Ischaemic Priapism and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Mechanism of Increased Oxidative Stress?

Ischaemic priapism is a devastating urological condition that has the potential to cause permanent erectile dysfunction. The disorder has been associated with numerous medical conditions and the use of pharmacotherapeutic agents. The aetiology is idiopathic in a number of cases. There are two prior case reports of the association of ischaemic priapism and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. We report on a third case of priapism associated with G6PD deficiency and review recently described molecular mechanisms of increased oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of ischaemic priapism. The case report of a 32-year old Afro-Caribbean male with his first episode of major ischaemic priapism is described. Screening for common causes of ischaemic priapism, including sickle cell disease was negative. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency was discovered on evaluation for priapism. Penile aspiration was performed and erectile function was good post treatment.Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency is a cause for ischaemic priapism and should be a part of the screening process in idiopathic causes of the disorder. Increased oxidative stress occurs in G6PD deficiency and may lead to priapism.

Increased fat and skeletal muscle beta-adrenergic receptors but unaltered metabolic and hemodynamic sensitivity to epinephrine in vivo in experimental human thyrotoxicosis.

Based largely on evidence of increased target tissue beta-adrenergic receptor densities and responsiveness in animal and, to a lesser extent, human tissues, it is often assumed that thyroid hormone excess results in increased sensitivity to catecholamines in vivo, thus explaining several clinical manifestations of thyrotoxicosis. To test the hypothesis that thyrotoxicosis results in increased target tissue beta-adrenergic receptor densities and correspondingly increased metabolic and hemodynamic sensitivity to epinephrine in vivo, we measured these in 10 normal humans before and after administration of triiodothyronine (100 micrograms daily) for 10 d. Thyrotoxicosis increased beta-adrenergic receptor densities in fat (approximately 60%) and skeletal muscle (approximately 30%). Despite increments in beta-adrenergic receptor densities in these and probably other target tissues, metabolic and hemodynamic sensitivity to epinephrine in vivo was unaltered. An apparently adaptive increase in insulin secretion plausibly explains normal glycemic, glycogenolytic/glycolytic, lipolytic, and ketogenic sensitivity to epinephrine in the thyrotoxic state. In view of this striking homeostatic efficiency of the intact individual, the finding of altered adrenergic receptors, even in relevant target tissues, should not be extrapolated to altered sensitivity to catecholamines in vivo in the absence of direct testing of that hypothesis. With respect to the clinical issue, these data suggest that increased sensitivity to catecholamines does not explain clinical manifestations of thyrotoxicosis in humans.

Cholinergic stimulation of norepinephrine release in man. Evidence of a sympathetic postganglionic axonal lesion in diabetic adrenergic neuropathy.

Amplification of endogenous cholinergic activity-produced by the intravenous injection of edrophonium, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor which does not enter the central nervous system, into normal subjects-resulted in significant and briefly sustained increments in the plasma concentrations of norepinephrine (153+/-15-234+/-29 pg/ml, P < 0.01) and epinephrine (16+/-3-34+/-5 pg/ml, P < 0.01) measured with a single-isotope derivative method. These increments were not attributable to reflex responses to hemodynamic changes and similar increments in plasma norepinephrine occurred in adrenalectomized (epinephrine deficient) patients. Thus, cholinergic activation results in direct stimulation of sympathetic postganglionic neurons, with augmented norepinephrine release, and of the adrenal medullae, with augmented epinephrine release, in man. Four diabetic patients with hypoadrenergic postural hypotension exhibited blunted sympathetic postganglionic neural responses, and normal adrenomedullary responses, to cholinergic stimulation (and to standing) indicative of the presence of a sympathetic postganglionic axonal lesion in diabetic adrenergic neuropathy. Nondiabetic patients with hypoadrenergic postural hypotension due to documented or probable central nervous system lesions exhibited normal responses to cholinergic stimulation produced in this fashion demonstrating the presence of intact sympathetic postganglionic neurons and adrenal medullae in these patients and providing further support for the conceptual soundness of this approach to the study of human adrenergic physiology and pathophysiology.

Role of epinephrine-mediated beta-adrenergic mechanisms in hypoglycemic glucose counterregulation and posthypoglycemic hyperglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Initially euglycemic (overnight insulin-infused) patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), compared with nondiabetic controls, exhibit similar, but somewhat delayed plasma glucose nadirs, delayed glucose recovery from hypoglycemia, and posthypoglycemic hyperglycemia after the rapid intravenous injection of 0.075 U/kg of regular insulin. These abnormalities are associated with and potentially attributable to markedly diminished glucagon secretory responses, partially reduced epinephrine secretory responses and delayed clearance of injected insulin in the diabetic patients. Because glucagon normally plays a primary role in hypoglycemic glucose counterregulation and enhanced epinephrine secretion largely compensates for glucagon deficiency, we hypothesized that patients with IDDM, who exhibit diminished glucagon secretory responses to hypoglycemia, would be more dependent upon epinephrine to promote glucose recovery from hypoglycemia than are nondiabetic persons. To test this hypothesis, glucose counterregulation during beta-adrenergic blockade with propranolol was compared with that during saline infusion in both nondiabetic controls and in patients with IDDM. Glucose counterregulation was unaffected by beta-adrenergic blockade in controls. In contrast, glucose recovery from hypoglycemia was significantly impaired during beta-adrenergic blockade in diabetic patients. This finding confirms the hypothesis that such patients are more dependent upon epinephrine-mediated beta-adrenergic mechanisms to promote glucose recovery from hypoglycemia and indicates that the measured deficiency of glucagon secretion is functionally important in patients with IDDM. Further, in the time frame of these studies, posthypoglycemic hyperglycemia was prevented by beta-adrenergic blockade in these patients. There was considerable heterogeneity among the diabetic patients with respect to the degree to which beta-adrenergic blockade limited the posthypoglycemic rise in plasma glucose. This rise was directly related to the degree of residual glucagon secretion and inversely related to plasma-free insulin concentrations.THUS, WE CONCLUDE: (a) that patients with IDDM are, to varying degrees, dependent upon epinephrine-mediated beta-adrenergic mechanisms to promote glucose recovery from hypoglycemia and that the degree of this dependence upon epinephrine is an inverse function of the residual capacity to secrete glucagon in response to hypoglycemia in individual patients; (b) that sympathoadrenal activation, coupled with the inability to secrete insulin, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of posthypoglycemic hyperglycemia in patients with IDDM.

Glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems are higher than the threshold for symptoms.

To define glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems and for symptoms of hypoglycemia, we measured these during stepped reductions in the plasma glucose concentration (in six 10-mg/dl hourly steps) from 90 to 40 mg/dl under hyperinsulinemic clamp conditions, and compared these with the same measurements during euglycemia (90 mg/dl) under the same conditions over 6 h in 10 normal humans. Arterialized venous plasma glucose concentrations were used to calculate glycemic thresholds of 69 +/- 2 mg/dl for epinephrine secretion, 68 +/- 2 mg/dl for glucagon secretion, 66 +/- 2 mg/dl for growth hormone secretion, and 58 +/- 3 mg/dl for cortisol secretion. In contrast, the glycemic threshold for symptoms was 53 +/- 2 mg/dl, significantly lower than the thresholds for epinephrine (P less than 0.001), glucagon (P less than 0.001), and growth hormone (P less than 0.01) secretion. Thus, the glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems during decrements in plasma glucose lie within or just below the physiologic plasma glucose concentration range, and are substantially higher than the threshold for hypoglycemic symptoms in normal humans. These findings provide further support for the concept that glucose counterregulatory systems are involved in the prevention, as well as the correction, of hypoglycemia.

Direct muscarinic cholinergic inhibition of hepatic glucose production in humans.

To explore the potential role of the parasympathetic nervous system in human glucoregulatory physiology, responses to the muscarinic cholinergic agonist bethanechol (5.0 mg s.c.) and antagonist atropine (1.0 mg i.v.) were measured in normal humans. There were no changes in the plasma glucose concentration or rates of glucose production or utilization following atropine administration. After bethanechol administration there were no changes in the plasma glucose concentration or fluxes despite increments in plasma glucagon (75 +/- 7 to 103 +/- 10 pg/ml, P less than 0.02). There were no changes in insulin or C-peptide levels. To test the hypothesis that direct muscarinic inhibition of glucose production was offset by an indirect action of the agonist, specifically increased glucagon secretion with consequent stimulation of glucose production, bethanechol was administered while glucagon levels were held constant with the islet clamp technique (somatostatin infusion with insulin, glucagon and growth hormone replacement at fixed rates). Under that condition the muscarinic agonist induced a 25% decrement in the plasma glucose concentration (101 +/- 8 to 75 +/- 8 mg/dl, P less than 0.05). When compared with separate clamp control studies (with placebo rather than bethanechol injection) both the rate of glucose production and the glucose concentration were reduced (P less than 0.05) following bethanechol injection; the rate of glucose utilization was unaltered. Thus, we conclude: Withdrawal of parasympathetic tone does not appear to be an important glucoregulatory process in humans. Direct muscarinic cholinergic inhibition of hepatic glucose production occurs in humans but during generalized muscarinic activation this is offset by an indirect muscarinic action, increased glucagon secretion with consequent stimulation of glucose production. Thus, particularly if regional neuronal firing occurs, the parasympathetic nervous system may play an important role in human glucoregulatory physiology.

Triiodothyronine-induced thyrotoxicosis increases mononuclear leukocyte beta-adrenergic receptor density in man.

beta-Adrenergic receptors are increased in some tissues of experimentally thyrotoxic animals but are reported to be unchanged in mononuclear leukocytes of spontaneously thyrotoxic humans. We examined the effects of triiodothyronine (100 mug/d for 7 d) and placebo on high-affinity mononuclear leukocyte beta-adrenergic receptors in 24 normal human subjects, using a double-blind design. beta-Adrenergic receptors were assessed by specific binding of the antagonist (-)[(3)H]dihydroalprenolol. Triiodothyronine administration resulted in objective evidence of moderate thyrotoxicosis and an increase in mean (-)[(3)H]dihydroalprenolol binding from 25+/-3 to 57+/-9 fmol/mg protein (P < 0.001). The latter was attributable, by Scatchard analysis, to an increase in beta-adrenergic receptor density (967 +/- 134 to 2250 +/- 387 sites per cell, P < 0.01); apparent dissociation constants did not change. Placebo administration had no effects. Marked inter- and intraindividual variation in mononuclear leukocyte beta-adrenergic receptor density was also noted. Because this was approximately threefold greater than analytical variation, it is largely attributable to biologic variation. Thus, we conclude: (a) The finding of a triiodothyronine-induced increase in mononuclear leukocyte beta-adrenergic receptor density in human mononuclear leukocytes, coupled with similar findings in tissues of experimentally thyrotoxic animals, provides support for the use of mononuclear leukocytes to assess receptor status in man. (b) There is considerable biologic variation in beta-adrenergic receptor density in man. (c) The findings of thyroid hormone-induced increments in beta-adrenergic receptor density provide a plausible mechanism for the putative enhanced responsiveness to endogenous catecholamines of patients with thyrotoxicosis.

Mechanisms of postprandial glucose counterregulation in man. Physiologic roles of glucagon and epinephrine vis-a-vis insulin in the prevention of hypoglycemia late after glucose ingestion.

The transition from exogenous glucose delivery to endogenous glucose production late after glucose ingestion is not solely attributable to dissipation of insulin and, therefore, must also involve factors that actively raise the plasma glucose concentration--glucose counterregulatory factors. We have shown that the secretion of two of these, glucagon and epinephrine, is specific for glucose ingestion and temporally related to the glucose counterregulatory process. To determine the physiologic roles of glucagon and epinephrine in postprandial glucose counterregulation, we produced pharmacologic interventions that resulted in endogenous glucagon deficiency with and without exogenous glucagon replacement, adrenergic blockade, and adrenergic blockade coupled with glucagon deficiency starting 225 min after the ingestion of 75 g of glucose in normal subjects. Also, we assessed the effect of endogenous epinephrine deficiency alone and in combination with glucagon deficiency late after glucose ingestion in bilaterally adrenalectomized subjects. Glucagon deficiency resulted in nadir plasma glucose concentrations that were approximately 30% lower (P less than 0.01) than control values, but did not cause hypoglycemia late after glucose ingestion. This effect was prevented by glucagon replacement. Neither adrenergic blockade nor epinephrine deficiency alone impaired the glucose counterregulatory process. However, combined glucagon and epinephrine deficiencies resulted in a progressive fall in mean plasma glucose to a hypoglycemic level late after glucose ingestion; the final glucose concentration was 40% lower (P less than 0.02) than the control (epinephrine deficient) value in these patients, and was nearly 50% lower (P less than 0.001) than the control value and approximately 30% lower (P less than 0.05) than the glucagon-deficient value in normal subjects. We conclude (a) the transition from exogenous glucose delivery to endogenous glucose production late after glucose ingestion is the result of the coordinated diminution of insulin secretion and the resumption of glucagon secretion. (b) Epinephrine does not normally play a critical role in this process, but enhanced epinephrine secretion compensates largely and prevents hypoglycemia when glucagon secretion is deficient.

Epinephrine plasma metabolic clearance rates and physiologic thresholds for metabolic and hemodynamic actions in man.

To determine the plasma epinephrine thresholds for its metabolic and hemodynamic actions and plasma epinephrine metabolic clearance rates, 60-min intravenous epinephrine infusions at nominal rates of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 microgram/min were performed in each of six normal human subjects. These 30 infusions resulted in steady-state plasma epinephrine concentrations ranging from 24 to 1,020 pg/ml. Plasma epinephrine thresholds were 50-100 pg/ml for increments in heart rate, 75-125 pg/ml for increments in blood glycerol and systolic blood pressure, 150-200 pg/ml for increments in plasma glucose (the resultant of increments in glucose production and decrements in glucose clearance), blood lactate, blood beta-hydroxybutyrate, and diastolic blood pressure, and greater than 400 pg/ml for early decrements in plasma insulin. Changes in blood alanine, plasma glucagon, plasma growth hormone, and plasma cortisol were not detected. At steady-state plasma epinephrine concentrations of 24-74 pg/ml, values overlapping the basal normal range, the mean (+/-SE) plasma metabolic clearance rate of epinephrine was 52 +/- 4 ml x min-1 x kg-1; this value rose to 89 +/- 6 ml x min-1 x kg-1 (P less than 0.01) at steady-state epinephrine concentrations of 90-1,020 pg/ml. We conclude that in human subjects: (a) the plasma epinephrine thresholds for its hemodynamic and metabolic actions lie within the physiologic range, (b) epinephrine and norepinephrine accelerate their own metabolic clearance, and (c) epinephrine is 10 times more potent than norepinephrine.

Direct relationship between mononuclear leukocyte and lung beta-adrenergic receptors and apparent reciprocal regulation of extravascular, but not intravascular, alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors by the sympathochromaffin system in humans.

To examine putative relationships between adrenergic receptors on accessible circulating cells and relatively inaccessible extravascular catecholamine target tissues, we measured mononuclear leukocyte (MNL) and lung beta-adrenergic receptors and platelet and lung alpha-adrenergic receptors in tissues obtained from 15 patients undergoing pulmonary resection. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured concurrently to explore potential regulatory relationships between the activity of the sympathochromaffin system and both intravascular and extravascular adrenergic receptors. MNL and lung membrane beta-adrenergic receptor densities were correlated highly (r = 0.845, P less than 0.001). Platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor and lung alpha 1-adrenergic receptor densities were not. Lung alpha 1-adrenergic receptor densities were positively related to plasma norepinephrine (r = 0.840, P less than 0.01) and epinephrine (r = 0.860, P less than 0.01) concentrations; in contrast, lung beta-adrenergic receptor densities were not positively related to plasma catecholamine concentrations (they tended to be inversely related to plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine [r = -0.698, P less than 0.05] levels). This apparent reciprocal regulation of alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors by the sympathochromaffin system was only demonstrable with adrenergic receptor measurements in the extravascular catecholamine target tissue. Neither MNL beta-adrenergic receptor nor platelet alpha-adrenergic receptor densities were correlated with plasma catecholamine levels. Thus, although measurements of beta-adrenergic receptors on circulating mononuclear leukocytes can be used as indices of extravascular target tissue beta-adrenergic receptor densities (at least in lung and heart), it would appear that extravascular tissues should be used to study adrenergic receptor regulation by endogenous catecholamines in humans. These data provide further support for the concept of up regulation, as well as down regulation, of some adrenergic receptor populations during short-term activation of the sympathochromaffin system in humans.

Glucoregulation during exercise: hypoglycemia is prevented by redundant glucoregulatory systems, sympathochromaffin activation, and changes in islet hormone secretion.

During mild or moderate nonexhausting exercise, glucose utilization increases sharply but is normally matched by increased glucose production such that hypoglycemia does not occur. To test the hypothesis that redundant glucoregulatory systems including sympathochromaffin activation and changes in pancreatic islet hormone secretion underlie this precise matching, eight young adults exercised at 55-60% of maximal oxygen consumption for 60 min on separate occasions under four conditions: (a) control study (saline infusion); (b) islet clamp study (insulin and glucagon held constant by somatostatin infusion with glucagon and insulin replacement at fixed rates before, during and after exercise with insulin doses determined individually and shown to produce normal and stable plasma glucose concentrations prior to each study); (c) adrenergic blockage study (infusions of the alpha- and beta-adrenergic antagonists phentolamine and propranolol); (d) adrenergic blockade plus islet clamp study. Glucose production matched increased glucose utilization during exercise in the control study and plasma glucose did not fall (92 +/- 1 mg/dl at base line, 90 +/- 2 mg/dl at the end of exercise). Plasma glucose also did not fall during exercise when changes in insulin and glucagon were prevented in the islet clamp study. In the adrenergic blockade study, plasma glucose declined initially during exercise because of a greater initial increase in glucose utilization, then plateaued with an end-exercise value of 74 +/- 3 mg/dl (P less than 0.01 vs. control). In contrast, in the adrenergic blockade plus islet clamp study, exercise was associated with glucose production substantially lower than control and plasma glucose fell progressively to 58 +/- 7 mg/dl (P less than 0.001); end-exercise plasma glucose concentrations ranged from 34 to 72 mg/dl. Thus, we conclude that: (a) redundant glucoregulatory systems are involved in the precise matching of increased glucose utilization and glucose production that normally prevents hypoglycemia during moderate exercise in humans. (b) Sympathochromaffin activation, perhaps sympathetic neural norepinephrine release, plays a primary glucoregulatory role by limiting glucose utilization as well as stimulating glucose production. (c) Changes in pancreatic islet hormone secretion (decrements in insulin, increments in glucagon, or both) are not normally critical but become critical when catecholamine action is deficient. (d) Glucoregulation fails, and hypoglycemia can develop, both when catecholamine action is deficient and when changes in islet hormones do not occur during exercise in humans.

Epinephrine supports the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration and prevents hypoglycemia when glucagon secretion is deficient in man.

We hypothesized that adrenergic mechanisms support the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration, and prevent hypoglycemia when glucagon secretion is deficient. Accordingly, we assessed the impact of glucagon deficiency, produced by infusion of somatostatin with insulin, without and with pharmacologic alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade on the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration and glucose kinetics in normal human subjects. During somatostatin with insulin alone mean glucose production fell from 1.5 +/- 0.05 to 0.7 +/- 0.2 mg/kg per min and mean plasma glucose declined from 93 +/- 3 to 67 +/- 4 mg/dl over 1 h; glucose production then increased to base-line rates and plasma glucose plateaued at 64-67 mg/dl over 2 h. This plateau was associated with, and is best attributed to, an eightfold increase in mean plasma epinephrine. It did not occur when adrenergic blockade was added; glucose production remained low and mean plasma glucose declined progressively to a hypoglycemic level of 45 +/- 4 mg/dl, significantly (P less than 0.001) lower than the final value during somatostatin with insulin alone. These data provide further support for the concept that maintenance of the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration is a function of insulin and glucagon, not of insulin alone, and that adrenergic mechanisms do not normally play a critical role. They indicate, however, that an endogenous adrenergic agonist, likely adrenomedullary epinephrine, compensates for deficient glucagon secretion and prevents hypoglycemia in the postabsorptive state in humans. Thus, postabsorptive hypoglycemia occurs when both glucagon and epinephrine are deficient, but not when either glucagon or epinephrine alone is deficient, and insulin is present.

Neuroendocrine responses to glucose ingestion in man. Specificity, temporal relationships, and quantitative aspects.

The mechanisms of postprandial glucose counterregulation-those that blunt late decrements in plasma glucose, prevent hypoglycemia, and restore euglycemia-have not been fully defined. To begin to clarify these mechanisms, we measured neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to the ingestion of glucose (75 g), xylose (62.5 g), mannitol (20 g), and water in ten normal human subjects to determine for each response the magnitude, temporal relationships, and specificity for glucose ingestion. Measurements were made at 10-min intervals over 5 h. By multivariate analysis of variance, the plasma glucose (P < 0.0001), insulin (P < 0.0001), glucagon (P < 0.03), epinephrine (P < 0.0004), and growth hormone (P < 0.01) curves, as well as the blood lactate (P < 0.0001), glycerol (P < 0.001), and beta-hydroxybutyrate (P < 0.0001) curves following glucose ingestion differed significantly from those following water ingestion. However, the growth hormone curves did not differ after correction for differences at base line. In contrast, the plasma norepinephrine (P < 0.31) and cortisol (P < 0.24) curves were similar after ingestion of all four test solutions, although early and sustained increments in norepinephrine occurred after all four test solutions. Thus, among the potentially important glucose regulatory factors, only transient increments in insulin, transient decrements in glucagon, and late increments in epinephrine are specific for glucose ingestion. They do not follow ingestion of water, xylose, or mannitol. Following glucose ingestion, plasma glucose rose to peak levels of 156+/-6 mg/dl at 46+/-4 min, returned to base line at 177+/-4 min, reached nadirs of 63+/-3 mg/dl at 232+/-12 min, and rose to levels comparable to base line at 305 min, which was the final sampling point. Plasma insulin rose to peak levels of 150+/-17 muU/ml (P < 0.001) at 67+/-8 min. At the time glucose returned to base line, insulin levels (49+/-12 muU/ml) remained fourfold higher than base line (P < 0.01); thereafter they declined but never fell below base line. Plasma glucagon decreased from 95+/-14 pg/ml to nadirs of 67+/-11 pg/ml (P < 0.001) at 84+/-9 min and then rose progressively to peak levels of 114+/-17 pg/ml (P < 0.001 vs. nadirs) at 265+/-12 min. Plasma epinephrine, which was 18+/-4 pg/ml at base line, did not change initially and then rose to peak levels of 119+/-20 pg/ml (P < 0.001) at 271+/-13 min. These data indicate that the glucose counterregulatory process late after glucose ingestion is not solely due to the dissipation of insulin and that sympathetic neural norepinephrine, growth hormone, and cortisol do not play critical roles. They are consistent with, but do not establish, physiologic roles for the counterregulatory hormones-glucagon, epinephrine, or both-in that process.

Enhanced glycemic responsiveness to epinephrine in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is the result of the inability to secrete insulin. Augmented insulin secretion normally limits the glycemic, but not the lipolytic or ketogenic, response to epinephrine in humans.

To determine if the enhanced glycemic response to epinephrine in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is the result of increased adrenergic sensitivity per se, increased glucagon secretion, decreased insulin secretion, or a combination of these, plasma epinephrine concentration-response curves were determined in insulin-infused (initially euglycemic) patients with IDDM and nondiabetic subjects on two occasions: once when insulin and glucagon were free to change (control study), and again when insulin and glucagon were held constant (islet clamp study). During the control study, plasma C-peptide doubled, and glucagon did not change in the nondiabetic subjects, whereas plasma C-peptide did not change but glucagon increased in the patients. The patients with IDDM exhibited threefold greater increments in plasma glucose, largely the result of greater increments in glucose production. This enhanced glycemic response was apparent with 30-min increments in epinephrine to plasma concentrations as low as 100-200 pg/ml, levels that occur commonly under physiologic conditions. During the islet clamp study (somatostatin infusion with insulin and glucagon replacement at fixed rates), the heightened glycemic response was unaltered in the patients with IDDM, but the nondiabetic subjects exhibited an enhanced glycemic response to epinephrine indistinguishable from that of patients with IDDM. In contrast, the FFA, glycerol, and beta-hydroxybutyrate responses were unaltered. Thus, we conclude the following: Short, physiologic increments in plasma epinephrine cause greater increments in plasma glucose in patients with IDDM than in nondiabetic subjects, a finding likely to be relevant to glycemic control during the daily lives of such patients as well as during the stress of intercurrent illness. Enhanced glycemic responsiveness of patients with IDDM to epinephrine is not the result of increased sensitivity of adrenergic receptor-effector mechanisms per se nor of their increased glucagon secretory response; rather, it is the result of their inability to augment insulin secretion. Augmented insulin secretion, albeit restrained, normally limits the glycemic response, but not the lipolytic or ketogenic responses, to epinephrine in humans.

Hypoglycemia per se stimulates sympathetic neural as well as adrenomedullary activity, but, unlike the adrenomedullary response, the forearm sympathetic neural response is not reduced after recent hypoglycemia.

We tested the hypotheses that 1) hypoglycemia per se stimulates the sympathetic neural as well as the adrenomedullary component of the sympathochromaffin system, and 2) sympathetic neural responses to hypoglycemia, like adrenomedullary responses, are reduced after recent hypoglycemia. To this end, we studied 10 healthy young adults on 2 consecutive days on two separate occasions, on one occasion with euglycemia (5.0 mmol/l) and on the other occasion with hypoglycemia (2.8 mmol/l) from 1000 to 1200 and 1400 to 1600 on day 1 of each occasion. On day 2 of each occasion, plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine (NE) concentrations and rates of systemic NE spillover (SNESO) and forearm NE spillover (FNESO) were measured during hyperinsulinemic (12.0 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) euglycemia (5.0 mmol/l) and hypoglycemia (2.8 mmol/l). Compared with values during euglycemia, plasma epinephrine and NE and rates of SNESO and FNESO all increased during hypoglycemia (P < 0.01). After day 1 hypoglycemia, there were reductions during hypoglycemia on day 2 in plasma epinephrine (2,050 +/- 500 vs. 2,960 +/- 400 pmol/l; P < 0.02), plasma NE (1.35 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.92 +/- 0.20 nmol/l; P < 0.01), and SNESO rates (5.13 +/- 0.84 vs. 6.87 +/- 0.81 nmol/min; P < 0.02). However, FNESO rates were unaltered (1.16 +/- 0.25 vs. 1.27 +/- 0.17 pmol x min(-1) x 100 ml tissue(-1). Thus we conclude that 1) hypoglycemia per se stimulates both the sympathetic neural and adrenomedullary components of the sympathochromaffin system and 2) adrenomedullary, but not forearm sympathetic neural, responses to hypoglycemia are reduced after recent hypoglycemia. The extent to which the lower plasma NE levels and reduced SNESO responses to hypoglycemia after day 1 hypoglycemia reflect reduced NE release from the adrenal medullae, sympathetic nerves other than those in the forearm, or both cannot be determined from these data.

Mononuclear leukocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptors and adenylate cyclase sensitivity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) have been found to have a heightened hyperglycemic response to epinephrine. To determine if patients with IDDM have increased sensitivity of cellular beta 2-adrenergic receptor-effector systems, we assessed beta 2-adrenergic receptors and adenylate cyclase sensitivities to isoproterenol in partially purified mononuclear leukocyte (MNL) plasma membranes from 10 patients with IDDM (without adrenergic neuropathy) and 10 matched nondiabetic controls. MNL beta 2-adrenergic receptor densities (Bmax = 48 +/- 8 fmol [3H] DHA/mg protein in IDDM, 44 +/- 3 fmol [3H] DHA/mg protein in controls) and binding affinities (apparent KD = 0.3 +/- 0.07 nM in IDDM, 0.3 +/- 0.04 nM in controls) did not differ. Further, MNL adenylate cyclase activities were not significantly different either at baseline (325 +/- 86 pmol/mg protein/15 min in IDDM, 275 +/- 49 pmol/mg protein/15 min in controls) or in response to isoproterenol (842 +/- 229 pmol/mg protein/15 min in IDDM, 608 +/- 86 pmol/mg protein/15 min in controls). Thus, the data do not support the presence of a generalized alteration of beta-adrenergic receptors or adenylate cyclase sensitivity in IDDM. To the extent that MNL beta 2-adrenergic receptors and adenylate cyclase activities reflect those of extravascular catecholamine target cells, these findings suggest that the heightened hyperglycemic response to epinephrine exhibited by patients with IDDM is not due to increased sensitivity of cellular beta 2-adrenergic receptor-effector systems and is best attributed to the altered hormonal milieu of the insulin-deficient state.

Examination of the role of the pituitary-adrenocortical axis, counterregulatory hormones, and insulin clearance in variable nocturnal insulin requirements in insulin-dependent diabetes.

In insulin-dependent diabetics, insulin requirements increase significantly after 0600 h, resulting in prebreakfast hyperglycemia with either conventional insulin therapy or constant insulin infusions with insulin infusion devices. In order to clarify the role of the pituitary-adrenocortical axis and further examine the mechanisms of the phenomenon of nocturnal variability in insulin requirements, we studied five IDDs using a closed-loop insulin infusion device (Biostator, GCIIS). The subjects were given saline (SAL) or dexamethasone (DEX) i.v. from 1800 to 0900 h on successive nights. From 2400-0300 to 0600-0900 h, mean insulin infusion rates required to maintain blood glucose values between 109 and 120 mg/dl increased by 0.21 +/- 0.05 mU/kg/min during the SAL infusion, and 0.16 +/- 0.04 mU/kg/min during the DEX infusion, when plasma cortisols were suppressed to less than or equal to 2 micrograms/dl. Mean free insulin concentrations did not increase and remained constant throughout both study nights in spite of the significantly higher 0600-0900-h insulin infusion rates. Growth hormone, glucagon, epinephrine, and norepinephrine concentrations showed normal nocturnal and early morning patterns during both study nights. We conclude that the nocturnal variability in insulin requirements persists despite suppression of the pituitary-adrenocortical axis, and that increased free insulin clearance or degradation may contribute to the "dawn phenomenon" of rising prebreakfast glucose despite constant insulin infusion.

Prognostic predictors of thalamic hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is no study evaluating the role of clinical, evoked potential and radiological parameters in the prognosis of thalamic hemorrhage employing multivariate logistic regression analysis, thus we aimed to evaluate the role of these parameters in predicting the 3 month outcome following thalamic hemorrhage. SETTING: Tertiary care referral teaching hospital. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with CT proven thalamic hematoma were evaluated. Conscious level was assessed using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), severity of stroke by the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS), while muscle tone, tendon reflexes and power were also recorded. Hematoma size and type, and evidence of ventricular extension were obtained from the CT scan. Hematomas were classified as (A) thalamic with postero-lateral extension or (B) thalamic without postero-lateral extension. Central motor conduction to upper limb and median somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were recorded. Outcome was defined at 3 months on the basis of the Barthel Index (BI) with good being a BI of 12 or greater and poor a BI of less than 12. Best predictors of outcome were evaluated by single variable logistic regression analysis followed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Age ranged between 35 and 85 years; 18 were women. Mean GCS was 10.4 and CNS was 3.9. Thirty-one patients had type A hematomas and 22 type B. The hematoma was small in 5, medium in 35 and large in 13 patients. Ventricular extension was present in 34 patients. Motor evoked potentials were unrecordable in 36 and central motor conduction time was prolonged in 8 patients. Median SEP was unrecordable in 37 and N9-N20 conduction time was prolonged in 2 patients. At 3 months, 8 patients had died, 24 had good and 21 had poor outcome. On univariate logistic regression analysis diabetes mellitus, GCS, pupillary asymmetry, CNS score, type and size of hematoma and motor and somatosensory evoked potentials were significant in relation to outcome. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the best predictors of outcome at 3 months were the type of hematoma and CNS score. CONCLUSION: CNS score and CT appearance of hematoma are the best predictors of 3 month outcome following thalamic hemorrhage. The proposed model for outcome assessment is simple and easy to apply and could have wide clinical application.

Oral propranolol and metoprolol both impair glucose recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

To the extent that they have deficient glucagon secretory responses to plasma glucose decrements, as they commonly do, patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) are dependent on epinephrine-mediated beta-adrenergic mechanisms to promote recovery from hypoglycemia. Thus, they are at increased risk for prolonged hypoglycemia if treated with a nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonist such as propranolol. If the hyperglycemic actions of epinephrine are mediated through beta 2-adrenergic mechanisms, therapeutic efficacy (e.g., for hypertension or ischemic heart disease) could be accomplished without increased risk of hypoglycemia by selective beta 1-adrenergic blockade in such patients. However, oral administration of the relatively selective beta 1-adrenergic antagonist metoprolol (100 mg) and of the nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol (80 mg) both impaired recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycemia in patients with IDDM. Thus, at a dose of 100 mg, oral metoprolol is not safer than oral propranolol with respect to recovery from hypoglycemia in patients with IDDM.

Failure of nocturnal hypoglycemia to cause daytime hyperglycemia in patients with IDDM.

To test the hypothesis that nocturnal hypoglycemia causes postprandial hyperglycemia the next day (the Somogyi phenomenon) in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), we studied 10 moderately well controlled patients, who were on their usual therapeutic regimens, from 2000 to 2000 on three occasions. On a control day, samples were obtained without intervention. On another day, nocturnal hypoglycemia was prevented (by intravenous infusion of glucose, if necessary, from 2200 to 0400 to keep plasma glucose levels at greater than 5.6 mM). On another day, nocturnal hypoglycemia was induced (by stepped intravenous insulin infusions between 2200 and 0200 to reduce plasma glucose levels to less than 2.8 mM). After nocturnal hypoglycemia (1.9 +/- 0.2 mM), fasting (0800), morning (0800-1100), afternoon (1200-1500), evening (1600-2000), and entire-day (0800-2000) plasma glucose concentrations were no higher than those after prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia or sampling only. On the control day, fasting and daytime plasma glucose levels were directly related to the preceding 2200 (r = 0.723, P less than 0.02, and r = 0.762, P = 0.01, respectively) and nocturnal nadir (r = 0.714, P less than 0.02, and r = 0.728, P less than 0.02) plasma glucose concentrations. Daytime plasma glucose levels were unrelated to peak nocturnal plasma glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, growth hormone, or cortisol concentrations. We conclude that nocturnal hypoglycemia does not appear to cause clinically important daytime hyperglycemia in patients representative of most patients with IDDM.