Antibody profile in post-vaccinated & SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals.

Background & objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic it was important to assess the antibody profile in individuals vaccinated with Covaxin (BBV152) and Covishield (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) with both 28 and 84 days gaps between two doses, those infected with SARS-CoV-2 and post-COVID-19-infected individuals vaccinated with only one dose of either of the vaccines. The present study was aimed to assess these objectives. Methods: Fifty real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19-infected individuals, along with 90 COVID-19-naïve (BBV152 and ChAdOx1 nCov-19)-vaccinated individuals, were included in the study. Individuals who received a single dose of either vaccine with a confirmed past diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=15) were also included. Blood samples were collected strictly between the 4th and 5th wk after development of symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and after the first/second vaccination dose. Antibody profile assessment was done using whole-virus, spike-receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid-specific ELISA kits along with neutralizing antibody kit. Results: There was an overall 97.7 per cent seropositivity rate in vaccinated individuals, and a strong correlation (R2=0.8, P<0.001) between neutralizing and spike-RBD antibodies. Among individuals who received two standard doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, the spike antibody levels developed were of higher titre with a longer prime boost interval than in those with shorter intervals (P<0.01). Individuals vaccinated with two doses as well as only one dose post-SARS-CoV-2 infection had high neutralizing and spike-specific antibodies. Interpretation & conclusions: High neutralizing and spike-specific antibodies were developed in individuals vaccinated only with one dose of either vaccine post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. With the main priority being vaccinating majority of the population in our country, single-dose administration to such individuals would be a sensible way to make the most of the limited supplies. Furthermore, neutralizing antibody levels observed in COVID-19-naïve vaccinees imply the need for booster vaccination.

Genetic basis of severe factor XIII deficiency in a large cohort of Indian patients: Identification of fourteen novel mutations.

Congenital factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency, the most under diagnosed disorder is caused mainly due to underlying defects in the catalytic A subunit of FXIII. More than 100 mutations throughout the factor XIII A gene (F13A1) have been identified so far. Present study aims to characterize the molecular basis of severe congenital FXIII deficiency in a large series of patients from different parts of India. F13A1 defects were identified in 37 severe FXIII deficient unrelated Indian patients by direct DNA sequencing. 25 mutations were detected, of which 10 were missense, 9 nonsense, 3 splice site and 3 deletions; 14 were novel. This is the largest series of FXIII deficient cases reported from India in which mutations were analysed with high heterogeneity in the nature of mutations along with several common mutations.

Molecular pathology of rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) in India: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Though rare in occurrence, patients with rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) are highly heterogeneous and may manifest with severe bleeding diathesis. Due to the high rate of consanguinity in many caste groups, these autosomal recessive bleeding disorders which are of rare occurrence in populations across the world, may not be as rare in India. OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively analyze the frequency and nature of mutations in Indian patients with RBDs. METHODS: Pubmed search was used (www.pubmed.com) to explore the published literature from India on RBDs using the key words "rare bleeding disorders", "mutations", "India", "fibrinogen", "afibrinogenemia", "factor II deficiency", "prothrombin" "factor VII deficiency", "factor V deficiency", "factor X deficiency", "factor XI deficiency", "combined factor V and VIII deficiency", "factor XIII deficiency", "Bernard Soulier syndrome" and "Glanzmanns thrombasthenia" in different combinations. A total of 60 relevant articles could be retrieved. The distribution of mutations from India was compared with that of the world literature by referring to the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) (www.hgmd.org). RESULTS: Taken together, 181 mutations in 270 patients with different RBDs have been reported from India. Though the types of mutations reported from India and their percentage distribution with respect to the world data are largely similar, yet much higher percentage of small deletions, duplication mutations, insertions, indels were observed in this analysis. Besides the identification of novel mutations and polymorphisms, several common mutations have also been reported, which will allow to develop a strategy for mutation screening in Indian patients with RBDs. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a consortium of Institutions working on the molecular pathology of RBDs in India. This will facilitate a quicker and cheaper diagnosis of RBDs besides its utility in first trimester prenatal diagnosis of the affected families.

The Epidemiology of FVIII Inhibitors in Indian Haemophilia A Patients.

A serious complication of replacement therapy in patients with bleeding disorders is the development of 'inhibitors', particularly FVIII inhibitors in haemophilia A patients. This leads to an increase in the management cost, morbidity and mortality, especially post-operatively. The mechanism of FVIII inhibitor development is quite complex and it is difficult to predict inhibitor development, but a prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical as early therapy can save lives. The aim of this study was to screen patients with bleeding disorders in India for inhibitors, and to analyse and compare the prevalence of inhibitors in different regions in India. Patient details were recorded and blood samples were collected in sodium citrate vacutainers from 1,505 patients with bleeding disorders, in different cities in India. Coagulation and inhibitor screening assays were performed, followed by the Bethesda assay in inhibitor positive samples to quantify the FVIII inhibitor titre. Out of the 1,505 samples analysed, 1,285 were Haemophilia A patients, out of which 78 (6.07 %) were positive for 'FVIII Inhibitors'. The highest incidence of FVIII Inhibitors was seen in South India (13.04 %). The highest incidence of 20.99 % was observed in Chennai, followed by Hyderabad (13.33 %), Jammu (9.90 %) and Guwahati (8.51 %), respectively, with respect to the samples analysed. The other regions showed an inhibitor incidence <8 %. The incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia A patients is different in different regions of India; this may be due to the intensity of treatment, type of product or the genetic characteristics of these patients.