Comparison of two-year treatment adherence, persistence, discontinuation, reinitiation, and switching between psoriasis patients treated with ixekizumab or secukinumab in real-world settings.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on long-term treatment patterns associated with interleukin-17A inhibitors in plaque psoriasis are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare ixekizumab or secukinumab treatment patterns over a 24-month period among plaque psoriasis patients. METHODS: Adult patients with psoriasis who had 1 or more claims for ixekizumab or secukinumab between March 1, 2016, and October 31, 2019, and with 24 months of follow-up after starting treatment were identified from IBM MarketScan claims databases. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable models were employed to balance cohorts and estimate the risks of nonpersistence, discontinuation, and switching and odds of highly adherent treatment (proportion of days covered ≥ 80%). RESULTS: A total of 471 ixekizumab and 990 secukinumab users were included. Compared to secukinumab, ixekizumab use was associated with a 20% lower risk of nonpersistence (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92), a 17% lower risk of discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96), and a 42% higher odds of being highly adherent to treatment (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.12-1.80). No difference in risk of switching was observed (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68-1.01). LIMITATIONS: Disease severity and clinical outcomes were unavailable. CONCLUSION: Over 24 months, ixekizumab users exhibited better persistence and adherence, and a lower risk of discontinuation than secukinumab users in real-world settings.

Long-Term Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Psoriasis Treated With Ixekizumab or Adalimumab: A Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of long-term real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness of ixekizumab (IXE) and adalimumab (ADA). We compared real-world treatment patterns of IXE-treated and ADA-treated patients with psoriasis over 24 months in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using IBM Watson Health MarketScan® databases. Adult patients with psoriasis having ≥1 claim for IXE or ADA from March 1, 2016 – October 31, 2019 were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address cohort imbalances. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of non-persistence, discontinuation, and switching. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds of high adherence. Persistence, adherence, discontinuation, reinitiation, and dosing and switching rates were also analyzed. RESULTS: The final cohorts comprised 475 IXE users and 3159 ADA users over 24 months. IXE users demonstrated higher adherence (36.3% vs 28.8%; P<0.001) and persistence rates (35.2% vs 28.8%; P=0.004), and a lower discontinuation rate (59.1% vs 65.3%; P=0.007) compared to ADA users. IXE users had a higher likelihood of being treatment-adherent compared to ADA users (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.24–1.87), a lower risk of non-persistence (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.95), and a lower risk of discontinuation (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.74–0.94), respectively. Switching rates were similar in both groups (31.2% vs 30.0%; P=0.608). CONCLUSION: IXE users had better treatment adherence and persistence, and a lower risk of discontinuation compared to ADA users over 24 months. There was no difference in the risk of switching between IXE and ADA. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(4):399-407. doi:10.36849/JDD.6336.

Comparison of real-world treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis prescribed ixekizumab or secukinumab.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on treatment patterns associated with use of interleukin-17A inhibitors in psoriasis are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment patterns between ixekizumab or secukinumab users in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients with psoriasis aged ≥18 years treated with ixekizumab or secukinumab between March 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018 in IBM MarketScan (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) databases. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable models were used to address cohort imbalances and estimate the risks of nonpersistence (60-day gap), discontinuation (≥90-day gap), switching, and the odds of adherence. RESULTS: The study monitored 645 ixekizumab users for 13.7 months and 1152 secukinumab users for 16.3 months. Ixekizumab users showed higher persistence rate (54.8% vs 45.1%, P < .001) and lower discontinuation rate (37.8% vs 47.5%, P < .001) than secukinumab. After multivariable adjustment, ixekizumab users had lower risks of nonpersistence (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.95) and discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.96), and higher odds of high adherence to treatment measured by a medication possession ratio ≥80% (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.60). The risk of switching was similar between cohorts. LIMITATIONS: Disease severity and clinical outcomes were unavailable. CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab users demonstrated longer drug persistence, lower discontinuation rate and risk of discontinuation, higher likelihood of adherence, and similar risk of switching compared with secukinumab users in clinical practices.

Healthcare resource use and costs associated with chronic kidney disease in US private insurance patients with multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVES: Within a median 1.2 years after patients have an initial diagnosis with multiple myeloma, up to 61% were diagnosed with renal impairment and 50% were diagnosed with chronic kidney disease. This study estimated economic burden associated with chronic kidney disease in multiple myeloma patients in the US. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients ≥18 years old with ≥1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient multiple myeloma diagnoses between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2015 were identified from MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. Chronic kidney disease patients had ≥1 diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 1-5 (first chronic kidney disease diagnosis date = index date) on or after the first multiple myeloma diagnosis, and were propensity score matched 1:1 to multiple myeloma patients without chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, dialysis, or other type of chronically impaired renal function. All patients had ≥six-month continuous enrollment prior to index date and were followed for ≥one month from index date until the earliest of inpatient death, end of continuous enrollment, or end of the study period (30 September 2015). The per-patient per-year healthcare resource utilization and costs were measured during follow-up. Costs were total reimbursed amount in 2016 US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 2541 multiple myeloma patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 and 2541 matched controls met the study criteria and were respectively 69.3 and 69.6 years, 54.5% and 55.3% men, and had 572.2 and 533.4 mean days of follow up. Compared to controls, chronic kidney disease patients had significantly (all P < 0.001) higher proportions (57.1% vs. 32.1%) and frequency (1.2 vs. 0.5) of inpatient admissions, frequency of emergency room visits (5.1 vs. 3.3), and total costs ($106,634 vs. $71,880). Sensitivity analyses found that patients with chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, or dialysis had $78,455 ( P < 0.001) higher costs (per-patient per-year) than matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden associated with chronic kidney disease in patients with multiple myeloma was estimated to be between $34,754 and $78,455 per-patient per-year. Given its substantial clinical and economic impact, preservation of renal function is important in multiple myeloma patient care.

Fractures in women treated with raloxifene or alendronate: a retrospective database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Raloxifene and alendronate are anti-resorptive therapies approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Raloxifene is also indicated to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in postmenopausal women at high risk of invasive breast cancer. A definitive study comparing the fracture effectiveness and rate of breast cancer for raloxifene and alendronate has not been published. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate fracture and breast cancer rates among patients treated with raloxifene or alendronate. METHODS: Females ≥45 years who initiated raloxifene or alendronate in 1998-2006 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® Databases, had continuous enrollment 12 months prior to and at least 12 months after the index date, and had a treatment medication possession ratio ≥80% were included in this study. Rates of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures and breast cancer during 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 years of treatment with raloxifene or alendronate were evaluated. Fracture rates were adjusted for potential treatment bias using inverse probability of treatment weights. Multivariate hazard ratios were estimated for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. RESULTS: Raloxifene patients had statistically significantly lower rates of vertebral fractures in 1, 3, 5, and 7 years and for nonvertebral fractures in 1 and 5 years. There were no statistically significant differences in the adjusted fracture rates between raloxifene and alendronate cohorts, except in the 3-year nonvertebral fracture rates where raloxifene was higher. Multivariate hazard ratios of raloxifene versus alendronate cohorts were not significantly different for vertebral and nonvertebral fracture in 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 years. Unweighted and weighted breast cancer rates were lower among raloxifene recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with alendronate and raloxifene had similar adjusted fracture rates in up to 8 years of adherent treatment, and raloxifene patients had lower breast cancer rates.

Comparison of Real-World Costs, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Comorbidity-Related Costs Between Ixekizumab and Secukinumab Among Biologic-Experienced Patients with Psoriasis Over 18 Months in the USA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Data on real-world healthcare costs for ixekizumab (IXE) and secukinumab (SEC) in biologic-experienced patients with psoriasis are limited. This study compared real-world costs and healthcare resource utilization between IXE and SEC in biologic-experienced patients with psoriasis over an 18-month follow-up period in the USA. METHODS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis between 1 March, 2015 and 31 October, 2019 were identified using health insurance claims data from IBM Watson Health MarketScan®. The index date was the date of the first IXE or SEC claim. Biologic-experienced patients with one or more pre-period claims for biologic drugs were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to reduce cohort imbalances. All-cause and psoriasis-related direct healthcare costs along with index drug costs were estimated during the follow-up and reported as per patient per month. Discount factors published by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review were applied to psoriasis-related biologics to adjust pharmacy costs. RESULTS: A total of 411 IXE and 780 SEC users were included. After weighting, all-cause inpatient admissions were similar between IXE (9.5%) and SEC users (10.3%). Weighted, mean ± standard deviation per patient per month all-cause healthcare costs were higher in IXE users ($6670 ± $2910) than in SEC users ($6239 ± $3903; p = 0.049). Psoriasis-related and monthly index drug costs were higher in IXE users ($5609 ± $2009; p < 0.001 and $4688 ± $1994; p < 0.001, respectively) than in SEC users ($5095 ± $2291 and $3853 ± $1977, respectively). After Institute for Clinical and Economic Review adjustment, mean per patient per month all-cause ($4363 ± $2576 vs $4398 ± $3517) and psoriasis-related costs ($3302 ± $1264 vs $3253 ± $1504) were similar between the groups. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review- and adherence-adjusted mean per patient per month index drug costs were similar between IXE and SEC users (p = 0.339). CONCLUSIONS: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review-adjusted all-cause and psoriasis-related costs were comparable between IXE and SEC users among biologic-experienced patients over an 18-month follow-up period.

Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab Versus Secukinumab in Real-World Settings Over 24 Months.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare healthcare costs between ixekizumab (IXE)-treated and secukinumab (SEC)-treated patients with psoriasis over a 24-month follow-up period in the United States. METHODS: Patients with psoriasis diagnosis were identified from IBM Watson Health MarketScan® Research Databases; those with one or more claim for index drug (IXE or SEC) between March 1, 2016 and October 31, 2019 were included. Included patients were ≥ 18 years old and had continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits ≥ 6 months before and ≥ 24 months after index date. Patients were classified as IXE or SEC users based on drug received at index. Per patient per month (PPPM) all-cause, psoriasis-related, and index drug costs for IXE and SEC users were estimated over 24 months of follow-up. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) discount factors were applied to adjust pharmacy costs. Index drug costs were additionally adjusted for adherence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to address cohort imbalances. Chi-square/t tests were used to compare IXE versus SEC users; p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Overall, 1461 patients (IXE users, n = 471; SEC users, n = 990) were included. IXE versus SEC users had higher weighted PPPM all-cause, psoriasis-related, and index drug costs (p ≤ 0.001). IXE versus SEC users had comparable ICER-adjusted mean PPPM all-cause costs (US$4172 ± 3349 vs US$3978 ± 2619; p = 0.227) and psoriasis-related costs (US$2950 ± 1332 vs US$2899 ± 1152; p = 0.447). After applying ICER and adherence adjustments, index drug costs were similar between IXE and SEC users (US$3794 ± 1822 vs US$3766 ± 1973; p = 0.795). CONCLUSIONS: All-cause and psoriasis-related costs were comparable between IXE and SEC users after ICER adjustments; index drug costs were similar after ICER and adherence adjustments.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with psoriasis treated with ixekizumab or adalimumab over 2 years of follow-up in real-world settings.

AIMS: To compare long-term healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients who initiated ixekizumab (IXE) or adalimumab (ADA) for treatment of psoriasis in the United States. METHODS: Adult patients with psoriasis who had ≥1 claim for IXE or ADA were identified from IBM MarketScan claims databases prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (1 March 2016-31 October 2019). The index date was the date of first claim for the index drug of interest. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to balance treatment cohorts. All-cause and psoriasis-related HCRU and costs were examined for 24 months of follow-up. Costs were reported as per patient per month. Costs of psoriasis-related biologics were adjusted using published Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) discount factors. Index drug costs were adjusted for adherence and ICER discount rates. RESULTS: The analyses included 407 IXE and 2,702 ADA users. IXE users had significantly higher inpatient admission rate (all-cause HCRU: 14.9% vs. 11.0%; p =0.012) and greater mean length of stay per admission (days, 6.6 vs. 4.1; p =0.004) than ADA users. ICER-adjusted costs were significantly higher in IXE than ADA users (all-cause costs: $4,132 vs. $3,610; p <0.001; psoriasis-related costs $3,077 vs. $2,700; p <0.001). After adjusting for ICER and adherence, IXE and ADA drug costs were comparable ($3,636 vs. $3,677; p =0.714). LIMITATIONS: Study relied on administrative claims data, subjected to data coding limitations and data entry errors. Rebates, patient assistance programs, and commission to wholesalers are not always captured in claims. Adjustment made by ICER discount factors may lead to double-discounting if the discounts have been applied in claim payments. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause HCRU was higher in IXE than ADA users. Healthcare costs were also higher in IXE than ADA users after ICER adjustment, over 24 months. Cost differences were largely driven by higher treatment adherence associated with IXE. Index drug costs were comparable after ICER and adherence adjustments.

Comparison of Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Biologic-Experienced Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab or Secukinumab Over 18 Months.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world data comparing effectiveness of ixekizumab (IXE) and secukinumab (SEC) among biologic-experienced patients are limited. This study compared treatment patterns over 18 months among biologic-experienced patients with psoriasis receiving IXE or SEC in the USA. METHODS: A retrospective observational study using administrative claims data from IBM® Watson Health MarketScan® Research Databases included adult patients with ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 non-diagnostic (≥ 30 days apart) outpatient claim/s with diagnosis of psoriasis between March 1, 2015 and October 31, 2019, and ≥ 1 claim/s for index drugs, IXE or SEC, between March 1, 2016 and October 31, 2019. Patients had to have ≥ 1 claim/s for biologics indicated for psoriasis in the 6-month pre-period. During the 18-month follow-up, treatment adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]), high adherence (PDC ≥ 80%), persistence, discontinuation, reinitiation, and switching were assessed. To address cohort imbalances, inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio for high adherence. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratio for non-persistence, discontinuation, and switching. RESULTS: Overall, 411 IXE and 780 SEC users were included. After weighting, IXE users had significantly higher rate of high treatment adherence (42% vs. 35%, p = 0.019), higher persistence rate (44.9% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.007), lower discontinuation rate (48.4% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.012), and lower switching rate (26.6% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.009) compared with SEC users. After multivariable adjustment, compared with SEC, IXE use was associated with 36% higher odds of high treatment adherence (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.74), 20% lower risk of treatment non-persistence (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), 19% lower risk of discontinuation (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96), and 25% lower risk of switching (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.93). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that IXE treatment is associated with significantly higher adherence rates and significantly lower non-persistence, discontinuation, and switching compared with SEC treatment.

Comparison of Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Psoriasis Patients Treated with Ixekizumab or Adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of real-world treatment pattern comparison data between ixekizumab and adalimumab which are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world treatment patterns among psoriasis patients initiating ixekizumab or adalimumab in the United States. METHODS: Psoriasis patients with ≥1 claim for ixekizumab or adalimumab between March 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, were identified (index date = date of first ixekizumab or adalimumab claim) from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan® databases. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled for ≥12 months before the index date and followed for a minimum of 6 months until inpatient death, enrollment end, or study end, whichever occurred first. Treatment persistence, adherence, discontinuation, restart, and switching were analyzed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable regression modeling were employed to address cohort imbalances and estimate the adjusted risk of non-persistence, discontinuation, and switching, and the odds of adherence. RESULTS: A total of 646 ixekizumab and 3668 adalimumab users were included and followed for a mean of 14.0 and 16.5 months, respectively. Compared to adalimumab, ixekizumab was associated with 19% lower risk of non-persistence (hazard ratio [HR]=0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.95), 26% lower risk of discontinuation (HR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.88), and 28% lower risk of switching (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.91). Ixekizumab users had higher odds of medication possession ratio ≥80% (odds ratio [OR]=1.36, 95% CI: 1.10-1.69) but similar odds by proportion of days covered ≥80% (OR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.98-1.53). CONCLUSION: Psoriasis patients treated with ixekizumab demonstrated longer persistency, higher adherence and were less likely to discontinue or switch treatment compared to adalimumab users. However, while patients achieving highly adherent threshold significantly differed by MPR ≥80%, it did not by PDC ≥80%; hence, further analysis using fixed-length follow-up is required.

Costs associated with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy after surgical resection in patients with colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare chemotherapy-related and total medical costs among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) monotherapy after surgical resection. METHODS: This retrospective, claim-based study utilized the Thomson Reuters Market Scan(R) databases to identify 1,396 CRC patients who received capecitabine or 5-FU monotherapy within 90 days of surgical resection from 2003 through 2006. Propensity score matching addressed selection bias, and multivariate models estimated adjusted relative risks of treatment-related complications and medical costs of matched cohorts. RESULTS: Capecitabine users incurred USD 740 less in total direct medical costs (p = 0.003) and USD 785 less in chemotherapy-related costs (p < 0.0001) than 5-FU users. Although drug acquisition cost was higher for capecitabine than for 5-FU (USD 958 vs. USD 71, p < 0.0001), chemotherapy administration cost was lower (USD 76 vs. USD 1,062, p < 0.0001). The unadjusted (610 vs. 1,960 events per 1,000 person-months) and adjusted risks (47%) were lower for capecitabine than 5-FU for any complication, and specifically for bone marrow (67%), gastrointestinal (50%), and constitutional (41%) complications (p < 0.0001, all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy was associated with lower total medical and chemotherapy-related costs than 5-FU. Reduced complications and costs associated with capecitabine administration offset the higher acquisition cost.

Examination of burden of skeletal-related events in patients naive to denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonate therapy in bone metastases from solid tumors population.

OBJECTIVES: Skeletal-related events (SREs), i.e. pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, surgery and radiation to bone, are serious skeletal complications that occur frequently in patients with bone metastases (BMs) from solid tumors (STs). Clinical guidelines recommend treatment with denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonates (IVBPs) to prevent SREs. However, therapy may be delayed by physicians due to perceived low risk of SREs or for other clinical reasons. This study estimated SRE incidence rates in treatment-naive (i.e. no denosumab or IVBPs) patients with BMs from STs in the US. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study adult patients with diagnoses of BM and ST between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2015 were identified from MarketScan Databases. All patients had ≥6 months of data before the first BM diagnosis date (index date) and were followed for ≥6 months from the index date until the earliest of inpatient death, initiation of denosumab/IVBP therapy or end of data. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate cumulative incidence of SREs. The incremental healthcare cost of SREs was estimated and compared to propensity score matched non-SRE patients. RESULTS: A total of 47,052 patients met the study criteria. Using the Kaplan-Meier method the cumulative incidences of SREs among treatment-naïve patients were 39.9% (95% confidence internal [CI]: 39.4-40.4), 46.3% (95% CI: 45.8-46.8), 52.5% (95% CI: 51.9-53.2) and 59.4% (95% CI: 58.6-60.3) by month 6, 12, 24 and 48 post index date, respectively. The SRE group was associated with higher all-cause total healthcare cost per-patient-per-year compared to those without SREs ($168,277 vs. $101,020, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half (46.3%) of the treatment-naïve population with BMs from STs experience SREs within 1 year of the first BM diagnosis. SREs were associated with an average $67,257 additional healthcare cost annually. Given the high SRE burden in these patients, early initiation of prophylactic therapy should be considered.

Comparison of Health Care Costs Among Patients with Psoriasis Initiating Ixekizumab, Secukinumab, or Adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: As more biologics become available for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO), there is a lack of direct comparisons of health care costs between patients who are treated by different medications, including ixekizumab (IXE), secukinumab (SEC), and adalimumab (ADA). OBJECTIVE: To compare the real-world health care costs of patients with PsO initiating IXE with those of patients initiating either SEC or ADA. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PsO between July 1, 2015, and May 31, 2018, were identified from the IBM MarketScan commercial and Medicare databases. Two weighted patient sample sets were constructed based on drug claims between March 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018: IXE versus SEC and IXE versus ADA. Within each sample, the first claim of eligible drugs was set as the index date. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years and had ≥ 12 months of continuous eligibility before and after the index date. Patients with other indications for the index drug in the preperiod or with use of the index drug within 90 days before the index date were excluded. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to balance cohorts. All-cause and PsO-related health care costs per member per month (PMPM) incurred during the 12-month follow-up period were assessed. Monthly PsO-related pharmacy costs were adjusted using drug discount rates published by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). Annual index drug costs were estimated by adjusting for medication possession ratio and ICER discount rates. All costs were weighted by IPTW. RESULTS: Two study samples were identified: 357 IXE users were compared with 763 SEC users, and 388 IXE users were separately compared with 2,578 ADA users. Before weighting, IXE users were demographically and clinically similar to SEC users but were older and had worse health status than ADA users. Cohorts were balanced postweighting. After weighting, mean monthly all-cause health care costs were $7,313 and $6,477 (P = 0.002) and mean PsO-related costs were $6,303 and $5,437 (P < 0.001), for IXE and SEC users, respectively. Similarly, mean monthly all-cause health care costs were $6,535 and $5,557 (P = 0.026) and mean PsO-related costs were $5,792 and $4,754 (P = 0.017), for IXE and ADA users, respectively. After applying ICER adjustments, mean monthly PsO-related costs were comparable between groups: $3,637/IXE versus $3,443/SEC (P = 0.132) and $3,320/IXE versus $3,287/ADA (P = 0.907). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for drug discount programs (through application of ICER discount rate), this real-world study estimated that average monthly PsO-related costs during the first year of treatment were similar between patients treated with IXE compared with those treated with SEC or ADA. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided to IBM Watson Health by Eli Lilly and Company. The analysis was conducted independently by IBM Watson Health. Eli Lilly and Company and IBM Watson Health collaborated on study design and interpretation of results. Shi, Lew, and Zimmerman were employed by IBM Watson Health and received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study. Zhu, Burge, Malatestinic, Lin, Goldblum, and Murage were employed by Eli Lilly and Company while this study was conducted. Blauvelt has served as a scientific adviser and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Aclaris, Akros, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, FLX Bio, Galderma, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo, Meiji, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Purdue Pharma, Regeneron, Revance, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sienna Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Valeant, and Vidac, and as a paid speaker for AbbVie, Regeneron, and Sanofi Genzyme. A portion of these results were presented at the 2019 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Annual Meeting; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, LA, and the 2019 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Annual Meeting; March 25-28, 2019; San Diego, CA.

Health Care Costs and Thromboembolic Events in Hydroxyurea-Treated Patients with Polycythemia Vera.

BACKGROUND: Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are at increased risk of thromboembolic events (TEs), which are key contributors to reduced overall survival compared with the age- and sex-matched general population. In addition to aspirin and phlebotomy to maintain hematocrit level < 45%, many patients receive cytoreduction with hydroxyurea (HU), which is associated with improved survival and may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and TEs. However, 1 in 4 patients become resistant to or intolerant of HU. In the general population, prophylaxis and treatment following arterial and venous thromboses are associated with increased health care resource utilization and costs. OBJECTIVE: To describe the health care resource utilization and costs associated with TEs in patients with PV treated with HU in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Databases included adult patients with a PV diagnosis who were newly treated with HU and continuously enrolled in medical and pharmacy benefit plans for ≥ 12 months pre- and post-index. HU treatment administration, persistence, adherence, and related adverse events, as well as TEs, were reported during the 12-month follow-up period. HU treatment patterns were further analyzed in a subgroup analysis comparing patients with and without a ≥ 45-day gap in HU treatment. Health care resource utilization and costs were analyzed in a subgroup analysis comparing patients who had TEs in the 12-month follow-up period with those who did not. Tests for statistically significant differences across the comparison groups were conducted, including chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: The records of 1,322 patients with PV were included in this study. Mean age was 66.0 years; 51.3% were men; and 14.0% had a history of TEs. During the first year of HU treatment, 764 (57.8%) patients had a treatment gap of ≥ 45 days; however, treatment adherence was similar between those with and those without a gap (85.2% vs. 90.7%, respectively). TEs occurred in 216 (16.3%) patients within 12 months of HU initiation. Health care resource utilization was higher for patients with TEs versus those without, including the proportion of patients requiring inpatient services (50.9% vs. 18.4%; P < 0.001) and emergency room visits (48.1% vs. 26.3%; P < 0.001) and the mean number of inpatient admissions (1.7 vs. 1.3; P = 0.004); office visits (18.9 vs. 14.1; P < 0.001); and prescriptions (45.8 vs. 36.2; P<0.001). In addition, total mean health care costs ($45,040 vs. $16,438; P < 0.001); inpatient costs ($18,952 vs. $4,794; P < 0.001); outpatient costs ($20,844 vs. $8,046; P < 0.001); and outpatient pharmacy costs ($5,244 vs. $3,598; P = 0.002) were higher among patients with TEs than those without. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PV receiving treatment with HU remain at risk for TEs. The occurrence of TEs during the 12-month follow-up in this patient population was associated with higher health care resource utilization and costs. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Incyte Corporation. Parasuraman and Paranagama are employees and stockholders of Incyte Corporation. Shi and Bonafede are employees of Truven Health Analytics, which was awarded a research contract to conduct this study with and on behalf of Incyte Corporation. Study concept and design were contributed by all of the authors, who also interpreted the data and wrote and revised the manuscript. Bonafede and Shi collected the data. This study was presented as an abstract at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy NEXUS Annual Meeting on October 26-29, 2015, in Orlando, Florida.

Extraintestinal Manifestations in Vedolizumab and Anti-TNF-Treated Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs) can impact morbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD; Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]). This study compared incidence rates of EIMs in patients with moderate to severe IBD receiving gut-selective vedolizumab (VDZ) vs those receiving systemic anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies. METHODS: Adult IBD patients receiving VDZ or anti-TNFs were identified from the MarketScan claims database from September 28, 2012, through September 30, 2016. Incidence rates of EIMs were compared between the 2 cohorts. Descriptive analyses were performed for all courses of treatment. Generalized linear models estimated the impact of treatment on the likelihood of developing EIMs. RESULTS: Compared with patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, VDZ-treated CD patients were 28% more likely to develop "any EIMs" (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.62). Specifically, CD patients treated with VDZ were more likely to develop erythema nodosum (IRR, 4.29; 95% CI, 1.73-10.64), aphthous stomatitis (IRR, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.51-9.23), episcleritis/scleritis (IRR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.02-6.14), arthropathy (IRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.15-1.84), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (IRR, 7.79; 95% CI, 3.32-18.27), and uveitis/iritis (IRR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.35-6.18). UC patients receiving VDZ did not have a statistically significant increase in "any EIMs" vs patients receiving anti-TNFs, but were more likely to develop specific EIMs (aphthous stomatitis: IRR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.30-10.34; pyoderma gangrenosum: IRR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.00-19.45; and PSC: IRR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.23-9.68). CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients receiving VDZ may be more likely to develop EIMs vs patients receiving anti-TNF therapies. The gut-selective inflammatory control of VDZ may potentially limit its clinical effect on EIM prevention.

Oseltamivir and the risk of influenza-related complications and hospitalizations in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This subgroup analysis of a retrospective cohort study examined, from a managed care perspective, the risk of influenza-related complications and hospitalizations in patients with diabetes who were prescribed oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza and those who were not prescribed antiviral treatment. METHODS: Health insurance claims data from the Thomson Healthcare MarketScan Research Database for 6 influenza seasons (October 1-March 31) between 2000 and 2006 were used to identify patients aged >/=18 years with influenza and diabetes. Patients who received a prescription for oseltamivir within 1 day of a diagnosis of influenza were compared with those who received no antiviral treatment. Outcomes included the frequency of pneumonia, respiratory diagnoses, and otitis media and its complications, and rates of hospitalization within 14 days of the diagnosis of influenza. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the relative risk (RR) of influenza-related complications and hospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 9090 patients with diabetes and a diagnosis of influenza were identified who met all study criteria. Of these, 2919 (32%) received a prescription for oseltamivir and 6171 (68%) received no antiviral treatment. Patients receiving oseltamivir had a significant 17% reduction in the risk of respiratory illnesses (RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93) and a 30% reduction in the risk of hospitalization for any reason (RR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94). There were no significant differences between the oseltamivir and control groups in terms of the risks for pneumonia (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64-1.18), otitis media and its complications (RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48-1.91), or hospitalization for pneumonia (RR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.41-1.58). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the risk of influenza-associated respiratory illnesses and the number of hospitalizations for any reason were reduced in patients with diabetes who were prescribed oseltamivir compared with an unmatched group that was not prescribed antiviral therapy.

Healthcare costs in psoriasis and psoriasis sub-groups over time following psoriasis diagnosis.

AIMS: To quantify healthcare costs in patients with psoriasis overall and in psoriasis patient sub-groups, by level of disease severity, presence or absence of psoriatic arthritis, or use of biologics. METHODS: Administrative data from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Research Database were used to select adult patients with psoriasis from January 2009 to January 2014. The first psoriasis diagnosis was set as the index date. Patients were required to have ≥6 months of continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits pre-index and ≥12 months post-index. Patients were followed from index until the earliest of loss to follow-up or study end. All-cause healthcare costs and outpatient pharmacy costs were calculated for the overall psoriasis cohort and for the six different psoriasis patient sub-groups: (a) patients with moderate-to-severe disease and mild disease, (b) patients with psoriatic arthritis and those without, and (c) patients on biologics and those who are not. Costs are presented per-patient-per-year (PPPY) and by years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of follow-up, expressed in 2014 US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 108,790 psoriasis patients were selected, with a mean age of 46.0 years (52.7% females). Average follow-up was 962 days. All-cause healthcare costs were $12,523 PPPY. Outpatient pharmacy costs accounted for 38.6% of total costs. All-cause healthcare costs were highest for patients on biologics ($29,832), then for patients with psoriatic arthritis ($23,427) and those with moderate-to-severe disease ($21,481). Overall, all-cause healthcare costs and outpatient pharmacy costs presented an upward trend over a 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Psoriasis is associated with significant economic burden, which increases over time as the disease progresses. Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, those with psoriatic arthritis, or use of biologics contributes to higher healthcare costs. Psoriasis-related pharmacy expenditure is the largest driver of healthcare costs in patients with psoriasis.

Treatment patterns and survival in metastatic breast cancer patients by tumor characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Study objectives were to compare the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients by receipt of HER2-targeted agents and among subgroups of HER2-targeted agent users. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult women newly diagnosed with mBC (index date) during 2008-2012 were selected from the Truven MarketScan databases and followed until end of enrollment or inpatient death. Patients with <12 months of data, pre-index primary cancers other than breast cancer, pregnancy, or HIV/AIDS were excluded. Study cohorts were users and nonusers of HER2-targeted agents and women with no treatment; and HER2-targeted agent subgroups by receipt of hormonal therapy (HT), de novo vs. recurrent status, and age group. Pre- and post-index breast cancer treatments were compared across cohorts. Relative risk of progression and death were evaluated among the subset of patients with mortality data. RESULTS: Of 18,059 eligible women selected, 14.6% were users of HER2-targeted agents, 71.1% were nonusers, and 14.3% untreated. HER2-targeted agent users received more aggressive cancer treatments compared to nonusers. HER2-targeted agent users were 33% more likely to progress and had a similar risk of death compared to nonusers. Among HER2-targeted agent subgroups, the risk of progression was 30% lower among HT+ patients vs. HT-, 32% lower for de novo vs. recurrent, and similar across age groups. The risk of death was 52% lower for HT+ vs. HT-, 35% lower for de novo vs. recurrent, and increased with age. LIMITATIONS: Identification of distant metastasis, tumor receptor expression and disease progression were based on claims data rather than on clinical assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of HER2-targeted agents (vs. non-HER2-targeted agents) was significantly associated with receipt of pre- and post-index breast cancer treatments. HER2-targeted agent users were more likely to progress but had a similar risk of death during follow-up. Among HER2-targeted agent subgroups, HT+ and de novo status were associated with a reduced risk of progression and death.

Healthcare Resource Use and Expenditures among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with HER2-Targeted Agents.

Objective. To compare healthcare utilization (HCU) and costs of women newly diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) by receipt of HER2-targeted agents (H2T) and among H2T subgroups. Methods. Adult women newly diagnosed with mBC (index date) during 2008-2012 were followed until enrollment end or inpatient death. Study cohorts were antineoplastic ± H2Ts, and no treatment; and subgroups of H2T patients stratified by receipt of hormonal therapy (HT+/HT-), by de novo versus recurrent disease status, and by age group. All-cause (ALL) and breast cancer related (BCR) HCU and costs (in 2012 dollars) were estimated using a generalized linear model. Results. Of 18,059 women, 14.6% were H2T users 71.1% nonusers, and 14.3% untreated. No treatment patients had the highest ALL and BCR inpatient HCU, and ALL emergency room HCU. H2Ts users had the highest ALL and BCR office visits, lab and diagnostic radiology, radiation treatments, other outpatient services, and prescription antineoplastics. Adjusted ALL and BCR costs were the highest for H2T users and, in H2T subgroups, higher for HT-versus HT+ and de novo versus recurrent, and declined with older age. Conclusions. Receipt of H2Ts was associated with greater levels of ALL and BCR HCU and costs. H2T subgroups of HT-, de novo, and younger age had higher HCU and costs, possibly indicating more aggressive treatments.

Risk of infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients switching from anti-TNF agents to rituximab, abatacept, or another anti-TNF agent, a retrospective administrative claims analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the incidence and hazard of ICD-9-CM-coded infections and severe infections in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with subsequent-line (SL) BIOs (BIO) after switching from first-line (FL) anti-TNF therapy (anti-TNF). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a large U.S. claims database. RA patients initiating an FL anti-TNF between 1/1/2004 and 3/31/2010 were identified and followed forward in time to capture all SL BIO episodes through 3/31/2010. SL BIO episodes were classified into: abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or rituximab. Multivariate mixed-effects survival models compared the hazard of infections and severe infections across the SL BIO episodes with adjustment for demographic and clinical confounders. RESULTS: In total, 4332 SL BIO episodes were identified: mean age 55 years; 80% female. In adjusted analyses: when compared to rituximab, the hazard of all infections was significantly higher for adalimumab (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.55), etanercept (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.20-1.72), and infliximab (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.07-1.57), and insignificantly different for abatacept (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.98-1.41); when compared to rituximab, the hazard of severe infection was significantly higher for infliximab (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03-2.55), and insignificantly different for abatacept (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.78-1.88), adalimumab (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.72-1.68), and etanercept (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.83-1.95). CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients treated with SL BIO, a 30-44% higher hazard of all infection was observed in anti-TNFs versus rituximab with a 62% higher hazard of severe infection observed in infliximab versus rituximab. This study used a non-randomized, observational design and is therefore subject to confounding from unmeasured factors that influence both treatment choice and infection risk.