Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Addison/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/etiología , Enfermedades de la Lengua/etiología , Lengua/patología , Enfermedad de Addison/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Addison/inmunología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/sangre , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/patología , Enfermedades de la Lengua/patologíaRESUMEN
Despite the increasing prevalence of social media usage, the activity of dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered organizations on top social media platforms has not been investigated since 2012. We investigated a total of 124 dermatology journals, 242 professional organizations, and 78 patient-centered organizations to assess their presence and popularity on social media. Searches were conducted to identify journals and organizations on Facebook and Twitter. Similar searches were done for organizations on LinkedIn. The number of Facebook likes, Twitter followers, and LinkedIn followers of the dermatological entities were quantified. There were 22 (17.7%) dermatology journals active on Facebook and 21 (16.9%) on Twitter. Amongst the professional organizations, 114 (47.1%) were on Facebook, 69 (28.5%) on Twitter, and 50 (20.7%) on LinkedIn. In comparison, 68 (87.2%) patient-centered organizations were on Facebook, 56 (71.8%) on Twitter, and 56 (71.8%) on LinkedIn. Our results demonstrate that the popularity of dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered organizations on top social networking sites has grown markedly since 2012. Although the number of dermatology journals on social media has increased since 2012, their presence continues to trail behind professional and patient-centered dermatological organizations, suggesting underutilization of a valuable resource.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , BibliometríaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a relationship between prewash total motile count and live births in couples undergoing IUI. DESIGN: Retrospective review in a single academic center. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Couples with infertility undergoing ovulation induction with IUI between 2010 and 2014. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live births. RESULT(S): Our cohort included 310 women who underwent 655 IUI cycles with a cumulative live birth rate (LBR) per couple of 20% and an LBR per cycle of 10%. A analysis yielded no correlation between prewash total motile count (TMC) and live births. No live births occurred with TMC <2 million sperms. Age had a significant negative relationship to LBR. A receiver operating characteristic analysis comparing age and live births indicated a significant decline in live births for women >37 years (90% sensitivity, 70% specificity). The LBR per couple was decreased to 7% in women >37 years compared with 25% in women <37 years. CONCLUSION(S): Prewash TMC is a poor predictor of live birth. There were no live births with prewash TMC <2 million sperms. The LBR for women >37 years with IUI was significantly lower than women <37 years.