Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Transplant ; 24(2): 271-279, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839709

RESUMEN

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of infection after transplantation, but few studies have evaluated its epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes among pancreas transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020, at 3 sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary outcome was clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi), defined as CMV disease or infection requiring antiviral therapy. The secondary outcome was pancreas allograft failure. Among 471 pancreas transplant recipients, 117 (24.8%) developed csCMVi after a median of 226 (interquartile range 154-289) days. CMV donor (D)+/R- patients had a significantly higher incidence of csCMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-7.64; P < .001). In adjusted analysis, a lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was associated with a greater risk of csCMVi among seropositive recipients (HR 1.39 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 1.13-1.73; P = .002) but not among D+/R- patients (HR 1.04 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 0.89-1.23; P = .595). csCMVi, lower ALC, and acute rejection (P < .001) were independently associated with pancreas allograft failure. In conclusion, CMV D+/R- was associated with csCMVi in pancreas recipients, although ALC was associated with csCMVi only among seropositive patients. The development of csCMVi in pancreas recipients was associated with poor pancreas allograft outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Páncreas , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Citomegalovirus , Factores de Riesgo , Aloinjertos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico
2.
Infection ; 2024 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nocardia often causes pulmonary infection among those with chronic pulmonary disease or immunocompromising conditions. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended as first-line treatment, though little data exists regarding outcomes of different dosing regimens. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients with non-disseminated pulmonary nocardiosis initially treated with TMP-SMX monotherapy. Patients' initial TMP-SMX dosing was categorized as high- (> 10 mg/kg/day), intermediate- (5-10 mg/kg/day) or low-dose (< 5 mg/kg/day). Outcomes included one-year mortality, post-treatment recurrence, and dose adjustment or early discontinuation of TMP-SMX. SMX serum concentrations and their effect on management were also assessed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included with 24 (26.4%), 37 (40.7%), and 30 (33.0%) treated with high-, intermediate-, and low-dose TMP-SMX, respectively. Patients who initially received low-dose (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.68) and intermediate-dose TMP-SMX (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-1.04) had lower risk of one-year mortality than the high-dose group. Risk of recurrence was similar between groups. Nineteen patients had peak SMX serum concentrations measured which resulted in 7 (36.8%) dose changes and was not associated with one-year mortality or recurrence. However, 66.7% of the high-dose group required TMP-SMX dose adjustment/discontinuation compared to 24.3% of the intermediate-dose and 26.7% of the low-dose groups (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low- and intermediate-dose TMP-SMX for non-disseminated pulmonary nocardiosis were not associated with poor outcomes compared to high-dose therapy, which had a higher rate of dose adjustment/early discontinuation. Historically used high-dose TMP-SMX may not be necessary for management of isolated pulmonary nocardiosis.

3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(5): 1061-1063, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37081593

RESUMEN

We describe an incidental Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory exposure in Arizona, USA. Because melioidosis cases are increasing in the United States and B. pseudomallei reservoirs have been discovered in the Gulf Coast Region, US laboratory staff could be at increased risk for B. pseudomallei exposure.


Asunto(s)
Burkholderia pseudomallei , Melioidosis , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Burkholderia pseudomallei/genética , Arizona/epidemiología , Melioidosis/diagnóstico , Melioidosis/epidemiología
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 67(6): e0012023, 2023 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37191533

RESUMEN

Beta-hemolytic streptococci are common causes of bloodstream infection (BSI). There is emerging data regarding oral antibiotics for BSI but limited for beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI. We conducted a retrospective study of adults with beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI from a primary skin/soft tissue source from 2015 to 2020. Patients transitioned to oral antibiotics within 7 days of treatment initiation were compared to those who continued intravenous therapy, after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was 30-day treatment failure (composite of mortality, infection relapse, and hospital readmission). A prespecified 10% noninferiority margin was used for the primary outcome. We identified 66 matched pairs of patients treated with oral and intravenous antibiotics as definitive therapy. Based on an absolute difference in 30-day treatment failure of 13.6% (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 24.8%), the noninferiority of oral therapy was not confirmed (P = 0.741); on the contrary, the superiority of intravenous antibiotics is suggested by this difference. Acute kidney injury occurred in two patients who received intravenous treatment and zero who received oral therapy. No patients experienced deep vein thrombosis or other vascular complications related to treatment. In patients treated for beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI, those who transitioned to oral antibiotics by day 7 showed higher rates of 30-day treatment failure than propensity-matched patients. This difference may have been driven by underdosing of oral therapy. Further investigation into optimal antibiotic choice, route, and dosing for definitive therapy of BSI is needed.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Sepsis , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus , Antibacterianos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Clin Transplant ; 37(9): e15016, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37170686

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nocardia is an opportunistic pathogen that primarily affects immunocompromised individuals, including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Up to 2.65% of SOT recipients develop nocardiosis; however, few studies have examined risk factors and prophylaxis for nocardiosis. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, matched nested case-control study of adult SOT recipients with culture-confirmed nocardiosis from 2000 through 2020. Controls were matched up to 2:1 by sex, first transplanted organ, year of transplant, transplant center, and adequate post-transplant follow-up. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed to analyze associations with nocardiosis. Cox proportional hazards regression compared 12-month mortality between infection and uninfected patients. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three SOT recipients were matched to 245 uninfected controls. Elevated calcineurin inhibitor level, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, lymphopenia, higher prednisone dose, and older age were significantly associated with nocardiosis while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was protective (odds ratio [OR] .34; 95% confidence interval [CI] .13-.84). The effect of prophylaxis was similar, though not always statistically significant, in sensitivity analyses that only included prophylaxis dosed more than twice-per-week (OR .30; 95% CI .11-.80) or restricted to years 2015-2020 (OR .33, 95% CI .09-1.21). Nocardiosis was associated with increased 12-month mortality (hazard ratio 5.47; 95% confidence interval 2.42-12.35). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple measures of immunosuppression and lack of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis were associated with nocardiosis in SOT recipients. Effectiveness of prophylaxis may be related to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole dose or frequency. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be preferentially utilized over alternative agents in SOT recipients with augmented immunosuppression or signs of heightened immunocompromise.


Asunto(s)
Nocardiosis , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardiosis/etiología , Nocardiosis/prevención & control , Receptores de Trasplantes , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Clin Transplant ; 37(11): e15135, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37705389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is a common complication of kidney transplantation. While BKV has been described in non-kidney transplant recipients, data are limited regarding its epidemiology and outcomes in pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from 2010-2020. The primary outcome was BKV DNAemia. Secondary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction by 30%, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , endstage kidney disease, and pancreas allograft failure. Cox regression with time-dependent variables was utilized. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-six patients were analyzed, including 74, 46, and 346 with pancreas transplant alone (PTA), pancreas-after-kidney, or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, respectively. PTA recipients experienced a lower incidence of BKV DNAemia (8.8% vs. 32.9%; p < .001) and shorter duration of DNAemia (median 28.0 vs. 84.5 days). No PTA recipients with BKV DNAemia underwent kidney biopsy or developed endstage kidney disease. Lymphopenia, non-PTA transplantation, and older age were associated with BKV DNAemia, which itself was associated with pancreas allograft failure (adjusted hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.27-3.60; p = .004). Among PTA recipients, BKV DNAemia was not associated with eGFR reduction or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CONCLUSIONS: BKV DNAemia was common among PTA recipients, though lower than a comparable group of pancreas-kidney recipients. However, BKV DNAemia was not associated with adverse native kidney outcomes and no PTA recipients developed endstage kidney disease. Conversely, BKV DNAemia was associated with pancreas allograft failure. Further studies are needed to estimate the rate of BKV nephropathy in this population, and further evaluate long-term kidney outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Virus BK , Enfermedades Renales , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Páncreas , Infecciones por Polyomavirus , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus , Adulto , Humanos , Virus BK/genética , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/epidemiología , Riñón , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones , Páncreas , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Receptores de Trasplantes , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/epidemiología
7.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 25(5): e14097, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378539

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specific pretransplant infections have been associated with poor posttransplant outcomes. However, the impact of pretransplant Nocardia isolation has not been studied. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study from three centers in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota of patients with Nocardia infection or colonization who subsequently underwent solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from November 2011 through April 2022. Outcomes included posttransplant Nocardia infection and mortality. RESULTS: Nine patients with pretransplant Nocardia were included. Two patients were deemed colonized with Nocardia, and the remaining seven had nocardiosis. These patients underwent bilateral lung (N = 5), heart (N = 1), heart-kidney (N = 1), liver-kidney (N = 1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (N = 1) at a median of 283 (interquartile range [IQR] 152-283) days after Nocardia isolation. Two (22.2%) patients had disseminated infection, and two were receiving active Nocardia treatment at the time of transplantation. One Nocardia isolate was resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and all patients received TMP-SMX prophylaxis posttransplant, often for extended durations. No patients developed posttransplant nocardiosis during a median follow-up of 1.96 (IQR 0.90-6.33) years. Two patients died during follow-up, both without evidence of nocardiosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify any episodes of posttransplant nocardiosis among nine patients with pretransplant Nocardia isolation. As patients with the most severe infections may have been denied transplantation, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better analyze any impact of pretransplant Nocardia on posttransplant outcomes. However, among patients who receive posttransplant TMP-SMX prophylaxis, these data suggest pretransplant Nocardia isolation may not impart a heightened risk of posttransplant nocardiosis.


Asunto(s)
Nocardiosis , Nocardia , Humanos , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardiosis/epidemiología
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(42): 1343-1347, 2022 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36264836

RESUMEN

As of October 11, 2022, a total of 26,577 monkeypox cases had been reported in the United States.* Although most cases of monkeypox are self-limited, lesions that involve anatomically vulnerable sites can cause complications. Ocular monkeypox can occur when Monkeypox virus (MPXV) is introduced into the eye (e.g., from autoinoculation), potentially causing conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, and loss of vision (1). This report describes five patients who acquired ocular monkeypox during July-September 2022. All patients received treatment with tecovirimat (Tpoxx)†; four also received topical trifluridine (Viroptic).§ Two patients had HIV-associated immunocompromise and experienced delays between clinical presentation with monkeypox and initiation of monkeypox-directed treatment. Four patients were hospitalized, and one experienced marked vision impairment. To decrease the risk for autoinoculation, persons with monkeypox should be advised to practice hand hygiene and to avoid touching their eyes, which includes refraining from using contact lenses (2). Health care providers and public health practitioners should be aware that ocular monkeypox, although rare, is a sight-threatening condition. Patients with signs and symptoms compatible with ocular monkeypox should be considered for urgent ophthalmologic evaluation and initiation of monkeypox-directed treatment. Public health officials should be promptly notified of cases of ocular monkeypox. Increased clinician awareness of ocular monkeypox and of approaches to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment might reduce associated morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Mpox , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiología , Trifluridina , Monkeypox virus , Isoindoles
9.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 24(4): e13901, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35848574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high-risk for severe infection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Anti-spike monoclonal antibodies are currently utilized under emergency use authorization to prevent hospitalization in high-risk individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including SOTRs. However, clinical data for bebtelovimab, the sole currently available anti-spike monoclonal antibody for COVID-19, is limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult SOTRs diagnosed with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 from January 2022 through May 2022 who received either bebtelovimab or sotrovimab. The primary outcome was COVID-19-related hospitalization within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Among 361 SOTRs, 92 (25.5%) received bebtelovimab and 269 (74.5%) received sotrovimab. The most common organ transplant was a kidney (42.4%). SOTRs who received bebtelovimab had a higher proportion who had received a booster SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose and had received their last vaccination dose more recently. Eleven (3.0%) SOTRs were hospitalized, and rates of hospitalization were similar between monoclonal antibody groups (3.3% versus 3.0%; p > .99). Three patients required admission to an intensive care unit, all of who received sotrovimab. Four (1.1%) patients died within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis, two from each group. CONCLUSIONS: SOTRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received bebtelovimab had similar rates of COVID-19-related hospitalization as those who received sotrovimab. While differences in vaccination rates and viral subvariants could act as confounders, bebtelovimab appears to be of similar effectiveness as sotrovimab.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Prueba de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes
10.
J Infect Dis ; 224(8): 1278-1286, 2021 10 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34279629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab are authorized for treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in high-risk patients. We compared the outcomes of patients who received these therapies to identify factors associated with hospitalization and other clinical outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients who received monoclonal antibody from 19 November 2020 to 11 February 2021 were selected and divided into those who received bamlanivimab (n = 2747) and casirivimab-imdevimab (n = 849). The 28-day all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalizations were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The population included 3596 patients; the median age was 62 years, and 50% were female. All had ≥1 medical comorbidity; 55% had multiple comorbidities. All-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalization rates at 28 days were 3.98% and 2.56%, respectively. After adjusting for medical comorbidities, there was no significant difference in all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalization rates between bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 1.4 [.9-2.2] and 1.6 [.8-2.7], respectively). Chronic kidney, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and immunocompromised status were associated with higher likelihood of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study on the use of bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab in high-risk patients showed similarly low rates of hospitalization. The number and type of medical comorbidities are associated with hospitalizations after monoclonal antibody treatment.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Multimorbilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Mycopathologia ; 181(11-12): 787-798, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492230

RESUMEN

Coccidioidomycosis is a common infection in the desert southwestern USA; approximately 3 % of healthy persons in Arizona alone become infected annually. Coccidioidomycosis may be severe in immunocompromised persons, but experience among patients with solid organ cancer has not been fully described. Therefore, we aimed to describe the clinical courses of patients whose cancers were complicated by coccidioidomycosis at our institution, which is located in an area with endemic Coccidioides. To do so, we conducted a retrospective review from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2014, of all patients with breast, colorectal, or ovarian cancer whose cancer courses were complicated by coccidioidomycosis. We identified 17,576 cancer patients; 14 (0.08 %) of these patients met criteria for proven or probable coccidioidomycosis diagnosed within the first 2 years after the cancer diagnosis. All of these patients had primary pulmonary coccidioidomycosis, none had relapsed prior infection, and 1 had possible extrapulmonary dissemination. Five had active coccidioidal infection during chemotherapy, 1 of whom was hospitalized for coccidioidal pneumonia. All were treated with fluconazole, and all improved clinically. Eleven did not require prolonged courses of fluconazole. There were no clearly demonstrated episodes of relapsed infection. In conclusion, coccidioidomycosis was not a common complication of breast, colorectal, or ovarian cancers in patients treated at our institution, and it was not commonly complicated by severe or disseminated infection.


Asunto(s)
Coccidioidomicosis/epidemiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Arizona/epidemiología , Coccidioidomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Endémicas , Femenino , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(2): 859-64, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24277023

RESUMEN

Pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with poor outcomes and frequently merits empirical antibiotic consideration despite its relatively low incidence. Nasal colonization with MRSA is associated with clinical MRSA infection and can be reliably detected using the nasal swab PCR assay. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the nasal swab MRSA PCR in predicting MRSA pneumonia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care center from January 2009 to July 2011. All patients with confirmed pneumonia who had both a nasal swab MRSA PCR test and a bacterial culture within predefined time intervals were included in the study. These data were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for clinically confirmed MRSA pneumonia. Four hundred thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of cases were classified as either health care-associated (HCAP) (54.7%) or community-acquired (CAP) (34%) pneumonia. MRSA nasal PCR was positive in 62 (14.3%) cases. MRSA pneumonia was confirmed by culture in 25 (5.7%) cases. The MRSA PCR assay demonstrated 88.0% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 35.4% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%. In patients with pneumonia, the MRSA PCR nasal swab has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia in populations with low MRSA pneumonia incidence. In cases of culture-negative pneumonia where initial empirical antibiotics include an MRSA-active agent, a negative MRSA PCR swab can be reasonably used to guide antibiotic de-escalation.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , Neumonía Estafilocócica/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Neumonía Estafilocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Estafilocócica/microbiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698946

RESUMEN

Objective: Prescribing of antibiotics for viral upper respiratory infections (URIs) remains a pressing public health problem. We sought to reduce inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for URIs in Mayo Clinic Arizona. Design: Single-center, quasi-experimental, and retrospective cohort study. Setting: Emergency medicine and all primary care departments. Methods: The interventions included sharing baseline prescribing data, education, resources, and quarterly peer comparison reports. Encounters with diagnostic codes for respiratory infections commonly caused by viruses were categorized as Tier 3 (ie, never appropriate to prescribe antibiotics). Our goal was to reduce inappropriate prescribing for Tier 3 encounters by 22% in 2022. Results: Department education was completed by June 2022. The annual antibiotic prescribing rate for Tier 3 encounters was reduced by 29%, from a baseline rate of 23.6% in 2021 to 16.4% in 2022 (P < .001). The posteducation prescribing rate was 13.1%. Repeat respiratory-related healthcare contact within 14 days of Tier 3 encounters did not differ between patients prescribed and not prescribed an antibiotic in all of 2022 (4.7% antibiotic vs 4.2% no antibiotic, P = .595) or during the posteducation period (3.7% vs 4.6%, P = .604). Conclusion: A multi-faceted intervention, which included baseline education, syndrome-specific order panels, resources for symptomatic management, and peer comparison reports, resulted in significant reduction of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for URIs.

16.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(4): ofae122, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38560606

RESUMEN

Background: Nocardia tends to cause infection in immunocompromised patients or those with chronic pulmonary disease. Nocardia is known to recur, prompting the practice of secondary prophylaxis in patients perceived at high risk. However, few data exist regarding the epidemiology of recurrent nocardiosis or the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with nocardiosis from November 2011 to April 2022, including patients who completed primary treatment and had at least 30 days of posttreatment follow-up. Propensity score matching was used to analyze the effect of secondary prophylaxis on Nocardia recurrence. Results: Fifteen of 303 (5.0%) patients developed recurrent nocardiosis after primary treatment. Most recurrences were diagnosed either within 60 days (N = 6/15, 40.0%) or between 2 to 3 years (N = 4/15, 26.7%). Patients with primary disseminated infection tended to recur within 1 year, whereas later recurrences were often nondisseminated pulmonary infection. Seventy-eight (25.7%) patients were prescribed secondary prophylaxis, mostly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (N = 67/78). After propensity-matching, secondary prophylaxis was not associated with reduced risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, .24-3.83), including in multiple subgroups. Eight (53.3%) patients with recurrent nocardiosis required hospitalization and no patients died from recurrent infection. Conclusions: Recurrent nocardiosis tends to occur either within months because of the same Nocardia species or after several years with a new species. Although we did not find evidence for the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis, the confidence intervals were wide. However, outcomes of recurrent nocardiosis are generally favorable and may not justify long-term antibiotic prophylaxis for this indication alone.

17.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(1): ofad632, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264094

RESUMEN

Mpox, caused by infection with Monkeypox virus, usually presents as a mild, self-limited illness in immunocompetent persons that resolves within 2-4 weeks. Serious complications have been reported when mpox lesions involve vulnerable anatomic sites, such as the eye, and in those with substantial immunosuppression. We describe a patient with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection and sustained viral shedding of mpox with ocular involvement, which resulted in vision loss.

20.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 29(3): 206.e1-206.e7, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36526261

RESUMEN

Nocardiosis occurs in up to 1.7% of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Risk factors for its development and subsequent outcomes have been incompletely studied. The present study evaluated risk factors for nocardiosis in HSCT recipients and an association with 12-month mortality following Nocardia infection. We performed a nested case-control study of HSCT recipients at 3 transplantation centers between 2011 and 2021. Allogeneic HSCT recipients were matched 1:4 to controls based on age, sex, date of transplantation, and transplantation site. Because of theorized differences in the risk for nocardiosis between allogeneic HSCT recipients and autologous HSCT recipients and a low number of infected autologous HSCT recipients, only allogeneic HSCT recipients were matched to controls. Associations with nocardiosis in the allogeneic group were assessed by multivariable conditional logistic regression. Outcomes of all HSCT recipients with nocardiosis included 12-month mortality and post-treatment recurrence. Twenty-seven HSCT recipients were diagnosed with nocardiosis, including 20 allogeneic HSCT recipients and 7 autologous HSCT recipients. Twenty (74.1%) had localized pulmonary infection, 4 (14.8%) had disseminated infection, and 3 (11.1%) had localized skin infection. The allogeneic recipients were diagnosed at a median of 12.2 months after transplantation, compared with 41 months for the autologous recipients. All autologous HSCT recipients had alternative reasons for ongoing immunosuppression at diagnosis, most frequently therapy for relapsed hematologic disease. No infected patients were receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis. In multivariable analysis of 20 allogeneic patients and 80 matched controls, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) requiring current immunosuppression and lack of prophylaxis were associated with nocardiosis. Nocardiosis was significantly associated with subsequent mortality, with a 12-month mortality rate of 29.6%; however, no patients who completed treatment experienced Nocardia recurrence. OUR DATA INDICATE THAT: intensified immunosuppression following allogeneic HSCT, such as treatment for GVHD, is associated with the development of nocardiosis. Nocardiosis occurs more distantly from transplantation in autologous recipients, possibly driven by therapy for relapsed hematologic disease. No patients receiving TMP-SMX prophylaxis developed nocardiosis. Nocardia infection is associated with high mortality, and further strategies for prevention and treatment are needed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Nocardiosis , Humanos , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardiosis/etiología , Nocardiosis/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA