Cooling Activity is Associated with Neurological Outcome in Patients with Severe Cerebrovascular Disease Undergoing Endovascular Temperature Control.

BACKGROUND: Neuroprotection through targeted temperature management is currently investigated in patients with severe brain injury in multiple trials. Feedback devices have been shown to precisely reach and maintain target temperature by constantly adjusting cooling activity. We analyzed the association between cooling activity expressed as cool bath temperatures and functional neurological outcome. METHODS: Data were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective randomized trial on controlled prophylactic normothermia (i.e., 36.5 °C) in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease. Body core temperature of patients who had been randomized to the endovascular group, was controlled using an endovascular cooling device. Cool bath temperature was analyzed over a period of 168 h. Functional neurological outcome was evaluated at 180 days using the modified Rankin Scale. RESULTS: 51 of 102 patients included were randomized to the endovascular group. Cool bath temperature data were available from 47/51 patients. Patients with lower cool bath temperatures reflecting high cooling activity had a more favorable neurological outcome at 180 days (mRS 0-2) than patients with low cooling activity (p < 0.05). We did not find a significant correlation between cool bath temperature and inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: High cooling activity of an endovascular feedback device is associated with favorable outcome in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease.

Clevidipine rapidly and safely reduces blood pressure in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: the ACCELERATE trial.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) causes 10-15% of primary strokes, with mortality related to hematoma volume. Blood pressure (BP) reduction may attenuate hematoma expansion. ACCELERATE (the Evaluation of Patients with Acute Hypertension and Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Intravenous Clevidipine Treatment) is a pilot study representing the first evaluation of safety and efficacy of intravenous clevidipine for the rapid treatment of hypertension in ICH patients. METHODS: ICH patients with a systolic BP (SBP) >160 mm Hg who present within 6 h (n = 27) or 12 h (n = 10) of symptoms were prospectively enrolled, treated with open-label clevidipine until SBP ≤160 mm Hg was achieved and then titrated to keep target SBP between 140-160 mm Hg. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with baseline median Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12, median NIH Stroke Scale score of 14, mean SBP of 186 mm Hg and a mean time from onset of symptoms of 5.5 h received clevidipine. Median time to achieve SBP target range was 5.5 min. All patients achieved target SBP within 30 min; 96.9% achieved target SBP with clevidipine monotherapy. CT scans showed minimal hematoma volume change for the overall population (median change 0.01 ml, -2.9%). Mild/moderate hypotension was reported in 3 patients and resolved with dose reduction or drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Clevidipine monotherapy was effective and safe for rapid BP reduction in this cohort of critically ill ICH patients. Overall, patients showed minimal hematoma expansion with BP reduction, suggesting that rapid BP control with clevidipine may have a beneficial impact on hematoma expansion and warrants further investigation.

Safety of Tirofiban in acute Ischemic Stroke: the SaTIS trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tirofiban is a highly selective, fast-acting nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist with a short half-life time. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists are effective for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes proven in large clinical trials. Safety and efficacy in patients with ischemic stroke are uncertain. This was addressed in the Safety of Tirofiban in acute Ischemic Stroke (SaTIS) trial. METHODS: Two hundred sixty patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a placebo-controlled, prospective, open-label treatment, blinded outcome reading multicenter trial. Subjects with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale between 4 and 18 received intravenously either tirofiban or placebo within 3 to 22 hours after symptom onset for 48 hours. The primary end point was the rate of cerebral bleeding as measured in follow-up CT scans 2 to 7 days after inclusion. The secondary end point was clinical efficacy within 1 week (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale) and after 5 months (Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale). RESULTS: The rate of cerebral hemorrhagic transformation (I/II) and parenchymal hemorrhage (I/II) did not differ between both groups (tirofiban 36 of 120; placebo 33 of 124: OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.06). Mortality after 5 months was significantly lower in patients treated with tirofiban (3 of 130 [2.3%] versus 11 of 126 [8.7%]; OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.1 to 14.9). No difference in neurological/functional outcome was found after 1 week and after 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tirofiban might be safe in acute moderate ischemic stroke even when administered within a large time window after symptom onset and might save lives in the late outcome. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: www.strokecenter.org/trials/. Trial name: SaTIS. Enrollment began before July 1, 2005.

Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but its efficacy and safety when administered more than 3 hours after the onset of symptoms have not been established. We tested the efficacy and safety of alteplase administered between 3 and 4.5 hours after the onset of a stroke. METHODS: After exclusion of patients with a brain hemorrhage or major infarction, as detected on a computed tomographic scan, we randomly assigned patients with acute ischemic stroke in a 1:1 double-blind fashion to receive treatment with intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo. The primary end point was disability at 90 days, dichotomized as a favorable outcome (a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale, which has a range of 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no symptoms at all and 6 indicating death) or an unfavorable outcome (a score of 2 to 6 on the modified Rankin scale). The secondary end point was a global outcome analysis of four neurologic and disability scores combined. Safety end points included death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and other serious adverse events. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 821 patients in the study and randomly assigned 418 to the alteplase group and 403 to the placebo group. The median time for the administration of alteplase was 3 hours 59 minutes. More patients had a favorable outcome with alteplase than with placebo (52.4% vs. 45.2%; odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.76; P=0.04). In the global analysis, the outcome was also improved with alteplase as compared with placebo (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.65; P<0.05). The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was higher with alteplase than with placebo (for any intracranial hemorrhage, 27.0% vs. 17.6%; P=0.001; for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 2.4% vs. 0.2%; P=0.008). Mortality did not differ significantly between the alteplase and placebo groups (7.7% and 8.4%, respectively; P=0.68). There was no significant difference in the rate of other serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, intravenous alteplase administered between 3 and 4.5 hours after the onset of symptoms significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke; alteplase was more frequently associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153036.)

Combined systemic thrombolysis with alteplase and early hyperbaric oxygen therapy in experimental embolic stroke in rats: relationship to functional outcome and reduction of structural damage.

INTRODUCTION: The only causal therapy in ischemic stroke is thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), but it is feasible only for few patients, and new therapies are needed. This study investigates the effects of systemic thrombolysis with rtPA combined with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in embolic stroke in rats. METHODS: In 22 male Wistar rats, an embolic ischemic stroke was induced. The animals were randomized to one of four groups: control, thrombolysis alone, HBOT sequential or HBOT parallel with thrombolysis. HBOT (2.4 ATA, 1 h) started 45 min (sequential) or 120 min (parallel) after stroke. rtPA was given intravenously 120 min after stroke onset. Functional tests were performed after stroke induction and after treatment. After 6 h infarct volume and intracerebral hemorrhagic complications were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to the control group only the combination of HBOT and thrombolysis significantly improved the functional outcome (p=0.03) and reduced the infarct volume (p=0.01), whereas thrombolysis alone did not show a significant benefit. In all treatment groups there was a trend towards fewer hemorrhagic transformations. CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen in combination with thrombolysis shows neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke in rats by reducing infarct volume and improving functional outcome in the early poststroke period.

S2k guideline diagnosis and treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning.

Carbon monoxide (CO) can occur in numerous situations and ambient conditions, such as fire smoke, indoor fireplaces, silos containing large quantities of wood pellets, engine exhaust fumes, and when using hookahs. Symptoms of CO poisoning are nonspecific and can range from dizziness, headache, and angina pectoris to unconsciousness and death. This guideline presents the current state of knowledge and national recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CO poisoning. The diagnosis of CO poisoning is based on clinical symptoms and proven or probable exposure to CO. Negative carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels should not rule out CO poisoning if the history and symptoms are consistent with this phenomenon. Reduced oxygen-carrying capacity, impairment of the cellular respiratory chain, and immunomodulatory processes may result in myocardial and central nervous tissue damage even after a reduction in COHb. If CO poisoning is suspected, 100% oxygen breathing should be immediately initiated in the prehospital setting. Clinical symptoms do not correlate with COHb elimination from the blood; therefore, COHb monitoring alone is unsuitable for treatment management. Especially in the absence of improvement despite treatment, a reevaluation for other possible differential diagnoses ought to be performed. Evidence regarding the benefit of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is scant and the subject of controversy due to the heterogeneity of studies. If required, HBOT should be initiated within 6 h. All patients with CO poisoning should be informed about the risk of delayed neurological sequelae (DNS).

Influence of prophylactic, endovascularly based normothermia on inflammation in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease: a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact of long-term endovascularly based prophylactic normothermia versus conventional temperature management on inflammatory parameters in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the course of inflammatory parameters between the 2 treatment arms: (1) prophylactically endovascular long-term normothermia; and (2) conventional, stepwise fever management with antiinflammatory drugs and surface cooling. Inclusion criteria were (1) spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage with Hunt-Hess grade between 3 and 5; (2) spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤ 10; or (3) complicated cerebral infarction requiring intensive care unit treatment with a NIH Stroke Scale score of ≥ 15. Treatment period was 336 hours in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients and 168 hours in patients with complicated stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage patients. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (56 female) were enrolled during a 3.5-year period. Overall median total fever burden during the course of treatment was 0.0°C hour and 4.3°C hours in the catheter and conventional group, respectively (P < 0.0001). C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were significantly elevated in the endovascular group (P < 0.05). Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, used as additional treatment of fever, significantly reduced mean C-reactive protein in endovascular treated patients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proinflammatory cytokines C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were significantly elevated in patients receiving prophylactic endovascularly based long-term normothermia. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs significantly affected the course of proinflammatory parameters; thus, future trials should investigate the role of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in severe cerebrovascular disease patients and their interaction with temperature management. Clinical Trial Registration-Trial not registered; enrollment began before July 2005.

AXIS: a trial of intravenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a promising stroke drug candidate. The present phase IIa study assessed safety and tolerability over a broad dose range of G-CSF doses in acute ischemic stroke patients and explored outcome data. METHODS: Four intravenous dose regimens (total cumulative doses of 30-180 µg/kg over the course of 3 days) of G-CSF were tested in 44 patients in a national, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled dose escalation study (NCT00132470; www.clinicaltrial.gov). Main inclusion criteria were a 12-hour time window after stroke onset, infarct localization to the middle cerebral artery territory, a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale range of 4 to 22, and presence of diffusion-weighted imaging/perfusion-weighted imaging mismatch. RESULTS: Concerning the primary safety end points, we observed no increase of thromboembolic events in the active treatment groups, and no increase in related serious adverse events. G-CSF led to expected increases in neutrophils and monocytes that resolved rapidly after end of treatment. We observed a clinically insignificant drug-related decrease of platelets. As expected from the low number of patients, we did not observe significant differences in clinical outcome in treatment vs. placebo. In exploratory analyses, we observed an interesting dose-dependent beneficial effect of treatment in patients with DWI lesions > 14-17 cm³. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that G-CSF was well-tolerated even at high dosages in patients with acute ischemic stroke, and that a substantial increase in leukocytes appears not problematic in stroke patients. In addition, exploratory analyses suggest treatment effects in patients with larger baseline diffusion-weighted imaging lesions. The obtained data provide the basis for a second trial aimed to demonstrate safety and efficacy of G-CSF on clinical end points.

Prophylactic, endovascularly based, long-term normothermia in ICU patients with severe cerebrovascular disease: bicenter prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to study the effectiveness and safety of endovascular cooling to maintain prophylactic normothermia in comparison with standardized, stepwise, escalating fever management to reduce fever burden in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial with a blinded neurologic outcome evaluation comparison between prophylactic, catheter-based normothermia (CoolGard; ie, body core temperature 36.5 degrees C) and conventional, stepwise fever management with anti-inflammatory drugs and surface cooling. Patients admitted to 1 of the 2 neurointensive care units were eligible for study inclusion when they had a (1) spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage with Hunt & Hess grade between 3 and 5, (2) spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with a Glasgow Coma Scale score or=15. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (56 female) were enrolled during a 3.5-year period. Fifty percent had a spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, 40% had a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, and 10% had a complicated cerebral infarction. Overall median total fever burden during the course of treatment was 0.0 degrees C hour and 4.3 degrees C hours in the catheter and conventional groups, respectively (P<0.0001). Prophylactic normothermia did not lead to an increase in the number of patients who experienced a major adverse event. No significant difference was found in mortality and neurologic long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, catheter-based, prophylactic normothermia significantly reduces fever burden in neurointensive care unit patients with severe cerebrovascular disease and is not associated with increased major adverse events.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial of intravenous microplasmin in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Microplasmin is a recombinant truncated form of human plasmin. It has demonstrated efficacy in experimental animal models of stroke and tolerability in healthy volunteers. We tested the tolerability of microplasmin in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II trial, 40 patients with ischemic stroke were treated with either placebo or active drug between 3 and 12 hours after symptom onset in a dose-finding design. Ten patients received placebo, 6 patients received a total dose of 2 mg/kg, 12 patients received a total dose of 3 mg/kg, and 12 patients received a total dose of 4 mg/kg. We studied the pharmacodynamics of microplasmin and its effect on the clinical and hemodynamic parameters of the patients. MRI was used as a surrogate marker and matrix metalloproteinases serum concentrations were used as markers of neurovascular integrity. The study was underpowered to detect clinical efficacy. RESULTS: Microplasmin induced reversible effects on markers of systemic thrombolysis and neutralized alpha(2)-antiplasmin by up to 80%. It was well tolerated with one of 30 treated patients developing a fatal symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. No significant effect on reperfusion rate or on clinical outcome was observed. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 levels were reduced in microplasmin-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Microplasmin was well tolerated and achieved neutralization of alpha(2)-antiplasmin. Further studies are warranted to determine whether microplasmin is an effective therapeutic agent for ischemic stroke.

Effectiveness and safety of transcranial laser therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We hypothesized that transcranial laser therapy (TLT) can use near-infrared laser technology to treat acute ischemic stroke. The NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-2 (NEST-2) tested the safety and efficacy of TLT in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized study compared TLT treatment to sham control. Patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator and patients with evidence of hemorrhagic infarct were excluded. The primary efficacy end point was a favorable 90-day score of 0 to 2 assessed by the modified Rankin Scale. Other 90-day end points included the overall shift in modified Rankin Scale and assessments of change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. RESULTS: We randomized 660 patients: 331 received TLT and 327 received sham; 120 (36.3%) in the TLT group achieved favorable outcome versus 101 (30.9%), in the sham group (P=0.094), odds ratio 1.38 (95% CI, 0.95 to 2.00). Comparable results were seen for the other outcome measures. Although no prespecified test achieved significance, a post hoc analysis of patients with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of <16 showed a favorable outcome at 90 days on the primary end point (P<0.044). Mortality rates and serious adverse events did not differ between groups with 17.5% and 17.4% mortality, 37.8% and 41.8% serious adverse events for TLT and sham, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TLT within 24 hours from stroke onset demonstrated safety but did not meet formal statistical significance for efficacy. However, all predefined analyses showed a favorable trend, consistent with the previous clinical trial (NEST-1). Both studies indicate that mortality and adverse event rates were not adversely affected by TLT. A definitive trial with refined baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale exclusion criteria is planned.

Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Numerous preclinical findings and a clinical pilot study suggest that recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) provides neuroprotection that may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke. Although EPO has been considered to be a safe and well-tolerated drug over 2 decades, recent studies have identified increased thromboembolic complications and/or mortality risks on EPO administration to patients with cancer or chronic kidney disease. Accordingly, the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized German Multicenter EPO Stroke Trial (Phase II/III; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00604630) was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of EPO in stroke. METHODS: This clinical trial enrolled 522 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory (intent-to-treat population) with 460 patients treated as planned (per-protocol population). Within 6 hours of symptom onset, at 24 and 48 hours, EPO was infused intravenously (40,000 IU each). Systemic thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was allowed and stratified for. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, a very high number of patients received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (63.4%). On analysis of total intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, neither primary outcome Barthel Index on Day 90 (P=0.45) nor any of the other outcome parameters showed favorable effects of EPO. There was an overall death rate of 16.4% (n=42 of 256) in the EPO and 9.0% (n=24 of 266) in the placebo group (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.38; P=0.01) without any particular mechanism of death unexpected after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Based on analysis of total intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations only, this is a negative trial that also raises safety concerns, particularly in patients receiving systemic thrombolysis.

Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that desmoteplase, a novel plasminogen activator, has clinical benefit when given 3-9 h after the onset of the symptoms of stroke in patients with presumptive tissue at risk that is identified by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (PI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging study, patients with acute ischaemic stroke and tissue at risk seen on either MRI or CT imaging were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, or placebo within 3-9 h after the onset of symptoms of stroke. The primary endpoint was clinical response rates at day 90, defined as a composite of improvement in National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score of 8 points or more or an NIHSS score of 1 point or less, a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 points, and a Barthel index of 75-100. Secondary endpoints included change in lesion volume between baseline and day 30, rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality rates. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00111852. FINDINGS: Between June, 2005, and March, 2007, 193 patients were randomised, and 186 patients received treatment: 57 received 90 microg/kg desmoteplase; 66 received 125 microg/kg desmoteplase; and 63 received placebo. 158 patients completed the study. The median baseline NIHSS score was 9 (IQR 6-14) points, and 30% (53 of 179) of the patients had a visible occlusion of a vessel at presentation. The core lesion and the mismatch volumes were small (median volumes were 10.6 cm(3) and 52.5 cm(3), respectively). The clinical response rates at day 90 were 47% (27 of 57) for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 36% (24 of 66) for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, and 46% (29 of 63) for placebo. The median changes in lesion volume were: 90 microg/kg desmoteplase 14.0% (0.5 cm(3)); 125 microg/kg desmoteplase 10.8% (0.3 cm(3)); placebo -10.0% (-0.9 cm(3)). The rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were 3.5% (2 of 57) for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 4.5% (3 of 66) for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, and 0% for placebo. The overall mortality rate was 11% (5% [3 of 57] for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase; 21% [14 of 66] for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase; and 6% [4 of 63] for placebo). INTERPRETATION: The DIAS-2 study did not show a benefit of desmoteplase given 3-9 h after the onset of stroke. The high response rate in the placebo group could be explained by the mild strokes recorded (low baseline NIHSS scores, small core lesions, and small mismatch volumes that were associated with no vessel occlusions), which possibly reduced the potential to detect any effect of desmoteplase. FUNDING: PAION Deutschland GmbH; Forest Laboratories.

Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial-1 (ImpACT-1). A single-arm feasibility study evaluating the safety and potential benefit of the Ischemic Stroke System for treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: The Ischemic Stroke System is a novel device designed to deliver stimulation to the sphenopalatine ganglion(SPG).The SPG sends parasympathetic innervations to the anterior cerebral circulation. In rat stroke models, SPG stimulation results in increased cerebral blood flow, reduced infarct volume, protects the blood brain barrier, and improved neurological outcome. We present here the results of a prospective, multinational, single-arm, feasibility study designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and potential benefit of SPG stimulation inpatients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS). METHODS: Patients with anterior AIS, baseline NIHSS 7-20 and ability to initiate treatment within 24h from stroke onset, were implanted and treated with the SPG stimulation. Patients were followed up for 90 days. Effect was assessed by comparing the patient outcome to a matched population from the NINDS rt-PA trial placebo patients. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled (mean age 57years, mean baseline NIHSS 12 and mean treatment time from stroke onset 19h). The observed mortality rate(12.2%), serious adverse events (SAE)incidence(23.5%) and nature of SAE were within the expected range for the population. The modified intention to treat cohort consisted of 84 patients who were compared to matched patients from the NINDS placebo arm. Patients treated with SPG stimulation had an average mRS lower by 0.76 than the historical controls(CMH test p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The implantation procedure and the SPG stimulation, initiated within 24hr from stroke onset, are feasible, safe, and tolerable. The results call for a follow-up randomized trial (funded by BrainsGate; clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03733236).

DP-b99, a membrane-activated metal ion chelator, as neuroprotective therapy in ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DP-b99 is a chelator of zinc and calcium ions that acts selectively within cell membranes and has neuroprotective properties in animal models of stroke. We present the results of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to assess the safety and potential protective effects of DP-b99 in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: One hundred and fifty stroke patients with signs of cortical involvement and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7 to 20 received a 4-day course of intravenous 1 mg/kg per day DP-b99 or placebo within 1 to 9 hours of stroke onset. Treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was not allowed. RESULTS: No major differences in mortality rate, causes of death, adverse events, safety laboratory tests, and ECG parameters were found between the 2 groups. The baseline NIHSS score of the 72 DP-b99- and 75 placebo-treated patients in the intent-to-treat cohort was (mean+/-SD) 12.2+/-4.0 and 12.6+/-3.3, respectively; the time to needle (mean+/-SD) was 6:36+/-1:47 and 6:28+/-1:33 hours, respectively; and the age (mean+/-SD) was 73.3+/-9.9 and 72.0+/-9.6 years, respectively. The 90-day median change from baseline (the primary end point) was -6.0 and -5.0 NIHSS points in the DP-b99 and placebo groups, respectively (nonsignificant). At 90 days, there was a significantly better outcome in the DP-b99 group compared with the placebo group (modified Rankin scale score of 0, 1, or same as prestroke): 30.6% and 16.0%, respectively (P=0.05). The recovery rate was unaffected by the time to needle. Further analyses indicated that the 90-day median change from baseline in patients with an entry NIHSS score of 10 to 16 was 8.0 and 5.0 points in the DP-b99 and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this small-scale study, the primary end point of change in NIHSS score from baseline to 90 days was not met. However, secondary end points demonstrated a significantly improved 90-day recovery rate with treatment with DP-b99 when compared with placebo. In addition, in patients with baseline NIHSS scores of 10 to 16, a significant post hoc change in NIHSS score from baseline to day 90 was observed. No major safety problems were identified. These findings need to be confirmed with a larger prospective study of strokes involving the cortex.

Prophylaxis of thrombotic and embolic events in acute ischemic stroke with the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin: results of the PROTECT Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with stroke are at substantial risk of thromboembolic complications and therefore require antithrombotic prophylaxis. To show the noninferiority of the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the prevention of thromboembolic complications, we performed a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled multicenter trial in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Overall, 545 patients were randomized within 24 hours of stroke onset to treatment with certoparin (3000 U anti-Xa OD; n=272) or UFH (5000 U TID; n=273) for 12 to 16 days. Patients with paresis of a leg and an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 4 to 30 points were included. The primary end point was a composite outcome of proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or death related to venous thromboembolism during treatment. Computed tomography was performed at trial entry, after 7 days, and when clinical deterioration occurred. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis revealed 17 (7.0%) primary events in the certoparin group compared with 24 (9.7%) in the UFH group, thereby demonstrating noninferiority (P=0.0011), confirmed by intention-to-treat analysis (6.6% versus 8.8%; P=0.008). Major bleeding occurred during treatment in 3 patients allocated to certoparin (1.1%) and 5 patients allocated to UFH (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Certoparin (3000 U anti-Xa OD) is at least as effective and safe as UFH (TID) for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Organ-Protective Intensive Care in Organ Donors.

BACKGROUND: The ascertainment of brain death (the irreversible, total loss of brain function) gives the physician the opportunity to limit or stop further treatment. Alternatively, if the brain-dead individual is an organ donor, the mode of treatment can be changed from patient-centered to donationcentered. Consensus-derived recommendations for the organ-protective treatment of brain-dead organ donors are not yet available in Germany. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on the authors' clinical experience. RESULTS: Brain death causes major pathophysiological changes, including an increase in catecholamine levels and a sudden drop in the concentration of multiple hormones, among them antidiuretic hormone, cortisol, insulin, and triand tetraiodothyronine. These changes affect the function of all organ systems, as well as the hemodynamic state and the regulation of body temperature. The use of standardized donor management protocols might well increase the rate of transplanted organs per donor and improve the quality of the transplanted organs. In addition, the administration of methylprednisolone, desmopressin, and vasopressin could be a useful supplement to treatment in some cases. Randomized controlled trials have not yet demonstrated either improved organ function or prolonged survival of the transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: The evidence base for organ-protective intensive care is weak; most of the available evidence is on the level of expert opinion. There is good reason to believe, however, that the continuation of intensive care, in the sense of early donor management, can make organ transplantation more successful both by increasing the number of transplantable organs and by improving organ quality.

Mortality prediction in critical care for acute stroke: Severity of illness-score or coma-scale?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of early prognostic data provided by various scores in critically ill stroke patients remains unclear. We tested the performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II in prediction of mortality of acute stroke patients in the NeuroCriticalCareUnit (NCCU). METHODS: During one year every patient admitted to the NCCUs at 2 University hospitals for cerebral ischemia (CI) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and intubated was included in this study. Data for SAPS (I)/II and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were collected, and mortality at 10 days, 90 days and 1 year was determined. Prognostic performance of all scores was tested by calculation of receiver operating curve (ROC) and by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: 90 patients were included in the study, 49 with ICH and 41 with CI. Mortality after 10 days was 32.2%, after 3 months 58.9% and after 1 year 67.8%. Compared by their area under curve the predictive values were overall quite good for both SAPS (I) (0.77) and SAPS II (0.77) as well as GCS. Motor subscore was equal to total GCS (0.75 vs. 0.73). In Cox regression models all three scores were independent predictors of fatal outcome. CONCLUSION: SAPS II and SAPS (I) but also the GCS are valuable tools for prediction of short and long-term mortality in acute stroke patients treated in NCCU. The GCS as a predictor for mortality in stroke patients could be further simplified by using its subscore "best motor response" alone.

P2X7 receptor expression after ischemia in the cerebral cortex of rats.

Large amounts of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) released from cellular sources under pathological conditions such as ischemia may activate purinoceptors of the P2X and P2Y types. In the present study, the expression of the P2X7 receptor-subtype in the brain cortex of spontaneously hypertensive rats was investigated using a permanent focal cerebral ischemia model. Immunocytochemistry with antibodies raised against the intracellular C-terminus of the P2X7 receptor showed a time-dependent upregulation of labeled cells in the peri-infarct region after right middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in comparison to controls. Double immunofluorescence visualized with confooal laser scanning microscopy indicated the localization of the P2X7 receptor after ischemia on microglial cells (after 1 and 4 days), on tubulin betaIII-labeled neurons (after 4 and 7 days), and on glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes (after 4 days). In the following experiments, changes occurring 4 days after MCAO were investigated in detail. Western blot analysis of the cortical tissue around the area of necrosis indicated an increase in the P2X7 receptor protein. Immunoelectron microscopy revealed the receptor localization on synapses (presynaptically), on dendrites, as well as on the nuclear membrane of neurons (postsynaptically) and glial cells. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling in combination with P2X7 receptor immunocytochemistry indicated a co-expression on the apoptotic cells. Active caspase 3 was especially observed on GFAP-positive astrocytes. In conclusion, the present data demonstrate a postischemic, time-dependent upregulation of the P2X7 receptor-subtype on neurons and glial cells and suggest a role for this receptor in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia in vivo.

Adenosine A2A receptor-induced inhibition of NMDA and GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in a subpopulation of rat striatal neurons.

The function of adenosine A(2A) receptors, localized at the enkephalin-containing GABAergic medium spiny neurons of the striatum, has been discussed controversially. Here we show that, in the absence of external Mg(2+), the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 postsynaptically depressed the NMDA, but not the non-NMDA (AMPA/kainate) receptor-mediated fraction of the electrically evoked EPSCs in a subpopulation of striatal neurons. Current responses to locally applied NMDA but not AMPA were also inhibited by CGS 21680. However, in the presence of external Mg(2+), the inhibition by CGS 21680 of the GABA(A) receptor-mediated IPSCs led to a depression of the EPSC/IPSC complexes. The current response to the locally applied GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol was unaltered by CGS 21680. Whereas, the frequency of spontaneous (s)IPSCs was inhibited by CGS 21680, their amplitude was not changed. Hence, it is suggested that under these conditions the release rather than the postsynaptic effect of GABA was affected by CGS 21680. In conclusion, under Mg(2+)-free conditions, CGS 21680 appeared to postsynaptically inhibit the NMDA receptor-mediated component of the EPSC, while in the presence of external Mg(2+) this effect turned into a presynaptic inhibition of the GABA(A) receptor-mediated IPSC.