Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: Our technique and long-term results in 14 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional pancreatic resections may be unnecessary for benign tumours or for tumours of low malignant potential located in the neck and body of pancreas. Such extensive resections can place the patient at increased risk of developing postoperative exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Central pancreatectomy is a plausible surgical option for the management of tumours located in these locations. Laparoscopic approach seems appropriate for such small tumours situated deep in the retroperitoneum. AIMS: To assess the technical feasibility, safety and long-term results of laparoscopic central pancreatectomy in patients with benign and low malignant potential tumours involving the neck and body of pancreas. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was an observational study which reports a single-centre experience with laparoscopic central pancreatectomy over a 9-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 14 patients underwent laparoscopic central pancreatectomy from October 2004 to September 2013. These included patients with tumours located in the neck and body of pancreas that were radiologically benign-looking tumours of less than 3 cm in size. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism software. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 48.93 years. The mean operative time was 239.7 min. Mean blood loss was 153.2 ml. Mean postoperative ICU stay was 1.2 days and overall mean hospital stay was 8.07 days. There were no mortalities and no major postoperative complications. Margins were negative in all cases and with a median follow-up of 44 months, there was no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy is a feasible procedure with acceptable morbidity. In the long term, there were no recurrences and pancreatic function was well preserved.

A Case of Aborted Sudden Cardiac Death Due to Coronary Artery Spasm.

Coronary artery spasm remains an important yet rarely recognized cause of myocardial ischemia, which may manifest as vasospastic angina, ventricular arrhythmia, or sudden cardiac death. Here we present a case of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest secondary to coronary artery spasm, diagnosed with invasive coronary function testing.

The Impact of Left Ventricular Mass on Diastolic Blood Pressure Targets for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Defining the optimal diastolic blood pressure (DBP) for patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) is an ongoing challenge in part because of the concern that low DBP may have adverse cardiac effects (the J curve hypothesis). METHODS: Left ventricular mass (LV mass) was measured on the echocardiogram of individuals (N = 92) with CAD who had coronary blood flow (CBF) in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery estimated from artery diameter and DBP distal to coronary stenosis. RESULTS: CBF approached 0 in a small but defined proportion of persons at DBP of 70mm Hg. CBF was significantly lower in persons with higher LV mass (above the median of 83g/m(2)) when DBP was ≥75mm Hg. Higher electrocardiogram QRS voltage (sum of S V1 and R in V6), in the absence of LV hypertrophy (LVH), identified persons with significantly lower CBF at DBP ≥ 80mm Hg. In multivariate analysis, LV mass was a significant CBF determinant after adjusting for DBP and CAD severity. LV mass has a major impact on CBF when DBP is >70mm Hg, while DBP is the primary determinant of CBF when DBP is ≤70mm Hg. Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant interaction between LV mass and DBP. CONCLUSIONS: DBP ≤ 70mm Hg is associated with a progressively greater proportion in whom CBF in the LAD approaches 0. For DBP > 70mm Hg, persons with higher LV mass, even in the absence of LVH, have lower CBF, suggesting LV mass is an important consideration when DBP is reduced in patients with CAD.

Clinical characteristics, angiographic findings, and one-year outcome of 101 consecutive stent thrombosis cases in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis (ST) is rare, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We analyzed data from the British Columbia (BC) Registry from April 2011-January 2012. RESULTS: 101 ST cases were reported and verified. Based on timing, ST was considered early (≤30days) in 35.6%, late (>30days-1year) in 17.8% and very late (>1year) in 46.5%. The majority (68.5%) presented with STEMI, and the remaining with non-STEMI (31.5%). Most vessels were functionally occluded (TIM1 flow grade ≤1 in 67.1%). Thrombus burden was high (TIMI thrombus grade ≥4 in 77.2%). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 41% of cases. New stents were implanted in 62.4% cases. Intra-coronary imaging was low (11%). At the original stent implantation, STEMI was the clinical presentation in 39.6%, the lesion was complex in 62.1%, and thrombus was visualized in 23.0%. Prognosis after ST was unfavorable with high mortality (11.9% at 30days and 16.8% at one year), and further revascularization (5.0% repeat PCI and 6.9% coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Early ST was associated with worse clinical outcome compared to late/very late ST: 30-day mortality at 22.2% versus 6.2% (p=0.02), and 1-year mortality at 27.8% versus 10.8% (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective registry from BC, all ST presented with myocardial infarction, and the majority was treated with emergency PCI. Additional stents were commonly implanted with infrequent use of intracoronary imaging. Mortality rate was higher for early ST in comparison with late/very late ST. A comprehensive approach should be developed to treat this difficult complication.

Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), although an advanced surgical procedure, is being increasingly used for pancreatic head and periampullary tumors. We present our experience of 15 years with the largest series in total LPD for periampullary and pancreatic head tumors with data on oncological outcome and long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective and retrospective data of patients undergoing LPD from March 1998 to April 2013 were reviewed. Of the 150 cases, 20 cases of LPD (7 cases done for chronic pancreatitis and 13 cases for benign cystic tumors of the pancreas) have been excluded, which leaves us with 130 cases of LPD performed for malignant indications. RESULTS: In total, 130 patients were chosen for the study. The male:female ratio was 1:1.6, with a median age of 54 years. We had one conversion to open surgery in our series, the overall postoperative morbidity was 29.7%, and the mortality rate was 1.53%. The pancreatic fistula rate was 8.46%. The mean operating time was 310±34 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 110±22 mL. The mean hospital stay was 8±2.6 days. Resected margins were positive in 9.23% of cases. The mean tumor size was 3.13±1.21 cm, and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 18.15±4.73. The overall 5-year actuarial survival was 29.42%, and the median survival was 33 months. CONCLUSIONS: LPD has evolved over a period of two decades and has the potential to become the standard of care for select periampullary and pancreatic head tumors with acceptable oncological outcomes, especially in high-volume centers. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the advantages of LPD.