did not further improve the simulation result (59.1% in the 1.25-fold range). In the third step, virtual twins matching individual demography, physiology, and CYP1A2 activity considerably improved the simulation results. The percentage of data within the 1.25-fold range was 66.15%. This case study shows that individual PK profiles can be predicted more accurately by considering individual attributes and that personalized PBPK models could be a valuable tool for model-informed precision dosing approaches in the future.

A Model-Based Workflow to Benchmark the Clinical Cholestasis Risk of Drugs.

We present a generic workflow combining physiology-based computational modeling and in vitro data to assess the clinical cholestatic risk of different drugs systematically. Changes in expression levels of genes involved in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids were obtained from an in vitro assay mimicking 14 days of repeated drug administration for 10 marketed drugs. These changes in gene expression over time were contextualized in a physiology-based bile acid model of glycochenodeoxycholic acid. The simulated drug-induced response in bile acid concentrations was then scaled with the applied drug doses to calculate the cholestatic potential for each compound. A ranking of the cholestatic potential correlated very well with the clinical cholestasis risk obtained from medical literature. The proposed workflow allows benchmarking the cholestatic risk of novel drug candidates. We expect the application of our workflow to significantly contribute to the stratification of the cholestatic potential of new drugs and to support animal-free testing in future drug development.