Adaptive control is reversed between hands after left hemisphere stroke and lost following right hemisphere stroke.

Human motor adaptability is of utmost utility after neurologic injury such as unilateral stroke. For successful adaptive control of movements, the nervous system must learn to correctly identify the source of a movement error and predictively compensate for this error. The current understanding is that in bimanual tasks, this process is flexible such that errors are assigned to, and compensated for, by the limb that is more likely to produce those errors. Here, we tested the flexibility of the error assignment process in right-handed chronic stroke survivors using a bimanual reaching task in which the hands jointly controlled a single cursor. We predicted that the nondominant left hand in neurotypical adults and the paretic hand in chronic stroke survivors will be more responsible for cursor errors and will compensate more within a trial and learn more from trial to trial. We found that in neurotypical adults, the nondominant left hand does compensate more than the right hand within a trial but learns less trial-to-trial. After a left hemisphere stroke, the paretic right hand compensates more than the nonparetic left hand within-trial but learns less trial-to-trial. After a right hemisphere stroke, the paretic left hand neither corrects more within-trial nor learns more trial-to-trial. Thus, adaptive control of visually guided bimanual reaching movements is reversed between hands after the left hemisphere stroke and lost following the right hemisphere stroke. These results indicate that responsibility assignment is not fully flexible but depends on a central mechanism that is lateralized to the right hemisphere.

NSF DARE-Transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: Four threads for catalyzing progress.

We present an overview of the Conference on Transformative Opportunities for Modeling in Neurorehabilitation held in March 2023. It was supported by the Disability and Rehabilitation Engineering (DARE) program from the National Science Foundation's Engineering Biology and Health Cluster. The conference brought together experts and trainees from around the world to discuss critical questions, challenges, and opportunities at the intersection of computational modeling and neurorehabilitation to understand, optimize, and improve clinical translation of neurorehabilitation. We organized the conference around four key, relevant, and promising Focus Areas for modeling: Adaptation & Plasticity, Personalization, Human-Device Interactions, and Modeling 'In-the-Wild'. We identified four common threads across the Focus Areas that, if addressed, can catalyze progress in the short, medium, and long terms. These were: (i) the need to capture and curate appropriate and useful data necessary to develop, validate, and deploy useful computational models (ii) the need to create multi-scale models that span the personalization spectrum from individuals to populations, and from cellular to behavioral levels (iii) the need for algorithms that extract as much information from available data, while requiring as little data as possible from each client (iv) the insistence on leveraging readily available sensors and data systems to push model-driven treatments from the lab, and into the clinic, home, workplace, and community. The conference archive can be found at (dare2023.usc.edu). These topics are also extended by three perspective papers prepared by trainees and junior faculty, clinician researchers, and federal funding agency representatives who attended the conference.

Moderate-intensity cardiovascular exercise performed before motor practice attenuates offline implicit motor learning in stroke survivors but not age-matched neurotypical adults.

The acute impact of cardiovascular exercise on implicit motor learning of stroke survivors is still unknown. We investigated the effects of cardiovascular exercise on implicit motor learning of mild-moderately impaired chronic stroke survivors and neurotypical adults. We addressed whether exercise priming effects are time-dependent (e.g., exercise before or after practice) in the encoding (acquisition) and recall (retention) phases. Forty-five stroke survivors and 45 age-matched neurotypical adults were randomized into three sub-groups: BEFORE (exercise, then motor practice), AFTER (motor practice, then exercise), and No-EX (motor practice alone). All sub-groups practiced a serial reaction time task (five repeated and two pseudorandom sequences per day) on three consecutive days, followed 7 days later by a retention test (one repeated sequence). Exercise was performed on a stationary bike, (one 20-min bout per day) at 50% to 70% heart rate reserve. Implicit motor learning was measured as a difference score (repeated-pseudorandom sequence response time) during practice (acquisition) and recall (delayed retention). Separate analyses were performed on the stroke and neurotypical groups using linear mixed-effects models (participant ID was a random effect). There was no exercise-induced benefit on implicit motor learning for any sub-group. However, exercise performed before practice impaired encoding in neurotypical adults and attenuated retention performance of stroke survivors. There is no benefit to implicit motor learning of moderately intense cardiovascular exercise for stroke survivors or age-matched neurotypical adults, regardless of timing. Practice under a high arousal state and exercise-induced fatigue may have attenuated offline learning in stroke survivors.

Essential Role of Social Context and Self-Efficacy in Daily Paretic Arm/Hand Use After Stroke: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study With Accelerometry.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the momentary effect of social-cognitive factors, in addition to motor capability, on post-stroke paretic arm/hand use in the natural environment. DESIGN: A 5-day observational study in which participants were sent 6 Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) prompts/day. SETTING: Participants' daily environment. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling, chronic stroke survivors with right-dominant, mild-moderate upper extremity paresis (N=30). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time duration of bimanual and unimanual paretic arm/hand use indexed by accelerometry; social-cognitive factors (social context, self-efficacy, mood) captured by EMA; motor capability of the paretic limb measured by Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment (FM). RESULTS: After accounting for participants' motor capability, we found that momentary social context (alone or not) and self-efficacy significantly predicted post-stroke paretic arm/hand use behavior in the natural environment. When participants were not alone, paretic arm/hand movement increased both with and without the less-paretic limb (bimanual and unimanual movements, P=.018 and P<.001, respectively). Importantly, participants were more likely to use their paretic arm/hand (unimanually) if they had greater self-efficacy for limb use (P=.042). EMA repeated-measures provide a real-time approach that captures the natural dynamic ebb and flow of social-cognitive factors and their effect on daily arm/hand use. We also observed that people with greater motor impairments (FM<50.6) increase unimanual paretic arm/hand movements when they are not alone, regardless of motor capability. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to motor capability, stroke survivors' momentary social context and self-efficacy play a role in paretic arm/hand use behavior. Our findings suggest the development of personalized rehabilitative interventions which target these factors to promote daily paretic arm/hand use. This study highlights the benefits of EMA to provide real-time information to unravel the complexities of the biopsychosocial (ie, motor capability and social-cognitive factors) interface in post-stroke upper extremity recovery.

Long-term forecasting of a motor outcome following rehabilitation in chronic stroke via a hierarchical bayesian dynamic model.

BACKGROUND: Given the heterogeneity of stroke, it is important to determine the best course of motor therapy for each patient, i.e., to personalize rehabilitation based on predictions of long-term outcomes. Here, we propose a hierarchical Bayesian dynamic (i.e., state-space) model (HBDM) to forecast long-term changes in a motor outcome due to rehabilitation in the chronic phase post-stroke. METHODS: The model incorporates the effects of clinician-supervised training, self-training, and forgetting. In addition, to improve forecasting early in rehabilitation, when data are sparse or unavailable, we use the Bayesian hierarchical modeling technique to incorporate prior information from similar patients. We use HBDM to re-analyze the Motor Activity Log (MAL) data of participants with chronic stroke included in two clinical trials: (1) the DOSE trial, in which participants were assigned to a 0, 15, 30, or 60-h dose condition (data of 40 participants analyzed), and (2) the EXCITE trial, in which participants were assigned a 60-h dose, in either an immediate or a delayed condition (95 participants analyzed). RESULTS: For both datasets, HBDM accounts well for individual dynamics in the MAL during and outside of training: mean RMSE = 0.28 for all 40 DOSE participants (participant-level RMSE 0.26 ± 0.19-95% CI) and mean RMSE = 0.325 for all 95 EXCITE participants (participant-level RMSE 0.32 ± 0.31), which are small compared to the 0-5 range of the MAL. Bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation shows that the model has better predictive accuracy than static regression models and simpler dynamic models that do not account for the effect of supervised training, self-training, or forgetting. We then showcase model's ability to forecast the MAL of "new" participants up to 8 months ahead. The mean RMSE at 6 months post-training was 1.36 using only the baseline MAL and then decreased to 0.91, 0.79, and 0.69 (respectively) with the MAL following the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd bouts of training. In addition, hierarchical modeling improves prediction for a patient early in training. Finally, we verify that this model, despite its simplicity, can reproduce previous findings of the DOSE trial on the efficiency, efficacy, and retention of motor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In future work, such forecasting models can be used to simulate different stages of recovery, dosages, and training schedules to optimize rehabilitation for each person. Trial registration This study contains a re-analysis of data from the DOSE clinical trial ID NCT01749358 and the EXCITE clinical trial ID NCT00057018.

Speed-dependent biomechanical changes vary across individual gait metrics post-stroke relative to neurotypical adults.

BACKGROUND: Gait training at fast speeds is recommended to reduce walking activity limitations post-stroke. Fast walking may also reduce gait kinematic impairments post-stroke. However, it is unknown if differences in gait kinematics between people post-stroke and neurotypical adults decrease when walking at faster speeds. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of faster walking speeds on gait kinematics post-stroke relative to neurotypical adults walking at similar speeds. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis with data from 28 people post-stroke and 50 neurotypical adults treadmill walking at multiple speeds. We evaluated the effects of speed and group on individual spatiotemporal and kinematic metrics and performed k-means clustering with all metrics at self-selected and fast speeds. RESULTS: People post-stroke decreased step length asymmetry and trailing limb angle impairment, reducing between-group differences at fast speeds. Speed-dependent changes in peak swing knee flexion, hip hiking, and temporal asymmetries exaggerated between-group differences. Our clustering analyses revealed two clusters. One represented neurotypical gait behavior, composed of neurotypical and post-stroke participants. The other characterized stroke gait behavior-comprised entirely of participants post-stroke with smaller lower extremity Fugl-Meyer scores than the post-stroke participants in the neurotypical gait behavior cluster. Cluster composition was largely consistent at both speeds, and the distance between clusters increased at fast speeds. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical effect of fast walking post-stroke varied across individual gait metrics. For participants within the stroke gait behavior cluster, walking faster led to an overall gait pattern more different than neurotypical adults compared to the self-selected speed. This suggests that to potentiate the biomechanical benefits of walking at faster speeds and improve the overall gait pattern post-stroke, gait metrics with smaller speed-dependent changes may need to be specifically targeted within the context of fast walking.

Effort, success, and side of lesion determine arm choice in individuals with chronic stroke.

In neurotypical individuals, arm choice in reaching movements depends on expected biomechanical effort, expected success, and a handedness bias. Following a stroke, does arm choice change to account for the decreased motor performance, or does it follow a preinjury habitual preference pattern? Participants with mild-to-moderate chronic stroke who were right-handed before stroke performed reaching movements in both spontaneous and forced-choice blocks, under no-time, medium-time, and fast-time constraint conditions designed to modulate reaching success. Mixed-effects logistic regression models of arm choice revealed that expected effort predicted choices. However, expected success only strongly predicted choice in left-hemiparetic individuals. In addition, reaction times decreased in left-hemiparetic individuals between the no-time and the fast-time constraint conditions but showed no changes in right-hemiparetic individuals. Finally, arm choice in the no-time constraint condition correlated with a clinical measure of spontaneous arm use for right-, but not for left-hemiparetic individuals. Our results are consistent with the view that right-hemiparetic individuals show a habitual pattern of arm choice for reaching movements relatively independent of failures. In contrast, left-hemiparetic individuals appear to choose their paretic left arm more optimally: that is, if a movement with the paretic arm is predicted to be not successful in the upcoming movement, the nonparetic right arm is chosen instead.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although we are seldom aware of it, we constantly make decisions to use one arm or the other in daily activities. Here, we studied whether these decisions change following stroke. Our results show that effort, success, and side of lesion determine arm choice in a reaching task: whereas left-paretic individuals modified their arm choice in response to failures in reaching the target, right-paretic individuals showed a pattern of choice independent of failures.

The ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group: Big data neuroimaging to study brain-behavior relationships after stroke.

The goal of the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Stroke Recovery working group is to understand brain and behavior relationships using well-powered meta- and mega-analytic approaches. ENIGMA Stroke Recovery has data from over 2,100 stroke patients collected across 39 research studies and 10 countries around the world, comprising the largest multisite retrospective stroke data collaboration to date. This article outlines the efforts taken by the ENIGMA Stroke Recovery working group to develop neuroinformatics protocols and methods to manage multisite stroke brain magnetic resonance imaging, behavioral and demographics data. Specifically, the processes for scalable data intake and preprocessing, multisite data harmonization, and large-scale stroke lesion analysis are described, and challenges unique to this type of big data collaboration in stroke research are discussed. Finally, future directions and limitations, as well as recommendations for improved data harmonization through prospective data collection and data management, are provided.

Stochastic optimal feedforward-feedback control determines timing and variability of arm movements with or without vision.

Human movements with or without vision exhibit timing (i.e. speed and duration) and variability characteristics which are not well captured by existing computational models. Here, we introduce a stochastic optimal feedforward-feedback control (SFFC) model that can predict the nominal timing and trial-by-trial variability of self-paced arm reaching movements carried out with or without online visual feedback of the hand. In SFFC, movement timing results from the minimization of the intrinsic factors of effort and variance due to constant and signal-dependent motor noise, and movement variability depends on the integration of visual feedback. Reaching arm movements data are used to examine the effect of online vision on movement timing and variability, and test the model. This modelling suggests that the central nervous system predicts the effects of sensorimotor noise to generate an optimal feedforward motor command, and triggers optimal feedback corrections to task-related errors based on the available limb state estimate.

Increased cognitive load in immersive virtual reality during visuomotor adaptation is associated with decreased long-term retention and context transfer.

BACKGROUND: Complex motor tasks in immersive virtual reality using a head-mounted display (HMD-VR) have been shown to increase cognitive load and decrease motor performance compared to conventional computer screens (CS). Separately, visuomotor adaptation in HMD-VR has been shown to recruit more explicit, cognitive strategies, resulting in decreased implicit mechanisms thought to contribute to motor memory formation. However, it is unclear whether visuomotor adaptation in HMD-VR increases cognitive load and whether cognitive load is related to explicit mechanisms and long-term motor memory formation. METHODS: We randomized 36 healthy participants into three equal groups. All groups completed an established visuomotor adaptation task measuring explicit and implicit mechanisms, combined with a dual-task probe measuring cognitive load. Then, all groups returned after 24-h to measure retention of the overall adaptation. One group completed both training and retention tasks in CS (measuring long-term retention in a CS environment), one group completed both training and retention tasks in HMD-VR (measuring long-term retention in an HMD-VR environment), and one group completed the training task in HMD-VR and the retention task in CS (measuring context transfer from an HMD-VR environment). A Generalized Linear Mixed-Effect Model (GLMM) was used to compare cognitive load between CS and HMD-VR during visuomotor adaptation, t-tests were used to compare overall adaptation and explicit and implicit mechanisms between CS and HMD-VR training environments, and ANOVAs were used to compare group differences in long-term retention and context transfer. RESULTS: Cognitive load was found to be greater in HMD-VR than in CS. This increased cognitive load was related to decreased use of explicit, cognitive mechanisms early in adaptation. Moreover, increased cognitive load was also related to decreased long-term motor memory formation. Finally, training in HMD-VR resulted in decreased long-term retention and context transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that cognitive load increases in HMD-VR and relates to explicit learning and long-term motor memory formation during motor learning. Future studies should examine what factors cause increased cognitive load in HMD-VR motor learning and whether this impacts HMD-VR training and long-term retention in clinical populations.

Electrical coupling controls dimensionality and chaotic firing of inferior olive neurons.

We previously proposed, on theoretical grounds, that the cerebellum must regulate the dimensionality of its neuronal activity during motor learning and control to cope with the low firing frequency of inferior olive neurons, which form one of two major inputs to the cerebellar cortex. Such dimensionality regulation is possible via modulation of electrical coupling through the gap junctions between inferior olive neurons by inhibitory GABAergic synapses. In addition, we previously showed in simulations that intermediate coupling strengths induce chaotic firing of inferior olive neurons and increase their information carrying capacity. However, there is no in vivo experimental data supporting these two theoretical predictions. Here, we computed the levels of synchrony, dimensionality, and chaos of the inferior olive code by analyzing in vivo recordings of Purkinje cell complex spike activity in three different coupling conditions: carbenoxolone (gap junctions blocker), control, and picrotoxin (GABA-A receptor antagonist). To examine the effect of electrical coupling on dimensionality and chaotic dynamics, we first determined the physiological range of effective coupling strengths between inferior olive neurons in the three conditions using a combination of a biophysical network model of the inferior olive and a novel Bayesian model averaging approach. We found that effective coupling co-varied with synchrony and was inversely related to the dimensionality of inferior olive firing dynamics, as measured via a principal component analysis of the spike trains in each condition. Furthermore, for both the model and the data, we found an inverted U-shaped relationship between coupling strengths and complexity entropy, a measure of chaos for spiking neural data. These results are consistent with our hypothesis according to which electrical coupling regulates the dimensionality and the complexity in the inferior olive neurons in order to optimize both motor learning and control of high dimensional motor systems by the cerebellum.

Corticospinal Tract Microstructure Predicts Distal Arm Motor Improvements in Chronic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The corticospinal tract (CST) is a crucial brain pathway for distal arm and hand motor control. We aimed to determine whether a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived CST metric predicts distal upper extremity (UE) motor improvements in chronic stroke survivors. METHODS: We analyzed clinical and neuroimaging data from a randomized controlled rehabilitation trial. Participants completed clinical assessments and neuroimaging at baseline and clinical assessments 4 months later, postintervention. Using univariate linear regression analysis, we determined the linear relationship between the DTI-derived CST fractional anisotropy asymmetry (FAasym) and the percentage of baseline change in log-transformed average Wolf Motor Function Test time for distal items (ΔlnWMFT-distal_%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) linear regressions with cross-validation and bootstrapping were used to determine the relative weighting of CST FAasym, other brain metrics, clinical outcomes, and demographics on distal motor improvement. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test whether the CST FAasym can predict clinically significant UE motor improvement. RESULTS: lnWMFT-distal significantly improved at the group level. Baseline CST FAasym explained 26% of the variance in ΔlnWMFT-distal_%. A multivariate LASSO model including baseline CST FAasym, age, and UE Fugl-Meyer explained 39% of the variance in ΔlnWMFT-distal_%. Further, CST FAasym explained more variance in ΔlnWMFT-distal_% than the other significant predictors in the LASSO model. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: CST microstructure is a significant predictor of improvement in distal UE motor function in the context of an UE rehabilitation trial in chronic stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate motor impairment.Video Abstract available for more insight from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A350).

Minimizing Precision-Weighted Sensory Prediction Errors via Memory Formation and Switching in Motor Adaptation.

Humans predict the sensory consequences of motor commands by learning internal models of the body and of environment perturbations. When facing a sensory prediction error, should we attribute this error to a change in our body, and update the body internal model, or to a change in the environment? In the latter case, should we update an existing perturbation model or create a new model? Here, we propose that a decision-making process compares the models' prediction errors, weighted by their precisions, to select and update either the body model or an existing perturbation model. When no model can predict a perturbation, a new perturbation model is created and selected. When a model is selected, both the prediction's mean estimate and uncertainty are updated to minimize future prediction errors and to increase the precision of the predictions. Results from computer simulations, which we verified in an arm visuomotor adaptation experiment with subjects of both sexes, account for short aftereffects and large savings after adaptation to large, but not small, perturbations. Results also clarify previous data in the absence of errors (error-clamp): motor memories show an initial lack of decay after a large perturbation, but gradual decay after a small perturbation. Finally, qualitative individual differences in adaptation were explained by subjects selecting and updating either the body model or a perturbation model. Our results suggest that motor adaptation belongs to a general class of learning according to which memories are created when no existing memories can predict sensory data accurately and precisely.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When movements are followed by unexpected outcomes, such as following the introduction of a visuomotor or a force field perturbation, or the sudden removal of such perturbations, it is unclear whether the CNS updates existing memories or creates new memories. Here, we propose a novel model of adaptation, and investigate, via computer simulations and behavioral experiments, how the amplitude and schedule of the perturbation, as well as the characteristics of the learner, lead to the selection and update of existing memories or the creation of new memories. Our results provide insights into a number of puzzling and contradictory motor adaptation data, as well as into qualitative individual differences in adaptation.

When 90% of the variance is not enough: residual EMG from muscle synergy extraction influences task performance.

Muscle synergies are usually identified via dimensionality reduction techniques, such that the identified synergies reconstruct the muscle activity to an accuracy level defined heuristically, often set to 90% of the variance. Here, we question the assumption that the residual muscle activity not explained by the synergies is due to noise. We hypothesize instead that the residual activity is not entirely random and can influence the execution of motor tasks. Young healthy subjects performed an isometric reaching task in which the surface electromyography of 10 arm muscles was mapped onto a two-dimensional force used to control a cursor. Three to five synergies explained 90% of the variance in muscle activity. We altered the muscle-force mapping via "hard" and "easy" virtual surgeries. Whereas in both surgeries the forces associated with synergies spanned the same dimension of the virtual environment, the muscle-force mapping was as close as possible to the initial mapping in the easy surgery; in contrast, it was as far as possible in the hard surgery. This design maximized potential differences in reaching errors attributable to residual activity. Results show that the easy surgery produced smaller directional errors than the hard surgery. Additionally, simulations of surgeries constructed with 1 to 10 synergies show that the errors in the easy and hard surgeries differ significantly for up to 8 synergies, which explains 98% of the variance on average. Our study thus indicates the need for cautious interpretations of results derived from synergy extraction techniques based on heuristics with lenient accuracy levels.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The muscle synergy hypothesis posits that the central nervous system simplifies motor control by grouping muscles into modules. Current techniques use dimensionality reduction, such that the identified synergies reconstruct 90% of the muscle activity. We show that residual muscle activity following such identification can have a large systematic effect on movements, even when the number of synergies approaches the number of muscles. Current synergy extraction techniques must therefore be updated to identify true physiological synergies.

The probability of choosing both hands depends on an interaction between motor capacity and limb-specific control in chronic stroke.

A goal of rehabilitation after stroke is to promote pre-stroke levels of arm use for every day, frequently bimanual, functional activities. We reasoned that, after a stroke, the choice to use one or both hands for bimanual tasks might depend not only on residual motor capacity, but also the specialized demands imposed by the task on the paretic hand. To capture spontaneous, task-specific choices, we covertly observed 50 pre-stroke right-handed chronic stroke survivors (25 each of left, LHD, and right-hemisphere damage, RHD) and 11 age-similar control adults and recorded their hand use strategies for two pairs of bimanual tasks with distinct demands: one with greater precision requirements (photo-album tasks), and another with greater stabilization requirements (letter-envelope tasks). The primary outcome was the choice to use one or both hands. Logistic regression was used to test the two hypotheses that the probability of choosing a bimanual strategy would be greater in those with less severe motor impairment and also in those with LHD. When collapsed across the four tasks, we found support for these hypotheses. Notably, however, the influence of these factors on bimanual choice varied based on task demands. For the photo-album pair, the probability of a bimanual strategy was greater for those with LHD compared to RHD, regardless of the degree of motor impairment. For the letter-envelope pair, we found a significant interaction between impairment and side of lesion in determining the likelihood of choosing both hands. Therefore, the manner in which side of lesion moderates the effect of impairment on hand use depends on the task.

Dosage Matters.

Background and Purpose- For stroke rehabilitation, task-specific training in animal models and human rehabilitation trials is considered important to modulate neuroplasticity, promote motor learning, and functional recovery. Little is known about what constitutes an effective dosage of therapy. Methods- This is a parallel group, 4 arms, single-blind, phase IIb, randomized controlled trial of 4 dosages of arm therapy delivered in an outpatient setting chronically after stroke. Participants were randomized into groups that varied in duration of scheduled therapy (ie, 0, 15, 30, or 60 hours). Forty-one participants completed the study. Planned primary analyses used linear mixed effects regression to model changes from baseline to postintervention in the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement rating and the Wolf Motor Function Test time score over 3 weeks of training as a function of therapy dosage. Results- We observed a dose response for the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement: the model that included dose and dose by week interaction significantly better fit the data than the model that included week only (log-likelihood test, P=0.0026). In addition, the greater the dosage of training, the greater the change in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement, with the dose by week interaction parameter equal to 0.0045 ( P=0.0016; 95% CI, 0.0018-0.0071). Over the 3 weeks of therapy, there was a gain of 0.92 in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement for the 60-hour group compared to the 0-hour group. There was no dose response for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Conclusions- For mild-to-moderately impaired stroke survivors, the dosage of patient-centered, task-specific practice systematically influences the gain in quality of arm use but not functional capacity. We caution that we may have been underpowered for the functional capacity outcome. These findings highlight the importance of recovery outcomes that capture arm use in the natural environment. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01749358.

Locomotor skill acquisition in virtual reality shows sustained transfer to the real world.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is a potentially promising tool for enhancing real-world locomotion in individuals with mobility impairment through its ability to provide personalized performance feedback and simulate real-world challenges. However, it is unknown whether novel locomotor skills learned in VR show sustained transfer to the real world. Here, as an initial step towards developing a VR-based clinical intervention, we study how young adults learn and transfer a treadmill-based virtual obstacle negotiation skill to the real world. METHODS: On Day 1, participants crossed virtual obstacles while walking on a treadmill, with the instruction to minimize foot clearance during obstacle crossing. Gradual changes in performance during training were fit via non-linear mixed effect models. Immediate transfer was measured by foot clearance during physical obstacle crossing while walking over-ground. Retention of the obstacle negotiation skill in VR and retention of over-ground transfer were assessed after 24 h. RESULTS: On Day 1, participants systematically reduced foot clearance throughout practice by an average of 5 cm (SD 4 cm) and transferred 3 cm (SD 1 cm) of this reduction to over-ground walking. The acquired reduction in foot clearance was also retained after 24 h in VR and over-ground. There was only a small, but significant 0.8 cm increase in foot clearance in VR and no significant increase in clearance over-ground on Day 2. Moreover, individual differences in final performance at the end of practice on Day 1 predicted retention both in VR and in the real environment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results support the use of VR for locomotor training as skills learned in a virtual environment readily transfer to real-world locomotion. Future work is needed to determine if VR-based locomotor training leads to sustained transfer in clinical populations with mobility impairments, such as individuals with Parkinson's disease and stroke survivors.

Neural Substrates Related to Motor Memory with Multiple Timescales in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Recent computational and behavioral studies suggest that motor adaptation results from the update of multiple memories with different timescales. Here, we designed a model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment in which subjects adapted to two opposing visuomotor rotations. A computational model of motor adaptation with multiple memories was fitted to the behavioral data to generate time-varying regressors of brain activity. We identified regional specificity to timescales: in particular, the activity in the inferior parietal region and in the anterior-medial cerebellum was associated with memories for intermediate and long timescales, respectively. A sparse singular value decomposition analysis of variability in specificities to timescales over the brain identified four components, two fast, one middle, and one slow, each associated with different brain networks. Finally, a multivariate decoding analysis showed that activity patterns in the anterior-medial cerebellum progressively represented the two rotations. Our results support the existence of brain regions associated with multiple timescales in adaptation and a role of the cerebellum in storing multiple internal models.

Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.

BACKGROUND: A large number of robotic or gravity-supporting devices have been developed for rehabilitation of upper extremity post-stroke. Because these devices continuously monitor performance data during training, they could potentially help to develop predictive models of the effects of motor training on recovery. However, during training with such devices, patients must become adept at using the new "tool" of the exoskeleton, including learning the new forces and visuomotor transformations associated with the device. We thus hypothesized that the changes in performance during extensive training with a passive, gravity-supporting, exoskeleton device (the Armeo Spring) will follow an initial fast phase, due to learning to use the device, and a slower phase that corresponds to reduction in overall arm impairment. Of interest was whether these fast and slow processes were related. METHODS: To test the two-process hypothesis, we used mixed-effect exponential models to identify putative fast and slow changes in smoothness of arm movements during 80 arm reaching tests performed during 20 days of exoskeleton training in 53 individuals with post-acute stroke. RESULTS: In line with our hypothesis, we found that double exponential models better fit the changes in smoothness of arm movements than single exponential models. In contrast, single exponential models better fit the data for a group of young healthy control subjects. In addition, in the stroke group, we showed that smoothness correlated with a measure of impairment (the upper extremity Fugl Meyer score - UEFM) at the end, but not at the beginning, of training. Furthermore, the improvement in movement smoothness due to the slow component, but not to the fast component, strongly correlated with the improvement in the UEFM between the beginning and end of training. There was no correlation between the change of peaks due to the fast process and the changes due to the slow process. Finally, the improvement in smoothness due to the slow, but not the fast, component correlated with the number of days since stroke at the onset of training - i.e. participants who started exoskeleton training sooner after stroke improved their smoothness more. CONCLUSIONS: Our results therefore demonstrate that at least two processes are involved in in performance improvements measured during mechanized training post-stroke. The fast process is consistent with learning to use the exoskeleton, while the slow process independently reflects the reduction in upper extremity impairment.

Correction to: Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.

The original article [1] contained an error whereby the co-author, Karima Bakhti's name was displayed incorrectly.