MRI of patellar stabilizers: Anatomic visibility, inter-reader reliability, and intra-reader reproducibility of primary and secondary ligament anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare MRI features of medial and lateral patellar stabilizers in patients with and without patellar instability. METHODS: Retrospective study of 196 patients (mean age, 33.1 ± 18.5 years; 119 women) after diagnosis of patellar instability (cohort-1, acute patellar dislocation; cohort-2, chronic patellar maltracking) or no patellar instability (cohort-3, acute ACL rupture; cohort-4, chronic medial meniscus tear). On MRI, four medial and four lateral stabilizers were evaluated for visibility and injury by three readers independently. Inter- and intra-reader agreement was determined. RESULTS: Medial and lateral patellofemoral ligaments (MPFL and LPFL) were mostly or fully visualized in all cases (100%). Of the secondary patellar stabilizers, the medial patellotibial ligament was mostly or fully visualized in 166 cases (84.7%). Other secondary stabilizers were mostly or fully visualized in only a minority of cases (range, 0.5-32.1%). Injury scores for all four medial stabilizers were higher in patients with acute patellar dislocation than the other 3 cohorts (p < .05). Visibility inter- and intra-reader agreement was good for medial stabilizers (κ 0.61-0.78) and moderate-to-good for lateral stabilizers (κ 0.40-0.72). Injury inter- and intra-reader agreement was moderate-to-excellent for medial stabilizers (κ 0.43-0.90) and poor-to-moderate for lateral stabilizers (κ 0-0.50). CONCLUSION: The MPFL and LPFL were well visualized on MRI while the secondary stabilizers were less frequently visualized. The secondary stabilizers were more frequently visualized medially than laterally, and patellotibial ligaments were more frequently visualized compared to the other secondary stabilizers. Injury to the medial stabilizers was more common with acute patellar dislocation than with chronic patellar maltracking or other knee injuries.

Experts Achieve Consensus on a Majority of Statements Regarding Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatments for Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pathology.

PURPOSE: To establish consensus statements on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of musculoskeletal pathologies. METHODS: A consensus process on the treatment of PRP using a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Thirty-five orthopaedic surgeons and sports medicine physicians participated in these consensus statements on PRP. The participants were composed of representatives of the Biologic Association, representing 9 international orthopaedic and musculoskeletal professional societies invited due to their active interest in the study of orthobiologics. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement. RESULTS: There was consensus on 62% of statements about PRP. CONCLUSIONS: (1) PRP should be classified based on platelet count, leukocyte count, red blood count, activation method, and pure-plasma versus fibrin matrix; (2) PRP characteristics for reporting in research studies are platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophil count, red blood cell count, total volume, the volume of injection, delivery method, and the number of injections; (3) the prognostic factors for those undergoing PRP injections are age, body mass index, severity/grade of pathology, chronicity of pathology, prior injections and response, primary diagnosis (primary vs postsurgery vs post-trauma vs psoriatic), comorbidities, and smoking; (4) regarding age and body mass index, there is no minimum or maximum, but clinical judgment should be used at extremes of either; (5) the ideal dose of PRP is undetermined; and (6) the minimal volume required is unclear and may depend on the pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Knee MRI: Meniscus Roots, Ramps, Repairs, and Repercussions.

Menisci play an essential role in maintaining normal pain-free function of the knee. While there are decades of MRI literature on the tears involving the meniscus body and horns, there is now a surge in knowledge regarding injuries at the meniscus roots and periphery. The authors briefly highlight new insights into meniscus anatomy and then summarize recent developments in the understanding of meniscus injuries that matter, emphasizing meniscus injuries at the root and peripheral (eg, ramp) regions that may be missed easily at MRI and arthroscopy. Root and ramp tears are important to diagnose because they may be amenable to repair. However, if these tears are left untreated, ongoing pain and accelerated cartilage degeneration may ensue. The posterior roots of the medial and lateral menisci are most commonly affected by injury, and each of these injuries is associated with distinctive clinical profiles, MRI findings, and tear patterns. Specific diagnostic pitfalls can make the roots challenging to evaluate, including MRI artifacts and anatomic variations. As with root tears, MRI interpretation and orthopedic treatment have important differences for injuries at the medial versus lateral meniscus (LM) periphery (located at or near the meniscocapsular junction). Medially, ramp lesions typically occur in the setting of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture and are generally classified into five patterns. Laterally, the meniscocapsular junction may be injured in association with tibial plateau fractures, but disruption of the popliteomeniscal fascicles may also result in a hypermobile LM. Updated knowledge of the meniscus root and ramp tears is crucial in optimizing diagnostic imaging before repair and understanding the clinical repercussions. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center.

Patellar Tracking: An Old Problem with New Insights.

Patellofemoral pain and instability are common indications for imaging that are encountered in everyday practice. The authors comprehensively review key aspects of patellofemoral instability pertinent to radiologists that can be seen before the onset of osteoarthritis, highlighting the anatomy, clinical evaluation, diagnostic imaging, and treatment. Regarding the anatomy, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary static soft-tissue restraint to lateral patellar displacement and is commonly reconstructed surgically in patients with MPFL dysfunction and patellar instability. Osteoarticular abnormalities that predispose individuals to patellar instability include patellar malalignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle lateralization. Clinically, patients with patellar instability may be divided into two broad groups with imaging findings that sometimes overlap: patients with a history of overt patellar instability after a traumatic event (eg, dislocation, subluxation) and patients without such a history. In terms of imaging, radiography is generally the initial examination of choice, and MRI is the most common cross-sectional examination performed preoperatively. For all imaging techniques, there has been a proliferation of published radiologic measurement methods. The authors summarize the most common validated measurements for patellar malalignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle lateralization. Given that static imaging is inherently limited in the evaluation of patellar motion, dynamic imaging with US, CT, or MRI may be requested by some surgeons. The primary treatment strategy for patellofemoral pain is conservative. Surgical treatment options include MPFL reconstruction with or without osseous corrections such as trochleoplasty and tibial tubercle osteotomy. Postoperative complications evaluated at imaging include patellar fracture, graft failure, graft malposition, and medial patellar subluxation. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Editorial Commentary: Evaluation of Patellofemoral Instability Is Complex and Multifactorial.

The work-up of patellofemoral instability is complex and multifactorial. Patient factors (i.e., age, activity demand, goals/expectations), clinical presentation (pain, instability, or both), and physical examination (i.e., J-sign, apprehension into flexion), must be correlated with imaging findings (radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography) and anatomic risk factors, including patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, patellar tilt, lateralized force vector, valgus, femoral anteversion, and tibial torsion. Thus, developing a standard battery of reliable and reproducible radiographic measures of patellofemoral instability is a challenge. Imaging cut-offs provide insight into relative risk of recurrent instability. We still fall short in using imaging parameters to predict when to operate, what procedure(s) to perform, and how the patient might do. Future directions include the use of artificial intelligence and 3-dimensional measurements to help simplify a complex problem.

An Initial Injection and a Crossover Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Following Failed Treatment with Hyaluronic Acid or Saline Are Equally Effective in the Treatment of Moderate Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis Over 12 Months.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this crossover study was to determine the efficacy of amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) for moderate symptomatic knee osteoarthritis following failed treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline through 12 months' postcrossover injection using patient-reported and safety outcomes. METHODS: In this multicenter study, 95 patients from a 200-patient single-blind randomized controlled trial were eligible to crossover and receive a single injection of ASA 3 months after failed treatment with HA or saline. Patient-reported outcomes, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analog scale (VAS), were collected out to 12 months postcrossover to determine pain and function. Radiographs and blood were collected for assessment of changes. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed effects model for repeated measures. RESULTS: Treatment with ASA following failed treatment with HA or saline resulted in significant improvements in KOOS and VAS scores compared with crossover baseline. There were no differences in radiographic measures or anti-human leukocyte antigen serum levels compared with baseline and no severe adverse events reported. In addition, more than 55% of patients were responders at months 3, 6, and 12 as measured by the Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International simplified responder criteria. There were no significant differences between the original ASA randomized group and crossover cohorts at any of the time points evaluated, suggesting that prior failed treatment with HA or saline did not significantly impact outcomes following treatment with ASA. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients who previously failed treatment with HA or saline had statistically significant improvements in pain and function scores following a crossover injection of ASA that was sustained for 12 months, as measured by KOOS and VAS. There were no serious adverse events reported, and the injection was safe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Survival analyses and their applications in orthopaedics.

Survival analyses are a powerful statistical tool used to analyse data when the outcome of interest involves the time until an event. There is an array of models fit for this goal; however, there are subtle differences in assumptions, as well as a number of pitfalls, that can lead to biased results if researchers are unaware of the subtleties. As larger amounts of data become available, and more survival analyses are published every year, it is important that healthcare professionals understand how to evaluate these models and apply them into their practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to present an overview of survival analyses, including required assumptions and important pitfalls, as well as examples of their use within orthopaedic surgery.

Return-to-play and performance after operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture in elite male athletes: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the current evidence regarding return-to-play (RTP) and performance after Achilles tendon rupture in elite athletes treated with operative intervention. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Published sources identified through a PubMed search of elite athletes, defined as professional or division one collegiate athletes in baseball, basketball, American football or soccer. METHODS: Our search yielded a total of 2402 studies, with 13 studies fulfilling the study criteria of reporting elite athletes with objective measures of their athletic performance. A total of 709 elite athletes were included from the NBA, NFL, Major League Baseball (MLB), National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football and professional soccer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall, 61%-100% of elite male athletes RTP after Achilles tendon rupture and operative repair. NBA players had inferior performance compared with their preoperative status as well as controls of non-injured players. Studies did not show significantly different performance after Achilles injury for MLB players. Professional soccer, NFL and NCAA football studies reported varying performance after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that sports with explosive plantarflexion demands, such as basketball, may be associated with a greater decrease in performance despite operative intervention after Achilles rupture.

An Injectable Containing Morphine, Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, and Ketorolac Is Not Cytotoxic to Articular Cartilage Explants From Degenerative Knees.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a multidrug injectate containing morphine, ropivacaine, epinephrine, and ketorolac, commonly referred to as the "Orthococktail," on cartilage tissue viability and metabolic responses using an established in vitro model. METHODS: With institutional review board approval and informed patient consent, tissues normally discarded after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were recovered. Full-thickness cartilage explants (n = 72, Outerbridge grade 1 to 3) were created and bisected. Paired explant halves were treated with either 1 mL Orthococktail or 1 mL of saline and cultured for 8 hours at 37°C, with 0.5 mL of the treatment being removed and replaced with tissue culture media every hour. Explants were cultured for 6 days, and media were changed and collected on days 3 and 6. After day 6, tissues were processed for cell viability, weighed, and processed for histologic grading. Outcome measures were compared for significant differences between treated and untreated samples. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in cartilage viability between control and Orthococktail-treated samples across a spectrum of cartilage pathologies. Orthococktail treatment consistently resulted in a significant decrease in the release of PGE2, MCP-1, MMP-7, and MMP-8 on day 3 of culture and PGE2, MMP-3, MMP-7, and MMP-8 on day 6 of culture, compared with saline controls. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicate that an Orthococktail injection composed of morphine, ropivacaine, epinephrine, and ketorolac is associated with a transient decrease in degradative and inflammatory mediators produced by more severely affected articular cartilage and may mitigate perioperative joint pain such that postoperative narcotic drug use could be reduced. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Orthococktail solution used in this study may be a safe intraoperative, intra-articular injection option for patients undergoing joint arthroplasty and other joint preservation surgical procedures.

Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers: effects of fastball velocity and usage.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are prevalent in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers and can cause significant loss of time with varying reports of impact on performance. Revision UCL reconstruction (UCLR) is becoming increasingly common, with little known about the effects on fastball (FB) velocity and usage (FB%) in this setting. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the effect of revision UCLR on MLB pitchers with respect to postoperative FB velocity and FB% at 1 and 2 years after return to play. The hypothesis was postoperative FB velocity and FB% would significantly decrease vs. prerevision levels, and that revision UCLRs would result in significantly decreased FB velocity and FB% in comparison to a matched group of MLB pitchers after primary UCLR. METHODS: Twenty-one pitchers who underwent revision UCLR and returned to MLB play were identified from public records from 2008-2021. The PITCHf(x) system collected FB velocity for 4-seam (4FB) and 2-seam (2FB) fastballs and total FB% for pitchers in the prerevision year as well as the 2 years after return. A matched control group of pitchers who underwent primary UCLR was used for comparison. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in FB velocity between prerevision levels (4FB 92.9 mph, 2FB 91.4 mph) and years 1 (4FB 92.5 mph, 2FB 91.2 mph) and 2 (4FB 93.4 mph, 2FB 91.1 mph) after revision UCLR. FB% decreased from the prerevision season (60.1) and the first (56.2, P = .036) and second years (52.5, P = .002) after return. There were no significant differences between FB velocity and FB% or between the revision and primary UCLR groups. CONCLUSION: Pitchers returning to the MLB level after revision UCLR can expect similar FB velocity to their prerevision FB velocity and to pitchers undergoing primary UCLR; however, they do demonstrate a decrease in FB%, which may suggest less confidence in their FB after RTP.

Editorial Commentary: Is the Pendulum "Swinging" Away From Patellar Fixation in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction?

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the "workhorse" for surgical stabilization of recurrent patella instability. Complications of patella fixation (i.e., patella fracture) are rare but potentially catastrophic. Modifications to traditional MPFL reconstruction that avoid patella fixation are promising. These alternatives may be favored in high-risk scenarios such as revision, smaller pediatric cases, and patellofemoral arthroplasty with concomitant instability. Large-scale prospective and/or randomized studies are needed to differentiate between MPFL reconstruction techniques.

Significantly Lower Infection Risk for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts Presoaked in Vancomycin Compared With Unsoaked Grafts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative infection rates following ACL reconstruction performed with grafts presoaked in vancomycin versus those without vancomycin. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for therapeutic level I to III studies that compared outcomes of presoaking ACL grafts with vancomycin versus without vancomycin in human patients. Included graft types were tendon autografts or allografts, and included studies documented infection with a minimum follow-up of 30 days. Postoperative infection rates and knee-specific patient-reported outcome scores were extracted from each study and compared between groups. Study methodological quality was analyzed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Infection rates and retear rates were pooled and weighted for meta-analysis using a random-effects model. All P values were reported with an α level of 0.05 set as significant. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 144 articles (44 duplicates, 100 screened, 29 full-text review). Ten articles (21,368 subjects [7,507 vancomycin and 13,861 no vancomycin], 67% males, mean ± standard deviation age 29.5 ± 1.5 years) were included and analyzed. Eight of the 10 studies included only autografts, with 94.5% of grafts being hamstring autografts. Soaking grafts in vancomycin resulted in significantly fewer infections (0.013% versus 0.77%; odds ratio 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.03, 0.18; P < .001). Only 2 studies included patient-reported outcomes, and both demonstrated no difference in International Knee Documentation Committee scores 1 year after surgery for patients with grafts presoaked in vancomycin versus without vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Soaking ACL tendon grafts with vancomycin before implantation is associated with a nearly 15 times decrease in odds of infection compared with grafts not soaked in vancomycin. Few studies investigated patient-reported outcomes and retear rates after soaking ACL grafts in vancomycin. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, systematic review of level III studies.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies investigating SCR with reported surgical techniques were included. Animal studies, cadaveric studies, review studies, and letters to the editor were excluded. The technical aspects of the surgical techniques for SCR were analyzed in each article, which included graft type, glenoid fixation method, greater tuberosity fixation method, graft passage technique, suture management, margin convergence, concomitant procedures, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Clinical outcomes, when available, were also analyzed. RESULTS: We screened 365 articles, of which 29 described surgical techniques for SCR. According to the Modified Coleman Methodology Score, 24 articles were rated as poor (score < 55), 4 were rated as fair (score between 55 and 69), and 1 was rated as good (score between 70 and 84), with an average score of 25.8 ± 20.9. The most commonly performed technique for SCR used the following: an acellular dermal allograft, 2 biocomposite suture anchors for glenoid fixation, transosseous-equivalent double-row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fixation with 2 biocomposite medial-row anchors and 2 biocomposite lateral-row anchors, the double-pulley technique combined with an arthroscopic grasper and/or pull suture to pass the graft into the shoulder, the performance of both anterior and posterior margin convergence, and a native rotator cuff repair when possible. Only 8 studies reported clinical outcomes, and they showed that SCR provides significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, significant improvement in shoulder range of motion, variable graft failure rates, low complication rates, and variable reoperation rates. There were no studies comparing outcomes among the various surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgical techniques exist for arthroscopic SCR. However, no superior technique was shown because there were no studies comparing clinical outcomes among these various techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, systematic review of Level III, IV, and V studies.

Administrative Databases Used for Sports Medicine Research Demonstrate Significant Differences in Underlying Patient Demographics and Resulting Surgical Trends.

PURPOSE: To discern differences between the PearlDiver and MarketScan databases with regards to patient demographics, costs, reoperations, and complication rates for isolated meniscectomy. METHODS: We queried the PearlDiver Humana Patient Records Database and the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database for all patients who had record of meniscectomy denoted by Current Procedure Terminology 29880 or 29881 between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Those that had any other knee procedure at the same time as the meniscectomy were excluded, and the first instance of isolated meniscectomy was recorded. Patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, reoperations, 30- and 90-day complication rates, and costs were collected from both databases. Pearson's χ2 test with Yate's continuity correction and the Student t test were used to compare the 2 databases, and an alpha value of 0.05 was set as significant. RESULTS: We identified 441,147 patients with isolated meniscectomy from the MarketScan database (0.36% of total database), approximately 10 times the number of patients (n = 49,924; 0.20% of total database) identified from PearlDiver. The PearlDiver population was significantly older (median age: 65-69) than the MarketScan cohort, where all patients were younger than 65 (median age: 52; P < .001). Average Charlson Comorbidity Index was significantly lower for MarketScan (0.172, standard deviation [SD]: 0.546) compared with PearlDiver (1.43, SD: 2.05; P < .001), even when we restricted the PearlDiver cohort to patients younger than 65 years (1.02, SD: 1.74; P < .001). The PearlDiver <65 years subcohort also had increased 30- (relative risk 1.53 [1.40-1.67]) and 90-day (relative risk 1.56 [1.47-1.66]) postoperative complications compared with MarketScan. Overall, laterality coding was more prevalent in the PearlDiver database. CONCLUSIONS: For those undergoing isolated meniscectomy, the MarketScan database comprised an overall larger and younger cohort of patients with fewer comorbidities, even when examining only subjects younger than 65 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Inflammatory Mechanisms in the Development of Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis was traditionally thought of as a noninflammatory disease, but improved molecular techniques have recognized a significant inflammatory component. An initial joint injury or biomechanical imbalance leads to local tissue damage and inflammation, which is propagated by the innate immune system. The production of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) results in the activation of immune-modulated mechanisms, leading to the production of catabolic factors that can damage native joint structures such as cartilage. DAMPs may originate from extracellular matrix degradation products, intracellular components of lysed cells, complement, or joint crystals-even plasma proteins can enter through an inflamed synovium and further perpetuate the inflammatory process. Therapeutic interventions have traditionally focused on symptom management; however, there is potential for pharmacologic modification of the disease process in osteoarthritis through novel anti-inflammatory agents.

Cartilage Disease of the Patellofemoral Joint: Realignment, Restoration, Replacement.

Chondral lesions of the patellofemoral joint are common, and when symptomatic they can be difficult to manage. Not only are there various degrees of injury with multiple etiologies, but patellofemoral anatomy is complex and the patient's lower extremity alignment may contribute to the pathology. Treatment depends on the location, size, and depth of the lesion and may require realignment or concomitant stabilizing procedures. Tibial tubercle osteotomy can be performed in isolation or combined with various cartilage-based treatments, including marrow stimulation techniques, autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft, and osteochondral allograft. End-stage lesions, failed primary patellofemoral cartilage restoration with diffuse involvement, or isolated primary patellofemoral arthritis may be amenable to treatment with patellofemoral arthroplasty. Recent investigations in properly indicated patients using advanced techniques have shown that management of patellofemoral cartilage disease is now more effective and predictable than in the past.

How to Address the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament, Tibial Tubercle, and Articular Cartilage in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Instability.

Patellofemoral instability is a common pathology especially in the adolescent female population.1,2 Prompt diagnosis and management is critical to prevent future episodes of instability as well as to reduce the risk of cartilaginous injury to the patellofemoral articular surface. Initial management of a first-time patellar dislocation has historically been nonsurgical; however, the presence of intra-articular loose bodies or osseocartilaginous injury may require surgical intervention.3,4 More recent evidence has shown patients with specific risk factors such as skeletal immaturity, an incompetent medial soft-tissue sleeve, family history of patellar dislocation, elevated tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance, patella alta, and high-grade trochlear dysplasia experience high rates of re-dislocation after initial nonsurgical management.4-9 Based on this, the provider needs to consider these risk factors and the possibility of initial surgical management in these patient populations following a first-time patellar dislocation. Surgical options for management of patellar instability and cartilaginous injury include medial patellofemoral ligament repair, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and various cartilaginous repair/restoration procedures. It is important to be knowledgeable about the clinical and anatomic/radiographic risk factors associated with patients presenting with patellar instability, the algorithm for treatment, the indications and surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tubercle osteotomy, and management of cartilaginous injury to the patellofemoral joint.

Joint Preservation Techniques for the Knee in 2020: The Utility of Biologics, Osteotomies, and Cartilage Restoration Procedures.

Joint preservation strategies in young, active patients are a challenge, particularly in those with combined cartilage and meniscal deficiency. Concomitant malalignment and/or ligamentous insufficiency are not uncommon and further add to the complex nature of these patients. In patients who require surgery, a complete treatment strategy must be developed and implemented because unaddressed pathology typically leads to poor outcomes over time. In addition to reconstructive procedures, biologic therapies both as nonsurgical treatments and surgical augments offer promise, but their indications and place in orthopaedics continue to evolve. A comprehensive approach to this difficult patient population, including understanding all underlying pathologies, the natural history of each condition, and the appropriate treatment for each pathology, is necessary for successful joint preservation treatment in the young and active population.

Surgeon practice patterns for pre-soaking ACL tendon grafts in vancomycin: a survey of the ACL study group.

PURPOSE: To survey members of The ACL study group to determine the current practice patterns surrounding the technique of pre-soaking ACL grafts in vancomycin. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the ACL Study Group. Questions included the use of vancomycin solution for graft soaking during ACL reconstruction, their protocol for soaking the graft, vancomycin concentration utilized, graft choices, and concerns with the technique. RESULTS: Sixty-six (57%) ACL surgeons completed the survey. Approximately one-third (37.9%) of respondents currently pre-soak their ACL grafts in vancomycin prior to implantation, with 60% of these surgeons being from Europe. Seventy-six percent have adopted this practice within the past 5 years. The majority of surgeons wrap the graft in a vancomycin-soaked gauze prior to implantation (56%), soak for a variable amount of time before implantation (56%), use a concentration of 5 mg/mL (68%), and soak hamstring grafts (92%). Concerns included the mechanical properties of the graft (35%), cost of vancomycin (23%), availability (12%), and antibiotic resistance (9%). CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates that 37.9% of ACL study group members currently utilize vancomycin to pre-soak ACL tendon grafts as a means to decrease post-operative infection risk, with the majority of surgeons having implemented this practice within the past 5 years. The biggest concern towards using vancomycin was the mechanical properties of the graft after soaking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades.

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) aims to restore knee function and stability, allowing patients to return to the activities they enjoy and minimize further injury to the meniscus and cartilage and their ultimate progression to osteoarthritis. This study aims to present the evolution of graft choice over the last three decades according to members of the ACL Study Group (SG). METHODS: Prior to the January 2020 ACL SG biannual meeting, a survey was administered consisting of 87 questions and 16 categories, including ACLR graft choice. A similar questionnaire has been administered prior to each meeting and survey results from the past 14 meetings (1992 through 2020, excluding 1994) are included in this work. Survey responses are reported as frequencies in percentages to quantify changes in practice over the surgery period. RESULTS: In 1992, the most frequent graft choice for primary ACLR was bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, at nearly 90%. Hamstring tendon (HT) autografts have increased in popularity, currently over 50%, followed by just under 40% BTB autograft. Recently, quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has increased in popularity since 2014. CONCLUSION: Autograft (HT, BTB, QT) is an overwhelming favorite for primary ACLR over allograft. The preference for HT autograft increased over the study period relative to BTB autograft, with QT autograft gaining in popularity in recent years. Graft selection should be individualized for each patient and understanding the global trends in graft choice can help orthopaedic surgeons discuss graft options with their patients and determine the appropriate graft for each case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, Expert Opinion.