Knowledge competence in clinical and counseling training and readiness for internship.

The concept of competence has become the driving force in the education and training of professional psychologists. In fact, competence has evolved into increasingly sophisticated forms, now perhaps best represented by the cube model, which integrates foundational, functional, and developmental variables into ideas about professional training. This article considers one component of professional training, scientific knowledge, and argues that knowledge competence, measured by the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology, should occur before a student is certified as internship ready.

Letters of recommendation for the predoctoral internship in medical schools and other settings: do they enhance decision making in the selection process?

Since the 1970s, letters of recommendation to medical and other internship settings have surfaced as important variables in the internship selection process. However, several studies have challenged their value in the selection process, specifically by pointing out that these letters have an overly positive bias and fail to address applicant weaknesses. Our study, using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count text analysis method, developed a quantitative profile for a sample of letters of recommendation, determined whether letters differentiated among applicants with regard to positive/negative attributions, evaluated letters for positive and negative bias, and investigated potential gender bias of writers toward applicants. Results indicated that writers apply positive and negative attributions homogeneously across applicants, thus, rendering applicant differentiation on this basis impossible. Also, results demonstrated that letters of male and female writers were not biased toward male or female applicants. These findings, in combination with previous studies, question the utility of letters of recommendation as presently structured. Possible modifications are discussed.

P-A-I-N: a four-cluster MMPI typology for chronic pain.

A 4-cluster empirically derived MMPI typology for chronic pain sufferers has been demonstrated by combining the results of 10 investigative teams. These MMPI 'types' have been labeled P-A-I-N and appear to have important clinical and demographic correlates. Type P is the most 'psychopathological' looking as nearly all scales are usually elevated. Type P patients are extreme in their claims of physical illness, psychological distress and social maladaptation. Demographic correlates include poor education, high rates of unemployment, and limited household income. Type A is defined by a 'conversion V' on the 'neurotic' triad scales. It has no unique correlates. Type I has elevations on all of the neurotic triad scales and on no others. Type I patients appear to be the most physically infirm with multiple surgeries and hospitalizations. They may not improve physical status with treatment, but appear to benefit psychologically. Type N profiles are 'normal' in that no scale, except perhaps scale K, is often elevated. Type N patients are moderate in their claims of ill health, often are better educated and employed, and appear to respond well to treatment. Classification rules have been proposed to allow patient-typing without a computer. Use of these rules should allow programmatic research into treatment/type interactions even in the ordinary clinical setting. The typology appears well enough established to allow for prospective studies to test theoretical hypotheses drawn from the literature base.