Rare lymphomas in routine practice - Treatment and outcome in marginal zone lymphoma in the prospective German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms.

Owing to its heterogeneity and rarity, management of disseminated marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) remains largely understudied. We present prospective data on choice of systemic treatment and survival of patients with MZL treated in German routine practice. Of 175 patients with MZL who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) collecting data on systemic treatment, 58 were classified as extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and 117 as non-MALT MZL. We analyzed the most commonly used first-line and second-line chemo(immuno)therapies between 2009 and 2016 and examined objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for survival. Compared to patients with MALT MZL, those with non-MALT MZL more often presented with bone marrow involvement (43% vs. 14%), Ann Arbor stage III/IV (72% vs. 57%) and were slightly less often in good general condition (ECOG = 0; 41% vs. 47%). In German routine practice, rituximab-bendamustine for a median of 6 cycles was the most frequently used first-line (76%) and second-line treatment (36%), with no major differences between MZL subtypes. The ORR for patients encompassing any positive response was 81%. For patients with MALT and non-MALT MZL, respectively, 5-years PFS was 69% (95% CI 52%-81%) and 66% (95% CI 56%-75%), 5-years OS 79% (95% CI 65%-89%) and 75% (95% CI 66%-83%). Cox proportional hazards models showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for higher age in all patient groups. Our prospective real world data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non-selected patients with MZL requiring systemic treatment and can help optimize therapy recommendations.

Health status and infections in patients with symptomatic primary and secondary immunoglobulin G (IgG) deficiencies receiving intravenous IgG replacement.

BACKGROUND: The effects of intravenous immunoglobulin G replacement on perceived health and infection susceptibility of patients suffering from immunoglobulin G (IgG) deficiencies should be evaluated in a prospective analysis. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic primary or secondary IgG deficiencies were interviewed prior to the first IgG infusion (t0) and over the course of their treatment (t1 - t6). The respondents rated their current health using a 100 point scale (EQ-5D-5L), ranging from 0 ('worst imaginable health') to 100 ('best imaginable health'). The patients also provided information on the frequency of infections and of infections requiring antibiotics in the past 8 weeks. A healthy control group (CG) without oncologic diseases answered the questions once. RESULTS: One hundred six patients with a median age of 65 years (21-85 years) were investigated. The median serum IgG concentration changed from 500 mg/dl (t0) to 772 mg/dl (t6). The mean number of infections and of infections requiring antibiotics decreased during IgG replacement significantly. Current health according to EQ-5D-5L improved from 57 (t0) to 68 (t6), compared to 73 in the CG. CONCLUSION: During the course of IgG replacement patients reported fewer and less severe infections. Their health assessment improved but still was inferior to the healthy CG.

Definition of a fluorescence in-situ hybridization score identifies high- and low-level FGFR1 amplification types in squamous cell lung cancer.

We recently reported fibroblast growth factor receptor-type 1 (FGFR1) amplification to be associated with therapeutically tractable FGFR1 dependency in squamous cell lung cancer. This makes FGFR1 a novel target for directed therapy in these tumors. To reproducibly identify patients for clinical studies, we developed a standardized reading and evaluation strategy for FGFR1 fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and propose evaluation criteria, describe different patterns of low- and high-level amplifications and report on the prevalence of FGFR1 amplifications in pulmonary carcinomas. A total of 420 lung cancer patients including 307 squamous carcinomas, 100 adenocarcinomas of the lung and 13 carcinomas of other types were analyzed for FGFR1 amplification using a dual color FISH. We found heterogeneous and different patterns of gene copy numbers. FGFR1 amplifications were observed in 20% of pulmonary squamous carcinomas but not in adenocarcinomas. High-level amplification (as defined by an FGFR1/centromer 8 (CEN8) ratio ≥2.0, or average number of FGFR1 signals per tumor cell nucleus ≥6, or the percentage of tumor cells containing ≥15 FGFR1 signals or large clusters ≥10%) was detected at a frequency of 16% and low-level amplification (as defined by ≥5 FGFR1 signals in ≥50% of tumor cells) at a frequency of 4%. We conclude that FGFR1 amplification is one of the most frequent therapeutically tractable genetic lesions in pulmonary carcinomas. Standardized reporting of FGFR1 amplification in squamous carcinomas of the lung will become increasingly important to correlate therapeutic responses with FGFR1 inhibitors in clinical studies. Thus, our reading and evaluation strategy might serve as a basis for identifying patients for ongoing and upcoming clinical trials.

First-line tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation versus single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, a systematic review of controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical studies have compared single with tandem (also called double) autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line treatment in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM), one of the leading indications for ASCT worldwide. OBJECTIVES: The present Cochrane Review compares tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (TASCT) with single autologous stem cell transplantation (SASCT) as first-line treatment in patients with symptomatic MM with respect to overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), quality of life (QoL) and treatment- or transplantation-related mortality. SEARCH METHODS: We systematically identified controlled trials published between January 1995 and May 2011 in two bibliographic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) and in clinical trial registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: One researcher screened references for controlled trials to determine eligibility for the systematic review (SR) according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria, reflecting characteristics of disease and the interventions. We required a minimal set of details to be reported for observational studies for the studies to be included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We critically evaluated eligible trials with respect to quality of design and actual performance. One researcher extracted individual trial results, which were checked by another researcher. We recapitulated the results of the individual trials in a standardised way for the SR in order to allow a systematic assessment of potential sources of bias. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, we identified 14 controlled studies. One registered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is still recruiting patients at the time of this review and no clinical results have been published. Two registered RCTs have remained unpublished despite their termination. Publications on one RCT had been retracted. We excluded five observational studies since neither patients nor treatment regimens were sufficiently characterised to allow an assessment of potential confounding by indication. We conducted a SR of study designs, definition of endpoints, treatment regimens and baseline characteristics of patients in the five included RCTs (two full-text publications, three conference presentations) enrolling1506 patients in total. Because we identified substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we refrained from conducting a formal meta-analysis.While we included only previously untreated, symptomatic patients with MM the treatment regimens differed notably with respect to acute toxicity, between trials and also between study arms. Compared to state of the art treatment standards, the treatment regimens applied in all trials have to be considered as below standard from a contemporary perspective in at least one component.Three trials were likely to have the potential of being highly biased while two RCTs had a moderate potential for bias. The observed treatment effects in the set of included trials may have been influenced by a steep decrease in compliance with the second ASCT and the concomitant selection of patients. In addition, OS data were confounded by the treatment subsequent to first-line therapy.OS was statistically significantly improved in one trial only. While EFS was prolonged in four of the five trials, the median prolongation ranged between three to 12 months, with an uncertain direction of bias in the individual trials. QoL was not reported in any study. Results concerning treatment- or transplantation-related mortality could not be adequately assessed due to substantial differences in definitions between trials and low reporting quality. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not consider any study to be sufficiently informative for contemporary treatment decisions concerning the question single versus tandem ASCT in view of inherent biases. In addition, none of the trials integrated the so-called "novel agents" which are now considered standard treatment for MM. To improve the quality of future studies, sample size calculations should consider the potentially steep decrease in compliance with the second ASCT. Reporting of results of treatment- or transplantation-related mortality should clearly specify the type and number of events (the numerator) in a well-defined population (the denominator).

Real-world patient-reported outcomes of breast cancer or prostate cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for bone metastases: Final results of the PROBone registry study.

Background: In breast cancer and prostate cancer patients, bone metastases (BM) present the main cause of morbidity and often cause debilitating pain, impaired functioning and subsequent deterioration of quality of life (QoL). The management of BM is still challenging. Maintenance or improvement in QoL is the main goal of treatment. Antiresorptive treatment, such as denosumab and bisphosphonates, can help to reduce the frequency of skeletal complications, to control bone pain and potentially to improve QoL. The optimal time point for initiation of antiresorptive therapy is still discussed controversially. In patients with BM, bone pain can be used as a surrogate measure of QoL. However, limited data exist on health-related QoL in patients with BM under antiresorptive treatment. The PROBone registry study evaluated complaints and limitations caused by BM of breast and prostate cancer patients using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in real-world in Germany. Methods: Between 2014 and 2019, 500 patients with histological confirmation of advanced breast or prostate cancer, diagnosed with BM at start of their first antiresorptive therapy were prospectively enrolled in 65 outpatient-centers specialized in medical oncology across Germany. Changes of QoL were assessed monthly from baseline until a maximum of 12 months using the validated pain score Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Quality of Life Measurement in patients with bone pain (FACT-BP) supplemented by questions on general pain and on the impact of time spent for treatment of illness on patients' daily activities. Statistical analysis was performed descriptively by relative and absolute frequencies. Results: In total, 486 patients were eligible for final analysis, of these 310 were diagnosed with breast cancer and 176 with prostate cancer. Median age was 67 years for breast cancer and 76 years for prostate cancer patients. 79.7% of breast cancer and 59.7% of prostate patients started antiresorptive treatment within 3 months after diagnosis of BM. More than 75% of patients suffered from bone pain at study inclusion. In total 52% of breast cancer patients and 47.9% of prostate cancer patients reported to take pain medication during the observation period. In breast and prostate cancer patients an initial pain reduction after start of BTA was observed: General pain and bone pain levels as well as the median FACT-BP score showed a constant improvement over the first months and maintained stable at a constant level afterwards. Subgroup analysis showed that patients without pain at baseline reported distinctly better FACT-BP scores throughout the whole observation period than patients with pain at baseline. Looking at time-stress (M)-scores, younger breast cancer patients (<65 years) showed highest burden especially during the first months of treatment. Conclusions: Our results indicate overall good adherence to current guideline recommendation, with most breast and prostate cancer patients starting antiresorptive therapy within the first 3 months after diagnosis of BM. This point gains even more importance as our data support current recommendations by ESMO guidelines as well as by German evidence-based S3-guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of breast and prostate cancer to initiate bone-targeted agents (BTA) as soon as BM are diagnosed, to keep pain levels at the lowest level possible, to minimize the debilitating effects of metastatic bone pain and maintain a good QoL. Bone pain management by an early use of BTA following BM diagnosis might improve patient care.

Sorafenib and everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and KRAS-mutated NSCLC: A phase I trial with early pharmacodynamic FDG-PET assessment.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with solid tumors and KRAS mutations remains disappointing. One option is the combined inhibition of pathways involved in RAF-MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR. METHODS: Patients with relapsed solid tumors were treated with escalating doses of everolimus (E) 2.5-10.0 mg/d in a 14-day run-in phase followed by combination therapy with sorafenib (S) 800 mg/d from day 15. KRAS mutational status was assessed retrospectively in the escalation phase. Extension phase included KRAS-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) only. Pharmacokinetic analyses were accompanied by pharmacodynamics assessment of E by FDG-PET. Efficacy was assessed by CT scans every 6 weeks of combination. RESULTS: Of 31 evaluable patients, 15 had KRAS mutation, 4 patients were negative for KRAS mutation, and the KRAS status remained unknown in 12 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was not reached. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as 7.5 mg/d E + 800 mg/d S due to toxicities at previous dose level (10 mg/d E + 800 mg/d S) including leucopenia/thrombopenia III° and pneumonia III° occurring after the DLT interval. The metabolic response rate in FDG-PET was 17% on day 5 and 20% on day 14. No patient reached partial response in CT scan. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.25 and 5.85 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with relapsed solid tumors with 7.5 mg/d E and 800 mg/d S is safe and feasible. Early metabolic response in FDG-PET was not confirmed in CT scan several weeks later. The combination of S and E is obviously not sufficient to induce durable responses in patients with KRAS-mutant solid tumors.

Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan-induced complete remission in a patient with classical lymphocyte-rich Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Radioimmunotherapeutics directed against CD20 have been established in several types of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Yttrium-90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) is the only approved radio - immunoconstruct for NHL in the EU. The malignant Hodgkin's and Reed-Sternberg cells in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) express CD20 infrequently. Thus, only very limited data of cHL patients treated with anti- CD20 immunoconstructs are available. To date, none of the patients treated with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan demonstrated any response. CASE REPORT: We report on a 78-year-old female patient suffering from a second systemic relapse of classical nodular lymphocyte-rich HL who experienced a complete remission (CR) after treatment with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan lasting over a period of 6 months. DISCUSSION: Treatment of patients with cHL with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab resulted in a response rate of 22%. 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan demonstrated superiority compared with rituximab in a randomized phase III trial. HL represents a radiosensitive tumor responding to anti-CD30 or antiferritin radioimmunotherapy. Further HL patients have to be treated with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan to evaluate a potential benefit. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan induced a clinically relevant CR in a patient with CD20-positive cHL. Thus, we will expand treatment of relapsed CD20-positive HL with 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan at our institution.

Treatment, outcome and quality of life of 1239 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer - final results from the prospective German TLK cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Real-life data on advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are centrally important to complement the results from clinical trials and to improve the standard of care. We present data on the choice of systemic first- and second-line treatment, number of treatment lines, survival and longitudinal data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients treated by medical oncologists in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1239 patients with advanced NSCLC were recruited at start of first-line therapy into the prospective German clinical cohort study TLK (Tumour Registry Lung Cancer) by 107 sites between February 2010 and December 2013 and followed-up until January 2016. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires. RESULTS: Most patients receive carboplatin- or cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy in first-line treatment. The choice of platinum agent did neither influence the outcome: median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months for carboplatin combinations (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.0-13.8) and 11.9 months for cisplatin combinations (95% CI 10.2-13.8), nor did it have a marked impact on the HRQOL. Patients receiving cisplatin were younger and fitter at start of therapy than patients receiving carboplatin or mono-chemotherapy. The longitudinal HRQOL analysis revealed the main symptoms that need to be addressed in follow-up care, irrespective of the platinum agent: fatigue, nausea, dyspnoea and pain. The patients receiving targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) had a median OS of 22.1 months (95% CI 15.0-35.1) and considerably superior HRQOL. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in outcome between the platinum compounds cisplatin and carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in routine care. This is the first report of longitudinal HRQOL data comparing treatments, showing no difference between carboplatin and cisplatin.

Treatment of refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with an iodine-131-labeled murine anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody.

PURPOSE: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has been demonstrated to be a good target for immunotherapy since lymphocyte activation markers such as CD30 are expressed in high numbers on the malignant cells. Thus, we developed a new radioimmunoconjugate consisting of the murine anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody (MAb) Ki-4 labeled with iodine-131 ((131)I). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The biodistribution of (131)I-Ki-4 was assessed via dosimetry after preinfusion of 5 mg native Ki-4 followed by 250 to 300 MBq (131)I-labeled Ki-4. Whole-body scintigraphy was performed 1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 6 days after the infusion. Dosimetry was calculated using the programs NucliDose ICON-IDL (version 5.0.2; Siemens, Erlanger, Germany) and MIRDOSE (version 3.1; Oak Ridge National Laboratories; Oak Ridge, TN). The therapeutic dose was given on day 8 after preinfusion of unlabeled Ki-4. RESULTS: We treated 22 patients with relapsed or refractory CD30-positive HL. Preinfusion of 5 mg native Ki-4 was sufficient to bind the soluble CD30. Imaging demonstrated localization of involved areas measuring 5 cm in diameter or more in four patients and 2.5 cm in one patient. Patients received total body doses of 0.035 Gy to 0.99 Gy. Acute toxicity was mild with grade 1 fatigue in 19 of 22 assessable patients. Seven patients experienced grade 4 degrees hematotoxicity 4 to 8 weeks after treatment. Response included one complete remission, five partial remissions, and three minor responses. CONCLUSION: Treatment with (131)I-Ki-4 is effective but can be associated with severe hematotoxicity.

Fludarabine in combination with alemtuzumab is effective and feasible in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a newly developed concomitant administration of fludarabine and alemtuzumab (FluCam) in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients were treated in this phase II study (median age, 61.47 years; mean number of prior chemotherapies, 2.6; Binet stage C, n = 28). After an initial dose escalation of alemtuzumab over 3 days, alemtuzumab 30 mg and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 were administered on 3 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated after 28 days for up to six cycles. Restaging (following National Cancer Institute criteria) was carried out after cycles 2 and 4 and 1 month after the end of treatment. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 83% (11 complete responses, 19 partial responses, one stable disease, and five progressive diseases). Two patients with progressive disease developed fungal pneumonias, and one patient died as a result of Escherichia coli sepsis. Two subclinical cytomegalovirus reactivations occurred. CONCLUSION: The new FluCam regimen is effective and feasible in patients with relapsed and refractory B-CLL.

SGN-30 (Seattle genetics).

Seattle Genetics is developing SGN-30, an intravenously administered recombinant anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody for the potential treatment of Hodgkin's disease, certain non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, specific leukemia, and immunological diseases such as multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Phase II trials in patients with Hodgkin's disease, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and cutaneous lymphoma have been conducted in the U.S. and Europe.

Current treatment and immunotherapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma has changed significantly over the last decades, rendering this entity one of the most curable human cancers. To date, about 80% of patients achieve long-term disease-free survival. Current strategies in first-line treatment aim at further improving outcome and thereby preventing therapy-induced complications, such as infertility, cardiopulmonary toxicity, and secondary malignancies. Ongoing trials for patients in early stages are investigating lower radiation doses and smaller radiation fields and possible reductions in the doses or number of cycles of chemotherapy given. For patients in advanced stages, new drug combinations with higher dose density and intensity have been developed, and are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Approaches for relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma comprise salvage radiotherapy, salvage chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. In recent years, the introduction of effective salvage high-dose therapy and a better understanding of prognostic factors have remarkably improved the management of relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma. For multiple pretreated patients antibody-based agents that showed promising results in experimental models are being investigated in clinical trials. Radioimmunoconjugates and monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated some clinical efficacy. Here, we review new aspects in the treatment of primary and relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma as well as recent immunotherapeutic approaches.

A Phase I study with an anti-CD30 ricin A-chain immunotoxin (Ki-4.dgA) in patients with refractory CD30+ Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Ki-4.dgA is an anti-CD30 immunotoxin (IT) constructed by coupling the monoclonal antibody Ki-4 via a sterically hindered disulfide linker to deglycosylated ricin A-chain. This IT was efficacious in vitro and in SCID mice with disseminated human Hodgkin's lymphoma. Accordingly, a Phase I trial in patients (pts) with Hodgkin's lymphoma was designed. The objectives of this Phase I trial were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. Seventeen pts with relapsed CD30+ lymphoma were treated with escalating doses (5, 7.5, or 10 mg/m(2)/cycle) of the IT as four bolus infusions on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 for one to three cycles. All of the pts had progressive disease and were heavily pretreated. Nine had primary progressive disease and 14 had advanced disease with massive tumor burdens. The mean age was 35 years (24-52 years). Peak serum concentrations of the intact IT varied from 0.23 to 1.1 microg/ml. Side effects and dose-limiting toxicities were related to vascular leak syndrome, i.e., decreases in serum albumin, edema, weight gain, hypotension, tachycardia, myalgia, and weakness. The maximum tolerated dose was 5 mg/m(2). Seven of 17 (40%) pts made human antiricin antibodies (> or =1.0 microg/ml), and 1 pt developed human antimouse antibodies (> or =1.0 microg/ml). Clinical response in the 15 evaluable pts included 1 partial remission, 1 minor response, and 2 stable diseases. In conclusion, the IT was less well tolerated than other ITs of this type. This might be because of the low number of CD30+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and in part because of binding of the IT to soluble CD30 antigen and the resulting circulation of IT/sCD30 complexes.

ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact, therapeutic options and genetic variability.

BACKGROUND: While recent data show that crizotinib is highly effective in patients with ROS1 rearrangement, few data is available about the prognostic impact, the predictive value for different treatments, and the genetic heterogeneity of ROS1-positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1137 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung were analyzed regarding their ROS1 status. In positive cases, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed. Clinical characteristics, treatments and outcome of these patients were assessed. Overall survival (OS) was compared with genetically defined subgroups of ROS1-negative patients. RESULTS: 19 patients of 1035 evaluable (1.8%) had ROS1-rearrangement. The median OS has not been reached. Stage IV patients with ROS1-rearrangement had the best OS of all subgroups (36.7 months, p < 0.001). 9 of 14 (64.2%) patients had at least one response to chemotherapy. Estimated mean OS for patients receiving chemotherapy and crizotinib was 5.3 years. Ten patients with ROS1-rearrangement (52.6%) harbored additional aberrations. CONCLUSION: ROS1-rearangement is not only a predictive marker for response to crizotinib, but also seems to be the one of the best prognostic molecular markers in NSCLC reported so far. In stage IV patients, response to chemotherapy was remarkable high and overall survival was significantly better compared to other subgroups including EGFR-mutated and ALK-fusion-positive NSCLC.

Monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Many new approaches involving the use of antibody-based agents have produced promising results in experimental Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) models. Early clinical trials using immunotoxins, radioimmunotherapy (RIT), bispecific molecules and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have demonstrated some clinical efficacy in patients with advanced refractory HL. Although it seems unlikely that these approaches alone will cure chemotherapy-resistant patients with larger tumor masses, combination with conventional chemotherapy may help to overcome resistance of Hodgkin-Reed/Sternberg (H-RS) cells or to eliminate residual disease. Since H-RS cells are extremely sensitive to irradiation, RIT may be a potential approach. A murine mAb (Ki-4)-based 131I conjugate showed efficacy in refractory HL patients, however, toxicity was a problem and less toxic constructs using alternate mAbs or isotopes need to be designed. A humanized and a fully human anti-CD30 mAb are currently being evaluated in phase I/II clinical trials. These mAbs could engage the human immune system against the HL and are capable of directly inducing apoptosis of H-RS cells. In addition, these mAbs could be combined with conventional chemotherapy and are thus promising candidates for further development for the therapy of HL.

Phase-II study of the new aza-anthracenedione, BBR 2778, in patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: BBR 2778 is a new aza-anthracenedione. Its activity against hematologic neoplasias in a mouse model is greater than that of doxorubicin or mitoxantrone. A phase-I study in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) showed that the drug has promising anti-tumor activity. Therefore, a phase-II study in patients with relapsed aggressive NHL was initiated. DESIGN AND METHODS: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of 85 mg/m2 BBR 2278 for a q1w x3 treatment schedule (repeat day 29). Secondary objectives included the evaluation of response duration and safety in this open-label, non-randomized, multicenter trial. Patients with relapsed aggressive NHL according to the REAL-classification were included. RESULTS: Eight centers enrolled a total of 33 patients. The median age of these patients was 66 years (range 24-81). The majority of patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=24) or mantle-cell lymphoma (n=7), pretreated with a median of 2 regimens. Confirmed responses included 5 complete and 4 partial remissions, with the period between the first appearance of response and any signs or symptoms of progression being up to 17+ months. The main toxicity was neutropenia. INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that 85 mg/m2 BBR 2778 in a q1w x 3 schedule is active in elderly and pretreated patients with relapsed aggressive NHL and was generally well tolerated. Thus, we recommend further clinical evaluation of this new compound in phase-III studies for the treatment of NHL.

Relapsed hodgkin lymphoma in older patients: a comprehensive analysis from the German hodgkin study group.

PURPOSE: Progression or relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is common among older patients. However, prognosis and effects of second-line treatment are thus far unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated second-line treatment and survival in older patients with progressive or relapsed HL. Patients treated within German Hodgkin Study Group first-line studies between 1993 and 2007 were screened for refractory disease or relapse (RR-HL). Patients with RR-HL age ≥ 60 years at first-line treatment were included in this analysis. RESULTS: We identified 105 patients (median age, 66 years); 28%, 31%, and 41% had progressive disease, early relapse, or late relapse, respectively. Second-line treatment strategies included intensified salvage regimens (22%), conventional polychemotherapy and/or salvage-radiotherapy with curative intent (42%), and palliative approaches (31%). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 12 months; OS at 3 years was 31% (95% CI, 22% to 40%). A prognostic score with risk factors (RFs) of early relapse, clinical stage III/IV, and anemia identified patients with favorable and unfavorable prognosis (≤ one RF: 3-year OS, 59%; 95% CI, 44% to 74%; ≥ two RFs: 3-year OS, 9%; 95% CI, 1% to 18%). In low-risk patients, the impact of therapy on survival was significant in favor of the conventional polychemotherapy/salvage radiotherapy approach. In high-risk patients, OS was low overall and did not differ significantly among treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: OS in older patients with RR-HL can be predicted using a simple prognostic score. Poor outcome in high-risk patients cannot be overcome by any of the applied treatment strategies. Our results might help to guide treatment decisions and evaluate new compounds in these patients.

Rituximab in relapsed lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: long-term results of a phase 2 trial by the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG).

Because nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) express CD20, rituximab may be used as a nonmutagenic treatment option to avoid late toxicities in this rather indolent entity. Between 1999 and 2004, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) investigated the activity of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) in 4 doses) in a phase 2 trial in 21 relapsed or refractory NLPHL patients. The initial diagnosis of NLPHL was confirmed in 15 of the 21 enrolled patients by reference pathology. The remaining cases were reclassified as Hodgkin lymphoma transformed to T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma (TCRBCL; n = 2) or CD20(+) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL; n = 4). In NLPHL patients the overall response rate was 94%, including 8 complete remission (CR) and 6 partial remission (PR). With a median follow-up of 63 months (range, 3-84), the median time to progression was 33 months, with the median overall survival (OS) not reached. Thus, rituximab is highly effective in relapsed and refractory NLPHL. This study is registered at http://www.klinisches-studienzentrum.de/trial/285.

A novel bispecific protein (ULBP2-BB4) targeting the NKG2D receptor on natural killer (NK) cells and CD138 activates NK cells and has potent antitumor activity against human multiple myeloma in vitro and in vivo.

The inability of the immune system to recognize and kill malignant plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has been attributed in part to the ineffective activation of natural killer (NK) cells. In order to activate and target NK cells to the malignant cells in MM we designed a novel recombinant bispecific protein (ULBP2-BB4). While ULBP2 binds the activating NK receptor NKG2D, the BB4 moiety binds to CD138, which is overexpressed on a variety of malignancies, including MM. ULBP2-BB4 strongly activated primary NK cells as demonstrated by a significant increase in interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) secretion. In vitro, ULBP2-BB4 enhanced the NK-mediated lysis of 2 CD138+ human MM cell lines, U-266 and RPMI-8226, and of primary malignant plasma cells in the allogenic and autologous setting. Moreover, in a nude mouse model with subcutaneously growing RPMI-8226 cells, the cotherapy with ULBP-BB4 and human peripheral blood lymphocytes abrogated the tumor growth. These data suggest potential clinical use of this novel construct in patients with MM. The use of recombinant NK receptor ligands that target NK cells to tumor cells might offer new approaches for other malignancies provided a tumor antigen-specific antibody is available.

The role of pixantrone in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Pixantrone is an anthraquinone-based inhibitor of topoisomerase II. It is similar to both the anthracycline doxorubicin and the anthracenedione mitoxantrone, but lacks the 5,8-dihydroxy substitution pattern of mitoxantrone, and has a tricyclic system unlike the tetracyclic structure seen with anthracyclines. Anthracyclines are the most active drugs in lymphoma therapy, but their use is limited by their cumulative and irreversible cardiotoxicity. Pixantrone was developed to improve the toxicity profile of the current anthracyclines and anthracenediones while maintaining their activity. Interestingly, pixantrone showed no measurable cardiotoxicity compared with its parent compound mitoxantrone or other anthracyclines at equi-effective doses in several animal models. Together with its superior cytotoxic activity in leukaemia and lymphoma models, these features render the drug a promising candidate for clinical development in indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In this review, the latest results of the use of pixantrone in indolen-t and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas are summarised.