Cold Spots in Protein Binding.

Understanding the energetics and architecture of protein-binding interfaces is important for basic research and could potentially facilitate the design of novel binding domains for biotechnological applications. It is well accepted that a few key residues at binding interfaces (binding hot spots) are responsible for contributing most to the free energy of binding. In this opinion article, we introduce a new concept of 'binding cold spots', or interface positions occupied by suboptimal amino acids. Such positions exhibit a potential for affinity enhancement through various mutations. We give several examples of cold spots from different protein-engineering studies and argue that identification of such positions is crucial for studies of protein evolution and protein design.

Predicting affinity- and specificity-enhancing mutations at protein-protein interfaces.

Manipulations of PPIs (protein-protein interactions) are important for many biological applications such as synthetic biology and drug design. Combinatorial methods have been traditionally used for such manipulations, failing, however, to explain the effects achieved. We developed a computational method for prediction of changes in free energy of binding due to mutation that bring about deeper understanding of the molecular forces underlying binding interactions. Our method could be used for computational scanning of binding interfaces and subsequent analysis of the interfacial sequence optimality. The computational method was validated in two biological systems. Computational saturated mutagenesis of a high-affinity complex between an enzyme AChE (acetylcholinesterase) and a snake toxin Fas (fasciculin) revealed the optimal nature of this interface with only a few predicted affinity-enhancing mutations. Binding measurements confirmed high optimality of this interface and identified a few mutations that could further improve interaction fitness. Computational interface scanning of a medium-affinity complex between TIMP-2 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2) and MMP (matrix metalloproteinase) 14 revealed a non-optimal nature of the binding interface with multiple mutations predicted to stabilize the complex. Experimental results corroborated our computational predictions, identifying a large number of mutations that improve the binding affinity for this interaction and some mutations that enhance binding specificity. Overall, our computational protocol greatly facilitates the discovery of affinity- and specificity-enhancing mutations and thus could be applied for design of potent and highly specific inhibitors of any PPI.

Triathlon for energy functions: who is the winner for design of protein-protein interactions?

Computational prediction of stabilizing mutations into monomeric proteins has become an almost ordinary task. Yet, computational stabilization of protein­protein complexes remains a challenge. Design of protein­protein interactions (PPIs) is impeded by the absence of an energy function that could reliably reproduce all favorable interactions between the binding partners. In this work, we present three energy functions: one function that was trained on monomeric proteins, while the other two were optimized by different techniques to predict side-chain conformations in a dataset of PPIs. The performances of these energy functions are evaluated in three different tasks related to design of PPIs: predicting side-chain conformations in PPIs, recovering native binding-interface sequences, and predicting changes in free energy of binding due to mutations. Our findings show that both functions optimized on side-chain repacking in PPIs are more suitable for PPI design compared to the function trained on monomeric proteins. Yet, no function performs best at all three tasks. Comparison of the three energy functions and their performances revealed that (1) burial of polar atoms should not be penalized significantly in PPI design as in single-protein design and (2) contribution of electrostatic interactions should be increased several-fold when switching from single-protein to PPI design. In addition, the use of a softer van der Waals potential is beneficial in cases when backbone flexibility is important. All things considered, we define an energy function that captures most of the nuances of the binding energetics and hence, should be used in future for design of PPIs.

Optimizing energy functions for protein-protein interface design.

Protein design methods have been originally developed for the design of monomeric proteins. When applied to the more challenging task of protein­protein complex design, these methods yield suboptimal results. In particular, they often fail to recapitulate favorable hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions across the interface. In this work, we aim to improve the energy function of the protein design program ORBIT to better account for binding interactions between proteins. By using the advanced machine learning framework of conditional random fields, we optimize the relative importance of all the terms in the energy function, attempting to reproduce the native side-chain conformations in protein­protein interfaces. We evaluate the performance of several optimized energy functions, each describes the van der Waals interactions using a different potential. In comparison with the original energy function, our best energy function (a) incorporates a much "softer" repulsive van der Waals potential, suitable for the discrete rotameric representation of amino acid side chains; (b) does not penalize burial of polar atoms, reflecting the frequent occurrence of polar buried residues in protein­protein interfaces; and (c) significantly up-weights the electrostatic term, attesting to the high importance of these interactions for protein­protein complex formation. Using this energy function considerably improves side chain placement accuracy for interface residues in a large test set of protein­protein complexes. Moreover, the optimized energy function recovers the native sequences of protein­protein interface at a higher rate than the default function and performs substantially better in predicting changes in free energy of binding due to mutations.

Antibody Repertoire Analysis of Hepatitis C Virus Infections Identifies Immune Signatures Associated With Spontaneous Clearance.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major public health concern, with over 70 million people infected worldwide, who are at risk for developing life-threatening liver disease. No vaccine is available, and immunity against the virus is not well-understood. Following the acute stage, HCV usually causes chronic infections. However, ~30% of infected individuals spontaneously clear the virus. Therefore, using HCV as a model for comparing immune responses between spontaneous clearer (SC) and chronically infected (CI) individuals may empower the identification of mechanisms governing viral infection outcomes. Here, we provide the first in-depth analysis of adaptive immune receptor repertoires in individuals with current or past HCV infection. We demonstrate that SC individuals, in contrast to CI patients, develop clusters of antibodies with distinct properties. These antibodies' characteristics were used in a machine learning framework to accurately predict infection outcome. Using combinatorial antibody phage display library technology, we identified HCV-specific antibody sequences. By integrating these data with the repertoire analysis, we constructed two antibodies characterized by high neutralization breadth, which are associated with clearance. This study provides insight into the nature of effective immune response against HCV and demonstrates an innovative approach for constructing antibodies correlating with successful infection clearance. It may have clinical implications for prognosis of the future status of infection, and the design of effective immunotherapies and a vaccine for HCV.

Mapping of the binding landscape for a picomolar protein-protein complex through computation and experiment.

Our understanding of protein evolution would greatly benefit from mapping of binding landscapes, i.e., changes in protein-protein binding affinity due to all single mutations. However, experimental generation of such landscapes is a tedious task due to a large number of possible mutations. Here, we use a simple computational protocol to map the binding landscape for two homologous high-affinity complexes, involving a snake toxin fasciculin and acetylcholinesterase from two different species. To verify our computational predictions, we experimentally measure binding between 25 Fas mutants and the 2 enzymes. Both computational and experimental results demonstrate that the Fas sequence is close to the optimum when interacting with its targets, yet a few mutations could further improve Kd, kon, and koff. Our computational predictions agree well with experimental results and generate distributions similar to those observed in other high-affinity PPIs, demonstrating the potential of simple computational protocols in capturing realistic binding landscapes.

Affinity- and specificity-enhancing mutations are frequent in multispecific interactions between TIMP2 and MMPs.

Multispecific proteins play a major role in controlling various functions such as signaling, regulation of transcription/translation, and immune response. Hence, a thorough understanding of the atomic-level principles governing multispecific interactions is important not only for the advancement of basic science but also for applied research such as drug design. Here, we study evolution of an exemplary multispecific protein, a Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP2) that binds with comparable affinities to more than twenty-six members of the Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP) and the related ADAMs families. We postulate that due to its multispecific nature, TIMP2 is not optimized to bind to any individual MMP type, but rather embodies a compromise required for interactions with all MMPs. To explore this hypothesis, we perform computational saturation mutagenesis of the TIMP2 binding interface and predict changes in free energy of binding to eight MMP targets. Computational results reveal the non-optimality of the TIMP2 binding interface for all studied proteins, identifying many affinity-enhancing mutations at multiple positions. Several TIMP2 point mutants predicted to enhance binding affinity and/or binding specificity towards MMP14 were selected for experimental verification. Experimental results show high abundance of affinity-enhancing mutations in TIMP2, with some point mutations producing more than ten-fold improvement in affinity to MMP14. Our computational and experimental results collaboratively demonstrate that the TIMP2 sequence lies far from the fitness maximum when interacting with its target enzymes. This non-optimality of the binding interface and high potential for improvement might characterize all proteins evolved for binding to multiple targets.

Computational methods for controlling binding specificity.

Learning to control, protein-binding specificity is useful for both fundamental and applied biology. In fundamental research, better understanding of complicated signaling networks could be achieved through engineering of regulator proteins to bind to only a subset of their effector proteins. In applied research such as drug design, nonspecific binding remains a major reason for failure of many drug candidates. However, developing antibodies that simultaneously inhibit several disease-associated pathways are a rising trend in pharmaceutical industry. Binding specificity could be manipulated experimentally through various display technologies that allow us to select desired binders from a large pool of candidate protein sequences. We developed an alternative approach for controlling binding specificity based on computational protein design. We can enhance binding specificity of a protein by computationally optimizing its sequence for better interactions with one target and worse interaction with alternative target(s). Moreover, we can design multispecific proteins that simultaneously interact with a predefined set of proteins. Unlike combinatorial techniques, our computational methods for manipulating binding specificity are fast, low cost and in principle are able to consider an unlimited number of desired and undesired binding partners.

What makes Ras an efficient molecular switch: a computational, biophysical, and structural study of Ras-GDP interactions with mutants of Raf.

Ras is a small GTP-binding protein that is an essential molecular switch for a wide variety of signaling pathways including the control of cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. In the GTP-bound state, Ras can interact with its effectors, triggering various signaling cascades in the cell. In the GDP-bound state, Ras looses its ability to bind to known effectors. The interaction of the GTP-bound Ras (Ras(GTP)) with its effectors has been studied intensively. However, very little is known about the much weaker interaction between the GDP-bound Ras (Ras(GDP)) and Ras effectors. We investigated the factors underlying the nucleotide-dependent differences in Ras interactions with one of its effectors, Raf kinase. Using computational protein design, we generated mutants of the Ras-binding domain of Raf kinase (Raf) that stabilize the complex with Ras(GDP). Most of our designed mutations narrow the gap between the affinity of Raf for Ras(GTP) and Ras(GDP), producing the desired shift in binding specificity towards Ras(GDP). A combination of our best designed mutation, N71R, with another mutation, A85K, yielded a Raf mutant with a 100-fold improvement in affinity towards Ras(GDP). The Raf A85K and Raf N71R/A85K mutants were used to obtain the first high-resolution structures of Ras(GDP) bound to its effector. Surprisingly, these structures reveal that the loop on Ras previously termed the switch I region in the Ras(GDP).Raf mutant complex is found in a conformation similar to that of Ras(GTP) and not Ras(GDP). Moreover, the structures indicate an increased mobility of the switch I region. This greater flexibility compared to the same loop in Ras(GTP) is likely to explain the natural low affinity of Raf and other Ras effectors to Ras(GDP). Our findings demonstrate that an accurate balance between a rigid, high-affinity conformation and conformational flexibility is required to create an efficient and stringent molecular switch.

Design, expression and characterization of mutants of fasciculin optimized for interaction with its target, acetylcholinesterase.

Predicting mutations that enhance protein-protein affinity remains a challenging task, especially for high-affinity complexes. To test our capability to improve the affinity of such complexes, we studied interaction of acetylcholinesterase with the snake toxin, fasciculin. Using the program ORBIT, we redesigned fasciculin's sequence to enhance its interactions with Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase. Mutations were predicted in 5 out of 13 interfacial residues on fasciculin, preserving most of the polar inter-molecular contacts seen in the wild-type toxin/enzyme complex. To experimentally characterize fasciculin mutants, we developed an efficient strategy to over-express the toxin in Escherichia coli, followed by refolding to the native conformation. Despite our predictions, a designed quintuple fasciculin mutant displayed reduced affinity for the enzyme. However, removal of a single mutation in the designed sequence produced a quadruple mutant with improved affinity. Moreover, one designed mutation produced 7-fold enhancement in affinity for acetylcholinesterase. This led us to reassess our criteria for enhancing affinity of the toxin for the enzyme. We observed that the change in the predicted inter-molecular energy, rather than in the total energy, correlates well with the change in the experimental free energy of binding, and hence may serve as a criterion for enhancement of affinity in protein-protein complexes.