Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 53(2): 80-89, 2024 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920232

RESUMEN

Introduction: We presented the key findings from Singapore's Changi General Hospital Breast Centre's lymphedema surveillance strategy that used patients' reported symptoms, standard arm circumference measurements and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Our secondary aim was to highlight and discuss important elements of a surveillance strategy that can be implemented to track this outcome measure of breast cancer treatment for future research. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 511 breast cancer patients to assess the prevalence of BCRL and its associated risk factors. We defined BCRL prevalence rates based on patients' self-reporting, objective arm circumference measure-ments and clinical diagnosis based on International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging. Results: The median follow-up of patients was 88.8 months. The cumulative prevalence rate in the cohort was 30.9%. The cohort of BCRL patients were older (58.4 versus [vs] 54.9 years), had higher mean Body Mass Index (27.7 vs 25.2), higher proportion of mastectomy (77% vs 64.3%), axillary clearance, less likely breast reconstruction, higher-grade tumour, more lymph nodes excised, more advanced nodal disease, and had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy. However, clinically apparent BCRL was only 6.5% (33 out of 511 patients). The proportion of clinically significant BCRL in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary sampling was 1.7% compared to 9.9% in patients who had undergone axillary clearance. Majority of the BCRL were subclinical or mild in severity. Conclusion: Our study showed that our rates of BCRL were comparable to international rates and highlighted similar patient profiles who were at risk of developing the disease. Having a comprehensive lymphedema surveillance strategy is paramount in paving the way for future studies.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Riesgo , Singapur/epidemiología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/epidemiología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Brazo , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Autoinforme , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA