Clinico-mycological and therapeutic updates on cutaneous dermatophytic infections in the era of Trichophyton indotineae.

Trichophyton indotineae has emerged as a novel dermatophyte species resulting in treatment recalcitrant skin infections. While the earliest reports came from India, T. indotineae has now spread to many parts of the world and is rapidly becoming a global health concern. Accurate identification of T. indotineae requires elaborate mycological investigations which is beyond the domain of routine microbiology testing. Extensive, non-inflammatory and atypical presentations are commonly seen with this novel species. T. indotineae shows an alarmingly high rate of mutations in the squalene epoxidase gene leading to lowered in vitro susceptibility to terbinafine. This has also translated into a lowered clinical response and requirement of a higher dose and much longer durations of treatment with the drug. Although the species remains largely susceptible to itraconazole, prolonged treatment durations are required to achieve cure with itraconazole. Fluconazole and griseofulvin do not have satisfactory in vitro or clinical activity. Apart from requirement of prolonged treatment durations, relapse postsuccessful treatment is a distressing and yet unexplained consequence of this "species-shift." Use of third generation azoles and combinations of systemic antifungals is unwarranted as both have not demonstrated clear superiority over itraconazole given alone, and the former is an important class of drugs for invasive mycoses.

Use of tofacitinib in baricitinib-refractory atopic dermatitis: An example of JAK inhibitor switching.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is predominantly mediated by a T-helper 2 immune system response. While JAK inhibitors have gained treatment approval for AD, data regarding interclass efficacy and therapeutic rationale is lacking. We report a patient with recalcitrant AD who failed baricitinib but demonstrated an excellent response to the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib.

A Real-World Study of Steroid-Free Monotherapy with Tofacitinib in Severe and Therapy-Recalcitrant Alopecia Areata, Alopecia Totalis, and Alopecia Universalis Cases: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) presents with noncicatricial alopecia and has multifactorial etiology. Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKibs) with potential efficacy and favorable side-effect profile are the first class of drugs to receive FDA approval in AA. Objectives: Our primary objective was to assess the complete response rates to tofacitinib monotherapy in severe and recalcitrant AA, alopecia totalis (AT), and alopecia universalis (AU) patients using the latest percentage change in Severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score. We also aimed to analyze the various systemic agents used by these patients prior to the use of tofacitinib. Materials and Methods: Institutional records of 17 patients with severe or refractory AA, AT, and AU treated with tofacitinib monotherapy were analyzed, retrospectively. The response to tofacitinib therapy was determined after calculating percentage change in SALT score. End of treatment was defined as the dose which resulted in a significant response (complete/near complete response was ≥75% hair regrowth from baseline as determined by SALT score). Results: Majority of patients had severe AA (SALT ≥ 50) (n = 9/17, 52.94%), while five patients had AT and three had AU. All patients had received either systemic glucocorticoids (GCS), which included oral mini pulse (OMP) (n = 8), intravenous pulse steroids (n = 4), and daily oral GCS (n = 6) or immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) which included cyclosporine (n = 14) followed by methotrexate (n = 6) and azathioprine (n = 6). Mean SALT score prior to starting tofacitinib was 74.23. Mean dose of tofacitinib used was 13.23 mg (10-15 mg) and mean duration of treatment was 9.23 months. Latest percentage change of SALT score ranged from 70.58% to 100%, with an average of 91.47%. Most patients showed complete/near complete response (13/17, 76.47%). Conclusion: Tofacitinib was found to be safe and effective in severe/refractory AA, AU, and AT patients recalcitrant to other treatment modalities in our study. Further studies are needed to assess the effect of these targeted drugs on JAK-STAT expression or tissue cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of AA using immunohistochemistry.

An update on the myriad antifungal resistance mechanisms in dermatophytes and the place of experimental and existential therapeutic agents for Trichophyton complex implicated in tinea corporis and cruris.

INTRODUCTION: There is an epidemic emergence of increased resistance in dermatophytes with to antifungal drugs with ergosterol1 (Erg1) and Erg11 mutations to terbinafine and azoles. Apart from mutations, mechanisms that predict clinical failure include efflux pumps, cellular kinases, heat shock proteins (Hsp), and biofilms. Apart from itraconazole and SUBATM (Super-Bioavailable) itraconazole, measures that can be used in terbinafine failure include efflux-pump inhibitors, Hsp inhibitors and judicious use of antifungal drugs (topical + systemic) combinations. AREAS COVERED: A PubMed search was done for the relevant studies and reviews published in the last 22 years using keywords dermatophytes OR Trichophyton, anti-fungal, resistance, mechanism and fungal AND resistance mechanisms. Our aim was to look for literature on prevalent species and we specifically researched studies on Trichophyton genus. We have analyzed varied antifungal drug mechanisms and detailed varied experimental and approved drugs to treat recalcitrant dermatophytosis. EXPERT OPINION: Apart from administering drugs with low minimum inhibitory concentration, combinations of oral and topical antifungals (based on synergy data) and new formulations of existing drugs are useful in recalcitrant cases. There is a need for research into resistance mechanism of the existent Trichophyton strains in therapeutic failures in tinea corporis & cruris instead of data derived from laboratory strains which may not mirror clinical failures.

Therapeutic Updates on the Management of Tinea Corporis or Cruris in the Era of Trichophyton Indotineae: Separating Evidence from Hype-A Narrative Review.

The emergence and spread of Trichophyton indotineae (T. indotineae) has led to a sea change in the prescription practices of clinicians regarding the management of dermatophytic skin infections. An infection easily managed with a few weeks of antifungals, tinea corporis or cruris, is now often chronic and recurrent and requires prolonged treatment. Rising resistance to terbinafine, with documented squalene epoxidase (SQLE) gene mutations, and slow clinical response to itraconazole leave clinicians with limited treatment choices. However, in these testing times, it is essential that the tenets of antifungal stewardship be followed in making therapeutic decisions, and that the existing armamentarium of antifungals be used in rationale ways to counter this extremely common cutaneous infection, while keeping the growing drug resistance among dermatophytes in check. This review provides updated evidence on the use of various systemic antifungals for dermatophytic infection of the glabrous skin, especially with respect to the emerging T. indotineae species, which is gradually becoming a worldwide concern.