Hypomagnesemia and incident delirium in hospitalized older persons.

BACKGROUND: Altered serum magnesium (Mg) levels in older persons have been hypothesized to have a role in predicting hospitalization and mortality. Hypomagnesemia and delirium are frequent problems in older patients, but no study has evaluated such an association in acute geriatric setting. AIMS: We investigated the impact of hypomagnesemia on the incidence of delirium in an acute geriatric setting. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 209 older hospitalized patients. All subjects underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Mg was measured in serum by routine laboratory methods. The presence of incident delirium was determined by the 4AT screening tool. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between serum Mg and delirium controlling for multiple covariates. RESULTS: 209 patients (77.9% women) were included in the study. The mean age of the participants was 85.7 ± 6.50 years (range 65-100). 27 subjects (12.9%) developed delirium during the hospitalization, with no difference between genders. Subjects with delirium had lower serum magnesium levels than those without (1.88 ± 0.34 versus 2.04 ± 0.28; p = 0.009). Delirium risk was significantly higher in patients with lower serum magnesium levels (OR 5.80 95% CI 1.450-23.222; p = 0.013), independent of multiple covariates. CONCLUSION: Our data show that low serum Mg level is a good predictor of incident delirium in acute geriatric settings. Present findings have relevant implications for clinical management, highlighting the need for analyzing Mg concentration carefully. Whether Mg supplementation in patients with hypomagnesemia could lead to delirium prevention and/or control needs further investigation.

Does comprehensive geriatric assessment improve the estimate of surgical risk in elderly patients? An Italian multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of surgical risk is crucial in elderly patients. At present, there is little evidence of the usefulness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) as a part of the overall assessment of surgical elderly patients. METHODS: We verified whether CGA associated with established surgical risk assessment tools is able to improve the prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in 377 elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. RESULTS: Overall mortality and morbidity were 2.4% and 19.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that impaired cognitive function (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 4.22; P < .02) and higher Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.23; P < .04) are predictive of mortality. Higher comorbidity is predictive of morbidity (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.22; P < .03) and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.63; P < .001) and National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome of Death score (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.00; P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: In elective surgical elderly patients, the morbidity and mortality are low. The use of CGA improves the identification of elderly patients at higher risk of adverse events, independent of the surgical prognostic indices.

Fracture prevention service to bridge the osteoporosis care gap.

BACKGROUND: A care gap exists between the health care needs of older persons with fragility fractures and the therapeutic answers they receive. The Fracture Prevention Service (FPS), a tailored in-hospital model of care, may effectively bridge the osteoporosis care gap for hip-fractured older persons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the FPS in targeting persons at high risk of future fracture and to improve their adherence to treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a teaching hospital with traumatology and geriatric units, and had a pre-intervention and post-intervention phase. The records of 172 participants were evaluated in the pre-intervention phase, while data from 210 participants were gathered in the post-intervention phase. All participants underwent telephone follow-up at 12 months after hospital discharge. The participants were patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the orthopedic acute ward who underwent surgical repair of a proximal femoral fracture. A multidisciplinary integrated model of care was established. Dedicated pathways were implemented in clinical practice to optimize the identification of high-risk persons, improve their evaluation through bone mineral density testing and blood examinations, and initiate an appropriate treatment for secondary prevention of falls and fragility fractures. RESULTS: Compared with the pre-intervention phase, more hip-fractured persons received bone mineral density testing (47.62% versus 14.53%, P<0.0001), specific pharmacological treatments (48.51% versus 17.16%, P<0.0001), and an appointment for evaluation at a fall and fracture clinic (52.48% versus 2.37%, P<0.0001) in the post-intervention phase. Independent of some confounders, implementation of the FPS was positively associated with recommendations for secondary fracture prevention at discharge (P<0.0001) and with 1-year adherence to pharmacological treatment (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The FPS is an effective multidisciplinary integrated model of care to optimize identification of older persons at highest risk for fragility fracture, to improve their clinical management, and to increase adherence to prescriptions.

The prevention of adverse drug reactions in older subjects.

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a public health problem in older subjects, being responsible for a significant morbidity, disability and mortality. Older subjects are more susceptible to develop ADRs mainly due to polypharmacy, multimorbidity and inappropriate prescribing. The prevention of these drug related negative events represents an important aim for physicians treating older patients. Several strategies could potentially be employed, including state of the art education of medical students and physicians concerning principles of geriatric medicine and appropriate prescription in older subjects, reduction of inappropriate drug use by means of computerized decision support systems, pharmacist involvement and comprehensive geriatric assessment, and finally the identification of at risk older patients. However, there is currently a lack of scientific evidence demonstrating that these strategies can achieve a reduction in ADRs and therefore future intervention studies should be performed to evaluate the best intervention to decrease the burden of drug related problems in the older population.