Minimally invasive surgery for intra-articular calcaneus fractures: a 9-year, single-center, retrospective study of a standardized technique using a 2-point distractor.

BACKGROUND: A fracture of the calcaneus can be a painful and disabling injury. Treatment modalities may be conservative or operative. Surgical treatment strategies include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques, as well as a variety of minimally invasive methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment options and post-treatment complication rates for intra-articular calcaneal fractures at the Traumacenter Linz over a 9-year period. METHODS: All patients with calcaneal fractures treated at the Traumacenter Linz between 2007 and 2015 were included in this study. The patients records were retrospectively reviewed, and the data, including demographic parameters, cause of injury, and the time between injury and operative treatment were analyzed. The number of secondary operative interventions due to soft-tissue complications, hardware removal, and the long-term arthrodesis rate were evaluated. RESULTS: A minimally invasive 2-point-distractor method was used in 85.8% (n = 182) of all operatively managed calcaneal fractures (n = 212) in our department. The majority of the operations (88.7%) were performed within 2 days after the accident. The secondary operation rate resulting from wound complications was 2.7% in the 2-point distractor group and 16.7% in the ORIF group. A secondary arthrodesis was performed in 4.7% (n = 9) of the subtalar joints in the entire study population. CONCLUSIONS: Our data supported the assumption that severe wound complications would be less likely to occur after minimally invasive treatment compared to ORIF treatment. The rate of secondary arthrodesis in the study cohort was comparable to that in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Lateral para-olecranon approach: surgical guide and anatomical considerations to the anconeus branch: is there a nerve-free zone?

PURPOSE: In the last decades, total elbow arthroplasty, elbow osteosynthesis and revision surgery have been more popularized. The study aimed to assess the course of the anconeus branch of the radial nerve in relation to two variations of the lateral para-olecranon approach, considering iatrogenic nerve injuries. METHODS: The study consisted of 120 upper extremities from 60 Thiel-embalmed human specimens. Two randomized versions of the lateral para-olecranon approach (centrally orientated: P1 and laterally orientated: P2) were performed. The olecranon and the intersection points to the anconeus branch of the radial nerve were determined as anatomical landmarks. The measurements were assessed by two independent observers. Differences were analyzed using the Student's t test; associations were computed with the Pearson correlation (r). An alpha of 0.05 (p) and a confidence interval of 95% were set. RESULTS: The intersection points averaged 12.3 cm (SD 1.8, range 8.2-16.8) for P1 versus 5.5 cm (SD 1.4, range 3.0-9.2) for P2 (p ≤ 0.001). Statistically significantly higher values for male and longer humeral specimens were revealed (all values: p < 0.05). Comparison of left and right sides yielded no difference. Excellent inter-rater agreements were found (ICC = 0.902, range 0.860-0.921). A correlation was evaluated between the humeral length and the distances in both approaches (P1: r = 0.550, p < 0.001, P2: r = 0.669, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The data presented here allow preservation of the anconeus branch. The P1 forms a potential advantage by owing a broader safe zone. Using the centrally orientated approach seems to provide adequate nerve protection during surgery for one of the motor branches for extension of the elbow joint and might result in improved postoperative benefits.

Mini-open carpal tunnel release: technique, feasibility and clinical outcome compared to the conventional procedure in a long-term follow-up.

We sought to evaluate the findings of our anatomically landmarks based mini-open procedure (MCTR) through a palmar approach and to compare its outcome and practicability to the conventional method (OCTR). The study consisted of 100 matched patients (n = 50 MCTR, n = 50 OCTR) with a minimum follow-up of three years. The outcome was characterized via the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH), Symptom Severity Scale (SSS), Functional Status Scale (FSC), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). All adverse events were observed. An alpha of 0.05 and a confidence level of 95% were set for statistical analyses. Both techniques showed comparable functional results in a long-term period (mean follow-up MCTR: 60 months and OCTR: 54 months). MCTR versus OCTR at mean: DASH: 4.6/8.3 (p = 0.398), SSS: 1.3/1.2 (p = 0.534), FSC: 1.3/1.2 (p = 0.617), VAS: 0.4/0.7 (p = 0.246). The MCTR convinced through a lower rate of scar sensibility (MCTR: 0% vs. OCTR: 12%, 0/50 vs. 6/50; p = 0.007) and pillar pain, as well as a shortened recovery period and surgical time relative to the OCTR. Low complication rates were observed in both groups, no recurrences had to be documented. The MCTR procedure revealed a similar good clinical outcome as the conventional technique. MCTR is a minimally-invasive, reliable, fast and simple procedure with an obvious benefit regarding scar sensibility.

Dorsal minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the humerus: Feasibility and risk of nervous injury of a modified technique in an anatomical study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to design a convenient technique for dorsal minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of extra-articular fractures of both distal thirds of the humeral shaft as well as to characterise the course and proximity of the radial nerve (RN) and the axillary nerve (AN). METHODS: The collective consisted of 20 upper extremities of human adult body donors. A 3.5 mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP), an extra-articular distal humerus plate was inserted through a MIPO approach including two incisions. The primary incision was performed 5 cm in lenght on the dorsal side of the lateral epicondyle. An additional 5 cm incision was conducted distal to the humeral deltoid muscle insertion and the RN was depicted. The longest suitable plate was advanced under nerve protection starting distally and fixed by locking screws. A third incision with a length of 5 cm was made beginning at the distal border of the deltoid muscle, and a muscle split was performed to dissect the AN. The respective plate holes, where the AN and RN were located and the distances between the nerves were examined. RESULTS: The RN was mostly (30%) localised on holes 6 and 7 (starting distally). The AN laid directly on the plate in 65% and on the most proximal plate hole in 12 cases, but was never situated underneath the plate. The distance between the AN and RN was at mean 93.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: MIPO via a dorsal method proves to be a noteworthy technique and valuable option as indicated by our results. This 5-5-(5) concept may be performed as a two-incision or three-incision technique for extra-articular fractures of both distal thirds of the humerus.

Definition of a Risk Zone for the Axillary Nerve Based on Superficial Landmarks.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the axillary nerve's location along superficial anatomical landmarks, and to define a convenient risk zone. METHODS: A total of 123 upper extremities were evaluated. After dissection of the axillary nerve, the vertical distance between the upper border of the anterolateral edge of the acromion and the proximal border of the nerve was measured. Furthermore, the interval between the proximal border and the distal border of the axillary nerve's branches was evaluated. The interval between the distal border of the branches and the most distal part of the lateral humeral epicondyle was measured. The distance between the anterolateral edge of the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle was evaluated. Measurements were expressed as proportions with respect to the distance between the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle. RESULTS: The distance between the acromion and the proximal border of the axillary nerve's branches was at a height of 10 percent of the distance between the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle, starting from the acromion (90 percent when starting from the lateral humeral epicondyle). The interval between the proximal and distal margins of the axillary nerve's branches was between 10 percent and 30 to 35 percent of this interval, starting from the acromion (65 to 70 percent when starting from the lateral humeral epicondyle). CONCLUSIONS: The authors were able to locate the branches of the axillary nerve at an interval between 10 and 35 percent of the distance between the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle, starting from the acromion. This makes the proximal third of this distance an easily applicable risk zone during shoulder surgery.

Correlation Analysis of the Anterolateral Ligament Length with the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Length and Patient's Height: An Anatomical Study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) with the focus on potential gender differences. The ALL length and the length of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) were taken in extension. The length of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was measured at 120° flexion. We correlated the length of the ALL with the LCL and ACL with respect to potential gender differences. The ALL was significantly (p = 0.044) shorter in females (mean length: 32.8 mm) compared to males (mean length: 35.7 mm). The length of the ALL correlated significantly positively with the lengths of the ACL (p < 0.001) and the LCL (p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation with the total leg length (TLL) (p = 0.888) and body size (p = 0.046). Furthermore, TLL and donor size correlated significantly positively (p < 0.001). The ALL length correlated significantly positively with the ACL and the LCL length. The ALL length did neither correlate with the TLL nor the donor size. This fact may contribute to planning of graft harvesting in the upcoming techniques for ALL reconstruction.

Avoiding radial nerve palsy in proximal radius shaft plating - a cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: Opinions vary concerning the position of forearm rotation during detachment of the supinator in radial nerve palsy Henry's and Thompson's approaches. PURPOSE: To define the optimal forearm position for a safe detachment of the supinator during these approaches and to clarify their close relationship to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). METHODS: The study sample comprised 90 upper extremities of 45 human adult cadavers, embalmed using Thiel's method. After detection of the radial nerve in the interval between the brachialis and brachioradialis, its pathway was traced to the Arcade of Frohse (AF). Measurements involved the distance between the AFand the radial border of the distal biceps tendon (DBT) in pronation and supination, the interval between the AF and the radiocapitellar joint space (RCJS) in supination and the radial length (RL). RESULTS: Distances between the DBT and the AF were significantly shorter during pronation (right side: 14.1 ± 3.4mm; left side: 13.5 ± 3.2mm) compared with supination (right side: 20.5 ± 3.6mm; left side: 19.8 ± 3.5mm) for both right and left extremities. The mean interval between the AF and the centre of the RCJS was 25.2 ± 5.9mm for the right side and 24.7 ± 5.6mm for the left side, which correlated positively with the RL. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a safe detachment of the supinator from the radius with the forearm placed in supination during both Henry's and Thompson's approaches.

Comparison of volar and dorsal plate osteosynthesis for radial shaft fractures: an anatomical pilot study.

BACKGROUND: No publication has yet described the interface between the radius and the plate in various positions. Neither clinical examination nor assessment of fracture radiographs provides information about the anatomy of the radius before injury. PURPOSE: We investigated radius anatomy to analyse dorsal and volar plate-to-bone fit for radial shaft fracture management. METHODS: We examined 20 specimens from human adult cadavers. An 8-hole 3.5-mm titanium locking plate was used at three different positions on the dorsal and the volar side of the bone. The space between the well-positioned plate and the radial shaft was attained for each hole of the plate. RESULTS: The average space between the midshaft radial cortex and the plate holes for all positions was 0.69mm (range: 0.0mmto 2.38mm). The greatest mean distance between the plate and the radial cortex was measured at the volar mid-diaphyseal position of the plate with an average of 1.31mm. CONCLUSION: This incongruence between the radial cortex at the volar diaphysis and the plate should be considered when applying plates to this position of the radius. The results of this cadaver study indicate that radius plate osteosynthesis should preferably be done from the dorsal side.