Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part III: Hindlimb and pelvis.

OBJECTIVES: To categorize the fascial planes and the intersections of these fascial planes in the hindlimb of the dog to facilitate preoperative planning for superficial cancers. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative anatomical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Four male and five female mixed breed dogs, weighing ~15-35 kg. METHODS: Skin and subcutaneous fat were removed, and fascial planes were explored to determine borders and quality. Fascia was categorized as type I (discrete sheets), type II (adhered to thin muscles), type III (adhered to thick muscles), or type IV (associated with periosteum). Digital modification of specimen photographs was performed to map tissues. RESULTS: Differences in dogs were noted due to either size or sex but were sufficiently minor to allow mapping. Fasciae of the hindlimb were predominantly type II or III, with type I fascia primarily at the lateral gluteal region, fascia lata, and lateral crus. Type IV fascia was seen at the iliac wing, ischium, patella, tibial tuberosity, medial tibia, distal crus, and pes. Fascia for surgical use was thin or absent at the ischiorectal fossa, femoral triangle, extensor mechanism, medial and distal crus, and pes. Intersections and tissues at the ventral perineum may also pose challenges for maintenance of a deep margin. CONCLUSION: Fascial types and integrity of the hindlimb varied with location, with the perineum, cranial stifle, and distal limb presenting the greatest challenges. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These images may be used to guide both therapeutic decision-making and intraoperative excision of superficial tumors of the hindlimb and pelvis.

Evaluating gender discrepancies in the time to successful match into a small animal surgery residency program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine any association between gender and likelihood of first attempt match and overall time to match into an American College of Veterinary Surgery (ACVS)-registered small animal surgical residency program (SASRP). STUDY DESIGN: Online survey. SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 100 (77 female, 23 male) ACVS small animal surgery residents or diplomates participating in a SASRP during the past 5 years. METHODS: An online survey was sent to eligible individuals. Respondents anonymously provided information related to demographics, postgraduate internships, and qualifications at the time of each surgical residency application. First attempt and overall match success were evaluated by gender through univariable analysis and then via a multivariable model. RESULTS: Men were 2.89 times more likely to match directly into a SASRP following a rotating internship than women (p = .041), and women completed more total internships than men prior to successful match into a SASRP (p = .030); however, men were found to have more publications at the time of first residency application (p < .001) or successful match (p = .018). Multivariable analysis revealed no association between gender on overall match success or first attempt match rate when considering all other qualifications. CONCLUSION: No evidence for gender bias was found during the Veterinary Internship and Residency Matching Program (VIRMP) SASRP applicant selection process; however, gender specific patterns in research qualifications were identified. IMPACT: Gender-blinded assessment is not considered necessary for the VIRMP small animal surgical resident selection process. Efforts should be made to educate applicants about the impact of research on the residency selection process and encourage research engagement of female students and graduates.

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part I: Neck and trunk.

OBJECTIVE: To provide qualitative fascial categories and classify the intersections of various fascial planes of the trunk of the dog to facilitate preoperative planning for superficial cancers. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative anatomical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Two male and three female mixed breed canine cadavers weighing approximately 15 to 35 kg. METHODS: The skin and subcutaneous fat were excised. Fascial planes were incised and elevated to allow exploration of their quality and borders. Fascia was categorized as type I (discrete sheets), type II (tightly adhered to thin muscles), type III (tightly adhered to thick muscles), or type IV (associated with periosteum). Photographs of specimens were digitally modified with overlays to map tissue types. RESULTS: Differences between cadavers were largely associated with muscle mass or sex, with only minor anatomical differences and enough subjective similarity among specimens to allow mapping. The fasciae of the neck and trunk were predominantly type I or type II, with type III fascia at the shoulder and type IV fascia at the scapular spine, 13th rib, dorsal spinous processes, and the wing of the ilium. CONCLUSION: The superficial fasciae of the canine trunk were consistent among the dogs evaluated and can be classified as four broad fascial types. The population used was small, and individual variation should be considered when using these images in a clinical setting. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The images and categorization of fascia and transitions between fascial layers detailed here provide a visual and written reference for surgeons to facilitate preoperative planning and excision of superficial cancers.

Fascial plane mapping for superficial tumor resection in dogs. Part II: Forelimb.

OBJECTIVE: To detail the qualitative fascial categories and fascial intersections of the forelimb of the dog to facilitate preoperative planning for superficial cancers. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative anatomical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Three male and four female mixed breed canine cadavers weighing approximately 20-35 kg. METHODS: The skin and subcutaneous fat were excised. Fascial planes were incised and elevated to allow exploration of their quality and borders. Fascia was categorized as type I (discrete sheets), type II (tightly adhered to thin muscles), type III (tightly adhered to thick muscles), or type IV (associated with periosteum). Photographs of specimens were digitally modified with overlays to map tissue types. RESULTS: Differences between the cadavers used were largely based on muscle mass and sex, with minimal other subjective differences affecting fascial mapping. The fasciae of the forelimb were largely type II or type III, with type I fascia at the antebrachium and type IV fascia at the olecranon, scapular spine, and accessory carpal bone. Fascial integrity was often questionable or lacking distal to the distal quarter of the antebrachium. CONCLUSION: The fascial types and integrity of the forelimb varied with anatomic location with thin or absent fascia for surgical use at the elbow, carpus, and manus. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides information for preoperative planning and excision of superficial tumors of the forelimb. Knowledge of the potential limitations of fascia to provide a deep margin may influence selection of treatment modalities.